Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Factors for suicide - a message posted in jyotish vidya

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

ear friend,

 

 

I am yet to cast and read the charts provided by you. But let me tell

two general points with regard to the suicides:

 

 

The first one is to do with the natal chart of the native. Generally,

the Lagna Lord will be a malefic for the native. This happens to

tarus and the four 'corner' lagnas. Also, the Moon must be severely

afflicted. If moon is severly afflicted, it can also indicate a

possibility of Balarishta, though in Balarishta, the connection of

Mars with certain Houses is compulsory. In other words, the Moons

position will be alike in both Balarishta and suicide cases.

 

The second point is to do with the transits. The Tr Lagna lord should

be cruelly aspecting himself in the natal chart. Sometimes, this

position can be taken by AK but then, AK should be AK for the transit

chart also.

 

Hope this helps,

 

Kishore patnaik

 

 

jyotish-vidya, Uttara <muttaraphalguni wrote:

>

> Dear Patrice and All,

>

> I have an added commentary to my last post. It is a social

science theory but I think adds to the astrological reasoning behind

some charts we encounter. Especially our families.

>

> Like your mother who is a Gemini, My mother has a Gemini Sun. I

often say she talks out of both sides of her mouth. She is also very

autocratic and opinionated. She too grew up in an era where people

just got on with things and didn't talk or dwell on them openly. I

have often found this to be a direct reaction to the severity of the

depression era of the 30's and then the atrocities of World War 11.

Actually, Alcoholic Anonymous grew out of this depression era,

teaching men how to cope better with events and things in their lives

that were bigger than them. That's where the 12-step program came to

say that one was "powerless over" and taught fraternity of likeness

and support. It was a kind of new religion to help pull men from the

depths of despair.

>

> Unfortunately, your Grandfather never experienced this or his

stoic Denmark ancestry lead him to be his own person.

>

> Then the war came and life changed. Young Men left home and often

didn't return. Or, men returned never to be the same again. Those

that did survive the hell came back with a new outlook on life and the

majority got on with life. Never to develop fraternity again.

>

> Women during the war came out of the house and into the factory to

work – to help supply the goods needed for war. That is where women

wearing pants developed and was allowed. Every thing was rationed, so

material for clothing was harder and sturdier – so pants came into

being and were cheaper. Also in factory work, pants were need for

safety and endurance rather than dresses. Pants became the uniform of

the War.

>

> Once the war ended there was a backlash on the concept of "being

powerless". All of a sudden being in control of ones life became an

obsession in self-help advice and personal stories of people

overcoming adversity for peace and contentment. Personal prosperity

was touted everywhere. Women went back to their kitchens, dresses,

and deferring roles.

>

> However, do you remember growing up how we the baby boomers were

raised and what expectations were required? There were four themes

going on. One to have a more relaxed permissive society, (this is

where entitlement was bred – don't you just love Dr Spock) two, the

sky's the limit, three, gratefulness was instilled instead of apathy.

And, four, mothers were quietly behind closed doors raising their

daughters to be more of their own person and equal to men. The

fifty's believed it. The sixty's teenagers rebelled against the

fifties restrictions, the seventies; married Women were screaming for

their autonomy and the eighties saw young college degreed women in the

workplace. The nineties reaped the backlash and the 21-century so

far in America is entitled happy and throwing all the common sense

rules for civility out the window.

>

> So, when we look at out mothers and hear their stories it really

was a different time of living and thinking and believing. I think

the more adversity and sacrifice they encountered and the more

deferment required, the more they built their own reservoirs for

survival. There are some who were able to keep their capacity to

nurture and empathize, but all too often like my mother their

stoicness, severe expectation, and rule has kept them safe and

protected. And like my mother and some others I know, they became

very narcissistic.

>

> My mother could have been a better mother to my adopted sister,

but in reality, my mother's thinking and feeling was and is one where

she provided this child with a better life and gave her opportunities

and education and a roof over her head that my sister has never been

able to return in kindness to my mother. As far as having any empathy

for a broken soul theory – there is none. That and my mother's

intolerance of my sister's chaotic inner soul is written off as

complete belligerence and added to that, she is not connected to my

mother in any depth because as my mother says, this child is not of

her blood. Gad, what a mess and a terrible fall out for two lives

with completely different experiences.

>

> I am looking forward to 2012. I think the current tide will

change, as it ultimately will. In the meantime, we have to slop

through another six years. I hope my mother isn't living then. She

like my mother in law need to go their graves to find peace and happiness.

>

> As Always,

> Uttara

>

>

>

> "Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate, our

deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light,

not our darkness, that most frightens us. There is nothing enlightened

about shrinking so that other people won't feel insecure around

you...As we let our own light shine, we unconsciously give other

people permission to do the same. As we are liberated from our own

fear, our presence automatically liberates others." from A Return To

Love: by Marianne Williamson

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

||Hare Rama Krsna||

Dear Kishore, Namaskar

Check for Jupiter or Moon associating with the third from arudha lagna.

These give self-consciousness/willingness or emotional distress at the time

of death.

 

What is YOUR condition for balarishta? Also you haven't elaborated on your

timing of the birth of certain souls from your last mail.

Best wishes,

***

Visti Larsen

For services and articles visit:

http://srigaruda.com

***

 

 

[] On

Behalf Of kishore mohan

08 May 2006 19:22

 

[Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message posted in jyotish

vidya

 

ear friend,

 

 

I am yet to cast and read the charts provided by you. But let me tell

two general points with regard to the suicides:

 

 

The first one is to do with the natal chart of the native. Generally,

the Lagna Lord will be a malefic for the native. This happens to

tarus and the four 'corner' lagnas. Also, the Moon must be severely

afflicted. If moon is severly afflicted, it can also indicate a

possibility of Balarishta, though in Balarishta, the connection of

Mars with certain Houses is compulsory. In other words, the Moons

position will be alike in both Balarishta and suicide cases.

 

The second point is to do with the transits. The Tr Lagna lord should

be cruelly aspecting himself in the natal chart. Sometimes, this

position can be taken by AK but then, AK should be AK for the transit

chart also.

 

Hope this helps,

 

Kishore patnaik

 

 

jyotish-vidya, Uttara <muttaraphalguni wrote:

>

> Dear Patrice and All,

>

> I have an added commentary to my last post. It is a social

science theory but I think adds to the astrological reasoning behind

some charts we encounter. Especially our families.

>

> Like your mother who is a Gemini, My mother has a Gemini Sun. I

often say she talks out of both sides of her mouth. She is also very

autocratic and opinionated. She too grew up in an era where people

just got on with things and didn't talk or dwell on them openly. I

have often found this to be a direct reaction to the severity of the

depression era of the 30's and then the atrocities of World War 11.

Actually, Alcoholic Anonymous grew out of this depression era,

teaching men how to cope better with events and things in their lives

that were bigger than them. That's where the 12-step program came to

say that one was "powerless over" and taught fraternity of likeness

and support. It was a kind of new religion to help pull men from the

depths of despair.

>

> Unfortunately, your Grandfather never experienced this or his

stoic Denmark ancestry lead him to be his own person.

>

> Then the war came and life changed. Young Men left home and often

didn't return. Or, men returned never to be the same again. Those

that did survive the hell came back with a new outlook on life and the

majority got on with life. Never to develop fraternity again.

>

> Women during the war came out of the house and into the factory to

work – to help supply the goods needed for war. That is where women

wearing pants developed and was allowed. Every thing was rationed, so

material for clothing was harder and sturdier – so pants came into

being and were cheaper. Also in factory work, pants were need for

safety and endurance rather than dresses. Pants became the uniform of

the War.

>

> Once the war ended there was a backlash on the concept of "being

powerless". All of a sudden being in control of ones life became an

obsession in self-help advice and personal stories of people

overcoming adversity for peace and contentment. Personal prosperity

was touted everywhere. Women went back to their kitchens, dresses,

and deferring roles.

>

> However, do you remember growing up how we the baby boomers were

raised and what expectations were required? There were four themes

going on. One to have a more relaxed permissive society, (this is

where entitlement was bred – don't you just love Dr Spock) two, the

sky's the limit, three, gratefulness was instilled instead of apathy.

And, four, mothers were quietly behind closed doors raising their

daughters to be more of their own person and equal to men. The

fifty's believed it. The sixty's teenagers rebelled against the

fifties restrictions, the seventies; married Women were screaming for

their autonomy and the eighties saw young college degreed women in the

workplace. The nineties reaped the backlash and the 21-century so

far in America is entitled happy and throwing all the common sense

rules for civility out the window.

>

> So, when we look at out mothers and hear their stories it really

was a different time of living and thinking and believing. I think

the more adversity and sacrifice they encountered and the more

deferment required, the more they built their own reservoirs for

survival. There are some who were able to keep their capacity to

nurture and empathize, but all too often like my mother their

stoicness, severe expectation, and rule has kept them safe and

protected. And like my mother and some others I know, they became

very narcissistic.

>

> My mother could have been a better mother to my adopted sister,

but in reality, my mother's thinking and feeling was and is one where

she provided this child with a better life and gave her opportunities

and education and a roof over her head that my sister has never been

able to return in kindness to my mother. As far as having any empathy

for a broken soul theory – there is none. That and my mother's

intolerance of my sister's chaotic inner soul is written off as

complete belligerence and added to that, she is not connected to my

mother in any depth because as my mother says, this child is not of

her blood. Gad, what a mess and a terrible fall out for two lives

with completely different experiences.

>

> I am looking forward to 2012. I think the current tide will

change, as it ultimately will. In the meantime, we have to slop

through another six years. I hope my mother isn't living then. She

like my mother in law need to go their graves to find peace and happiness.

>

> As Always,

> Uttara

>

>

>

> "Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate, our

deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light,

not our darkness, that most frightens us. There is nothing enlightened

about shrinking so that other people won't feel insecure around

you...As we let our own light shine, we unconsciously give other

people permission to do the same. As we are liberated from our own

fear, our presence automatically liberates others." from A Return To

Love: by Marianne Williamson

 

 

 

 

 

 

~ om tat sat ~

Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram.

Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna'

(2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said that the

human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals.

(3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading today

Links

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear visti,

 

Namaskar.

 

Thanks for the combination.

 

If you are saying about the Hanumanji taking over as the current

Brahma, I have no clue about it. It is only a polular belief. Please

elaborate on the question if I misunderstood.

 

Kishore patnaik

 

, "Visti Larsen" <visti wrote:

>

> ||Hare Rama Krsna||

> Dear Kishore, Namaskar

> Check for Jupiter or Moon associating with the third from arudha lagna.

> These give self-consciousness/willingness or emotional distress at

the time

> of death.

>

> What is YOUR condition for balarishta? Also you haven't elaborated

on your

> timing of the birth of certain souls from your last mail.

> Best wishes,

> ***

> Visti Larsen

> For services and articles visit:

> http://srigaruda.com

> ***

>

>

>

[] On

> Behalf Of kishore mohan

> 08 May 2006 19:22

>

> [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message posted in

jyotish

> vidya

>

> ear friend,

>

>

> I am yet to cast and read the charts provided by you. But let me tell

> two general points with regard to the suicides:

>

>

> The first one is to do with the natal chart of the native. Generally,

> the Lagna Lord will be a malefic for the native. This happens to

> tarus and the four 'corner' lagnas. Also, the Moon must be severely

> afflicted. If moon is severly afflicted, it can also indicate a

> possibility of Balarishta, though in Balarishta, the connection of

> Mars with certain Houses is compulsory. In other words, the Moons

> position will be alike in both Balarishta and suicide cases.

>

> The second point is to do with the transits. The Tr Lagna lord should

> be cruelly aspecting himself in the natal chart. Sometimes, this

> position can be taken by AK but then, AK should be AK for the transit

> chart also.

>

> Hope this helps,

>

> Kishore patnaik

>

>

> jyotish-vidya, Uttara <muttaraphalguni@> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Patrice and All,

> >

> > I have an added commentary to my last post. It is a social

> science theory but I think adds to the astrological reasoning behind

> some charts we encounter. Especially our families.

> >

> > Like your mother who is a Gemini, My mother has a Gemini Sun. I

> often say she talks out of both sides of her mouth. She is also very

> autocratic and opinionated. She too grew up in an era where people

> just got on with things and didn't talk or dwell on them openly. I

> have often found this to be a direct reaction to the severity of the

> depression era of the 30's and then the atrocities of World War 11.

> Actually, Alcoholic Anonymous grew out of this depression era,

> teaching men how to cope better with events and things in their lives

> that were bigger than them. That's where the 12-step program came to

> say that one was "powerless over" and taught fraternity of likeness

> and support. It was a kind of new religion to help pull men from the

> depths of despair.

> >

> > Unfortunately, your Grandfather never experienced this or his

> stoic Denmark ancestry lead him to be his own person.

> >

> > Then the war came and life changed. Young Men left home and often

> didn't return. Or, men returned never to be the same again. Those

> that did survive the hell came back with a new outlook on life and the

> majority got on with life. Never to develop fraternity again.

> >

> > Women during the war came out of the house and into the factory to

> work – to help supply the goods needed for war. That is where women

> wearing pants developed and was allowed. Every thing was rationed, so

> material for clothing was harder and sturdier – so pants came into

> being and were cheaper. Also in factory work, pants were need for

> safety and endurance rather than dresses. Pants became the uniform of

> the War.

> >

> > Once the war ended there was a backlash on the concept of "being

> powerless". All of a sudden being in control of ones life became an

> obsession in self-help advice and personal stories of people

> overcoming adversity for peace and contentment. Personal prosperity

> was touted everywhere. Women went back to their kitchens, dresses,

> and deferring roles.

> >

> > However, do you remember growing up how we the baby boomers were

> raised and what expectations were required? There were four themes

> going on. One to have a more relaxed permissive society, (this is

> where entitlement was bred – don't you just love Dr Spock) two, the

> sky's the limit, three, gratefulness was instilled instead of apathy.

> And, four, mothers were quietly behind closed doors raising their

> daughters to be more of their own person and equal to men. The

> fifty's believed it. The sixty's teenagers rebelled against the

> fifties restrictions, the seventies; married Women were screaming for

> their autonomy and the eighties saw young college degreed women in the

> workplace. The nineties reaped the backlash and the 21-century so

> far in America is entitled happy and throwing all the common sense

> rules for civility out the window.

> >

> > So, when we look at out mothers and hear their stories it really

> was a different time of living and thinking and believing. I think

> the more adversity and sacrifice they encountered and the more

> deferment required, the more they built their own reservoirs for

> survival. There are some who were able to keep their capacity to

> nurture and empathize, but all too often like my mother their

> stoicness, severe expectation, and rule has kept them safe and

> protected. And like my mother and some others I know, they became

> very narcissistic.

> >

> > My mother could have been a better mother to my adopted sister,

> but in reality, my mother's thinking and feeling was and is one where

> she provided this child with a better life and gave her opportunities

> and education and a roof over her head that my sister has never been

> able to return in kindness to my mother. As far as having any empathy

> for a broken soul theory – there is none. That and my mother's

> intolerance of my sister's chaotic inner soul is written off as

> complete belligerence and added to that, she is not connected to my

> mother in any depth because as my mother says, this child is not of

> her blood. Gad, what a mess and a terrible fall out for two lives

> with completely different experiences.

> >

> > I am looking forward to 2012. I think the current tide will

> change, as it ultimately will. In the meantime, we have to slop

> through another six years. I hope my mother isn't living then. She

> like my mother in law need to go their graves to find peace and

happiness.

> >

> > As Always,

> > Uttara

> >

> >

> >

> > "Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate, our

> deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light,

> not our darkness, that most frightens us. There is nothing enlightened

> about shrinking so that other people won't feel insecure around

> you...As we let our own light shine, we unconsciously give other

> people permission to do the same. As we are liberated from our own

> fear, our presence automatically liberates others." from A Return To

> Love: by Marianne Williamson

~ om tat sat ~

> Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram.

> Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna'

> (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said

that the

> human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals.

> (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading

today

> Links

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

||Hare Rama Krsna||

Dear Kishore, Namaskar

If the Brahma has to change then the creation must also. Then in that case

we should have experienced pralaya over the last few years already... Can't

really accept that.

Best wishes,

***

Visti Larsen

For services and articles visit:

http://srigaruda.com

***

 

 

[] On

Behalf Of kishore mohan

09 May 2006 08:44

 

Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message posted in

jyotish vidya

 

Dear visti,

 

Namaskar.

 

Thanks for the combination.

 

If you are saying about the Hanumanji taking over as the current

Brahma, I have no clue about it. It is only a polular belief. Please

elaborate on the question if I misunderstood.

 

Kishore patnaik

 

, "Visti Larsen" <visti wrote:

>

> ||Hare Rama Krsna||

> Dear Kishore, Namaskar

> Check for Jupiter or Moon associating with the third from arudha lagna.

> These give self-consciousness/willingness or emotional distress at

the time

> of death.

>

> What is YOUR condition for balarishta? Also you haven't elaborated

on your

> timing of the birth of certain souls from your last mail.

> Best wishes,

> ***

> Visti Larsen

> For services and articles visit:

> http://srigaruda.com

> ***

>

>

>

[] On

> Behalf Of kishore mohan

> 08 May 2006 19:22

>

> [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message posted in

jyotish

> vidya

>

> ear friend,

>

>

> I am yet to cast and read the charts provided by you. But let me tell

> two general points with regard to the suicides:

>

>

> The first one is to do with the natal chart of the native. Generally,

> the Lagna Lord will be a malefic for the native. This happens to

> tarus and the four 'corner' lagnas. Also, the Moon must be severely

> afflicted. If moon is severly afflicted, it can also indicate a

> possibility of Balarishta, though in Balarishta, the connection of

> Mars with certain Houses is compulsory. In other words, the Moons

> position will be alike in both Balarishta and suicide cases.

>

> The second point is to do with the transits. The Tr Lagna lord should

> be cruelly aspecting himself in the natal chart. Sometimes, this

> position can be taken by AK but then, AK should be AK for the transit

> chart also.

>

> Hope this helps,

>

> Kishore patnaik

>

>

> jyotish-vidya, Uttara <muttaraphalguni@> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Patrice and All,

> >

> > I have an added commentary to my last post. It is a social

> science theory but I think adds to the astrological reasoning behind

> some charts we encounter. Especially our families.

> >

> > Like your mother who is a Gemini, My mother has a Gemini Sun. I

> often say she talks out of both sides of her mouth. She is also very

> autocratic and opinionated. She too grew up in an era where people

> just got on with things and didn't talk or dwell on them openly. I

> have often found this to be a direct reaction to the severity of the

> depression era of the 30's and then the atrocities of World War 11.

> Actually, Alcoholic Anonymous grew out of this depression era,

> teaching men how to cope better with events and things in their lives

> that were bigger than them. That's where the 12-step program came to

> say that one was "powerless over" and taught fraternity of likeness

> and support. It was a kind of new religion to help pull men from the

> depths of despair.

> >

> > Unfortunately, your Grandfather never experienced this or his

> stoic Denmark ancestry lead him to be his own person.

> >

> > Then the war came and life changed. Young Men left home and often

> didn't return. Or, men returned never to be the same again. Those

> that did survive the hell came back with a new outlook on life and the

> majority got on with life. Never to develop fraternity again.

> >

> > Women during the war came out of the house and into the factory to

> work – to help supply the goods needed for war. That is where women

> wearing pants developed and was allowed. Every thing was rationed, so

> material for clothing was harder and sturdier – so pants came into

> being and were cheaper. Also in factory work, pants were need for

> safety and endurance rather than dresses. Pants became the uniform of

> the War.

> >

> > Once the war ended there was a backlash on the concept of "being

> powerless". All of a sudden being in control of ones life became an

> obsession in self-help advice and personal stories of people

> overcoming adversity for peace and contentment. Personal prosperity

> was touted everywhere. Women went back to their kitchens, dresses,

> and deferring roles.

> >

> > However, do you remember growing up how we the baby boomers were

> raised and what expectations were required? There were four themes

> going on. One to have a more relaxed permissive society, (this is

> where entitlement was bred – don't you just love Dr Spock) two, the

> sky's the limit, three, gratefulness was instilled instead of apathy.

> And, four, mothers were quietly behind closed doors raising their

> daughters to be more of their own person and equal to men. The

> fifty's believed it. The sixty's teenagers rebelled against the

> fifties restrictions, the seventies; married Women were screaming for

> their autonomy and the eighties saw young college degreed women in the

> workplace. The nineties reaped the backlash and the 21-century so

> far in America is entitled happy and throwing all the common sense

> rules for civility out the window.

> >

> > So, when we look at out mothers and hear their stories it really

> was a different time of living and thinking and believing. I think

> the more adversity and sacrifice they encountered and the more

> deferment required, the more they built their own reservoirs for

> survival. There are some who were able to keep their capacity to

> nurture and empathize, but all too often like my mother their

> stoicness, severe expectation, and rule has kept them safe and

> protected. And like my mother and some others I know, they became

> very narcissistic.

> >

> > My mother could have been a better mother to my adopted sister,

> but in reality, my mother's thinking and feeling was and is one where

> she provided this child with a better life and gave her opportunities

> and education and a roof over her head that my sister has never been

> able to return in kindness to my mother. As far as having any empathy

> for a broken soul theory – there is none. That and my mother's

> intolerance of my sister's chaotic inner soul is written off as

> complete belligerence and added to that, she is not connected to my

> mother in any depth because as my mother says, this child is not of

> her blood. Gad, what a mess and a terrible fall out for two lives

> with completely different experiences.

> >

> > I am looking forward to 2012. I think the current tide will

> change, as it ultimately will. In the meantime, we have to slop

> through another six years. I hope my mother isn't living then. She

> like my mother in law need to go their graves to find peace and

happiness.

> >

> > As Always,

> > Uttara

> >

> >

> >

> > "Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate, our

> deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light,

> not our darkness, that most frightens us. There is nothing enlightened

> about shrinking so that other people won't feel insecure around

> you...As we let our own light shine, we unconsciously give other

> people permission to do the same. As we are liberated from our own

> fear, our presence automatically liberates others." from A Return To

> Love: by Marianne Williamson

~ om tat sat ~

> Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram.

> Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna'

> (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said

that the

> human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals.

> (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading

today

> Links

>

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

~ om tat sat ~

Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram.

Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna'

(2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said that the

human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals.

(3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading today

Links

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear visti,

 

namaskar.

 

everybody has their own theories regarding that. As i said, it is only

a popular belief and usually, you can not debate over a belief.

 

regards,

 

Kishore patnaik

 

, "Visti Larsen" <visti wrote:

>

> ||Hare Rama Krsna||

> Dear Kishore, Namaskar

> If the Brahma has to change then the creation must also. Then in

that case

> we should have experienced pralaya over the last few years

already... Can't

> really accept that.

