Guest guest Posted June 10, 2003 Report Share Posted June 10, 2003 Dear TanVeer and All Rahu and ketu should be treated as nodal point only since they r mathematical point in space and that too not fixed one, so aspect made by them is of no significance, no doubt, these two points are frequently used in astrology but my strong arugument is that they represent the faces of sun and moon only i.e anything related to sun or moon in horoscope and nothing else.. this is something very strange... but my dear friends if we have to bring true vedic astrology then we have to find truth.... Om Ra Rahuah Namah: Om Ke Ketuah Namah: I prey to almighty to bless me and forgive me for all sin Regards shri Harsh , "Tanvir" <tanvir@s...> wrote: > Hi, > There are many opinions, but most of the astrologers take 5, 7, 9, 12 for Rahu's aspect (Count anti-zodiac). > > Some advocate that Rahu - Ketu has no aspect, Some say They both have, some say only Rahu does. > > A news school Systems Approach teaches They cast aspect 5,7,9 houses - thus all odd / even signs of the zodiac become aspected by either Rahu or Ketu. > > I personally use 5,7,9, 12 for Rahu but sign aspect for Ketu - but really not sure what is the truth. > > Regards, > Tanvir > > > > What can not happen, can never happen. > Which is mine, is forever mine. > > Tanvir Chowdhury > tanvir@s... > http://www.geocities.com/king_tanvir > http://www.geocities.com/planetaryastro > > > > - > astrorajas > > Wednesday, May 28, 2003 4:16 PM > rahu/ketu aspect > > > Dear All, > > I have found very mix reactions/opinions on whether rahu ketu does > have aspect or not? can someone provide vedic script details about > the same as whether rahu/ketu does have aspect & if yes, which one ? > only 7th or any more? > waiting for reply > thanks & regards > Rajas > > > > > Help others to your best, so that the nature helps you. > > Your use of is subject to Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 11, 2003 Report Share Posted June 11, 2003 Dear Harsh, BPHS in a part suggests that If Ketu aspects this then this will happen. I assume that Ketu has no aspect of it's own but for sign aspect it can influence others. I am not too sure about Rahu's own aspects but again I believe he aspects for sign aspects. I really did not understand what did you mean that they represents anything related to Sun and Moon and nothing else? Best wishes,Tanvir What can not happen, can never happen.Which is mine, is forever mine. Tanvir Chowdhurytanvir (AT) siriusbb (DOT) comhttp://www.geocities.com/king_tanvirhttp://www.geocities.com/planetaryastro - Harsh Tuesday, June 10, 2003 4:25 PM Re: Rahu/ketu aspect - second thought Dear TanVeer and AllRahu and ketu should be treated as nodal point only since they r mathematical point in space and that too not fixed one, so aspect made by them is of no significance,no doubt, these two points are frequently used in astrology but my strong arugument is that they represent the faces of sun and moon onlyi.e anything related to sun or moon in horoscope and nothing else..this is something very strange... but my dear friends if we have to bring true vedic astrology then we have to find truth....Om Ra Rahuah Namah:Om Ke Ketuah Namah:I prey to almighty to bless me and forgive me for all sinRegardsshri Harsh, "Tanvir" <tanvir@s...> wrote:> Hi,> There are many opinions, but most of the astrologers take 5, 7, 9, 12 for Rahu's aspect (Count anti-zodiac).> > Some advocate that Rahu - Ketu has no aspect, Some say They both have, some say only Rahu does.> > A news school Systems Approach teaches They cast aspect 5,7,9 houses - thus all odd / even signs of the zodiac become aspected by either Rahu or Ketu.> > I personally use 5,7,9, 12 for Rahu but sign aspect for Ketu - but really not sure what is the truth.> > Regards,> Tanvir> > > > What can not happen, can never happen.> Which is mine, is forever mine.> > Tanvir Chowdhury> tanvir@s...> http://www.geocities.com/king_tanvir> http://www.geocities.com/planetaryastro> > > > ----- Original Message ----- > astrorajas > > Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 4:16 PM> rahu/ketu aspect> > > Dear All,> > I have found very mix reactions/opinions on whether rahu ketu does > have aspect or not? can someone provide vedic script details about > the same as whether rahu/ketu does have aspect & if yes, which one ? > only 7th or any more?> waiting for reply> thanks & regards> Rajas> > > Help others to your best, so that the nature helps you. Your use of is subject to the Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 11, 2003 Report Share Posted June 11, 2003 I believe generally that Rahu is considered to have an aspect to the 5th and 9th signs from where they are positioned by birth or transit. Generally the interpretation rule is that they magnify the effects of those planets which they co-join in a sign, or if alone, they give the results of the sign ruler. Thus Rahu in Kumbha (Aquarius) would give the results of Saturn. Regards, Ben Collins - Tanvir Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:58 AM Re: Re: Rahu/ketu aspect - second thought Dear Harsh, BPHS in a part suggests that If Ketu aspects this then this will happen. I assume that Ketu has no aspect of it's own but for sign aspect it can influence others. I am not too sure about Rahu's own aspects but again I believe he aspects for sign aspects. I really did not understand what did you mean that they represents anything related to Sun and Moon and nothing else? Best wishes,Tanvir What can not happen, can never happen.Which is mine, is forever mine. Tanvir Chowdhurytanvir (AT) siriusbb (DOT) comhttp://www.geocities.com/king_tanvirhttp://www.geocities.com/planetaryastro - Harsh Tuesday, June 10, 2003 4:25 PM Re: Rahu/ketu aspect - second thought Dear TanVeer and AllRahu and ketu should be treated as nodal point only since they r mathematical point in space and that too not fixed one, so aspect made by them is of no significance,no doubt, these two points are frequently used in astrology but my strong arugument is that they represent the faces of sun and moon onlyi.e anything related to sun or moon in horoscope and nothing else..this is something very strange... but my dear friends if we have to bring true vedic astrology then we have to find truth....Om Ra Rahuah Namah:Om Ke Ketuah Namah:I prey to almighty to bless me and forgive me for all sinRegardsshri Harsh, "Tanvir" <tanvir@s...> wrote:> Hi,> There are many opinions, but most of the astrologers take 5, 7, 9, 12 for Rahu's aspect (Count anti-zodiac).> > Some advocate that Rahu - Ketu has no aspect, Some say They both have, some say only Rahu does.> > A news school Systems Approach teaches They cast aspect 5,7,9 houses - thus all odd / even signs of the zodiac become aspected by either Rahu or Ketu.> > I personally use 5,7,9, 12 for Rahu but sign aspect for Ketu - but really not sure what is the truth.> > Regards,> Tanvir> > > > What can not happen, can never happen.> Which is mine, is forever mine.> > Tanvir Chowdhury> tanvir@s...> http://www.geocities.com/king_tanvir> http://www.geocities.com/planetaryastro> > > > ----- Original Message ----- > astrorajas > > Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 4:16 PM> rahu/ketu aspect> > > Dear All,> > I have found very mix reactions/opinions on whether rahu ketu does > have aspect or not? can someone provide vedic script details about > the same as whether rahu/ketu does have aspect & if yes, which one ? > only 7th or any more?> waiting for reply> thanks & regards> Rajas> > > Help others to your best, so that the nature helps you. Your use of is subject to the Help others to your best, so that the nature helps you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.