Harish's Theory --> Taming Chaos

[Guest guest]

I have given a new name to Harish Bhai's theory "Taming Chaos". I

call him Bhai because he is older to me and I have been instilled

values in me by my parents to respect my elders. He also brings in a

lot of experience to this forum through his "life experiences" and

his "years of astr-experiences". This forum gains strength by his

experience.

 

Anyway, moving on.....

 

The answer is right in the midst of this chaos :-). Is it Rahu

talking :-).

 

One of the most interesting issues in the study of chaotic systems

is whether or not the presence of chaos may actually produce ordered

structures and patterns on a larger scale. It has been found that

the presence of chaos may actually be necessary for larger scale

physical patterns, such as mountains and galaxies, to arise. The

presence of chaos in physics is what gives the universe its "arrow

of time", the irreversible flow from the past to the future. For

centuries mathematicians and physicists have overlooked dynamical

systems as being random and unpredictable. The only systems that

could be understood in the past were those that were believed to be

linear, but in actuality, we do not live in a linear world at all.

In this world linearity is incredibly scarce. The reason physicists

didn't know about and study chaos earlier is because the computer is

our "telescope" when studying chaos, and they didn't have computers

or anything that could carry out extremely complex calculations in

minimal time. Now, thanks to computers, we understand chaos a little

bit more each and every day.

 

Now, a word of caution! There is something called a "Patent". And

when a theory evolves towards being "Patentable", there are always

some who oppose it and some who want to steal "ideas" and call it

their own. In general there are always people who tend to "oppose"

creative views which is a step back towards "growth". Creative ideas

again come from the word "Creator". However a creative idea

which "inspires" the human soul and behaves like the "pineal gland"

(a metaphor) in the human brain is considered "soul breaking". We

are not dealing with ordinary mortal concepts here, we are playing

with the unknown. Let us try and encourage every MORTAL who makes an

attempt to define IMMORTALITY in any shape or form. Any thing which

strikes a "concord" between like minded mortals is

considered "positive energy", anything which strikes a "discord" is

considered "negative energy".

 

The dictionary definition of chaos is turmoil, turbulence,

primordial abyss, and undesired randomness, but some will tell you

that chaos is something extremely sensitive to initial conditions.

Chaos also refers to the question of whether or not it is possible

to make good long-term predictions about how a system will act. A

chaotic system can actually develop in a way that appears very

smooth and ordered.

 

On another note, had Netscape not evolved in 1995 would we be here

discussing astrology on a forum like this??

 

Rgds.

 

--Sanjay Aggarwal

 

, "cerulean122000"

<cerulean122000> wrote:

> Dear Rahuvadins:

>

> There is a way to compile this information so that it can be

> available. You just collect in a document, or series of

documents,

> and file them in a folder in the 'files' section of the group (see

> left sidebar). Anyone can do this.

>

> Harish Punditji's theory is a work in progress, and like Rahu

> himself, is somewhat chaotic, I feel. But there certainly could

be

> more attention to a clear and intelligible record of what he has

> written on the subject.

>

> Blessed Be

> Dharmananda

>

> , "sanjaytechnology"

> <sanjaytechnology> wrote:

> > Dear Anil:

> >

> > Check for RAHU articles under Harish Trivedi's name. I wish we

had

> a

> > way of compiling all these "hard worked" articles on the web

site.

> I

> > am a person who records "ground breaking" information in

my "brain"

> > so that it never gets erased. I dont trust hard copies or soft

> > copies :-).

> >

> > Rgds.

> >

> > --Sanjay Aggarwal

> >

> > , gogatea <gogatea@v...>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Sanjay, Harish

> > >

> > > No of times I have read Sanjay mentioning about Harish's

theory.

> I

> > am relatively new to site. Is there any link where articles on

his

> > theory are available in comprehensive form ?

> > >

> > > Thanks and with regards,

> > >

> > > Anil