> Best wishes,

> ***

> Visti Larsen

> For services and articles visit:

> http://srigaruda.com

> ***

>

>

>

[] On

> Behalf Of kishore mohan

> 09 May 2006 08:44

>

> Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message posted in

> jyotish vidya

>

> Dear visti,

>

> Namaskar.

>

> Thanks for the combination.

>

> If you are saying about the Hanumanji taking over as the current

> Brahma, I have no clue about it. It is only a polular belief. Please

> elaborate on the question if I misunderstood.

>

> Kishore patnaik

>

> , "Visti Larsen" <visti@> wrote:

> >

> > ||Hare Rama Krsna||

> > Dear Kishore, Namaskar

> > Check for Jupiter or Moon associating with the third from arudha

lagna.

> > These give self-consciousness/willingness or emotional distress at

> the time

> > of death.

> >

> > What is YOUR condition for balarishta? Also you haven't elaborated

> on your

> > timing of the birth of certain souls from your last mail.

> > Best wishes,

> > ***

> > Visti Larsen

> > For services and articles visit:

> > http://srigaruda.com

> > ***

> >

> >

> >

> [] On

> > Behalf Of kishore mohan

> > 08 May 2006 19:22

> >

> > [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message posted in

> jyotish

> > vidya

> >

> > ear friend,

> >

> >

> > I am yet to cast and read the charts provided by you. But let me tell

> > two general points with regard to the suicides:

> >

> >

> > The first one is to do with the natal chart of the native. Generally,

> > the Lagna Lord will be a malefic for the native. This happens to

> > tarus and the four 'corner' lagnas. Also, the Moon must be severely

> > afflicted. If moon is severly afflicted, it can also indicate a

> > possibility of Balarishta, though in Balarishta, the connection of

> > Mars with certain Houses is compulsory. In other words, the Moons

> > position will be alike in both Balarishta and suicide cases.

> >

> > The second point is to do with the transits. The Tr Lagna lord should

> > be cruelly aspecting himself in the natal chart. Sometimes, this

> > position can be taken by AK but then, AK should be AK for the transit

> > chart also.

> >

> > Hope this helps,

> >

> > Kishore patnaik

> >

> >

> > jyotish-vidya, Uttara <muttaraphalguni@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Patrice and All,

> > >

> > > I have an added commentary to my last post. It is a social

> > science theory but I think adds to the astrological reasoning behind

> > some charts we encounter. Especially our families.

> > >

> > > Like your mother who is a Gemini, My mother has a Gemini Sun. I

> > often say she talks out of both sides of her mouth. She is also very

> > autocratic and opinionated. She too grew up in an era where people

> > just got on with things and didn't talk or dwell on them openly. I

> > have often found this to be a direct reaction to the severity of the

> > depression era of the 30's and then the atrocities of World War 11.

> > Actually, Alcoholic Anonymous grew out of this depression era,

> > teaching men how to cope better with events and things in their lives

> > that were bigger than them. That's where the 12-step program came to

> > say that one was "powerless over" and taught fraternity of likeness

> > and support. It was a kind of new religion to help pull men from the

> > depths of despair.

> > >

> > > Unfortunately, your Grandfather never experienced this or his

> > stoic Denmark ancestry lead him to be his own person.

> > >

> > > Then the war came and life changed. Young Men left home and often

> > didn't return. Or, men returned never to be the same again. Those

> > that did survive the hell came back with a new outlook on life and the

> > majority got on with life. Never to develop fraternity again.

> > >

> > > Women during the war came out of the house and into the factory to

> > work – to help supply the goods needed for war. That is where women

> > wearing pants developed and was allowed. Every thing was rationed, so

> > material for clothing was harder and sturdier – so pants came into

> > being and were cheaper. Also in factory work, pants were need for

> > safety and endurance rather than dresses. Pants became the uniform of

> > the War.

> > >

> > > Once the war ended there was a backlash on the concept of "being

> > powerless". All of a sudden being in control of ones life became an

> > obsession in self-help advice and personal stories of people

> > overcoming adversity for peace and contentment. Personal prosperity

> > was touted everywhere. Women went back to their kitchens, dresses,

> > and deferring roles.

> > >

> > > However, do you remember growing up how we the baby boomers were

> > raised and what expectations were required? There were four themes

> > going on. One to have a more relaxed permissive society, (this is

> > where entitlement was bred – don't you just love Dr Spock) two, the

> > sky's the limit, three, gratefulness was instilled instead of apathy.

> > And, four, mothers were quietly behind closed doors raising their

> > daughters to be more of their own person and equal to men. The

> > fifty's believed it. The sixty's teenagers rebelled against the

> > fifties restrictions, the seventies; married Women were screaming for

> > their autonomy and the eighties saw young college degreed women in the

> > workplace. The nineties reaped the backlash and the 21-century so

> > far in America is entitled happy and throwing all the common sense

> > rules for civility out the window.

> > >

> > > So, when we look at out mothers and hear their stories it really

> > was a different time of living and thinking and believing. I think

> > the more adversity and sacrifice they encountered and the more

> > deferment required, the more they built their own reservoirs for

> > survival. There are some who were able to keep their capacity to

> > nurture and empathize, but all too often like my mother their

> > stoicness, severe expectation, and rule has kept them safe and

> > protected. And like my mother and some others I know, they became

> > very narcissistic.

> > >

> > > My mother could have been a better mother to my adopted sister,

> > but in reality, my mother's thinking and feeling was and is one where

> > she provided this child with a better life and gave her opportunities

> > and education and a roof over her head that my sister has never been

> > able to return in kindness to my mother. As far as having any empathy

> > for a broken soul theory – there is none. That and my mother's

> > intolerance of my sister's chaotic inner soul is written off as

> > complete belligerence and added to that, she is not connected to my

> > mother in any depth because as my mother says, this child is not of

> > her blood. Gad, what a mess and a terrible fall out for two lives

> > with completely different experiences.

> > >

> > > I am looking forward to 2012. I think the current tide will

> > change, as it ultimately will. In the meantime, we have to slop

> > through another six years. I hope my mother isn't living then. She

> > like my mother in law need to go their graves to find peace and

> happiness.

> > >

> > > As Always,

> > > Uttara

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > "Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate, our

> > deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light,

> > not our darkness, that most frightens us. There is nothing enlightened

> > about shrinking so that other people won't feel insecure around

> > you...As we let our own light shine, we unconsciously give other

> > people permission to do the same. As we are liberated from our own

> > fear, our presence automatically liberates others." from A Return To

> > Love: by Marianne Williamson

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > ~ om tat sat ~

> > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram.

> > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna'

> > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said

> that the

> > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals.

> > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading

> today

> > Links

> >

>

~ om tat sat ~

> Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram.

> Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna'

> (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said

that the

> human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals.

> (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading

today

> Links

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

||Hare Rama Krsna||

Dear Kishore, Namaskar

I disagree. As Jyotishas we not only have to understand the time/dasas of

humans but the dasas of the entire creation, herein the yugas, manvantaras,

kalpas (blinking of brahmas eye) and the first Brahma himself who will live

for zillions of human years. By implication the opening and closing of

brahmas eye causes the pralaya, so also his reinstatement would imply the

same as Brahma embodies the creation itself... we are living in Brahma, so

if he is replaced then so is our creation.

Best wishes,

***

Visti Larsen

For services and articles visit:

http://srigaruda.com

***

 

 

[] On

Behalf Of kishore mohan

09 May 2006 10:51

 

Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message posted in

jyotish vidya

 

Dear visti,

 

namaskar.

 

everybody has their own theories regarding that. As i said, it is only

a popular belief and usually, you can not debate over a belief.

 

regards,

 

Kishore patnaik

 

, "Visti Larsen" <visti wrote:

>

> ||Hare Rama Krsna||

> Dear Kishore, Namaskar

> If the Brahma has to change then the creation must also. Then in

that case

> we should have experienced pralaya over the last few years

already... Can't

> really accept that.

> Best wishes,

> ***

> Visti Larsen

> For services and articles visit:

> http://srigaruda.com

> ***

>

>

>

[] On

> Behalf Of kishore mohan

> 09 May 2006 08:44

>

> Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message posted in

> jyotish vidya

>

> Dear visti,

>

> Namaskar.

>

> Thanks for the combination.

>

> If you are saying about the Hanumanji taking over as the current

> Brahma, I have no clue about it. It is only a polular belief. Please

> elaborate on the question if I misunderstood.

>

> Kishore patnaik

>

> , "Visti Larsen" <visti@> wrote:

> >

> > ||Hare Rama Krsna||

> > Dear Kishore, Namaskar

> > Check for Jupiter or Moon associating with the third from arudha

lagna.

> > These give self-consciousness/willingness or emotional distress at

> the time

> > of death.

> >

> > What is YOUR condition for balarishta? Also you haven't elaborated

> on your

> > timing of the birth of certain souls from your last mail.

> > Best wishes,

> > ***

> > Visti Larsen

> > For services and articles visit:

> > http://srigaruda.com

> > ***

> >

> >

> >

> [] On

> > Behalf Of kishore mohan

> > 08 May 2006 19:22

> >

> > [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message posted in

> jyotish

> > vidya

> >

> > ear friend,

> >

> >

> > I am yet to cast and read the charts provided by you. But let me tell

> > two general points with regard to the suicides:

> >

> >

> > The first one is to do with the natal chart of the native. Generally,

> > the Lagna Lord will be a malefic for the native. This happens to

> > tarus and the four 'corner' lagnas. Also, the Moon must be severely

> > afflicted. If moon is severly afflicted, it can also indicate a

> > possibility of Balarishta, though in Balarishta, the connection of

> > Mars with certain Houses is compulsory. In other words, the Moons

> > position will be alike in both Balarishta and suicide cases.

> >

> > The second point is to do with the transits. The Tr Lagna lord should

> > be cruelly aspecting himself in the natal chart. Sometimes, this

> > position can be taken by AK but then, AK should be AK for the transit

> > chart also.

> >

> > Hope this helps,

> >

> > Kishore patnaik

> >

> >

> > jyotish-vidya, Uttara <muttaraphalguni@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Patrice and All,

> > >

> > > I have an added commentary to my last post. It is a social

> > science theory but I think adds to the astrological reasoning behind

> > some charts we encounter. Especially our families.

> > >

> > > Like your mother who is a Gemini, My mother has a Gemini Sun. I

> > often say she talks out of both sides of her mouth. She is also very

> > autocratic and opinionated. She too grew up in an era where people

> > just got on with things and didn't talk or dwell on them openly. I

> > have often found this to be a direct reaction to the severity of the

> > depression era of the 30's and then the atrocities of World War 11.

> > Actually, Alcoholic Anonymous grew out of this depression era,

> > teaching men how to cope better with events and things in their lives

> > that were bigger than them. That's where the 12-step program came to

> > say that one was "powerless over" and taught fraternity of likeness

> > and support. It was a kind of new religion to help pull men from the

> > depths of despair.

> > >

> > > Unfortunately, your Grandfather never experienced this or his

> > stoic Denmark ancestry lead him to be his own person.

> > >

> > > Then the war came and life changed. Young Men left home and often

> > didn't return. Or, men returned never to be the same again. Those

> > that did survive the hell came back with a new outlook on life and the

> > majority got on with life. Never to develop fraternity again.

> > >

> > > Women during the war came out of the house and into the factory to

> > work – to help supply the goods needed for war. That is where women

> > wearing pants developed and was allowed. Every thing was rationed, so

> > material for clothing was harder and sturdier – so pants came into

> > being and were cheaper. Also in factory work, pants were need for

> > safety and endurance rather than dresses. Pants became the uniform of

> > the War.

> > >

> > > Once the war ended there was a backlash on the concept of "being

> > powerless". All of a sudden being in control of ones life became an

> > obsession in self-help advice and personal stories of people

> > overcoming adversity for peace and contentment. Personal prosperity

> > was touted everywhere. Women went back to their kitchens, dresses,

> > and deferring roles.

> > >

> > > However, do you remember growing up how we the baby boomers were

> > raised and what expectations were required? There were four themes

> > going on. One to have a more relaxed permissive society, (this is

> > where entitlement was bred – don't you just love Dr Spock) two, the

> > sky's the limit, three, gratefulness was instilled instead of apathy.

> > And, four, mothers were quietly behind closed doors raising their

> > daughters to be more of their own person and equal to men. The

> > fifty's believed it. The sixty's teenagers rebelled against the

> > fifties restrictions, the seventies; married Women were screaming for

> > their autonomy and the eighties saw young college degreed women in the

> > workplace. The nineties reaped the backlash and the 21-century so

> > far in America is entitled happy and throwing all the common sense

> > rules for civility out the window.

> > >

> > > So, when we look at out mothers and hear their stories it really

> > was a different time of living and thinking and believing. I think

> > the more adversity and sacrifice they encountered and the more

> > deferment required, the more they built their own reservoirs for

> > survival. There are some who were able to keep their capacity to

> > nurture and empathize, but all too often like my mother their

> > stoicness, severe expectation, and rule has kept them safe and

> > protected. And like my mother and some others I know, they became

> > very narcissistic.

> > >

> > > My mother could have been a better mother to my adopted sister,

> > but in reality, my mother's thinking and feeling was and is one where

> > she provided this child with a better life and gave her opportunities

> > and education and a roof over her head that my sister has never been

> > able to return in kindness to my mother. As far as having any empathy

> > for a broken soul theory – there is none. That and my mother's

> > intolerance of my sister's chaotic inner soul is written off as

> > complete belligerence and added to that, she is not connected to my

> > mother in any depth because as my mother says, this child is not of

> > her blood. Gad, what a mess and a terrible fall out for two lives

> > with completely different experiences.

> > >

> > > I am looking forward to 2012. I think the current tide will

> > change, as it ultimately will. In the meantime, we have to slop

> > through another six years. I hope my mother isn't living then. She

> > like my mother in law need to go their graves to find peace and

> happiness.

> > >

> > > As Always,

> > > Uttara

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > "Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate, our

> > deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light,

> > not our darkness, that most frightens us. There is nothing enlightened

> > about shrinking so that other people won't feel insecure around

> > you...As we let our own light shine, we unconsciously give other

> > people permission to do the same. As we are liberated from our own

> > fear, our presence automatically liberates others." from A Return To

> > Love: by Marianne Williamson

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > ~ om tat sat ~

> > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram.

> > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna'

> > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said

> that the

> > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals.

> > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading

> today

> > Links

> >

>

~ om tat sat ~

> Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram.

> Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna'

> (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said

that the

> human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals.

> (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading

today

> Links

>

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

~ om tat sat ~

Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram.

Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna'

(2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said that the

human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals.

(3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading today

Links

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

dear visti,

 

you are going into the same self centric theory of any scientist.

a scientist says his theories are the centre of all the known and

unknown and thinks every known phenomenon should be explained by his

theories and every unknown phenomenon should be predicted by them. an

egoistic scientist rejects any phenomenon that does not fall within

the stratum of his theories. this is not a good indication.

 

while it is good to try and explain everything- from anu(atom) to

mahan(the infinite)- with in your theories which will help you in your

spiritual and academic sojourn, it is utterly undesirable to reject

what you can not explain.

 

In any case, as I have said, what I have said is only a belief and

those who expound this belief have their own ways of explaining it. I

am one of the believers. I can not explain you more on this, as you

will not appreiciate my explanations unless you accept my assumptions.

 

Kishore patnaik

 

, "Visti Larsen" <visti wrote:

>

> ||Hare Rama Krsna||

> Dear Kishore, Namaskar

> I disagree. As Jyotishas we not only have to understand the

time/dasas of

> humans but the dasas of the entire creation, herein the yugas,

manvantaras,

> kalpas (blinking of brahmas eye) and the first Brahma himself who

will live

> for zillions of human years. By implication the opening and closing of

> brahmas eye causes the pralaya, so also his reinstatement would

imply the

> same as Brahma embodies the creation itself... we are living in

Brahma, so

> if he is replaced then so is our creation.

> Best wishes,

> ***

> Visti Larsen

> For services and articles visit:

> http://srigaruda.com

> ***

>

>

>

[] On

> Behalf Of kishore mohan

> 09 May 2006 10:51

>

> Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message posted in

> jyotish vidya

>

> Dear visti,

>

> namaskar.

>

> everybody has their own theories regarding that. As i said, it is only

> a popular belief and usually, you can not debate over a belief.

>

> regards,

>

> Kishore patnaik

>

> , "Visti Larsen" <visti@> wrote:

> >

> > ||Hare Rama Krsna||

> > Dear Kishore, Namaskar

> > If the Brahma has to change then the creation must also. Then in

> that case

> > we should have experienced pralaya over the last few years

> already... Can't

> > really accept that.

> > Best wishes,

> > ***

> > Visti Larsen

> > For services and articles visit:

> > http://srigaruda.com

> > ***

> >

> >

> >

> [] On

> > Behalf Of kishore mohan

> > 09 May 2006 08:44

> >

> > Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message

posted in

> > jyotish vidya

> >

> > Dear visti,

> >

> > Namaskar.

> >

> > Thanks for the combination.

> >

> > If you are saying about the Hanumanji taking over as the current

> > Brahma, I have no clue about it. It is only a polular belief. Please

> > elaborate on the question if I misunderstood.

> >

> > Kishore patnaik

> >

> > , "Visti Larsen" <visti@> wrote:

> > >

> > > ||Hare Rama Krsna||

> > > Dear Kishore, Namaskar

> > > Check for Jupiter or Moon associating with the third from arudha

> lagna.

> > > These give self-consciousness/willingness or emotional distress at

> > the time

> > > of death.

> > >

> > > What is YOUR condition for balarishta? Also you haven't elaborated

> > on your

> > > timing of the birth of certain souls from your last mail.

> > > Best wishes,

> > > ***

> > > Visti Larsen

> > > For services and articles visit:

> > > http://srigaruda.com

> > > ***

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > [] On

> > > Behalf Of kishore mohan

> > > 08 May 2006 19:22

> > >

> > > [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message posted in

> > jyotish

> > > vidya

> > >

> > > ear friend,

> > >

> > >

> > > I am yet to cast and read the charts provided by you. But let me

tell

> > > two general points with regard to the suicides:

> > >

> > >

> > > The first one is to do with the natal chart of the native.

Generally,

> > > the Lagna Lord will be a malefic for the native. This happens to

> > > tarus and the four 'corner' lagnas. Also, the Moon must be severely

> > > afflicted. If moon is severly afflicted, it can also indicate a

> > > possibility of Balarishta, though in Balarishta, the connection of

> > > Mars with certain Houses is compulsory. In other words, the Moons

> > > position will be alike in both Balarishta and suicide cases.

> > >

> > > The second point is to do with the transits. The Tr Lagna lord

should

> > > be cruelly aspecting himself in the natal chart. Sometimes, this

> > > position can be taken by AK but then, AK should be AK for the

transit

> > > chart also.

> > >

> > > Hope this helps,

> > >

> > > Kishore patnaik

> > >

> > >

> > > jyotish-vidya, Uttara <muttaraphalguni@>

wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear Patrice and All,

> > > >

> > > > I have an added commentary to my last post. It is a social

> > > science theory but I think adds to the astrological reasoning behind

> > > some charts we encounter. Especially our families.

> > > >

> > > > Like your mother who is a Gemini, My mother has a Gemini

Sun. I

> > > often say she talks out of both sides of her mouth. She is also

very

> > > autocratic and opinionated. She too grew up in an era where people

> > > just got on with things and didn't talk or dwell on them openly. I

> > > have often found this to be a direct reaction to the severity of the

> > > depression era of the 30's and then the atrocities of World War 11.

> > > Actually, Alcoholic Anonymous grew out of this depression era,

> > > teaching men how to cope better with events and things in their

lives

> > > that were bigger than them. That's where the 12-step program

came to

> > > say that one was "powerless over" and taught fraternity of likeness

> > > and support. It was a kind of new religion to help pull men

from the

> > > depths of despair.

> > > >

> > > > Unfortunately, your Grandfather never experienced this or his

> > > stoic Denmark ancestry lead him to be his own person.

> > > >

> > > > Then the war came and life changed. Young Men left home and

often

> > > didn't return. Or, men returned never to be the same again. Those

> > > that did survive the hell came back with a new outlook on life

and the

> > > majority got on with life. Never to develop fraternity again.

> > > >

> > > > Women during the war came out of the house and into the

factory to

> > > work – to help supply the goods needed for war. That is where women

> > > wearing pants developed and was allowed. Every thing was

rationed, so

> > > material for clothing was harder and sturdier – so pants came into

> > > being and were cheaper. Also in factory work, pants were need for

> > > safety and endurance rather than dresses. Pants became the

uniform of

> > > the War.

> > > >

> > > > Once the war ended there was a backlash on the concept of "being

> > > powerless". All of a sudden being in control of ones life became an

> > > obsession in self-help advice and personal stories of people

> > > overcoming adversity for peace and contentment. Personal prosperity

> > > was touted everywhere. Women went back to their kitchens, dresses,

> > > and deferring roles.

> > > >

> > > > However, do you remember growing up how we the baby boomers were

> > > raised and what expectations were required? There were four themes

> > > going on. One to have a more relaxed permissive society, (this is

> > > where entitlement was bred – don't you just love Dr Spock) two, the

> > > sky's the limit, three, gratefulness was instilled instead of

apathy.

> > > And, four, mothers were quietly behind closed doors raising their

> > > daughters to be more of their own person and equal to men. The

> > > fifty's believed it. The sixty's teenagers rebelled against the

> > > fifties restrictions, the seventies; married Women were

screaming for

> > > their autonomy and the eighties saw young college degreed women

in the

> > > workplace. The nineties reaped the backlash and the 21-century so

> > > far in America is entitled happy and throwing all the common sense

> > > rules for civility out the window.

> > > >

> > > > So, when we look at out mothers and hear their stories it really

> > > was a different time of living and thinking and believing. I think

> > > the more adversity and sacrifice they encountered and the more

> > > deferment required, the more they built their own reservoirs for

> > > survival. There are some who were able to keep their capacity to

> > > nurture and empathize, but all too often like my mother their

> > > stoicness, severe expectation, and rule has kept them safe and

> > > protected. And like my mother and some others I know, they became

> > > very narcissistic.

> > > >

> > > > My mother could have been a better mother to my adopted sister,

> > > but in reality, my mother's thinking and feeling was and is one

where

> > > she provided this child with a better life and gave her

opportunities

> > > and education and a roof over her head that my sister has never been

> > > able to return in kindness to my mother. As far as having any

empathy

> > > for a broken soul theory – there is none. That and my mother's

> > > intolerance of my sister's chaotic inner soul is written off as

> > > complete belligerence and added to that, she is not connected to my

> > > mother in any depth because as my mother says, this child is not of

> > > her blood. Gad, what a mess and a terrible fall out for two lives

> > > with completely different experiences.

