Guest guest Posted September 16, 2003 Report Share Posted September 16, 2003 Dear Group Patrons; Namaste, Ahimsa. There were some comments about the western Astrology thing. It should be clarified that archealogist Van der Vaarden in the early part of the twentieth century stated: The Babylonians clearly had a sidereal zodiac that consisted of 12 signs, each thirty degrees by which the measured astronomical events along the ecliptic. This astro-archealogical research and findings have very much been confirmed the last fifty years by western scholars and academics. More recently, Babylonian Horoscopes have likewise been cataloged in the Sachs-Hunger translations; and other doctorial dissertations by Rosenberg, further demonstrating that the Assyrians, Babylonians, and Chaldeans all utilized a sidereal zodiac defined by fiducials namely, Antares, Aldeboran, Regulas, Spica, etc. dividing the zodiac of 360 degrees and 12 houses, i.e., sidereal signs equal 30 degrees each. This was all hot & controversial stuff when Cyril Fagan published in his Solunars column in American Astrology Magazine 1953 the Sachs translation of Chaldean Horoscopes circa 300 B.C. exemplifying that the earliest or first found recorded horoscopes were "sidereal" and simple. Since that time many have continued to argue about the data, but clearly the origins of twelve sign zodiac we know of today was sidereal and a Mesopatamean invention consumated by the Assyrians & Babylonians. I so very much appreciate the boon of this Astrology Group, and only wish to give an academic perspective in citing some discoveries that gave precident to the Western Sidereal Astrology School, albeit this information is rapidly fading and may soon all be forgotten. I hope I've not offended our Vedic colleagues by stating facts from the last century, as they did assist the early western sidereal movement in many ways. Still to date the earliest written horoscopes appear to be no earlier than 300 B.C. I am aware of the Palm Leaves libraries in India, and hope to pilgrimage to one some day, but I have no empirical or other data supporting that those depositories of horoscopes were written before the Chaldean texts discussed. Though, I've read claims that they are of great antiquity, and may prove to be so someday. It is my hope these comments give clarification to an debate that was long forgotten, and mis-information still going around about. Blessings & Salutations of the Highest, Namaste, Sidereal Bob. ________________ McAfee VirusScan Online from the Netscape Network. Comprehensive protection for your entire computer. Get your free trial today! http://channels.netscape.com/ns/computing/mcafee/index.jsp?promo=393397 Get AOL Instant Messenger 5.1 free of charge. Download Now! http://aim.aol.com/aimnew/Aim/register.adp?promo=380455 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.