Guest guest Posted December 23, 2003 Report Share Posted December 23, 2003 Dear all, There are specific malefics for specific lagnas irrespective of their nature. (for example Ju. is a natural benefic but for taurus ascendant it is no. 1 malefic being owner of 8th house). Does the same principle apply when analysing divisional charts? I was reading principles of Iyyer method of analyzing Divisional charts accoring to which natural benefics (or malefics) always has to be considered as benefics (or malefics respectively) irrespective of the lagna. Also should one take into account the yogas caused by lordship of houses when studying divisional chart? (ex. for a native with taurs ascendant in D1 chart, but Mars rajyoga in a D10 chart with Leo ascendant. In such a case should mars be considered yogkarak for that D10 chart?) regards chandra ===== ******************************************************************** Chandrashekhar Joglekar Predoc Fellow, Eaton Group Max Planck Institute of Molecular cell Biology & Genetics Pfotenhauerstr. 108, Dresden, Germany Phone: +49/351/2102745 ******************************************************************** New Photos - easier uploading and sharing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.