> > > >

> > > > I am looking forward to 2012. I think the current tide will

> > > change, as it ultimately will. In the meantime, we have to slop

> > > through another six years. I hope my mother isn't living then. She

> > > like my mother in law need to go their graves to find peace and

> > happiness.

> > > >

> > > > As Always,

> > > > Uttara

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > "Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate, our

> > > deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our

light,

> > > not our darkness, that most frightens us. There is nothing

enlightened

> > > about shrinking so that other people won't feel insecure around

> > > you...As we let our own light shine, we unconsciously give other

> > > people permission to do the same. As we are liberated from our own

> > > fear, our presence automatically liberates others." from A

Return To

> > > Love: by Marianne Williamson

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > ~ om tat sat ~

> > > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram.

> > > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna'

> > > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said

> > that the

> > > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals.

> > > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading

> > today

> > > Links

> > >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > ~ om tat sat ~

> > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram.

> > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna'

> > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said

> that the

> > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals.

> > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading

> today

> > Links

> >

>

~ om tat sat ~

> Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram.

> Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna'

> (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said

that the

> human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals.

> (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading

today

> Links

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

||Hare Rama Krsna||

Dear Kishore, Namaskar

The rishis explained this theory in all the puranas and also the Guru of

this parampara (sri achyuta dasa) has also talked about its relevance. It is

used for prediction and if you think the rishis are self-centric when trying

to predict the tides of humanity then i can't help you.

I'm not rejecting other theories, otherwise i wouldn't even bring up the

topic. Instead i wanto know which evolution theory could accept this to be

true, and understand the background. As far as i know there are two theories

which have their main difference in the understanding of the length of the

year of Gods, but i don't believe that this theory accomedates the change of

Brahma occuring any time soon.

If you can't answer then don't answer instead of getting personal.

Best wishes,

***

Visti Larsen

For services and articles visit:

http://srigaruda.com

***

 

 

[] On

Behalf Of kishore mohan

09 May 2006 11:36

 

Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message posted in

jyotish vidya

 

dear visti,

 

you are going into the same self centric theory of any scientist.

a scientist says his theories are the centre of all the known and

unknown and thinks every known phenomenon should be explained by his

theories and every unknown phenomenon should be predicted by them. an

egoistic scientist rejects any phenomenon that does not fall within

the stratum of his theories. this is not a good indication.

 

while it is good to try and explain everything- from anu(atom) to

mahan(the infinite)- with in your theories which will help you in your

spiritual and academic sojourn, it is utterly undesirable to reject

what you can not explain.

 

In any case, as I have said, what I have said is only a belief and

those who expound this belief have their own ways of explaining it. I

am one of the believers. I can not explain you more on this, as you

will not appreiciate my explanations unless you accept my assumptions.

 

Kishore patnaik

 

, "Visti Larsen" <visti wrote:

>

> ||Hare Rama Krsna||

> Dear Kishore, Namaskar

> I disagree. As Jyotishas we not only have to understand the

time/dasas of

> humans but the dasas of the entire creation, herein the yugas,

manvantaras,

> kalpas (blinking of brahmas eye) and the first Brahma himself who

will live

> for zillions of human years. By implication the opening and closing of

> brahmas eye causes the pralaya, so also his reinstatement would

imply the

> same as Brahma embodies the creation itself... we are living in

Brahma, so

> if he is replaced then so is our creation.

> Best wishes,

> ***

> Visti Larsen

> For services and articles visit:

> http://srigaruda.com

> ***

>

>

>

[] On

> Behalf Of kishore mohan

> 09 May 2006 10:51

>

> Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message posted in

> jyotish vidya

>

> Dear visti,

>

> namaskar.

>

> everybody has their own theories regarding that. As i said, it is only

> a popular belief and usually, you can not debate over a belief.

>

> regards,

>

> Kishore patnaik

>

> , "Visti Larsen" <visti@> wrote:

> >

> > ||Hare Rama Krsna||

> > Dear Kishore, Namaskar

> > If the Brahma has to change then the creation must also. Then in

> that case

> > we should have experienced pralaya over the last few years

> already... Can't

> > really accept that.

> > Best wishes,

> > ***

> > Visti Larsen

> > For services and articles visit:

> > http://srigaruda.com

> > ***

> >

> >

> >

> [] On

> > Behalf Of kishore mohan

> > 09 May 2006 08:44

> >

> > Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message

posted in

> > jyotish vidya

> >

> > Dear visti,

> >

> > Namaskar.

> >

> > Thanks for the combination.

> >

> > If you are saying about the Hanumanji taking over as the current

> > Brahma, I have no clue about it. It is only a polular belief. Please

> > elaborate on the question if I misunderstood.

> >

> > Kishore patnaik

> >

> > , "Visti Larsen" <visti@> wrote:

> > >

> > > ||Hare Rama Krsna||

> > > Dear Kishore, Namaskar

> > > Check for Jupiter or Moon associating with the third from arudha

> lagna.

> > > These give self-consciousness/willingness or emotional distress at

> > the time

> > > of death.

> > >

> > > What is YOUR condition for balarishta? Also you haven't elaborated

> > on your

> > > timing of the birth of certain souls from your last mail.

> > > Best wishes,

> > > ***

> > > Visti Larsen

> > > For services and articles visit:

> > > http://srigaruda.com

> > > ***

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > [] On

> > > Behalf Of kishore mohan

> > > 08 May 2006 19:22

> > >

> > > [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message posted in

> > jyotish

> > > vidya

> > >

> > > ear friend,

> > >

> > >

> > > I am yet to cast and read the charts provided by you. But let me

tell

> > > two general points with regard to the suicides:

> > >

> > >

> > > The first one is to do with the natal chart of the native.

Generally,

> > > the Lagna Lord will be a malefic for the native. This happens to

> > > tarus and the four 'corner' lagnas. Also, the Moon must be severely

> > > afflicted. If moon is severly afflicted, it can also indicate a

> > > possibility of Balarishta, though in Balarishta, the connection of

> > > Mars with certain Houses is compulsory. In other words, the Moons

> > > position will be alike in both Balarishta and suicide cases.

> > >

> > > The second point is to do with the transits. The Tr Lagna lord

should

> > > be cruelly aspecting himself in the natal chart. Sometimes, this

> > > position can be taken by AK but then, AK should be AK for the

transit

> > > chart also.

> > >

> > > Hope this helps,

> > >

> > > Kishore patnaik

> > >

> > >

> > > jyotish-vidya, Uttara <muttaraphalguni@>

wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear Patrice and All,

> > > >

> > > > I have an added commentary to my last post. It is a social

> > > science theory but I think adds to the astrological reasoning behind

> > > some charts we encounter. Especially our families.

> > > >

> > > > Like your mother who is a Gemini, My mother has a Gemini

Sun. I

> > > often say she talks out of both sides of her mouth. She is also

very

> > > autocratic and opinionated. She too grew up in an era where people

> > > just got on with things and didn't talk or dwell on them openly. I

> > > have often found this to be a direct reaction to the severity of the

> > > depression era of the 30's and then the atrocities of World War 11.

> > > Actually, Alcoholic Anonymous grew out of this depression era,

> > > teaching men how to cope better with events and things in their

lives

> > > that were bigger than them. That's where the 12-step program

came to

> > > say that one was "powerless over" and taught fraternity of likeness

> > > and support. It was a kind of new religion to help pull men

from the

> > > depths of despair.

> > > >

> > > > Unfortunately, your Grandfather never experienced this or his

> > > stoic Denmark ancestry lead him to be his own person.

> > > >

> > > > Then the war came and life changed. Young Men left home and

often

> > > didn't return. Or, men returned never to be the same again. Those

> > > that did survive the hell came back with a new outlook on life

and the

> > > majority got on with life. Never to develop fraternity again.

> > > >

> > > > Women during the war came out of the house and into the

factory to

> > > work – to help supply the goods needed for war. That is where women

> > > wearing pants developed and was allowed. Every thing was

rationed, so

> > > material for clothing was harder and sturdier – so pants came into

> > > being and were cheaper. Also in factory work, pants were need for

> > > safety and endurance rather than dresses. Pants became the

uniform of

> > > the War.

> > > >

> > > > Once the war ended there was a backlash on the concept of "being

> > > powerless". All of a sudden being in control of ones life became an

> > > obsession in self-help advice and personal stories of people

> > > overcoming adversity for peace and contentment. Personal prosperity

> > > was touted everywhere. Women went back to their kitchens, dresses,

> > > and deferring roles.

> > > >

> > > > However, do you remember growing up how we the baby boomers were

> > > raised and what expectations were required? There were four themes

> > > going on. One to have a more relaxed permissive society, (this is

> > > where entitlement was bred – don't you just love Dr Spock) two, the

> > > sky's the limit, three, gratefulness was instilled instead of

apathy.

> > > And, four, mothers were quietly behind closed doors raising their

> > > daughters to be more of their own person and equal to men. The

> > > fifty's believed it. The sixty's teenagers rebelled against the

> > > fifties restrictions, the seventies; married Women were

screaming for

> > > their autonomy and the eighties saw young college degreed women

in the

> > > workplace. The nineties reaped the backlash and the 21-century so

> > > far in America is entitled happy and throwing all the common sense

> > > rules for civility out the window.

> > > >

> > > > So, when we look at out mothers and hear their stories it really

> > > was a different time of living and thinking and believing. I think

> > > the more adversity and sacrifice they encountered and the more

> > > deferment required, the more they built their own reservoirs for

> > > survival. There are some who were able to keep their capacity to

> > > nurture and empathize, but all too often like my mother their

> > > stoicness, severe expectation, and rule has kept them safe and

> > > protected. And like my mother and some others I know, they became

> > > very narcissistic.

> > > >

> > > > My mother could have been a better mother to my adopted sister,

> > > but in reality, my mother's thinking and feeling was and is one

where

> > > she provided this child with a better life and gave her

opportunities

> > > and education and a roof over her head that my sister has never been

> > > able to return in kindness to my mother. As far as having any

empathy

> > > for a broken soul theory – there is none. That and my mother's

> > > intolerance of my sister's chaotic inner soul is written off as

> > > complete belligerence and added to that, she is not connected to my

> > > mother in any depth because as my mother says, this child is not of

> > > her blood. Gad, what a mess and a terrible fall out for two lives

> > > with completely different experiences.

> > > >

> > > > I am looking forward to 2012. I think the current tide will

> > > change, as it ultimately will. In the meantime, we have to slop

> > > through another six years. I hope my mother isn't living then. She

> > > like my mother in law need to go their graves to find peace and

> > happiness.

> > > >

> > > > As Always,

> > > > Uttara

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > "Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate, our

> > > deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our

light,

> > > not our darkness, that most frightens us. There is nothing

enlightened

> > > about shrinking so that other people won't feel insecure around

> > > you...As we let our own light shine, we unconsciously give other

> > > people permission to do the same. As we are liberated from our own

> > > fear, our presence automatically liberates others." from A

Return To

> > > Love: by Marianne Williamson

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > ~ om tat sat ~

> > > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram.

> > > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna'

> > > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said

> > that the

> > > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals.

> > > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading

> > today

> > > Links

> > >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > ~ om tat sat ~

> > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram.

> > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna'

> > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said

> that the

> > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals.

> > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading

> today

> > Links

> >

>

~ om tat sat ~

> Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram.

> Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna'

> (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said

that the

> human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals.

> (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading

today

> Links

>

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

~ om tat sat ~

Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram.

Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna'

(2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said that the

human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals.

(3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading today

Links

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear visti,

 

first and foremost, I think I have a right to get personal as you were

doing the same too sometime back. In any case, I do not criticise the

person but only what the person said or thought.

 

Secondly, the basis of all sciences is Vedas and we have got only a

'lesh' of vedas with us. so, we do not know all that what the rshis

knew. the puranas are not strict basis of science, as they are more

stories, though there is lots of science in them too and we have to

utilize this science as the original ' text books' of the science viz

the scientific parts of vedas are not given unto us. Otherwise, the

science and scientific theories given in puranas are incidental. they

are more of an attempt to recall all the stories, whether true or

symbolic, told in the ancient times and hence, the name puranas-the

ancient lore. of course, you should not mistake me that i am

rejecting puranas as a source of science, Noway, infact, I have groups

like Vedic history and Ancient India which attempt to look at Indian

History as told in the Vedas and puranas and other scriptures.

 

But, if you want to look at science only on the basis of puranas,

there is lots of vedic science which is not told in puranas and I hope

you realise that.

 

Btw, you are right that I dont want to tell the answer to your

question only because it depends a lot on the belief., which you may

share.

 

I hope you take in the most positive spirit as I have no intention of

hurting anyone, much less yourself.

 

Kishore patnaik

 

 

 

 

, "Visti Larsen" <visti wrote:

>

> ||Hare Rama Krsna||

> Dear Kishore, Namaskar

> The rishis explained this theory in all the puranas and also the Guru of

> this parampara (sri achyuta dasa) has also talked about its

relevance. It is

> used for prediction and if you think the rishis are self-centric

when trying

> to predict the tides of humanity then i can't help you.

> I'm not rejecting other theories, otherwise i wouldn't even bring up the

> topic. Instead i wanto know which evolution theory could accept this

to be

> true, and understand the background. As far as i know there are two

theories

> which have their main difference in the understanding of the length

of the

> year of Gods, but i don't believe that this theory accomedates the

change of

> Brahma occuring any time soon.

> If you can't answer then don't answer instead of getting personal.

> Best wishes,

> ***

> Visti Larsen

> For services and articles visit:

> http://srigaruda.com

> ***

>

>

>

[] On

> Behalf Of kishore mohan

> 09 May 2006 11:36

>

> Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message posted in

> jyotish vidya

>

> dear visti,

>

> you are going into the same self centric theory of any scientist.

> a scientist says his theories are the centre of all the known and

> unknown and thinks every known phenomenon should be explained by his

> theories and every unknown phenomenon should be predicted by them. an

> egoistic scientist rejects any phenomenon that does not fall within

> the stratum of his theories. this is not a good indication.

>

> while it is good to try and explain everything- from anu(atom) to

> mahan(the infinite)- with in your theories which will help you in your

> spiritual and academic sojourn, it is utterly undesirable to reject

> what you can not explain.

>

> In any case, as I have said, what I have said is only a belief and

> those who expound this belief have their own ways of explaining it. I

> am one of the believers. I can not explain you more on this, as you

> will not appreiciate my explanations unless you accept my assumptions.

>

> Kishore patnaik

>

> , "Visti Larsen" <visti@> wrote:

> >

> > ||Hare Rama Krsna||

> > Dear Kishore, Namaskar

> > I disagree. As Jyotishas we not only have to understand the

> time/dasas of

> > humans but the dasas of the entire creation, herein the yugas,

> manvantaras,

> > kalpas (blinking of brahmas eye) and the first Brahma himself who

> will live

> > for zillions of human years. By implication the opening and closing of

> > brahmas eye causes the pralaya, so also his reinstatement would

> imply the

> > same as Brahma embodies the creation itself... we are living in

> Brahma, so

> > if he is replaced then so is our creation.

> > Best wishes,

> > ***

> > Visti Larsen

> > For services and articles visit:

> > http://srigaruda.com

> > ***

> >

> >

> >

> [] On

> > Behalf Of kishore mohan

> > 09 May 2006 10:51

> >

> > Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message

posted in

> > jyotish vidya

> >

> > Dear visti,

> >

> > namaskar.

> >

> > everybody has their own theories regarding that. As i said, it is only

> > a popular belief and usually, you can not debate over a belief.

> >

> > regards,

> >

> > Kishore patnaik

> >

> > , "Visti Larsen" <visti@> wrote:

> > >

> > > ||Hare Rama Krsna||

> > > Dear Kishore, Namaskar

> > > If the Brahma has to change then the creation must also. Then in

> > that case

> > > we should have experienced pralaya over the last few years

> > already... Can't

> > > really accept that.

> > > Best wishes,

> > > ***

> > > Visti Larsen

> > > For services and articles visit:

> > > http://srigaruda.com

> > > ***

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > [] On

> > > Behalf Of kishore mohan

> > > 09 May 2006 08:44

> > >

> > > Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message

> posted in

> > > jyotish vidya

> > >

> > > Dear visti,

> > >

> > > Namaskar.

> > >

> > > Thanks for the combination.

> > >

> > > If you are saying about the Hanumanji taking over as the current

> > > Brahma, I have no clue about it. It is only a polular belief. Please

> > > elaborate on the question if I misunderstood.

> > >

> > > Kishore patnaik

> > >

> > > , "Visti Larsen" <visti@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > ||Hare Rama Krsna||

> > > > Dear Kishore, Namaskar

> > > > Check for Jupiter or Moon associating with the third from arudha

> > lagna.

> > > > These give self-consciousness/willingness or emotional distress at

> > > the time

> > > > of death.

> > > >

> > > > What is YOUR condition for balarishta? Also you haven't elaborated

> > > on your

> > > > timing of the birth of certain souls from your last mail.

> > > > Best wishes,

> > > > ***

> > > > Visti Larsen

> > > > For services and articles visit:

> > > > http://srigaruda.com

> > > > ***

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > [] On

> > > > Behalf Of kishore mohan

> > > > 08 May 2006 19:22

> > > >

> > > > [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message

posted in

> > > jyotish

> > > > vidya

> > > >

> > > > ear friend,

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > I am yet to cast and read the charts provided by you. But let me

> tell

> > > > two general points with regard to the suicides:

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > The first one is to do with the natal chart of the native.

> Generally,

> > > > the Lagna Lord will be a malefic for the native. This happens to

> > > > tarus and the four 'corner' lagnas. Also, the Moon must be

severely

> > > > afflicted. If moon is severly afflicted, it can also indicate a

> > > > possibility of Balarishta, though in Balarishta, the connection of

> > > > Mars with certain Houses is compulsory. In other words, the Moons

> > > > position will be alike in both Balarishta and suicide cases.

> > > >

> > > > The second point is to do with the transits. The Tr Lagna lord

> should

> > > > be cruelly aspecting himself in the natal chart. Sometimes, this

> > > > position can be taken by AK but then, AK should be AK for the

> transit

> > > > chart also.

> > > >

> > > > Hope this helps,

> > > >

> > > > Kishore patnaik

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > jyotish-vidya, Uttara <muttaraphalguni@>

> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear Patrice and All,

> > > > >

> > > > > I have an added commentary to my last post. It is a social

> > > > science theory but I think adds to the astrological reasoning

behind

> > > > some charts we encounter. Especially our families.

> > > > >

> > > > > Like your mother who is a Gemini, My mother has a Gemini

> Sun. I

> > > > often say she talks out of both sides of her mouth. She is also

> very

> > > > autocratic and opinionated. She too grew up in an era where

people

> > > > just got on with things and didn't talk or dwell on them

openly. I

> > > > have often found this to be a direct reaction to the severity

of the

> > > > depression era of the 30's and then the atrocities of World

War 11.

> > > > Actually, Alcoholic Anonymous grew out of this depression era,

> > > > teaching men how to cope better with events and things in their

> lives

> > > > that were bigger than them. That's where the 12-step program

> came to

> > > > say that one was "powerless over" and taught fraternity of

likeness

> > > > and support. It was a kind of new religion to help pull men

> from the

> > > > depths of despair.

> > > > >

> > > > > Unfortunately, your Grandfather never experienced this or his

> > > > stoic Denmark ancestry lead him to be his own person.

> > > > >

> > > > > Then the war came and life changed. Young Men left home and

> often

> > > > didn't return. Or, men returned never to be the same again. Those

> > > > that did survive the hell came back with a new outlook on life

> and the

> > > > majority got on with life. Never to develop fraternity again.

> > > > >

> > > > > Women during the war came out of the house and into the

> factory to

> > > > work – to help supply the goods needed for war. That is where

women

> > > > wearing pants developed and was allowed. Every thing was

> rationed, so

> > > > material for clothing was harder and sturdier – so pants came into

> > > > being and were cheaper. Also in factory work, pants were need for

> > > > safety and endurance rather than dresses. Pants became the

> uniform of

> > > > the War.

> > > > >

> > > > > Once the war ended there was a backlash on the concept of

"being

> > > > powerless". All of a sudden being in control of ones life

became an

> > > > obsession in self-help advice and personal stories of people

> > > > overcoming adversity for peace and contentment. Personal

prosperity

> > > > was touted everywhere. Women went back to their kitchens,

dresses,

> > > > and deferring roles.

> > > > >

> > > > > However, do you remember growing up how we the baby

boomers were

> > > > raised and what expectations were required? There were four

themes

> > > > going on. One to have a more relaxed permissive society, (this is

> > > > where entitlement was bred – don't you just love Dr Spock)

two, the

> > > > sky's the limit, three, gratefulness was instilled instead of

> apathy.

> > > > And, four, mothers were quietly behind closed doors raising

their

> > > > daughters to be more of their own person and equal to men. The

> > > > fifty's believed it. The sixty's teenagers rebelled against the

> > > > fifties restrictions, the seventies; married Women were

> screaming for

> > > > their autonomy and the eighties saw young college degreed women

> in the

> > > > workplace. The nineties reaped the backlash and the

21-century so

> > > > far in America is entitled happy and throwing all the common sense

> > > > rules for civility out the window.

> > > > >

> > > > > So, when we look at out mothers and hear their stories it

really

> > > > was a different time of living and thinking and believing. I

think

> > > > the more adversity and sacrifice they encountered and the more

> > > > deferment required, the more they built their own reservoirs for

> > > > survival. There are some who were able to keep their capacity to

> > > > nurture and empathize, but all too often like my mother their

> > > > stoicness, severe expectation, and rule has kept them safe and

> > > > protected. And like my mother and some others I know, they became

> > > > very narcissistic.

> > > > >

> > > > > My mother could have been a better mother to my adopted

sister,

> > > > but in reality, my mother's thinking and feeling was and is one

> where

> > > > she provided this child with a better life and gave her

> opportunities

> > > > and education and a roof over her head that my sister has

never been

> > > > able to return in kindness to my mother. As far as having any

> empathy

> > > > for a broken soul theory – there is none. That and my mother's

> > > > intolerance of my sister's chaotic inner soul is written off as

> > > > complete belligerence and added to that, she is not connected

to my

> > > > mother in any depth because as my mother says, this child is

not of

> > > > her blood. Gad, what a mess and a terrible fall out for two lives

> > > > with completely different experiences.

> > > > >

> > > > > I am looking forward to 2012. I think the current tide will

> > > > change, as it ultimately will. In the meantime, we have to slop

> > > > through another six years. I hope my mother isn't living

then. She

> > > > like my mother in law need to go their graves to find peace and

> > > happiness.

> > > > >

> > > > > As Always,

> > > > > Uttara

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > "Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate, our

> > > > deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our

> light,

> > > > not our darkness, that most frightens us. There is nothing

> enlightened

> > > > about shrinking so that other people won't feel insecure around

> > > > you...As we let our own light shine, we unconsciously give other

> > > > people permission to do the same. As we are liberated from

our own

> > > > fear, our presence automatically liberates others." from A

> Return To

> > > > Love: by Marianne Williamson

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > ~ om tat sat ~

> > > > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram.

> > > > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna'

> > > > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said

> > > that the

> > > > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals.

> > > > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart

reading

> > > today

> > > > Links

> > > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > ~ om tat sat ~

> > > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram.

> > > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna'

> > > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said

> > that the

> > > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals.

> > > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading

> > today

> > > Links

> > >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > ~ om tat sat ~

> > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram.

> > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna'

> > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said

> that the

> > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals.

> > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading

> today

> > Links

> >

>

~ om tat sat ~

> Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram.

> Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna'

> (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said

that the

> human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals.

> (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading

today

> Links

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

||Hare Rama Krsna||

Dear Kishore, Namaskar

Leaving personal issues aside, i must make something

clear.

You said:

the puranas are not strict basis of

science, as they are more

stories, though there is lots of

science in them too and we have to

utilize this science as the original

' text books' of the science viz

the scientific parts of vedas are

not given unto us.

 

If they are the original text books as you say then they

are a STRICT BASIS OF SCIENCE. The Narada purana is the basis of ALOT of

astrology as is the Agni Purana. Your

statement is negating your second statement:

 

Otherwise, the science and

scientific theories given in puranas are incidental. they

are more of an attempt to recall all

the stories, whether true or

symbolic, told in the ancient times

and hence, the name puranas-the

ancient lore.

 

So if i read the Narada Purana that gives the exact

ammount of days in a Chaturyuga as 1.577.917.828 civil (savana) days, and

proceeds to give the methods of defining the solar and lunar months and days

with calculations, then what exactly is incidental? When Agni Purana gives astrological

timing methods to decide when a person will die, then what stories are being

told? If you haven’t read them then you cannot be blamed, but then we all

can learn more everyday can’t we?

 

You said:

But, if you want to look at science

only on the basis of puranas,

there is lots of vedic science which

is not told in puranas and I hope

you realise that.

 

Now WHO would restrict themself to reading only books

written by Shakespeare or by David Frawley when you have such large compendiums

of knowledge elsewhere. Comeon Kishore, where are you going with this

statement? The members of these lists are always dwelving deep into Parasara’s

Hora Shastra, Puranas, Gita, Vedas, Upanishads, etc. Infact based on your previous

question regarding Vimshottari Dasa calculation i almost thought you had never

opened an astrology book! I know this can only be a wrong thought, but you do

suprise me sometimes and i felt i had to point that out to you... afterall we

must be serious in this study of Jyotish if we are to offer our assistance to

those who need it.

Best wishes and blessings,

***

Visti Larsen

For services and articles visit:

http://srigaruda.com

***

 

 

[] On

Behalf Of kishore mohan

09 May 2006 12:01

 

Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message posted in

jyotish vidya

 

Dear visti,

 

first and foremost, I think I have a right to get

personal as you were

doing the same too sometime back. In any case, I do

not criticise the

person but only what the person said or thought.

 

Secondly, the basis of all sciences is Vedas and we

have got only a

'lesh' of vedas with us. so, we do not know all

that what the rshis

knew. the puranas are not strict basis of science, as

they are more

stories, though there is lots of science in them too

and we have to

utilize this science as the original ' text books' of

the science viz

the scientific parts of vedas are not given unto us.

Otherwise, the

science and scientific theories given in puranas are

incidental. they

are more of an attempt to recall all the stories,

whether true or

symbolic, told in the ancient times and hence, the

name puranas-the

ancient lore. of course, you should not mistake

me that i am

rejecting puranas as a source of science, Noway,

infact, I have groups

like Vedic history and Ancient India which

attempt to look at Indian

History as told in the Vedas and puranas and other

scriptures.

 

But, if you want to look at science only on the basis

of puranas,

there is lots of vedic science which is not told in

puranas and I hope

you realise that.

 

Btw, you are right that I dont want to tell the answer

to your

question only because it depends a lot on the belief.,

which you may

share.

 

I hope you take in the most positive spirit as I have

no intention of

hurting anyone, much less yourself.

 

Kishore patnaik

 

 

 

 

, "Visti

Larsen" <visti wrote:

>

> ||Hare Rama Krsna||

> Dear Kishore, Namaskar

> The rishis explained this theory in all the

puranas and also the Guru of

> this parampara (sri achyuta dasa) has also talked

about its

relevance. It is

> used for prediction and if you think the rishis

are self-centric

when trying

> to predict the tides of humanity then i can't

help you.

> I'm not rejecting other theories, otherwise i

wouldn't even bring up the

> topic. Instead i wanto know which evolution

theory could accept this

to be

> true, and understand the background. As far as i

know there are two

theories

> which have their main difference in the

understanding of the length

of the

> year of Gods, but i don't believe that this

theory accomedates the

change of

> Brahma occuring any time soon.

> If you can't answer then don't answer instead of

getting personal.

> Best wishes,

> ***

> Visti Larsen

> For services and articles visit:

> http://srigaruda.com

> ***

>

>

>

[] On

> Behalf Of kishore mohan

> 09 May 2006 11:36

>

> Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for

suicide - a message posted in

> jyotish vidya

>

> dear visti,

>

> you are going into the same self centric theory

of any scientist.

> a scientist says his theories are the centre of

all the known and

> unknown and thinks every known phenomenon should

be explained by his

> theories and every unknown phenomenon should be

predicted by them. an

> egoistic scientist rejects any phenomenon that

does not fall within

> the stratum of his theories. this is not a good

indication.

>

> while it is good to try and explain everything-

from anu(atom) to

> mahan(the infinite)- with in your theories which

will help you in your

> spiritual and academic sojourn, it is utterly

undesirable to reject

> what you can not explain.

>

> In any case, as I have said, what I have said is

only a belief and

> those who expound this belief have their own ways

of explaining it. I

> am one of the believers. I can not explain you

more on this, as you

> will not appreiciate my explanations unless you

accept my assumptions.

>

> Kishore patnaik

>

> , "Visti

Larsen" <visti@> wrote:

> >

> > ||Hare Rama Krsna||

> > Dear Kishore, Namaskar

> > I disagree. As Jyotishas we not only have to

understand the

> time/dasas of

> > humans but the dasas of the entire creation,

herein the yugas,

> manvantaras,

> > kalpas (blinking of brahmas eye) and the

first Brahma himself who

> will live

> > for zillions of human years. By implication

the opening and closing of

> > brahmas eye causes the pralaya, so also his

reinstatement would

> imply the

> > same as Brahma embodies the creation

itself... we are living in

> Brahma, so

> > if he is replaced then so is our creation.

> > Best wishes,

> > ***

> > Visti Larsen

> > For services and articles visit:

> > http://srigaruda.com

> > ***

> >

> >

> >

> [] On

> > Behalf Of kishore mohan

> > 09 May 2006 10:51

> >

> > Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for

suicide - a message

posted in

> > jyotish vidya

> >

> > Dear visti,

> >

> > namaskar.

> >

> > everybody has their own theories regarding

that. As i said, it is only

> > a popular belief and usually, you can not

debate over a belief.

> >

> > regards,

> >

> > Kishore patnaik

> >

> > ,

"Visti Larsen" <visti@> wrote:

> > >

> > > ||Hare Rama Krsna||

> > > Dear Kishore, Namaskar

> > > If the Brahma has to change then the

creation must also. Then in

> > that case

> > > we should have experienced pralaya over

the last few years

> > already... Can't

> > > really accept that.

> > > Best wishes,

> > > ***

> > > Visti Larsen

> > > For services and articles visit:

> > > http://srigaruda.com

> > > ***

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > [] On

> > > Behalf Of kishore mohan

> > > 09 May 2006 08:44

> > >

> > > Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors

for suicide - a message

> posted in

> > > jyotish vidya

> > >

> > > Dear visti,

> > >

> > > Namaskar.

> > >

> > > Thanks for the combination.

> > >

> > > If you are saying about the Hanumanji

taking over as the current

> > > Brahma, I have no clue about it. It is

only a polular belief. Please

> > > elaborate on the question if I

misunderstood.

> > >

> > > Kishore patnaik

> > >

> > > ,

"Visti Larsen" <visti@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > ||Hare Rama Krsna||

> > > > Dear Kishore, Namaskar

> > > > Check for Jupiter or Moon

associating with the third from arudha

> > lagna.

> > > > These give

self-consciousness/willingness or emotional distress at

> > > the time

> > > > of death.

> > > >

> > > > What is YOUR condition for

balarishta? Also you haven't elaborated

> > > on your

> > > > timing of the birth of certain

souls from your last mail.

> > > > Best wishes,

> > > > ***

> > > > Visti Larsen

> > > > For services and articles visit:

> > > > http://srigaruda.com

> > > > ***

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > []

On

> > > > Behalf Of kishore mohan

> > > > 08 May 2006 19:22

> > > >

> > > > [Om Krishna Guru] Factors

for suicide - a message

posted in

> > > jyotish

> > > > vidya

> > > >

> > > > ear friend,

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > I am yet to cast and read the

charts provided by you. But let me

> tell

> > > > two general points with

regard to the suicides:

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > The first one is to do with the

natal chart of the native.

> Generally,

> > > > the Lagna Lord will be

a malefic for the native. This happens to

> > > > tarus and the four 'corner'

lagnas. Also, the Moon must be

severely

> > > > afflicted. If moon is

severly afflicted, it can also indicate a

> > > > possibility of Balarishta, though

in Balarishta, the connection of

> > > > Mars with certain Houses is

compulsory. In other words, the Moons

> > > > position will be alike in both

Balarishta and suicide cases.

> > > >

> > > > The second point is to do with the

transits. The Tr Lagna lord

> should

> > > > be cruelly aspecting himself in

the natal chart. Sometimes, this

> > > > position can be taken by AK but

then, AK should be AK for the

> transit

> > > > chart also.

> > > >

> > > > Hope this helps,

> > > >

> > > > Kishore patnaik

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > --- In

jyotish-vidya, Uttara <muttaraphalguni@>

> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear Patrice and All,

> > > > >

> > > > > I have an added

commentary to my last post. It is a social

> > > > science theory but I think adds to

the astrological reasoning

behind

> > > > some charts we encounter.

Especially our families.

> > > > >

> > > > > Like your mother

who is a Gemini, My mother has a Gemini

> Sun. I

> > > > often say she talks out of both

sides of her mouth. She is also

> very

> > > > autocratic and opinionated.

She too grew up in an era where

people

> > > > just got on with things and didn't

talk or dwell on them

openly. I

> > > > have often found this to be a

direct reaction to the severity

of the

> > > > depression era of the 30's and

then the atrocities of World

War 11.

> > > > Actually, Alcoholic Anonymous grew

out of this depression era,

> > > > teaching men how to cope better

with events and things in their

> lives

> > > > that were bigger than them.

That's where the 12-step program

> came to

> > > > say that one was "powerless

over" and taught fraternity of

likeness

> > > > and support. It was a kind

of new religion to help pull men

> from the

> > > > depths of despair.

> > > > >

> > > > > Unfortunately,

your Grandfather never experienced this or his

> > > > stoic Denmark ancestry lead him to be his

own person.

> > > > >

> > > > > Then the war came

and life changed. Young Men left home and

> often

> > > > didn't return. Or, men returned never

to be the same again. Those

> > > > that did survive the hell came

back with a new outlook on life

> and the

> > > > majority got on with life.

Never to develop fraternity again.

> > > > >

> > > > > Women during the

war came out of the house and into the

> factory to

> > > > work – to help supply the

goods needed for war. That is where

women

> > > > wearing pants developed and was

allowed. Every thing was

> rationed, so

> > > > material for clothing was harder

and sturdier – so pants came into

> > > > being and were cheaper. Also

in factory work, pants were need for

> > > > safety and endurance rather than

dresses. Pants became the

> uniform of

> > > > the War.

> > > > >

> > > > > Once the war

ended there was a backlash on the concept of

"being

> > > > powerless". All of a sudden

being in control of ones life

became an

> > > > obsession in self-help advice and

personal stories of people

> > > > overcoming adversity for peace and

contentment. Personal

prosperity

> > > > was touted everywhere. Women

went back to their kitchens,

dresses,

> > > > and deferring roles.

> > > > >

> > > > > However, do you

remember growing up how we the baby

boomers were

> > > > raised and what expectations were

required? There were four

themes

> > > > going on. One to have a more

relaxed permissive society, (this is

> > > > where entitlement was bred –

don't you just love Dr Spock)

two, the

> > > > sky's the limit, three,

gratefulness was instilled instead of

> apathy.

> > > > And, four, mothers

were quietly behind closed doors raising

their

> > > > daughters to be more of their own

person and equal to men. The

> > > > fifty's believed it. The

sixty's teenagers rebelled against the

> > > > fifties restrictions, the

seventies; married Women were

> screaming for

> > > > their autonomy and the eighties

saw young college degreed women

> in the

> > > > workplace. The

nineties reaped the backlash and the

21-century so

> > > > far in America is entitled happy and

throwing all the common sense

> > > > rules for civility out the window.

> > > > >

> > > > > So, when we look

at out mothers and hear their stories it

really

> > > > was a different time of living and

thinking and believing. I

think

> > > > the more adversity and sacrifice

they encountered and the more

> > > > deferment required, the more they

built their own reservoirs for

> > > > survival. There are some who

were able to keep their capacity to

> > > > nurture and empathize, but all too

often like my mother their

> > > > stoicness, severe expectation, and

rule has kept them safe and

> > > > protected. And like my

mother and some others I know, they became

> > > > very narcissistic.

> > > > >

> > > > > My mother

could have been a better mother to my adopted

sister,

> > > > but in reality, my mother's

thinking and feeling was and is one

> where

> > > > she provided this child with a

better life and gave her

> opportunities

> > > > and education and a roof over her

head that my sister has

never been

> > > > able to return in kindness to my

mother. As far as having any

> empathy

> > > > for a broken soul theory –

there is none. That and my mother's

> > > > intolerance of my sister's chaotic

inner soul is written off as

> > > > complete belligerence and added to

that, she is not connected

to my

> > > > mother in any depth because as my

mother says, this child is

not of

> > > > her blood. Gad, what a mess

and a terrible fall out for two lives

> > > > with completely different

experiences.

> > > > >

> > > > > I am looking

forward to 2012. I think the current tide will

> > > > change, as it ultimately

will. In the meantime, we have to slop

> > > > through another six years. I

hope my mother isn't living

then. She

> > > > like my mother in law need to go

their graves to find peace and

> > > happiness.

> > > > >

> > > > > As Always,

> > > > > Uttara

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

>

"Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate, our

> > > > deepest fear is that we are

powerful beyond measure. It is our

> light,

> > > > not our darkness, that most

frightens us. There is nothing

> enlightened

> > > > about shrinking so that other

people won't feel insecure around

> > > > you...As we let our own light

shine, we unconsciously give other

> > > > people permission to do the

same. As we are liberated from

our own

> > > > fear, our presence automatically

liberates others." from A

> Return To

> > > > Love: by Marianne Williamson

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > ~ om tat sat ~

> > > > Thank you for maintaining the

decorum of the Achyuta Ashram.

> > > > Reminders: (1) Recite the

Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna'

> > > > (2) Try to become Vegetarian -

remember Akbar the Great who said

> > > that the

> > > > human stomach should not become a

graveyard for animals.

> > > > (3) Practise charity in thought

and deed - do one free chart

reading

> > > today

> > > > Links

> > > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > ~ om tat sat ~

> > > Thank you for maintaining the decorum

of the Achyuta Ashram.

> > > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari

Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna'

> > > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember

Akbar the Great who said

> > that the

> > > human stomach should not become a

graveyard for animals.

> > > (3) Practise charity in thought and

deed - do one free chart reading

> > today

> > > Links

> > >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > ~ om tat sat ~

> > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the

Achyuta Ashram.

> > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra

'Hare Rama Krishna'

> > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember

Akbar the Great who said

> that the

> > human stomach should not become a graveyard

for animals.

> > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed -

do one free chart reading

> today

> > Links

> >

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> ~ om tat sat ~

> Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the

Achyuta Ashram.

> Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra

'Hare Rama Krishna'

> (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the

Great who said

that the

> human stomach should not become a graveyard for

animals.

> (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one

free chart reading

today

> Links

>

 

 

 

 

 

 

------------------------ Sponsor

--------------------~-->

You can search right from your browser? It's easy and

it's free. See how.

http://us.click./_7bhrC/NGxNAA/yQLSAA/C9XolB/TM

--~->

 

~ om tat sat ~

Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta

Ashram.

Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare

Rama Krishna'

(2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the

Great who said that the human stomach should not become a graveyard for

animals.

(3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free

chart reading today

<*>

/

 

<*> To from this group, send an

email to:

 

 

<*> Your

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

dear visti,

 

I let your smirks pass. when you can not read a simple message from a

person like me, then why talk of puranas and vedas? I want you to read

my message once more and comment.

 

 

 

 

Kishore patnaik

, "Visti Larsen" <visti wrote:

>

> ||Hare Rama Krsna||

>

> Dear Kishore, Namaskar

>

> Leaving personal issues aside, i must make something clear.

>

> You said:

>

> the puranas are not strict basis of science, as they are more

>

> stories, though there is lots of science in them too and we have to

>

> utilize this science as the original ' text books' of the science viz

>

> the scientific parts of vedas are not given unto us.

>

>

>

> If they are the original text books as you say then they are a

STRICT BASIS

> OF SCIENCE. The Narada purana is the basis of ALOT of astrology as

is the

> Agni Purana. Your statement is negating your second statement:

>

>

>

> Otherwise, the science and scientific theories given in puranas are

> incidental. they

>

> are more of an attempt to recall all the stories, whether true or

>

> symbolic, told in the ancient times and hence, the name puranas-the

>

> ancient lore.

>

>

>

> So if i read the Narada Purana that gives the exact ammount of days in a

> Chaturyuga as 1.577.917.828 civil (savana) days, and proceeds to

give the

> methods of defining the solar and lunar months and days with

calculations,

> then what exactly is incidental? When Agni Purana gives astrological

timing

> methods to decide when a person will die, then what stories are

being told?

> If you haven't read them then you cannot be blamed, but then we all can

> learn more everyday can't we?

>

>

>

> You said:

>

> But, if you want to look at science only on the basis of puranas,

>

> there is lots of vedic science which is not told in puranas and I hope

>

> you realise that.

>

>

>

> Now WHO would restrict themself to reading only books written by

Shakespeare

> or by David Frawley when you have such large compendiums of knowledge

> elsewhere. Comeon Kishore, where are you going with this statement? The

> members of these lists are always dwelving deep into Parasara's Hora

> Shastra, Puranas, Gita, Vedas, Upanishads, etc. Infact based on your

> previous question regarding Vimshottari Dasa calculation i almost

thought

> you had never opened an astrology book! I know this can only be a wrong

> thought, but you do suprise me sometimes and i felt i had to point

that out

> to you... afterall we must be serious in this study of Jyotish if we

are to

> offer our assistance to those who need it.

>

> Best wishes and blessings,

>

> ***

>

> Visti Larsen

>

> For services and articles visit:

>

> http://srigaruda.com

>

> ***

>

>

>

>

>

[] On

> Behalf Of kishore mohan

> 09 May 2006 12:01

>

> Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message posted in

> jyotish vidya

>

>

>

> Dear visti,

>

>

>

> first and foremost, I think I have a right to get personal as you were

>

> doing the same too sometime back. In any case, I do not criticise the

>

> person but only what the person said or thought.

>

>

>

> Secondly, the basis of all sciences is Vedas and we have got only a

>

> 'lesh' of vedas with us. so, we do not know all that what the rshis

>

> knew. the puranas are not strict basis of science, as they are more

>

> stories, though there is lots of science in them too and we have to

>

> utilize this science as the original ' text books' of the science viz

>

> the scientific parts of vedas are not given unto us. Otherwise, the

>

> science and scientific theories given in puranas are incidental. they

>

> are more of an attempt to recall all the stories, whether true or

>

> symbolic, told in the ancient times and hence, the name puranas-the

>

> ancient lore. of course, you should not mistake me that i am

>

> rejecting puranas as a source of science, Noway, infact, I have groups

>

> like Vedic history and Ancient India which attempt to look at Indian

>

> History as told in the Vedas and puranas and other scriptures.

>

>

>

> But, if you want to look at science only on the basis of puranas,

>

> there is lots of vedic science which is not told in puranas and I hope

>

> you realise that.

>

>

>

> Btw, you are right that I dont want to tell the answer to your

>

> question only because it depends a lot on the belief., which you may

>

> share.

>

>

>

> I hope you take in the most positive spirit as I have no intention of

>

> hurting anyone, much less yourself.

>

>

>

> Kishore patnaik

>

>

>

, "Visti Larsen" <visti@> wrote:

>

> >

>

> > ||Hare Rama Krsna||

>

> > Dear Kishore, Namaskar

>

> > The rishis explained this theory in all the puranas and also the

Guru of

>

> > this parampara (sri achyuta dasa) has also talked about its

>

> relevance. It is

>

> > used for prediction and if you think the rishis are self-centric

>

> when trying

>

> > to predict the tides of humanity then i can't help you.

>

> > I'm not rejecting other theories, otherwise i wouldn't even bring

up the

>

> > topic. Instead i wanto know which evolution theory could accept this

>

> to be

>

> > true, and understand the background. As far as i know there are two

>

> theories

>

> > which have their main difference in the understanding of the length

>

> of the

>

> > year of Gods, but i don't believe that this theory accomedates the

>

> change of

>

> > Brahma occuring any time soon.

>

> > If you can't answer then don't answer instead of getting personal.

>

> > Best wishes,

>

> > ***

>

> > Visti Larsen

>

> > For services and articles visit:

>

> > http://srigaruda.com

>

> > ***

>

> >

>

> >

>

> >

>

> [] On

>

> > Behalf Of kishore mohan

>

> > 09 May 2006 11:36

>

> >

>

> > Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message

posted in

>

> > jyotish vidya

>

> >

>

> > dear visti,

>

> >

>

> > you are going into the same self centric theory of any scientist.

>

> > a scientist says his theories are the centre of all the known and

>

> > unknown and thinks every known phenomenon should be explained by his

>

> > theories and every unknown phenomenon should be predicted by them. an

>

> > egoistic scientist rejects any phenomenon that does not fall within

>

> > the stratum of his theories. this is not a good indication.

>

> >

>

> > while it is good to try and explain everything- from anu(atom) to

>

> > mahan(the infinite)- with in your theories which will help you in your

>

> > spiritual and academic sojourn, it is utterly undesirable to reject

>

> > what you can not explain.

>

> >

>

> > In any case, as I have said, what I have said is only a belief and

>

> > those who expound this belief have their own ways of explaining it. I

>

> > am one of the believers. I can not explain you more on this, as you

>

> > will not appreiciate my explanations unless you accept my

assumptions.

>

> >

>

> > Kishore patnaik

>

> >

>

> > , "Visti Larsen" <visti@> wrote:

>

> > >

>

> > > ||Hare Rama Krsna||

>

> > > Dear Kishore, Namaskar

>

> > > I disagree. As Jyotishas we not only have to understand the

>

> > time/dasas of

>

> > > humans but the dasas of the entire creation, herein the yugas,

>

> > manvantaras,

>

> > > kalpas (blinking of brahmas eye) and the first Brahma himself who

>

> > will live

>

> > > for zillions of human years. By implication the opening and

closing of

>

> > > brahmas eye causes the pralaya, so also his reinstatement would

>

> > imply the

>

> > > same as Brahma embodies the creation itself... we are living in

>

> > Brahma, so

>

> > > if he is replaced then so is our creation.

>

> > > Best wishes,

>

> > > ***

>

> > > Visti Larsen

>

> > > For services and articles visit:

>

> > > http://srigaruda.com

>

> > > ***

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > [] On

>

> > > Behalf Of kishore mohan

>

> > > 09 May 2006 10:51

>

> > >

>

> > > Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message

>

> posted in

>

> > > jyotish vidya

>

> > >

>

> > > Dear visti,

>

> > >

>

> > > namaskar.

>

> > >

>

> > > everybody has their own theories regarding that. As i said, it

is only

>

> > > a popular belief and usually, you can not debate over a belief.

>

> > >

>

> > > regards,

>

> > >

>

> > > Kishore patnaik

>

> > >

>

> > > , "Visti Larsen" <visti@> wrote:

>

> > > >

>

> > > > ||Hare Rama Krsna||

>

> > > > Dear Kishore, Namaskar

>

> > > > If the Brahma has to change then the creation must also. Then in

>

> > > that case

>

> > > > we should have experienced pralaya over the last few years

>

> > > already... Can't

>

> > > > really accept that.

>

> > > > Best wishes,

>

> > > > ***

>

> > > > Visti Larsen

>

> > > > For services and articles visit:

>

> > > > http://srigaruda.com

>

> > > > ***

>

> > > >

>

> > > >

>

> > > >

>

> > > [] On

>

> > > > Behalf Of kishore mohan

>

> > > > 09 May 2006 08:44

>

> > > >

>

> > > > Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message

>

> > posted in

>

> > > > jyotish vidya

>

> > > >

>

> > > > Dear visti,

>

> > > >

>

> > > > Namaskar.

>

> > > >

>

> > > > Thanks for the combination.

>

> > > >

>

> > > > If you are saying about the Hanumanji taking over as the current

>

> > > > Brahma, I have no clue about it. It is only a polular belief.

Please

>

> > > > elaborate on the question if I misunderstood.

>

> > > >

>

> > > > Kishore patnaik

>

> > > >

>

> > > > , "Visti Larsen" <visti@>

wrote:

>

> > > > >

>

> > > > > ||Hare Rama Krsna||

>

> > > > > Dear Kishore, Namaskar

>

> > > > > Check for Jupiter or Moon associating with the third from arudha

>

> > > lagna.

>

> > > > > These give self-consciousness/willingness or emotional

distress at

>

> > > > the time

>

> > > > > of death.

>

> > > > >

>

> > > > > What is YOUR condition for balarishta? Also you haven't

elaborated

>

> > > > on your

>

> > > > > timing of the birth of certain souls from your last mail.

>

> > > > > Best wishes,

>

> > > > > ***

>

> > > > > Visti Larsen

>

> > > > > For services and articles visit:

>

> > > > > http://srigaruda.com

>

> > > > > ***

>

> > > > >

>

> > > > >

>

> > > > >

>

> > > > [] On

>

> > > > > Behalf Of kishore mohan

>

> > > > > 08 May 2006 19:22

>

> > > > >

>

> > > > > [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message

>

> posted in

>

> > > > jyotish

>

> > > > > vidya

>

> > > > >

>

> > > > > ear friend,

>

> > > > >

>

> > > > >

>

> > > > > I am yet to cast and read the charts provided by you. But let me

>

> > tell

>

> > > > > two general points with regard to the suicides:

>

> > > > >

>

> > > > >

>

> > > > > The first one is to do with the natal chart of the native.

>

> > Generally,

>

> > > > > the Lagna Lord will be a malefic for the native. This

happens to

>

> > > > > tarus and the four 'corner' lagnas. Also, the Moon must be

>

> severely

>

> > > > > afflicted. If moon is severly afflicted, it can also indicate a

>

> > > > > possibility of Balarishta, though in Balarishta, the

connection of

>

> > > > > Mars with certain Houses is compulsory. In other words, the

Moons

>

> > > > > position will be alike in both Balarishta and suicide cases.

>

> > > > >

>

> > > > > The second point is to do with the transits. The Tr Lagna lord

>

> > should

>

> > > > > be cruelly aspecting himself in the natal chart. Sometimes, this

>

> > > > > position can be taken by AK but then, AK should be AK for the

>

> > transit

>

> > > > > chart also.

>

> > > > >

>

> > > > > Hope this helps,

>

> > > > >

>

> > > > > Kishore patnaik

>

> > > > >

>

> > > > >

>

> > > > > jyotish-vidya, Uttara <muttaraphalguni@>

>

> > wrote:

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > > Dear Patrice and All,

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > > I have an added commentary to my last post. It is a social

>

> > > > > science theory but I think adds to the astrological reasoning

>

> behind

>

> > > > > some charts we encounter. Especially our families.

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > > Like your mother who is a Gemini, My mother has a Gemini

>

> > Sun. I

>

> > > > > often say she talks out of both sides of her mouth. She is also

>

> > very

>

> > > > > autocratic and opinionated. She too grew up in an era where

>

> people

>

> > > > > just got on with things and didn't talk or dwell on them

>

> openly. I

>

> > > > > have often found this to be a direct reaction to the severity

>

> of the

>

> > > > > depression era of the 30's and then the atrocities of World

>

> War 11.

>

> > > > > Actually, Alcoholic Anonymous grew out of this depression era,

>

> > > > > teaching men how to cope better with events and things in their

>

> > lives

>

> > > > > that were bigger than them. That's where the 12-step program

>

> > came to

>

> > > > > say that one was "powerless over" and taught fraternity of

>

> likeness

>

> > > > > and support. It was a kind of new religion to help pull men

>

> > from the

>

> > > > > depths of despair.

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > > Unfortunately, your Grandfather never experienced this

or his

>

> > > > > stoic Denmark ancestry lead him to be his own person.

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > > Then the war came and life changed. Young Men left home and

>

> > often

>

> > > > > didn't return. Or, men returned never to be the same again.

Those

>

> > > > > that did survive the hell came back with a new outlook on life

>

> > and the

>

> > > > > majority got on with life. Never to develop fraternity again.

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > > Women during the war came out of the house and into the

>

> > factory to

>

> > > > > work - to help supply the goods needed for war. That is where

>

> women

>

> > > > > wearing pants developed and was allowed. Every thing was

>

> > rationed, so

>

> > > > > material for clothing was harder and sturdier - so pants

came into

>

> > > > > being and were cheaper. Also in factory work, pants were

need for

>

> > > > > safety and endurance rather than dresses. Pants became the

>

> > uniform of

>

> > > > > the War.

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > > Once the war ended there was a backlash on the concept of

>

> "being

>

> > > > > powerless". All of a sudden being in control of ones life

>

> became an

>

> > > > > obsession in self-help advice and personal stories of people

>

> > > > > overcoming adversity for peace and contentment. Personal

>

> prosperity

>

> > > > > was touted everywhere. Women went back to their kitchens,

>

> dresses,

>

> > > > > and deferring roles.

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > > However, do you remember growing up how we the baby

>

> boomers were

>

> > > > > raised and what expectations were required? There were four

>

> themes

>

> > > > > going on. One to have a more relaxed permissive society,

(this is

>

> > > > > where entitlement was bred - don't you just love Dr Spock)

>

> two, the

>

> > > > > sky's the limit, three, gratefulness was instilled instead of

>

> > apathy.

>

> > > > > And, four, mothers were quietly behind closed doors raising

>

> their

>

> > > > > daughters to be more of their own person and equal to men. The

>

> > > > > fifty's believed it. The sixty's teenagers rebelled against the

>

> > > > > fifties restrictions, the seventies; married Women were

>

> > screaming for

>

> > > > > their autonomy and the eighties saw young college degreed women

>

> > in the

>

> > > > > workplace. The nineties reaped the backlash and the

>

> 21-century so

>

> > > > > far in America is entitled happy and throwing all the common

sense

>

> > > > > rules for civility out the window.

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > > So, when we look at out mothers and hear their stories it

>

> really

>

> > > > > was a different time of living and thinking and believing. I

>

> think

>

> > > > > the more adversity and sacrifice they encountered and the more

>

> > > > > deferment required, the more they built their own reservoirs for

>

> > > > > survival. There are some who were able to keep their

capacity to

>

> > > > > nurture and empathize, but all too often like my mother their

>

> > > > > stoicness, severe expectation, and rule has kept them safe and

>

> > > > > protected. And like my mother and some others I know, they

became

>

> > > > > very narcissistic.

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > > My mother could have been a better mother to my adopted

>

> sister,

>

> > > > > but in reality, my mother's thinking and feeling was and is one

>

> > where

>

> > > > > she provided this child with a better life and gave her

>

> > opportunities

>

> > > > > and education and a roof over her head that my sister has

>

> never been

>

> > > > > able to return in kindness to my mother. As far as having any

>

> > empathy

>

> > > > > for a broken soul theory - there is none. That and my mother's

>

> > > > > intolerance of my sister's chaotic inner soul is written off as

>

> > > > > complete belligerence and added to that, she is not connected

>

> to my

>

> > > > > mother in any depth because as my mother says, this child is

>

> not of

>

> > > > > her blood. Gad, what a mess and a terrible fall out for two

lives

>

> > > > > with completely different experiences.

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > > I am looking forward to 2012. I think the current tide will

>

> > > > > change, as it ultimately will. In the meantime, we have to slop

>

> > > > > through another six years. I hope my mother isn't living

>

> then. She

>

> > > > > like my mother in law need to go their graves to find peace and

>

> > > > happiness.

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > > As Always,

>

> > > > > > Uttara

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > > "Our deepest fear is not that we are

inadequate, our

>

> > > > > deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our

>

> > light,

>

> > > > > not our darkness, that most frightens us. There is nothing

>

> > enlightened

>

> > > > > about shrinking so that other people won't feel insecure around

>

> > > > > you...As we let our own light shine, we unconsciously give other

>

> > > > > people permission to do the same. As we are liberated from

>

> our own

>

> > > > > fear, our presence automatically liberates others." from A

>

> > Return To

>

> > > > > Love: by Marianne Williamson

>

> > > > >

>

> > > > >

>

> > > > >

>

> > > > >

>

> > > > >

>

> > > > >

>

> > > > > ~ om tat sat ~

>

> > > > > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram.

>

> > > > > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna'

>

> > > > > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said

>

> > > > that the

>

> > > > > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals.

>

> > > > > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart

>

> reading

>

> > > > today

>

> > > > > Links

>

> > > > >

>

> > > >

>

> > > >

>

> > > >

>

> > > >

>

> > > >

>

> > > >

>

> > > >

>

> > > > ~ om tat sat ~

>

> > > > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram.

>

> > > > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna'

>

> > > > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said

>

> > > that the

>

> > > > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals.

>

> > > > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart

reading

>

> > > today

>

> > > > Links

>

> > > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > > ~ om tat sat ~

>

> > > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram.

>

> > > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna'

>

> > > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said

>

> > that the

>

> > > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals.

>

> > > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading

>

> > today

>

> > > Links

>

> > >

>

> >

>

> >

>

> >

>

> >

>

> >

>

> >

>

> >

>

> > ~ om tat sat ~

>

> > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram.

>

> > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna'

>

> > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said

>

> that the

>

> > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals.

>

> > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading

>

> today

>

> > Links

>

> >

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

~ om tat sat ~

>

> Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram.

>

> Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna'

>

> (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said

that the

> human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals.

>

> (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading

today

>

> Links

>

>

>

> /

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

||Hare Rama Krsna||

Dear Kishore, Namaskar

Now, are you claiming me to be illiterate?

Am i supposed to read the words you write or am I to 'guess' the gist of

your statements. Please Kishore, you are prolonging this more than

necessary, If you agreed with me all along just admit your momentary lapse

when you chose your words, or go read those puranas and vimshottari

calculations which you maybe lacking in.

 

There is no more astrology in this thread, so this discussion should be done

for now.

Best wishes,

***

Visti Larsen

For services and articles visit:

http://srigaruda.com

***

 

 

[] On

Behalf Of kishore mohan

09 May 2006 13:05

 

Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message posted in

jyotish vidya

 

dear visti,

 

I let your smirks pass. when you can not read a simple message from a

person like me, then why talk of puranas and vedas? I want you to read

my message once more and comment.

 

 

 

 

Kishore patnaik

, "Visti Larsen" <visti wrote:

>

> ||Hare Rama Krsna||

>

> Dear Kishore, Namaskar

>

> Leaving personal issues aside, i must make something clear.

>

> You said:

>

> the puranas are not strict basis of science, as they are more

>

> stories, though there is lots of science in them too and we have to

>

> utilize this science as the original ' text books' of the science viz

>

> the scientific parts of vedas are not given unto us.

>

>

>

> If they are the original text books as you say then they are a

STRICT BASIS

> OF SCIENCE. The Narada purana is the basis of ALOT of astrology as

is the

> Agni Purana. Your statement is negating your second statement:

>

>

>

> Otherwise, the science and scientific theories given in puranas are

> incidental. they

>

> are more of an attempt to recall all the stories, whether true or

>

> symbolic, told in the ancient times and hence, the name puranas-the

>

> ancient lore.

>

>

>

> So if i read the Narada Purana that gives the exact ammount of days in a

> Chaturyuga as 1.577.917.828 civil (savana) days, and proceeds to

give the

> methods of defining the solar and lunar months and days with

calculations,

> then what exactly is incidental? When Agni Purana gives astrological

timing

> methods to decide when a person will die, then what stories are

being told?

> If you haven't read them then you cannot be blamed, but then we all can

> learn more everyday can't we?

>

>

>

> You said:

>

> But, if you want to look at science only on the basis of puranas,

>

> there is lots of vedic science which is not told in puranas and I hope

>

> you realise that.

>

>

>

> Now WHO would restrict themself to reading only books written by

Shakespeare

> or by David Frawley when you have such large compendiums of knowledge

> elsewhere. Comeon Kishore, where are you going with this statement? The

> members of these lists are always dwelving deep into Parasara's Hora

> Shastra, Puranas, Gita, Vedas, Upanishads, etc. Infact based on your

> previous question regarding Vimshottari Dasa calculation i almost

thought

> you had never opened an astrology book! I know this can only be a wrong

> thought, but you do suprise me sometimes and i felt i had to point

that out

> to you... afterall we must be serious in this study of Jyotish if we

are to

> offer our assistance to those who need it.

>

> Best wishes and blessings,

>

> ***

>

> Visti Larsen

>

> For services and articles visit:

>

> http://srigaruda.com

>

> ***

>

>

>

>

>

[] On

> Behalf Of kishore mohan

> 09 May 2006 12:01

>

> Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message posted in

> jyotish vidya

>

>

>

> Dear visti,

>

>

>

> first and foremost, I think I have a right to get personal as you were

>

> doing the same too sometime back. In any case, I do not criticise the

>

> person but only what the person said or thought.

>

>

>

> Secondly, the basis of all sciences is Vedas and we have got only a

>

> 'lesh' of vedas with us. so, we do not know all that what the rshis

>

> knew. the puranas are not strict basis of science, as they are more

>

> stories, though there is lots of science in them too and we have to

>

> utilize this science as the original ' text books' of the science viz

>

> the scientific parts of vedas are not given unto us. Otherwise, the

>

> science and scientific theories given in puranas are incidental. they

>

> are more of an attempt to recall all the stories, whether true or

>

> symbolic, told in the ancient times and hence, the name puranas-the

>

> ancient lore. of course, you should not mistake me that i am

>

> rejecting puranas as a source of science, Noway, infact, I have groups

>

> like Vedic history and Ancient India which attempt to look at Indian

>

> History as told in the Vedas and puranas and other scriptures.

>

>

>

> But, if you want to look at science only on the basis of puranas,

>

> there is lots of vedic science which is not told in puranas and I hope

>

> you realise that.

>

>

>

> Btw, you are right that I dont want to tell the answer to your

>

> question only because it depends a lot on the belief., which you may

>

> share.

>

>

>

> I hope you take in the most positive spirit as I have no intention of

>

> hurting anyone, much less yourself.

>

>

>

> Kishore patnaik

>

>

>

, "Visti Larsen" <visti@> wrote:

>

> >

>

> > ||Hare Rama Krsna||

>

> > Dear Kishore, Namaskar

>

> > The rishis explained this theory in all the puranas and also the

Guru of

>

> > this parampara (sri achyuta dasa) has also talked about its

>

> relevance. It is

>

> > used for prediction and if you think the rishis are self-centric

>

> when trying

>

> > to predict the tides of humanity then i can't help you.

>

> > I'm not rejecting other theories, otherwise i wouldn't even bring

up the

>

> > topic. Instead i wanto know which evolution theory could accept this

>

> to be

>

> > true, and understand the background. As far as i know there are two

>

> theories

>

> > which have their main difference in the understanding of the length

>

> of the

>

> > year of Gods, but i don't believe that this theory accomedates the

>

> change of

>

> > Brahma occuring any time soon.

>

> > If you can't answer then don't answer instead of getting personal.

>

> > Best wishes,

>

> > ***

>

> > Visti Larsen

>

> > For services and articles visit:

>

> > http://srigaruda.com

>

> > ***

>

> >

>

> >

>

> >

>

> [] On

>

> > Behalf Of kishore mohan

>

> > 09 May 2006 11:36

>

> >

>

> > Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message

posted in

>

> > jyotish vidya

>

> >

>

> > dear visti,

>

> >

>

> > you are going into the same self centric theory of any scientist.

>

> > a scientist says his theories are the centre of all the known and

>

> > unknown and thinks every known phenomenon should be explained by his

>

> > theories and every unknown phenomenon should be predicted by them. an

>

> > egoistic scientist rejects any phenomenon that does not fall within

>

> > the stratum of his theories. this is not a good indication.

>

> >

>

> > while it is good to try and explain everything- from anu(atom) to

>

> > mahan(the infinite)- with in your theories which will help you in your

>

> > spiritual and academic sojourn, it is utterly undesirable to reject

>

> > what you can not explain.

>

> >

>

> > In any case, as I have said, what I have said is only a belief and

>

> > those who expound this belief have their own ways of explaining it. I

>

> > am one of the believers. I can not explain you more on this, as you

>

> > will not appreiciate my explanations unless you accept my

assumptions.

>

> >

>

> > Kishore patnaik

>

> >

>

> > , "Visti Larsen" <visti@> wrote:

>

> > >

>

> > > ||Hare Rama Krsna||

>

> > > Dear Kishore, Namaskar

>

> > > I disagree. As Jyotishas we not only have to understand the

>

> > time/dasas of

>

> > > humans but the dasas of the entire creation, herein the yugas,

>

> > manvantaras,

>

> > > kalpas (blinking of brahmas eye) and the first Brahma himself who

>

> > will live

>

> > > for zillions of human years. By implication the opening and

closing of

>

> > > brahmas eye causes the pralaya, so also his reinstatement would

>

> > imply the

>

> > > same as Brahma embodies the creation itself... we are living in

>

> > Brahma, so

>

> > > if he is replaced then so is our creation.

>

> > > Best wishes,

>

> > > ***

>

> > > Visti Larsen

>

> > > For services and articles visit:

>

> > > http://srigaruda.com

>

> > > ***

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > [] On

>

> > > Behalf Of kishore mohan

>

> > > 09 May 2006 10:51

>

> > >

>

> > > Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message

>

> posted in

>

> > > jyotish vidya

>

> > >

>

> > > Dear visti,

>

> > >

>

> > > namaskar.

>

> > >

>

> > > everybody has their own theories regarding that. As i said, it

is only

>

> > > a popular belief and usually, you can not debate over a belief.

>

> > >

>

> > > regards,

>

> > >

>

> > > Kishore patnaik

>

> > >

>

> > > , "Visti Larsen" <visti@> wrote:

>

> > > >

>

> > > > ||Hare Rama Krsna||

>

> > > > Dear Kishore, Namaskar

>

> > > > If the Brahma has to change then the creation must also. Then in

>

> > > that case

>

> > > > we should have experienced pralaya over the last few years

>

> > > already... Can't

>

> > > > really accept that.

>

> > > > Best wishes,

>

> > > > ***

>

> > > > Visti Larsen

>

> > > > For services and articles visit:

>

> > > > http://srigaruda.com

>

> > > > ***

>

> > > >

>

> > > >

>

> > > >

>

> > > [] On

>

> > > > Behalf Of kishore mohan

>

> > > > 09 May 2006 08:44

>

> > > >

>

> > > > Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message

>

> > posted in

>

> > > > jyotish vidya

>

> > > >

>

> > > > Dear visti,

>

> > > >

>

> > > > Namaskar.

>

> > > >

>

> > > > Thanks for the combination.

>

> > > >

>

> > > > If you are saying about the Hanumanji taking over as the current

>

> > > > Brahma, I have no clue about it. It is only a polular belief.

Please

>

> > > > elaborate on the question if I misunderstood.

>

> > > >

>

> > > > Kishore patnaik

>

> > > >

>

> > > > , "Visti Larsen" <visti@>

wrote:

>

> > > > >

>

> > > > > ||Hare Rama Krsna||

>

> > > > > Dear Kishore, Namaskar

>

> > > > > Check for Jupiter or Moon associating with the third from arudha

>

> > > lagna.

>

> > > > > These give self-consciousness/willingness or emotional

distress at

>

> > > > the time

>

> > > > > of death.

>

> > > > >

>

> > > > > What is YOUR condition for balarishta? Also you haven't

elaborated

>

> > > > on your

>

> > > > > timing of the birth of certain souls from your last mail.

>

> > > > > Best wishes,

>

> > > > > ***

>

> > > > > Visti Larsen

>

> > > > > For services and articles visit:

>

> > > > > http://srigaruda.com

>

> > > > > ***

>

> > > > >

>

> > > > >

>

> > > > >

>

> > > > [] On

>

> > > > > Behalf Of kishore mohan

>

> > > > > 08 May 2006 19:22

>

> > > > >

>

> > > > > [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message

>

> posted in

>

> > > > jyotish

>

> > > > > vidya

>

> > > > >

>

> > > > > ear friend,

>

> > > > >

>

> > > > >

>

> > > > > I am yet to cast and read the charts provided by you. But let me

>

> > tell

>

> > > > > two general points with regard to the suicides:

>

> > > > >

>

> > > > >

>

> > > > > The first one is to do with the natal chart of the native.

>

> > Generally,

>

> > > > > the Lagna Lord will be a malefic for the native. This

happens to

>

> > > > > tarus and the four 'corner' lagnas. Also, the Moon must be

>

> severely

>

> > > > > afflicted. If moon is severly afflicted, it can also indicate a

>

> > > > > possibility of Balarishta, though in Balarishta, the

connection of

>

> > > > > Mars with certain Houses is compulsory. In other words, the

Moons

>

> > > > > position will be alike in both Balarishta and suicide cases.

>

> > > > >

>

> > > > > The second point is to do with the transits. The Tr Lagna lord

>

> > should

>

> > > > > be cruelly aspecting himself in the natal chart. Sometimes, this

>

> > > > > position can be taken by AK but then, AK should be AK for the

>

> > transit

>

> > > > > chart also.

>

> > > > >

>

> > > > > Hope this helps,

>

> > > > >

>

> > > > > Kishore patnaik

>

> > > > >

>

> > > > >

>

> > > > > jyotish-vidya, Uttara <muttaraphalguni@>

>

> > wrote:

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > > Dear Patrice and All,

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > > I have an added commentary to my last post. It is a social

>

> > > > > science theory but I think adds to the astrological reasoning

>

> behind

>

> > > > > some charts we encounter. Especially our families.

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > > Like your mother who is a Gemini, My mother has a Gemini

>

> > Sun. I

>

> > > > > often say she talks out of both sides of her mouth. She is also

>

> > very

>

> > > > > autocratic and opinionated. She too grew up in an era where

>

> people

>

> > > > > just got on with things and didn't talk or dwell on them

>

> openly. I

>

> > > > > have often found this to be a direct reaction to the severity

>

> of the

>

> > > > > depression era of the 30's and then the atrocities of World

>

> War 11.

>

> > > > > Actually, Alcoholic Anonymous grew out of this depression era,

>

> > > > > teaching men how to cope better with events and things in their

>

> > lives

>

> > > > > that were bigger than them. That's where the 12-step program

>

> > came to

>

> > > > > say that one was "powerless over" and taught fraternity of

>

> likeness

>

> > > > > and support. It was a kind of new religion to help pull men

>

> > from the

>

> > > > > depths of despair.

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > > Unfortunately, your Grandfather never experienced this

or his

>

> > > > > stoic Denmark ancestry lead him to be his own person.

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > > Then the war came and life changed. Young Men left home and

>

> > often

>

> > > > > didn't return. Or, men returned never to be the same again.

Those

>

> > > > > that did survive the hell came back with a new outlook on life

>

> > and the

>

> > > > > majority got on with life. Never to develop fraternity again.

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > > Women during the war came out of the house and into the

>

> > factory to

>

> > > > > work - to help supply the goods needed for war. That is where

>

> women

>

> > > > > wearing pants developed and was allowed. Every thing was

>

> > rationed, so

>

> > > > > material for clothing was harder and sturdier - so pants

came into

>

> > > > > being and were cheaper. Also in factory work, pants were

need for

>

> > > > > safety and endurance rather than dresses. Pants became the

>

> > uniform of

>

> > > > > the War.

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > > Once the war ended there was a backlash on the concept of

>

> "being

>

> > > > > powerless". All of a sudden being in control of ones life

>

> became an

>

> > > > > obsession in self-help advice and personal stories of people

>

> > > > > overcoming adversity for peace and contentment. Personal

>

> prosperity

>

> > > > > was touted everywhere. Women went back to their kitchens,

>

> dresses,

>

> > > > > and deferring roles.

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > > However, do you remember growing up how we the baby

>

> boomers were

>

> > > > > raised and what expectations were required? There were four

>

> themes

>

> > > > > going on. One to have a more relaxed permissive society,

(this is

>

> > > > > where entitlement was bred - don't you just love Dr Spock)

>

> two, the

>

> > > > > sky's the limit, three, gratefulness was instilled instead of

>

> > apathy.

>

> > > > > And, four, mothers were quietly behind closed doors raising

>

> their

>

> > > > > daughters to be more of their own person and equal to men. The

>

> > > > > fifty's believed it. The sixty's teenagers rebelled against the

>

> > > > > fifties restrictions, the seventies; married Women were

>

> > screaming for

>

> > > > > their autonomy and the eighties saw young college degreed women

>

> > in the

>

> > > > > workplace. The nineties reaped the backlash and the

>

> 21-century so

>

> > > > > far in America is entitled happy and throwing all the common

sense

>

> > > > > rules for civility out the window.

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > > So, when we look at out mothers and hear their stories it

>

> really

>

> > > > > was a different time of living and thinking and believing. I

>

> think

>

> > > > > the more adversity and sacrifice they encountered and the more

>

> > > > > deferment required, the more they built their own reservoirs for

>

> > > > > survival. There are some who were able to keep their

capacity to

>

> > > > > nurture and empathize, but all too often like my mother their

>

> > > > > stoicness, severe expectation, and rule has kept them safe and

>

> > > > > protected. And like my mother and some others I know, they

became

>

> > > > > very narcissistic.

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > > My mother could have been a better mother to my adopted

>

> sister,

>

> > > > > but in reality, my mother's thinking and feeling was and is one

>

> > where

>

> > > > > she provided this child with a better life and gave her

>

> > opportunities

>

> > > > > and education and a roof over her head that my sister has

>

> never been

>

> > > > > able to return in kindness to my mother. As far as having any

>

> > empathy

>

> > > > > for a broken soul theory - there is none. That and my mother's

>

> > > > > intolerance of my sister's chaotic inner soul is written off as

>

> > > > > complete belligerence and added to that, she is not connected

>

> to my

>

> > > > > mother in any depth because as my mother says, this child is

>

> not of

>

> > > > > her blood. Gad, what a mess and a terrible fall out for two

lives

>

> > > > > with completely different experiences.

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > > I am looking forward to 2012. I think the current tide will

>

> > > > > change, as it ultimately will. In the meantime, we have to slop

>

> > > > > through another six years. I hope my mother isn't living

>

> then. She

>

> > > > > like my mother in law need to go their graves to find peace and

>

> > > > happiness.

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > > As Always,

>

> > > > > > Uttara

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > >

>

> > > > > > "Our deepest fear is not that we are

inadequate, our

>

> > > > > deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our

>

> > light,

>

> > > > > not our darkness, that most frightens us. There is nothing

>

> > enlightened

>

> > > > > about shrinking so that other people won't feel insecure around

>

> > > > > you...As we let our own light shine, we unconsciously give other

>

> > > > > people permission to do the same. As we are liberated from

>

> our own

>

> > > > > fear, our presence automatically liberates others." from A

>

> > Return To

>

> > > > > Love: by Marianne Williamson

>

> > > > >

>

> > > > >

>

> > > > >

>

> > > > >

>

> > > > >

>

> > > > >

>

> > > > > ~ om tat sat ~

>

> > > > > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram.

>

> > > > > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna'

>

> > > > > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said

>

> > > > that the

>

> > > > > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals.

>

> > > > > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart

>

> reading

>

> > > > today

>

> > > > > Links

>

> > > > >

>

> > > >

>

> > > >

>

> > > >

>

> > > >

>

> > > >

>

> > > >

>

> > > >

>

> > > > ~ om tat sat ~

>

> > > > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram.

>

> > > > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna'

>

> > > > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said

>

> > > that the

>

> > > > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals.

>

> > > > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart

reading

>

> > > today

>

> > > > Links

>

> > > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > >

>

> > > ~ om tat sat ~

>

> > > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram.

>

> > > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna'

>

> > > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said

>

> > that the

>

> > > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals.

>

> > > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading

>

> > today

>

> > > Links

>

> > >

>

> >

>

> >

>

> >

>

> >

>

> >

>

> >

>

> >

>

> > ~ om tat sat ~

>

> > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram.

>

> > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna'

>

> > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said

>

> that the

>

> > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals.

>

> > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading

>

> today

>

> > Links

>

> >

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

~ om tat sat ~

>

> Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram.

>

> Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna'

>

> (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said

that the

> human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals.

>

> (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading

today

>

> Links

>

>

>

> /

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

~ om tat sat ~

Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram.

Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna'

(2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said that the

human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals.

(3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading today

Links

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

||Jai Ramakrishna||

Dear Vistiji & Kishoreji,

Please forgive this intervention, but I agree both we Kishoreji &

Vistiji , in one point that Our Puranas are not "Story-tellers" but

they stories are made with a scientific bend. We can talk of many

stories from Vishnu Purana, Narada Purana, Skanda Purana,etc. We

cannot say that those are texts of science directly, but they guide

us the path of science & how thing goes..

Wish you all success,

.

 

 

, "Visti Larsen" <visti

wrote:

>

>

> ||Hare Rama Krsna||

> Dear Kishore, Namaskar

> Now, are you claiming me to be illiterate?

> Am i supposed to read the words you write or am I to 'guess' the

gist of

> your statements. Please Kishore, you are prolonging this more than

> necessary, If you agreed with me all along just admit your

momentary lapse

> when you chose your words, or go read those puranas and vimshottari

> calculations which you maybe lacking in.

>

> There is no more astrology in this thread, so this discussion

should be done

> for now.

> Best wishes,

> ***

> Visti Larsen

> For services and articles visit:

> http://srigaruda.com

> ***

>

>

>

[] On

> Behalf Of kishore mohan

> 09 May 2006 13:05

>

> Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message

posted in

> jyotish vidya

>

> dear visti,

>

> I let your smirks pass. when you can not read a simple message

from a

> person like me, then why talk of puranas and vedas? I want you to

read

> my message once more and comment.

>

>

>

>

> Kishore patnaik

> , "Visti Larsen" <visti@> wrote:

> >

> > ||Hare Rama Krsna||

> >

> > Dear Kishore, Namaskar

> >

> > Leaving personal issues aside, i must make something clear.

> >

> > You said:

> >

> > the puranas are not strict basis of science, as they are more

> >

> > stories, though there is lots of science in them too and we have

to

> >

> > utilize this science as the original ' text books' of the

science viz

> >

> > the scientific parts of vedas are not given unto us.

> >

> >

> >

> > If they are the original text books as you say then they are a

> STRICT BASIS

> > OF SCIENCE. The Narada purana is the basis of ALOT of astrology

as

> is the

> > Agni Purana. Your statement is negating your second statement:

> >

> >

> >

> > Otherwise, the science and scientific theories given in puranas

are

> > incidental. they

> >

> > are more of an attempt to recall all the stories, whether true or

> >

> > symbolic, told in the ancient times and hence, the name puranas-

the

> >

> > ancient lore.

> >

> >

> >

> > So if i read the Narada Purana that gives the exact ammount of

days in a

> > Chaturyuga as 1.577.917.828 civil (savana) days, and proceeds to

> give the

> > methods of defining the solar and lunar months and days with

> calculations,

> > then what exactly is incidental? When Agni Purana gives

astrological

> timing

> > methods to decide when a person will die, then what stories are

> being told?

> > If you haven't read them then you cannot be blamed, but then we

all can

> > learn more everyday can't we?

> >

> >

> >

> > You said:

> >

> > But, if you want to look at science only on the basis of puranas,

> >

> > there is lots of vedic science which is not told in puranas and

I hope

> >

> > you realise that.

> >

> >

> >

> > Now WHO would restrict themself to reading only books written by

> Shakespeare

> > or by David Frawley when you have such large compendiums of

knowledge

> > elsewhere. Comeon Kishore, where are you going with this

statement? The

> > members of these lists are always dwelving deep into Parasara's

Hora

> > Shastra, Puranas, Gita, Vedas, Upanishads, etc. Infact based on

your

> > previous question regarding Vimshottari Dasa calculation i almost

> thought

> > you had never opened an astrology book! I know this can only be

a wrong

> > thought, but you do suprise me sometimes and i felt i had to

point

> that out

> > to you... afterall we must be serious in this study of Jyotish

if we

> are to

> > offer our assistance to those who need it.

> >

> > Best wishes and blessings,

> >

> > ***

> >

> > Visti Larsen

> >

> > For services and articles visit:

> >

> > http://srigaruda.com

> >

> > ***

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> [] On

> > Behalf Of kishore mohan

> > 09 May 2006 12:01

> >

> > Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message

posted in

> > jyotish vidya

> >

> >

> >

> > Dear visti,

> >

> >

> >

> > first and foremost, I think I have a right to get personal as

you were

> >

> > doing the same too sometime back. In any case, I do not

criticise the

> >

> > person but only what the person said or thought.

> >

> >

> >

> > Secondly, the basis of all sciences is Vedas and we have got

only a

> >

> > 'lesh' of vedas with us. so, we do not know all that what the

rshis

> >

> > knew. the puranas are not strict basis of science, as they are

more

> >

> > stories, though there is lots of science in them too and we have

to

> >

> > utilize this science as the original ' text books' of the

science viz

> >

> > the scientific parts of vedas are not given unto us. Otherwise,

the

> >

> > science and scientific theories given in puranas are incidental.

they

> >

> > are more of an attempt to recall all the stories, whether true or

> >

> > symbolic, told in the ancient times and hence, the name puranas-

the

> >

> > ancient lore. of course, you should not mistake me that i am

> >

> > rejecting puranas as a source of science, Noway, infact, I have

groups

> >

> > like Vedic history and Ancient India which attempt to look at

Indian

> >

> > History as told in the Vedas and puranas and other scriptures.

> >

> >

> >

> > But, if you want to look at science only on the basis of puranas,

> >

> > there is lots of vedic science which is not told in puranas and

I hope

> >

> > you realise that.

> >

> >

> >

> > Btw, you are right that I dont want to tell the answer to your

> >

> > question only because it depends a lot on the belief., which you

may

> >

> > share.

> >

> >

> >

> > I hope you take in the most positive spirit as I have no

intention of

> >

> > hurting anyone, much less yourself.

> >

> >

> >

> > Kishore patnaik

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > , "Visti Larsen" <visti@>

wrote:

> >

> > >

> >

> > > ||Hare Rama Krsna||

> >

> > > Dear Kishore, Namaskar

> >

> > > The rishis explained this theory in all the puranas and also

the

> Guru of

> >

> > > this parampara (sri achyuta dasa) has also talked about its

> >

> > relevance. It is

> >

> > > used for prediction and if you think the rishis are self-

centric

> >

> > when trying

> >

> > > to predict the tides of humanity then i can't help you.

> >

> > > I'm not rejecting other theories, otherwise i wouldn't even

bring

> up the

> >

> > > topic. Instead i wanto know which evolution theory could

accept this

> >

> > to be

> >

> > > true, and understand the background. As far as i know there

are two

> >

> > theories

> >

> > > which have their main difference in the understanding of the

length

> >

> > of the

> >

> > > year of Gods, but i don't believe that this theory accomedates

the

> >

> > change of

> >

> > > Brahma occuring any time soon.

> >

> > > If you can't answer then don't answer instead of getting

personal.

> >

> > > Best wishes,

> >

> > > ***

> >

> > > Visti Larsen

> >

> > > For services and articles visit:

> >

> > > http://srigaruda.com

> >

> > > ***

> >

> > >

> >

> > >

> >

> > >

> >

> > [] On

> >

> > > Behalf Of kishore mohan

> >

> > > 09 May 2006 11:36

> >

> > >

> >

> > > Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message

> posted in

> >

> > > jyotish vidya

> >

> > >

> >

> > > dear visti,

> >

> > >

> >

> > > you are going into the same self centric theory of any

scientist.

> >

> > > a scientist says his theories are the centre of all the known

and

> >

> > > unknown and thinks every known phenomenon should be explained

by his

> >

> > > theories and every unknown phenomenon should be predicted by

them. an

> >

> > > egoistic scientist rejects any phenomenon that does not fall

within

> >

> > > the stratum of his theories. this is not a good indication.

> >

> > >

> >

> > > while it is good to try and explain everything- from anu(atom)

to

> >

> > > mahan(the infinite)- with in your theories which will help you

in your

> >

> > > spiritual and academic sojourn, it is utterly undesirable to

reject

> >

> > > what you can not explain.

> >

> > >

> >

> > > In any case, as I have said, what I have said is only a belief

and

> >

> > > those who expound this belief have their own ways of

explaining it. I

> >

> > > am one of the believers. I can not explain you more on this,

as you

> >

> > > will not appreiciate my explanations unless you accept my

> assumptions.

> >

> > >

> >

> > > Kishore patnaik

> >

> > >

> >

> > > , "Visti Larsen" <visti@>

wrote:

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > > ||Hare Rama Krsna||

> >

> > > > Dear Kishore, Namaskar

> >

> > > > I disagree. As Jyotishas we not only have to understand the

> >

> > > time/dasas of

> >

> > > > humans but the dasas of the entire creation, herein the

yugas,

> >

> > > manvantaras,

> >

> > > > kalpas (blinking of brahmas eye) and the first Brahma

himself who

> >

> > > will live

> >

> > > > for zillions of human years. By implication the opening and

> closing of

> >

> > > > brahmas eye causes the pralaya, so also his reinstatement

would

> >

> > > imply the

> >

> > > > same as Brahma embodies the creation itself... we are living

in

> >

> > > Brahma, so

> >

> > > > if he is replaced then so is our creation.

> >

> > > > Best wishes,

> >

> > > > ***

> >

> > > > Visti Larsen

> >

> > > > For services and articles visit:

> >

> > > > http://srigaruda.com

> >

> > > > ***

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > [] On

> >

> > > > Behalf Of kishore mohan

> >

> > > > 09 May 2006 10:51

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > > Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a

message

> >

> > posted in

> >

> > > > jyotish vidya

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > > Dear visti,

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > > namaskar.

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > > everybody has their own theories regarding that. As i said,

it

> is only

> >

> > > > a popular belief and usually, you can not debate over a

belief.

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > > regards,

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > > Kishore patnaik

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > > , "Visti Larsen" <visti@>

wrote:

> >

> > > > >

> >

> > > > > ||Hare Rama Krsna||

> >

> > > > > Dear Kishore, Namaskar

> >

> > > > > If the Brahma has to change then the creation must also.

Then in

> >

> > > > that case

> >

> > > > > we should have experienced pralaya over the last few years

> >

> > > > already... Can't

> >

> > > > > really accept that.

> >

> > > > > Best wishes,

> >

> > > > > ***

> >

> > > > > Visti Larsen

> >

> > > > > For services and articles visit:

> >

> > > > > http://srigaruda.com

> >

> > > > > ***

> >

> > > > >

> >

> > > > >

> >

> > > > >

> >

> > > > [] On

> >

> > > > > Behalf Of kishore mohan

> >

> > > > > 09 May 2006 08:44

> >

> > > > >

> >

> > > > > Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a

message

> >

> > > posted in

> >

> > > > > jyotish vidya

> >

> > > > >

> >

> > > > > Dear visti,

> >

> > > > >

> >

> > > > > Namaskar.

> >

> > > > >

> >

> > > > > Thanks for the combination.

> >

> > > > >

> >

> > > > > If you are saying about the Hanumanji taking over as the

current

> >

> > > > > Brahma, I have no clue about it. It is only a polular

belief.

> Please

> >

> > > > > elaborate on the question if I misunderstood.

> >

> > > > >

> >

> > > > > Kishore patnaik

> >

> > > > >

> >

> > > > > , "Visti Larsen"

<visti@>

> wrote:

> >

> > > > > >

> >

> > > > > > ||Hare Rama Krsna||

> >

> > > > > > Dear Kishore, Namaskar

> >

> > > > > > Check for Jupiter or Moon associating with the third

from arudha

> >

> > > > lagna.

> >

> > > > > > These give self-consciousness/willingness or emotional

> distress at

> >

> > > > > the time

> >

> > > > > > of death.

> >

> > > > > >

> >

> > > > > > What is YOUR condition for balarishta? Also you haven't

> elaborated

> >

> > > > > on your

> >

> > > > > > timing of the birth of certain souls from your last mail.

> >

> > > > > > Best wishes,

> >

> > > > > > ***

> >

> > > > > > Visti Larsen

> >

> > > > > > For services and articles visit:

> >

> > > > > > http://srigaruda.com

> >

> > > > > > ***

> >

> > > > > >

> >

> > > > > >

> >

> > > > > >

> >

> > > > > [] On

> >

> > > > > > Behalf Of kishore mohan

> >

> > > > > > 08 May 2006 19:22

> >

> > > > > >

> >

> > > > > > [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a

message

> >

> > posted in

> >

> > > > > jyotish

> >

> > > > > > vidya

> >

> > > > > >

> >

> > > > > > ear friend,

> >

> > > > > >

> >

> > > > > >

> >

> > > > > > I am yet to cast and read the charts provided by you.

But let me

> >

> > > tell

> >

> > > > > > two general points with regard to the suicides:

> >

> > > > > >

> >

> > > > > >

> >

> > > > > > The first one is to do with the natal chart of the

native.

> >

> > > Generally,

> >

> > > > > > the Lagna Lord will be a malefic for the native. This

> happens to

> >

> > > > > > tarus and the four 'corner' lagnas. Also, the Moon must

be

> >

> > severely

> >

> > > > > > afflicted. If moon is severly afflicted, it can also

indicate a

> >

> > > > > > possibility of Balarishta, though in Balarishta, the

> connection of

> >

> > > > > > Mars with certain Houses is compulsory. In other words,

the

> Moons

> >

> > > > > > position will be alike in both Balarishta and suicide

cases.

> >

> > > > > >

> >

> > > > > > The second point is to do with the transits. The Tr

Lagna lord

> >

> > > should

> >

> > > > > > be cruelly aspecting himself in the natal chart.

Sometimes, this

> >

> > > > > > position can be taken by AK but then, AK should be AK

for the

> >

> > > transit

> >

> > > > > > chart also.

> >

> > > > > >

> >

> > > > > > Hope this helps,

> >

> > > > > >

> >

> > > > > > Kishore patnaik

> >

> > > > > >

> >

> > > > > >

> >

> > > > > > jyotish-vidya, Uttara

<muttaraphalguni@>

> >

> > > wrote:

> >

> > > > > > >

> >

> > > > > > > Dear Patrice and All,

> >

> > > > > > >

> >

> > > > > > > I have an added commentary to my last post. It is a

social

> >

> > > > > > science theory but I think adds to the astrological

reasoning

> >

> > behind

> >

> > > > > > some charts we encounter. Especially our families.

> >

> > > > > > >

> >

> > > > > > > Like your mother who is a Gemini, My mother has a

Gemini

> >

> > > Sun. I

> >

> > > > > > often say she talks out of both sides of her mouth. She

is also

> >

> > > very

> >

> > > > > > autocratic and opinionated. She too grew up in an era

where

> >

> > people

> >

> > > > > > just got on with things and didn't talk or dwell on them

> >

> > openly. I

> >

> > > > > > have often found this to be a direct reaction to the

severity

> >

> > of the

> >

> > > > > > depression era of the 30's and then the atrocities of

World

> >

> > War 11.

> >

> > > > > > Actually, Alcoholic Anonymous grew out of this

depression era,

> >

> > > > > > teaching men how to cope better with events and things

in their

> >

> > > lives

> >

> > > > > > that were bigger than them. That's where the 12-step

program

> >

> > > came to

> >

> > > > > > say that one was "powerless over" and taught fraternity

of

> >

> > likeness

> >

> > > > > > and support. It was a kind of new religion to help pull

men

> >

> > > from the

> >

> > > > > > depths of despair.

> >

> > > > > > >

> >

> > > > > > > Unfortunately, your Grandfather never experienced

this

> or his

> >

> > > > > > stoic Denmark ancestry lead him to be his own person.

> >

> > > > > > >

> >

> > > > > > > Then the war came and life changed. Young Men left

home and

> >

> > > often

> >

> > > > > > didn't return. Or, men returned never to be the same

again.

> Those

> >

> > > > > > that did survive the hell came back with a new outlook

on life

> >

> > > and the

> >

> > > > > > majority got on with life. Never to develop fraternity

again.

> >

> > > > > > >

> >

> > > > > > > Women during the war came out of the house and into

the

> >

> > > factory to

> >

> > > > > > work - to help supply the goods needed for war. That is

where

> >

> > women

> >

> > > > > > wearing pants developed and was allowed. Every thing was

> >

> > > rationed, so

> >

> > > > > > material for clothing was harder and sturdier - so pants

> came into

> >

> > > > > > being and were cheaper. Also in factory work, pants were

> need for

> >

> > > > > > safety and endurance rather than dresses. Pants became

the

> >

> > > uniform of

> >

> > > > > > the War.

> >

> > > > > > >

> >

> > > > > > > Once the war ended there was a backlash on the

concept of

> >

> > "being

> >

> > > > > > powerless". All of a sudden being in control of ones life

> >

> > became an

> >

> > > > > > obsession in self-help advice and personal stories of

people

> >

> > > > > > overcoming adversity for peace and contentment. Personal

> >

> > prosperity

> >

> > > > > > was touted everywhere. Women went back to their

kitchens,

> >

> > dresses,

> >

> > > > > > and deferring roles.

> >

> > > > > > >

> >

> > > > > > > However, do you remember growing up how we the baby

> >

> > boomers were

> >

> > > > > > raised and what expectations were required? There were

four

> >

> > themes

> >

> > > > > > going on. One to have a more relaxed permissive society,

> (this is

> >

> > > > > > where entitlement was bred - don't you just love Dr

Spock)

> >

> > two, the

> >

> > > > > > sky's the limit, three, gratefulness was instilled

instead of

> >

> > > apathy.

> >

> > > > > > And, four, mothers were quietly behind closed doors

raising

> >

> > their

> >

> > > > > > daughters to be more of their own person and equal to

men. The

> >

> > > > > > fifty's believed it. The sixty's teenagers rebelled

against the

> >

> > > > > > fifties restrictions, the seventies; married Women were

> >

> > > screaming for

> >

> > > > > > their autonomy and the eighties saw young college

degreed women

> >

> > > in the

> >

> > > > > > workplace. The nineties reaped the backlash and the

> >

> > 21-century so

> >

> > > > > > far in America is entitled happy and throwing all the

common

> sense

> >

> > > > > > rules for civility out the window.

> >

> > > > > > >

> >

> > > > > > > So, when we look at out mothers and hear their

stories it

> >

> > really

> >

> > > > > > was a different time of living and thinking and

believing. I

> >

> > think

> >

> > > > > > the more adversity and sacrifice they encountered and

the more

> >

> > > > > > deferment required, the more they built their own

reservoirs for

> >

> > > > > > survival. There are some who were able to keep their

> capacity to

> >

> > > > > > nurture and empathize, but all too often like my mother

their

> >

> > > > > > stoicness, severe expectation, and rule has kept them

safe and

> >

> > > > > > protected. And like my mother and some others I know,

they

> became

> >

> > > > > > very narcissistic.

> >

> > > > > > >

> >

> > > > > > > My mother could have been a better mother to my

adopted

> >

> > sister,

> >

> > > > > > but in reality, my mother's thinking and feeling was and

is one

> >

> > > where

> >

> > > > > > she provided this child with a better life and gave her

> >

> > > opportunities

> >

> > > > > > and education and a roof over her head that my sister has

> >

> > never been

> >

> > > > > > able to return in kindness to my mother. As far as

having any

> >

> > > empathy

> >

> > > > > > for a broken soul theory - there is none. That and my

mother's

> >

> > > > > > intolerance of my sister's chaotic inner soul is written

off as

> >

> > > > > > complete belligerence and added to that, she is not

connected

> >

> > to my

> >

> > > > > > mother in any depth because as my mother says, this

child is

> >

> > not of

> >

> > > > > > her blood. Gad, what a mess and a terrible fall out for

two

> lives

> >

> > > > > > with completely different experiences.

> >

> > > > > > >

> >

> > > > > > > I am looking forward to 2012. I think the current

tide will

> >

> > > > > > change, as it ultimately will. In the meantime, we have

to slop

> >

> > > > > > through another six years. I hope my mother isn't living

> >

> > then. She

> >

> > > > > > like my mother in law need to go their graves to find

peace and

> >

> > > > > happiness.

> >

> > > > > > >

> >

> > > > > > > As Always,

> >

> > > > > > > Uttara

> >

> > > > > > >

> >

> > > > > > >

> >

> > > > > > >

> >

> > > > > > > "Our deepest fear is not that we are

> inadequate, our

> >

> > > > > > deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It

is our

> >

> > > light,

> >

> > > > > > not our darkness, that most frightens us. There is

nothing

> >

> > > enlightened

> >

> > > > > > about shrinking so that other people won't feel insecure

around

> >

> > > > > > you...As we let our own light shine, we unconsciously

give other

> >

> > > > > > people permission to do the same. As we are liberated

from

> >

> > our own

> >

> > > > > > fear, our presence automatically liberates others."

from A

> >

> > > Return To

> >

> > > > > > Love: by Marianne Williamson

> >

> > > > > >

> >

> > > > > >

> >

> > > > > >

> >

> > > > > >

> >

> > > > > >

> >

> > > > > >

> >

> > > > > > ~ om tat sat ~

> >

> > > > > > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta

Ashram.

> >

> > > > > > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama

Krishna'

> >

> > > > > > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great

who said

> >

> > > > > that the

> >

> > > > > > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals.

> >

> > > > > > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free

chart

> >

> > reading

> >

> > > > > today

> >

> > > > > > Links

> >

> > > > > >

> >

> > > > >

> >

> > > > >

> >

> > > > >

> >

> > > > >

> >

> > > > >

> >

> > > > >

> >

> > > > >

> >

> > > > > ~ om tat sat ~

> >

> > > > > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta

Ashram.

> >

> > > > > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama

Krishna'

> >

> > > > > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great

who said

> >

> > > > that the

> >

> > > > > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals.

> >

> > > > > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free

chart

> reading

> >

> > > > today

> >

> > > > > Links

> >

> > > > >

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > >

> >

> > > > ~ om tat sat ~

> >

> > > > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram.

> >

> > > > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama

Krishna'

> >

> > > > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who

said

> >

> > > that the

> >

> > > > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals.

> >

> > > > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart

reading

> >

> > > today

> >

> > > > Links

> >

> > > >

> >

> > >

> >

> > >

> >

> > >

> >

> > >

> >

> > >

> >

> > >

> >

> > >

> >

> > > ~ om tat sat ~

> >

> > > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram.

> >

> > > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama

Krishna'

> >

> > > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who

said

> >

> > that the

> >

> > > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals.

> >

> > > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart

reading

> >

> > today

> >

> > > Links

> >

> > >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > ~ om tat sat ~

> >

> > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram.

> >

> > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna'

> >

> > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said

> that the

> > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals.

> >

> > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart

reading

> today

> >

> > Links

> >

> >

> >

> > /

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

>

>

~ om tat sat ~

> Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram.

> Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna'

> (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said

that the

> human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals.

> (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart

reading today

> Links

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear gaurav,

 

namaskar.

 

I have repeatedly refused to be dragged into contoversy, inspite of

provocation, because picking on the virtual selves that the other

persons sometimes assume to be, is not a very good idea simply the

time is not worth it.

 

By his own admission, Mr visti larsen did not go beyond the BPHS and I

have nothing to comment on his understanding of the sacred texts.

 

On the other hand, the two extremes of understanding of the puranas

and related texts are to throw them out as a result of wild

imagination of good old idle indians on one hand and to say that they

are the ultimate in understanding the creation and science on the other.

 

Both are wrong. They are the efforts of our forefathers to recreate

the Old stories and in the process, so much of sciences and technology

have been touched. I dont think you would want to take a good story on

aeroplane as a text book in aeronautics, just because it recounts

several Engineering facts. I want you to understand that the facts

aout the science and technology are absolutely incidental and

unfortunately, we are trying to understand about the science and

techology of the yesteryears based on this folklore, only because the

actual ancient text books are lost to posterity.

 

 

If I am not clear in what I am saying, please be patient to ask and I

will be happy to elaborate.

 

regards,

 

Kishore patnaik

 

, "" <gg_0202 wrote:

>

> ||Jai Ramakrishna||

> Dear Vistiji & Kishoreji,

> Please forgive this intervention, but I agree both we Kishoreji &

> Vistiji , in one point that Our Puranas are not "Story-tellers" but

> they stories are made with a scientific bend. We can talk of many

> stories from Vishnu Purana, Narada Purana, Skanda Purana,etc. We

> cannot say that those are texts of science directly, but they guide

> us the path of science & how thing goes..

> Wish you all success,

> .

>

>

> , "Visti Larsen" <visti@>

> wrote:

> >

> >

> > ||Hare Rama Krsna||

> > Dear Kishore, Namaskar

> > Now, are you claiming me to be illiterate?

> > Am i supposed to read the words you write or am I to 'guess' the

> gist of

> > your statements. Please Kishore, you are prolonging this more than

> > necessary, If you agreed with me all along just admit your

> momentary lapse

> > when you chose your words, or go read those puranas and vimshottari

> > calculations which you maybe lacking in.

> >

> > There is no more astrology in this thread, so this discussion

> should be done

> > for now.

> > Best wishes,

> > ***

> > Visti Larsen

> > For services and articles visit:

> > http://srigaruda.com

> > ***

> >

> >

> >

> [] On

> > Behalf Of kishore mohan

> > 09 May 2006 13:05

> >

> > Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message

> posted in

> > jyotish vidya

> >

> > dear visti,

> >

> > I let your smirks pass. when you can not read a simple message

> from a

> > person like me, then why talk of puranas and vedas? I want you to

> read

> > my message once more and comment.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Kishore patnaik

> > , "Visti Larsen" <visti@> wrote:

> > >

> > > ||Hare Rama Krsna||

> > >

> > > Dear Kishore, Namaskar

> > >

> > > Leaving personal issues aside, i must make something clear.

> > >

> > > You said:

> > >

> > > the puranas are not strict basis of science, as they are more

> > >

> > > stories, though there is lots of science in them too and we have

> to

> > >

> > > utilize this science as the original ' text books' of the

> science viz

> > >

> > > the scientific parts of vedas are not given unto us.

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > If they are the original text books as you say then they are a

> > STRICT BASIS

> > > OF SCIENCE. The Narada purana is the basis of ALOT of astrology

> as

> > is the

> > > Agni Purana. Your statement is negating your second statement:

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Otherwise, the science and scientific theories given in puranas

> are

> > > incidental. they

> > >

> > > are more of an attempt to recall all the stories, whether true or

> > >

> > > symbolic, told in the ancient times and hence, the name puranas-

> the

> > >

> > > ancient lore.

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > So if i read the Narada Purana that gives the exact ammount of

> days in a

> > > Chaturyuga as 1.577.917.828 civil (savana) days, and proceeds to

> > give the

> > > methods of defining the solar and lunar months and days with

> > calculations,

> > > then what exactly is incidental? When Agni Purana gives

> astrological

> > timing

> > > methods to decide when a person will die, then what stories are

> > being told?

> > > If you haven't read them then you cannot be blamed, but then we

> all can

> > > learn more everyday can't we?

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > You said:

> > >

> > > But, if you want to look at science only on the basis of puranas,

> > >

> > > there is lots of vedic science which is not told in puranas and

> I hope

> > >

> > > you realise that.

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Now WHO would restrict themself to reading only books written by

> > Shakespeare

> > > or by David Frawley when you have such large compendiums of

> knowledge

> > > elsewhere. Comeon Kishore, where are you going with this

> statement? The

> > > members of these lists are always dwelving deep into Parasara's

> Hora

> > > Shastra, Puranas, Gita, Vedas, Upanishads, etc. Infact based on

> your

> > > previous question regarding Vimshottari Dasa calculation i almost

> > thought

> > > you had never opened an astrology book! I know this can only be

> a wrong

> > > thought, but you do suprise me sometimes and i felt i had to

> point

> > that out

> > > to you... afterall we must be serious in this study of Jyotish

> if we

> > are to

> > > offer our assistance to those who need it.

> > >

> > > Best wishes and blessings,

> > >

> > > ***

> > >

> > > Visti Larsen

> > >

> > > For services and articles visit:

> > >

> > > http://srigaruda.com

> > >

> > > ***

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > [] On

> > > Behalf Of kishore mohan

> > > 09 May 2006 12:01

> > >

> > > Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message

> posted in

> > > jyotish vidya

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Dear visti,

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > first and foremost, I think I have a right to get personal as

> you were

> > >

> > > doing the same too sometime back. In any case, I do not

> criticise the

> > >

> > > person but only what the person said or thought.

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Secondly, the basis of all sciences is Vedas and we have got

> only a

> > >

> > > 'lesh' of vedas with us. so, we do not know all that what the

> rshis

> > >

> > > knew. the puranas are not strict basis of science, as they are

> more

> > >

> > > stories, though there is lots of science in them too and we have

> to

> > >

> > > utilize this science as the original ' text books' of the

> science viz

> > >

> > > the scientific parts of vedas are not given unto us. Otherwise,

> the

> > >

> > > science and scientific theories given in puranas are incidental.

> they

> > >

> > > are more of an attempt to recall all the stories, whether true or

> > >

> > > symbolic, told in the ancient times and hence, the name puranas-

> the

> > >

> > > ancient lore. of course, you should not mistake me that i am

> > >

> > > rejecting puranas as a source of science, Noway, infact, I have

> groups

> > >

> > > like Vedic history and Ancient India which attempt to look at

> Indian

> > >

> > > History as told in the Vedas and puranas and other scriptures.

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > But, if you want to look at science only on the basis of puranas,

> > >

> > > there is lots of vedic science which is not told in puranas and

> I hope

> > >

> > > you realise that.

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Btw, you are right that I dont want to tell the answer to your

> > >

> > > question only because it depends a lot on the belief., which you

> may

> > >

> > > share.

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > I hope you take in the most positive spirit as I have no

> intention of

> > >

> > > hurting anyone, much less yourself.

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Kishore patnaik

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > , "Visti Larsen" <visti@>

> wrote:

> > >

> > > >

> > >

> > > > ||Hare Rama Krsna||

> > >

> > > > Dear Kishore, Namaskar

> > >

> > > > The rishis explained this theory in all the puranas and also

> the

> > Guru of

> > >

> > > > this parampara (sri achyuta dasa) has also talked about its

> > >

> > > relevance. It is

> > >

> > > > used for prediction and if you think the rishis are self-

> centric

> > >

> > > when trying

> > >

> > > > to predict the tides of humanity then i can't help you.

> > >

> > > > I'm not rejecting other theories, otherwise i wouldn't even

> bring

> > up the

> > >

> > > > topic. Instead i wanto know which evolution theory could

> accept this

> > >

> > > to be

> > >

> > > > true, and understand the background. As far as i know there

> are two

> > >

> > > theories

> > >

> > > > which have their main difference in the understanding of the

> length

> > >

> > > of the

> > >

> > > > year of Gods, but i don't believe that this theory accomedates

> the

> > >

> > > change of

> > >

> > > > Brahma occuring any time soon.

> > >

> > > > If you can't answer then don't answer instead of getting

> personal.

> > >

> > > > Best wishes,

> > >

> > > > ***

> > >

> > > > Visti Larsen

> > >

> > > > For services and articles visit:

> > >

> > > > http://srigaruda.com

> > >

> > > > ***

> > >

> > > >

> > >

> > > >

> > >

> > > >

> > >

> > > [] On

> > >

> > > > Behalf Of kishore mohan

> > >

> > > > 09 May 2006 11:36

> > >

> > > >

> > >

> > > > Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message

> > posted in

> > >

> > > > jyotish vidya

> > >

> > > >

> > >

> > > > dear visti,

> > >

> > > >

> > >

> > > > you are going into the same self centric theory of any

> scientist.

> > >

> > > > a scientist says his theories are the centre of all the known

> and

> > >

> > > > unknown and thinks every known phenomenon should be explained

> by his

> > >

> > > > theories and every unknown phenomenon should be predicted by

> them. an

> > >

> > > > egoistic scientist rejects any phenomenon that does not fall

> within

> > >

> > > > the stratum of his theories. this is not a good indication.

> > >

> > > >

> > >

> > > > while it is good to try and explain everything- from anu(atom)

> to

> > >

> > > > mahan(the infinite)- with in your theories which will help you

> in your

> > >

> > > > spiritual and academic sojourn, it is utterly undesirable to

> reject

> > >

> > > > what you can not explain.

> > >

> > > >

> > >

> > > > In any case, as I have said, what I have said is only a belief

> and

> > >

> > > > those who expound this belief have their own ways of

> explaining it. I

> > >

> > > > am one of the believers. I can not explain you more on this,

> as you

> > >

> > > > will not appreiciate my explanations unless you accept my

> > assumptions.

> > >

> > > >

> > >

> > > > Kishore patnaik

> > >

> > > >

> > >

> > > > , "Visti Larsen" <visti@>

> wrote:

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > > ||Hare Rama Krsna||

> > >

> > > > > Dear Kishore, Namaskar

> > >

> > > > > I disagree. As Jyotishas we not only have to understand the

> > >

> > > > time/dasas of

> > >

> > > > > humans but the dasas of the entire creation, herein the

> yugas,

> > >

> > > > manvantaras,

> > >

> > > > > kalpas (blinking of brahmas eye) and the first Brahma

> himself who

> > >

> > > > will live

> > >

> > > > > for zillions of human years. By implication the opening and

> > closing of

> > >

> > > > > brahmas eye causes the pralaya, so also his reinstatement

> would

> > >

> > > > imply the

> > >

> > > > > same as Brahma embodies the creation itself... we are living

> in

> > >

> > > > Brahma, so

> > >

> > > > > if he is replaced then so is our creation.

> > >

> > > > > Best wishes,

> > >

> > > > > ***

> > >

> > > > > Visti Larsen

> > >

> > > > > For services and articles visit:

> > >

> > > > > http://srigaruda.com

> > >

> > > > > ***

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > [] On

> > >

> > > > > Behalf Of kishore mohan

> > >

> > > > > 09 May 2006 10:51

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > > Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a

> message

> > >

> > > posted in

> > >

> > > > > jyotish vidya

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > > Dear visti,

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > > namaskar.

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > > everybody has their own theories regarding that. As i said,

> it

> > is only

> > >

> > > > > a popular belief and usually, you can not debate over a

> belief.

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > > regards,

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > > Kishore patnaik

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > > , "Visti Larsen" <visti@>

> wrote:

> > >

> > > > > >

> > >

> > > > > > ||Hare Rama Krsna||

> > >

> > > > > > Dear Kishore, Namaskar

> > >

> > > > > > If the Brahma has to change then the creation must also.

> Then in

> > >

> > > > > that case

> > >

> > > > > > we should have experienced pralaya over the last few years

> > >

> > > > > already... Can't

> > >

> > > > > > really accept that.

> > >

> > > > > > Best wishes,

> > >

> > > > > > ***

> > >

> > > > > > Visti Larsen

> > >

> > > > > > For services and articles visit:

> > >

> > > > > > http://srigaruda.com

> > >

> > > > > > ***

> > >

> > > > > >

> > >

> > > > > >

> > >

> > > > > >

> > >

> > > > > [] On

> > >

> > > > > > Behalf Of kishore mohan

> > >

> > > > > > 09 May 2006 08:44

> > >

> > > > > >

> > >

> > > > > > Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a

> message

> > >

> > > > posted in

> > >

> > > > > > jyotish vidya

> > >

> > > > > >

> > >

> > > > > > Dear visti,

> > >

> > > > > >

> > >

> > > > > > Namaskar.

> > >

> > > > > >

> > >

> > > > > > Thanks for the combination.

> > >

> > > > > >

> > >

> > > > > > If you are saying about the Hanumanji taking over as the

> current

> > >

> > > > > > Brahma, I have no clue about it. It is only a polular

> belief.

> > Please

> > >

> > > > > > elaborate on the question if I misunderstood.

> > >

> > > > > >

> > >

> > > > > > Kishore patnaik

> > >

> > > > > >

> > >

> > > > > > , "Visti Larsen"

> <visti@>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > > > > >

> > >

> > > > > > > ||Hare Rama Krsna||

> > >

> > > > > > > Dear Kishore, Namaskar

> > >

> > > > > > > Check for Jupiter or Moon associating with the third

> from arudha

> > >

> > > > > lagna.

> > >

> > > > > > > These give self-consciousness/willingness or emotional

> > distress at

> > >

> > > > > > the time

> > >

> > > > > > > of death.

> > >

> > > > > > >

> > >

> > > > > > > What is YOUR condition for balarishta? Also you haven't

> > elaborated

> > >

> > > > > > on your

> > >

> > > > > > > timing of the birth of certain souls from your last mail.

> > >

> > > > > > > Best wishes,

> > >

> > > > > > > ***

> > >

> > > > > > > Visti Larsen

> > >

> > > > > > > For services and articles visit:

> > >

> > > > > > > http://srigaruda.com

> > >

> > > > > > > ***

> > >

> > > > > > >

> > >

> > > > > > >

> > >

> > > > > > >

> > >

> > > > > > [] On

> > >

> > > > > > > Behalf Of kishore mohan

> > >

> > > > > > > 08 May 2006 19:22

> > >

> > > > > > >

> > >

> > > > > > > [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a

> message

> > >

> > > posted in

> > >

> > > > > > jyotish

> > >

> > > > > > > vidya

> > >

> > > > > > >

> > >

> > > > > > > ear friend,

> > >

> > > > > > >

> > >

> > > > > > >

> > >

> > > > > > > I am yet to cast and read the charts provided by you.

> But let me

> > >

> > > > tell

> > >

> > > > > > > two general points with regard to the suicides:

> > >

> > > > > > >

> > >

> > > > > > >

> > >

> > > > > > > The first one is to do with the natal chart of the

> native.

> > >

> > > > Generally,

> > >

> > > > > > > the Lagna Lord will be a malefic for the native. This

> > happens to

> > >

> > > > > > > tarus and the four 'corner' lagnas. Also, the Moon must

> be

> > >

> > > severely

> > >

> > > > > > > afflicted. If moon is severly afflicted, it can also

> indicate a

> > >

> > > > > > > possibility of Balarishta, though in Balarishta, the

> > connection of

> > >

> > > > > > > Mars with certain Houses is compulsory. In other words,

> the

> > Moons

> > >

> > > > > > > position will be alike in both Balarishta and suicide

> cases.

> > >

> > > > > > >

> > >

> > > > > > > The second point is to do with the transits. The Tr

> Lagna lord

> > >

> > > > should

> > >

> > > > > > > be cruelly aspecting himself in the natal chart.

> Sometimes, this

> > >

> > > > > > > position can be taken by AK but then, AK should be AK

> for the

> > >

> > > > transit

> > >

> > > > > > > chart also.

> > >

> > > > > > >

> > >

> > > > > > > Hope this helps,

> > >

> > > > > > >

> > >

> > > > > > > Kishore patnaik

> > >

> > > > > > >

> > >

> > > > > > >

> > >

> > > > > > > jyotish-vidya, Uttara

> <muttaraphalguni@>

> > >

> > > > wrote:

> > >

> > > > > > > >

> > >

> > > > > > > > Dear Patrice and All,

> > >

> > > > > > > >

> > >

> > > > > > > > I have an added commentary to my last post. It is a

> social

> > >

> > > > > > > science theory but I think adds to the astrological

> reasoning

> > >

> > > behind

> > >

> > > > > > > some charts we encounter. Especially our families.

> > >

> > > > > > > >

> > >

> > > > > > > > Like your mother who is a Gemini, My mother has a

> Gemini

> > >

> > > > Sun. I

> > >

> > > > > > > often say she talks out of both sides of her mouth. She

> is also

> > >

> > > > very

> > >

> > > > > > > autocratic and opinionated. She too grew up in an era

> where

> > >

> > > people

> > >

> > > > > > > just got on with things and didn't talk or dwell on them

> > >

> > > openly. I

> > >

> > > > > > > have often found this to be a direct reaction to the

> severity

> > >

> > > of the

> > >

> > > > > > > depression era of the 30's and then the atrocities of

> World

> > >

> > > War 11.

> > >

> > > > > > > Actually, Alcoholic Anonymous grew out of this

> depression era,

> > >

> > > > > > > teaching men how to cope better with events and things

> in their

> > >

> > > > lives

> > >

> > > > > > > that were bigger than them. That's where the 12-step

> program

> > >

> > > > came to

> > >

> > > > > > > say that one was "powerless over" and taught fraternity

> of

> > >

> > > likeness

> > >

> > > > > > > and support. It was a kind of new religion to help pull

> men

> > >

> > > > from the

> > >

> > > > > > > depths of despair.

> > >

> > > > > > > >

> > >

> > > > > > > > Unfortunately, your Grandfather never experienced

> this

> > or his

> > >

> > > > > > > stoic Denmark ancestry lead him to be his own person.

> > >

> > > > > > > >

> > >

> > > > > > > > Then the war came and life changed. Young Men left

> home and

> > >

> > > > often

> > >

> > > > > > > didn't return. Or, men returned never to be the same

> again.

> > Those

> > >

> > > > > > > that did survive the hell came back with a new outlook

> on life

> > >

> > > > and the

> > >

> > > > > > > majority got on with life. Never to develop fraternity

> again.

> > >

> > > > > > > >

> > >

> > > > > > > > Women during the war came out of the house and into

> the

> > >

> > > > factory to

> > >

> > > > > > > work - to help supply the goods needed for war. That is

> where

> > >

> > > women

> > >

> > > > > > > wearing pants developed and was allowed. Every thing was

> > >

> > > > rationed, so

> > >

> > > > > > > material for clothing was harder and sturdier - so pants

> > came into

> > >

> > > > > > > being and were cheaper. Also in factory work, pants were

> > need for

> > >

> > > > > > > safety and endurance rather than dresses. Pants became

> the

> > >

> > > > uniform of

> > >

> > > > > > > the War.

> > >

> > > > > > > >

> > >

> > > > > > > > Once the war ended there was a backlash on the

> concept of

> > >

> > > "being

> > >

> > > > > > > powerless". All of a sudden being in control of ones life

> > >

> > > became an

> > >

> > > > > > > obsession in self-help advice and personal stories of

> people

> > >

> > > > > > > overcoming adversity for peace and contentment. Personal

> > >

> > > prosperity

> > >

> > > > > > > was touted everywhere. Women went back to their

> kitchens,

> > >

> > > dresses,

> > >

> > > > > > > and deferring roles.

> > >

> > > > > > > >

> > >

> > > > > > > > However, do you remember growing up how we the baby

> > >

> > > boomers were

> > >

> > > > > > > raised and what expectations were required? There were

> four

> > >

> > > themes

> > >

> > > > > > > going on. One to have a more relaxed permissive society,

> > (this is

> > >

> > > > > > > where entitlement was bred - don't you just love Dr

> Spock)

> > >

> > > two, the

> > >

> > > > > > > sky's the limit, three, gratefulness was instilled

> instead of

> > >

> > > > apathy.

> > >

> > > > > > > And, four, mothers were quietly behind closed doors

> raising

> > >

> > > their

> > >

> > > > > > > daughters to be more of their own person and equal to

> men. The

> > >

> > > > > > > fifty's believed it. The sixty's teenagers rebelled

> against the

> > >

> > > > > > > fifties restrictions, the seventies; married Women were

> > >

> > > > screaming for

> > >

> > > > > > > their autonomy and the eighties saw young college

> degreed women

> > >

> > > > in the

> > >

> > > > > > > workplace. The nineties reaped the backlash and the

> > >

> > > 21-century so

> > >

> > > > > > > far in America is entitled happy and throwing all the

> common

> > sense

> > >

> > > > > > > rules for civility out the window.

> > >

> > > > > > > >

> > >

> > > > > > > > So, when we look at out mothers and hear their

> stories it

> > >

> > > really

> > >

> > > > > > > was a different time of living and thinking and

> believing. I

> > >

> > > think

> > >

> > > > > > > the more adversity and sacrifice they encountered and

> the more

> > >

> > > > > > > deferment required, the more they built their own

> reservoirs for

> > >

> > > > > > > survival. There are some who were able to keep their

> > capacity to

> > >

> > > > > > > nurture and empathize, but all too often like my mother

> their

> > >

> > > > > > > stoicness, severe expectation, and rule has kept them

> safe and

> > >

> > > > > > > protected. And like my mother and some others I know,

> they

> > became

> > >

> > > > > > > very narcissistic.

> > >

> > > > > > > >

> > >

> > > > > > > > My mother could have been a better mother to my

> adopted

> > >

> > > sister,

> > >

> > > > > > > but in reality, my mother's thinking and feeling was and

> is one

> > >

> > > > where

> > >

> > > > > > > she provided this child with a better life and gave her

> > >

> > > > opportunities

> > >

> > > > > > > and education and a roof over her head that my sister has

> > >

> > > never been

> > >

> > > > > > > able to return in kindness to my mother. As far as

> having any

> > >

> > > > empathy

> > >

> > > > > > > for a broken soul theory - there is none. That and my

> mother's

> > >

> > > > > > > intolerance of my sister's chaotic inner soul is written

> off as

> > >

> > > > > > > complete belligerence and added to that, she is not

> connected

> > >

> > > to my

> > >

> > > > > > > mother in any depth because as my mother says, this

> child is

> > >

> > > not of

> > >

> > > > > > > her blood. Gad, what a mess and a terrible fall out for

> two

> > lives

> > >

> > > > > > > with completely different experiences.

> > >

> > > > > > > >

> > >

> > > > > > > > I am looking forward to 2012. I think the current

> tide will

> > >

> > > > > > > change, as it ultimately will. In the meantime, we have

> to slop

> > >

> > > > > > > through another six years. I hope my mother isn't living

> > >

> > > then. She

> > >

> > > > > > > like my mother in law need to go their graves to find

> peace and

> > >

> > > > > > happiness.

> > >

> > > > > > > >

> > >

> > > > > > > > As Always,

> > >

> > > > > > > > Uttara

> > >

> > > > > > > >

> > >

> > > > > > > >

> > >

> > > > > > > >

> > >

> > > > > > > > "Our deepest fear is not that we are

> > inadequate, our

> > >

> > > > > > > deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It

> is our

> > >

> > > > light,

> > >

> > > > > > > not our darkness, that most frightens us. There is

> nothing

> > >

> > > > enlightened

> > >

> > > > > > > about shrinking so that other people won't feel insecure

> around

> > >

> > > > > > > you...As we let our own light shine, we unconsciously

> give other

> > >

> > > > > > > people permission to do the same. As we are liberated

> from

> > >

> > > our own

> > >

> > > > > > > fear, our presence automatically liberates others."

> from A

> > >

> > > > Return To

> > >

> > > > > > > Love: by Marianne Williamson

> > >

> > > > > > >

> > >

> > > > > > >

> > >

> > > > > > >

> > >

> > > > > > >

> > >

> > > > > > >

> > >

> > > > > > >

> > >

> > > > > > > ~ om tat sat ~

> > >

> > > > > > > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta

> Ashram.

> > >

> > > > > > > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama

> Krishna'

> > >

> > > > > > > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great

> who said

> > >

> > > > > > that the

> > >

> > > > > > > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals.

> > >

> > > > > > > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free

> chart

> > >

> > > reading

> > >

> > > > > > today

> > >

> > > > > > > Links

> > >

> > > > > > >

> > >

> > > > > >

> > >

> > > > > >

> > >

> > > > > >

> > >

> > > > > >

> > >

> > > > > >

> > >

> > > > > >

> > >

> > > > > >

> > >

> > > > > > ~ om tat sat ~

> > >

> > > > > > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta

> Ashram.

> > >

> > > > > > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama

> Krishna'

> > >

> > > > > > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great

> who said

> > >

> > > > > that the

> > >

> > > > > > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals.

> > >

> > > > > > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free

> chart

> > reading

> > >

> > > > > today

> > >

> > > > > > Links

> > >

> > > > > >

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > > > ~ om tat sat ~

> > >

> > > > > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram.

> > >

> > > > > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama

> Krishna'

> > >

> > > > > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who

> said

> > >

> > > > that the

> > >

> > > > > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals.

> > >

> > > > > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart

> reading

> > >

> > > > today

> > >

> > > > > Links

> > >

> > > > >

> > >

> > > >

> > >

> > > >

> > >

> > > >

> > >

> > > >

> > >

> > > >

> > >

> > > >

> > >

> > > >

> > >

> > > > ~ om tat sat ~

> > >

> > > > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram.

> > >

> > > > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama

> Krishna'

> > >

> > > > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who

> said

> > >

> > > that the

> > >

> > > > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals.

> > >

> > > > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart

> reading

> > >

> > > today

> > >

> > > > Links

> > >

> > > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > ~ om tat sat ~

> > >

> > > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram.

> > >

> > > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna'

> > >

> > > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said

> > that the

> > > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals.

> > >

> > > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart

> reading

> > today

> > >

> > > Links

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > /

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > ~ om tat sat ~

> > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram.

> > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna'

> > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said

> that the

> > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals.

> > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart

> reading today

> > Links

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

*|| OM MAHAGANAPATAYE NAMAH ||*"Om Namah Shivaaya Omkareshvaraaya Om Om Sah".

Hariom, Dear Friends,

With due respects , to all the participants, i would like to submit, After veda

in post vedic period there was transformation with evolution of collective

consciousness of People in this part of asia( jamboo dwipa) and methods of

imparting

knowledge registered total shift anf gestalt in conveying the cosmic facts and social phenoenon.

Like three dimensional exposition started as a model to depicit by contemprary

teachers to explain deities/ god , Idol worship set in , so also after

upnishidic model story telling become part of curriculam.The old method of

Teaching by wrote learning was taken over by Puranic story.As Memory functions

by association each story had hidden facts of cosmos for students to understand

the sublime trouth,

Moth to mouth teaching continued till they were reduced in writing.At those time

we did not develop language as rich and abstract as it is today so to a non

initiate they are just stories but to a mind who has key to interprate it siply

is imbibed with an scientific facts.

Thus truly all purans are not History as understood by some but are scientific

like book of seers reduced to level of understanding to common people of those

times.

Hope what i write is tkaen as a missing gap giving rise to mis understanding.In

light of my understanding i feel Both Visti and Kishore are right and continue

to bless the group with their wisdom.

 

 

 

|| May all people be happy ||OM TAT SATR.C.Srivastava .swami_rcs mob

9412268768http://www.cosmograce.comhttp://www.cosmograce.blogspot.com

-

kishore mohan

 

Wednesday, May 10, 2006 7:27 PM

Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message posted in jyotish vidya

Dear gaurav, namaskar. I have repeatedly refused to be dragged into contoversy,

inspite ofprovocation, because picking on the virtual selves that the

otherpersons sometimes assume to be, is not a very good idea simply thetime

is not worth it. By his own admission, Mr visti larsen did not go beyond the

BPHS and Ihave nothing to comment on his understanding of the sacred texts. On

the other hand, the two extremes of understanding of the puranasand related

texts are to throw them out as a result of wildimagination of good old idle

indians on one hand and to say that theyare the ultimate in understanding the

creation and science on the other. Both are wrong. They are the efforts of our

forefathers to recreatethe Old stories and in the process, so much of sciences

and technologyhave been touched. I dont think you would want to take a good

story onaeroplane as a text book in aeronautics, just because it

recountsseveral Engineering facts. I want you to understand that the factsaout

the science and technology are absolutely incidental andunfortunately, we are

trying to understand about the science andtechology of the yesteryears based on

this folklore, only because theactual ancient text books are lost to posterity.

If I am not clear in what I am saying, please be patient to ask and Iwill be

happy to elaborate. regards, Kishore patnaik --- In

, "" <gg_0202 wrote:>> ||Jai

Ramakrishna||> Dear Vistiji & Kishoreji,> Please forgive this intervention, but

I agree both we Kishoreji & > Vistiji , in one point that Our Puranas are not

"Story-tellers" but > they stories are made with a scientific bend. We can talk

of many > stories from Vishnu Purana, Narada Purana, Skanda Purana,etc. We >

cannot say that those are texts of science directly, but they guide > us the

path of science & how thing goes..> Wish you all success,> .> > >

, "Visti Larsen" <visti@> > wrote:> >> > > >

||Hare Rama Krsna||> > Dear Kishore, Namaskar> > Now, are you claiming me to be

illiterate? > > Am i supposed to read the words you write or am I to 'guess'

the > gist of> > your statements. Please Kishore, you are prolonging this more

than> > necessary, If you agreed with me all along just admit your > momentary

lapse> > when you chose your words, or go read those puranas and vimshottari> >

calculations which you maybe lacking in.> > > > There is no more astrology in

this thread, so this discussion > should be done> > for now.> > Best wishes,> >

***> > Visti Larsen> > For services and articles visit: > >

http://srigaruda.com> > ***> > > > > >

> [] On> >

Behalf Of kishore mohan> > 09 May 2006 13:05> > To:

> > Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for

suicide - a message > posted in> > jyotish vidya> > > > dear visti, > > > > I

let your smirks pass. when you can not read a simple message > from a> > person

like me, then why talk of puranas and vedas? I want you to > read> > my message

once more and comment. > > > > > > > > > > Kishore patnaik > > --- In

, "Visti Larsen" <visti@> wrote:> > >> > > ||Hare

Rama Krsna||> > > > > > Dear Kishore, Namaskar> > > > > > Leaving personal

issues aside, i must make something clear.> > > > > > You said:> > > > > > the

puranas are not strict basis of science, as they are more> > > > > > stories,

though there is lots of science in them too and we have > to> > > > > > utilize

this science as the original ' text books' of the > science viz> > > > > > the

scientific parts of vedas are not given unto us.> > > > > > > > > > > > If

they are the original text books as you say then they are a> > STRICT BASIS> >

> OF SCIENCE. The Narada purana is the basis of ALOT of astrology > as> > is

the> > > Agni Purana. Your statement is negating your second statement:> > > >

> > > > > > > > Otherwise, the science and scientific theories given in

puranas > are> > > incidental. they> > > > > > are more of an attempt to recall

all the stories, whether true or> > > > > > symbolic, told in the ancient times

and hence, the name puranas-> the> > > > > > ancient lore.> > > > > > > > > >

> > So if i read the Narada Purana that gives the exact ammount of > days in a>

> > Chaturyuga as 1.577.917.828 civil (savana) days, and proceeds to> > give

the> > > methods of defining the solar and lunar months and days with> >

calculations,> > > then what exactly is incidental? When Agni Purana gives >

astrological> > timing> > > methods to decide when a person will die, then what

stories are> > being told?> > > If you haven't read them then you cannot be

blamed, but then we > all can> > > learn more everyday can't we?> > > > > > >

> > > > > You said: > > > > > > But, if you want to look at science only on the

basis of puranas,> > > > > > there is lots of vedic science which is not told in

puranas and > I hope> > > > > > you realise that.> > > > > > > > > > > > Now

WHO would restrict themself to reading only books written by> > Shakespeare> >

> or by David Frawley when you have such large compendiums of > knowledge> > >

elsewhere. Comeon Kishore, where are you going with this > statement? The> > >

members of these lists are always dwelving deep into Parasara's > Hora> > >

Shastra, Puranas, Gita, Vedas, Upanishads, etc. Infact based on > your> > >

previous question regarding Vimshottari Dasa calculation i almost> > thought> >

> you had never opened an astrology book! I know this can only be > a wrong> > >

thought, but you do suprise me sometimes and i felt i had to > point> > that

out> > > to you... afterall we must be serious in this study of Jyotish > if

we> > are to> > > offer our assistance to those who need it.> > > > > > Best

wishes and blessings,> > > > > > ***> > > > > > Visti Larsen> > > > > > For

services and articles visit: > > > > > > http://srigaruda.com> > > > > > ***> >

> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > [] On> > >

Behalf Of kishore mohan> > > 09 May 2006 12:01> > > To:

> > > Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for

suicide - a message > posted in> > > jyotish vidya> > > > > > > > > > > > Dear

visti, > > > > > > > > > > > > first and foremost, I think I have a right to

get personal as > you were> > > > > > doing the same too sometime back. In any

case, I do not > criticise the> > > > > > person but only what the person said

or thought. > > > > > > > > > > > > Secondly, the basis of all sciences is

Vedas and we have got > only a> > > > > > 'lesh' of vedas with us. so, we do

not know all that what the > rshis> > > > > > knew. the puranas are not strict

basis of science, as they are > more> > > > > > stories, though there is lots

of science in them too and we have > to> > > > > > utilize this science as the

original ' text books' of the > science viz> > > > > > the scientific parts of

vedas are not given unto us. Otherwise, > the> > > > > > science and scientific

theories given in puranas are incidental. > they> > > > > > are more of an

attempt to recall all the stories, whether true or> > > > > > symbolic, told in

the ancient times and hence, the name puranas-> the> > > > > > ancient lore. of

course, you should not mistake me that i am> > > > > > rejecting puranas as a

source of science, Noway, infact, I have > groups> > > > > > like Vedic

history and Ancient India which attempt to look at > Indian> > > > > > History

as told in the Vedas and puranas and other scriptures. > > > > > > > > > > > >

But, if you want to look at science only on the basis of puranas,> > > > > >

there is lots of vedic science which is not told in puranas and > I hope> > > >

> > you realise that.> > > > > > > > > > > > Btw, you are right that I dont

want to tell the answer to your> > > > > > question only because it depends a

lot on the belief., which you > may> > > > > > share. > > > > > > > > > > > >

I hope you take in the most positive spirit as I have no > intention of> > > >

> > hurting anyone, much less yourself. > > > > > > > > > > > > Kishore

patnaik > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In

, "Visti Larsen" <visti@> > wrote:> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > ||Hare Rama Krsna||> > > > > > > Dear Kishore, Namaskar> > > > > > >

The rishis explained this theory in all the puranas and also > the> > Guru of>

> > > > > > this parampara (sri achyuta dasa) has also talked about its> > > >

> > relevance. It is> > > > > > > used for prediction and if you think the

rishis are self-> centric> > > > > > when trying> > > > > > > to predict the

tides of humanity then i can't help you.> > > > > > > I'm not rejecting other

theories, otherwise i wouldn't even > bring> > up the> > > > > > > topic.

Instead i wanto know which evolution theory could > accept this> > > > > > to

be> > > > > > > true, and understand the background. As far as i know there >

are two> > > > > > theories> > > > > > > which have their main difference in

the understanding of the > length> > > > > > of the> > > > > > > year of Gods,

but i don't believe that this theory accomedates > the> > > > > > change of> >

> > > > > Brahma occuring any time soon.> > > > > > > If you can't answer then

don't answer instead of getting > personal.> > > > > > > Best wishes,> > > > >

> > ***> > > > > > > Visti Larsen> > > > > > > For services and articles visit:

> > > > > > > http://srigaruda.com> > > > > > > ***> > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > [] On> > > > > > > Behalf Of kishore

mohan> > > > > > > 09 May 2006 11:36> > > > > > > To:

> > > > > > > Re: [Om Krishna Guru]

Factors for suicide - a message> > posted in> > > > > > > jyotish vidya> > > >

> > > > > > > > > > dear visti,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > you are going into

the same self centric theory of any > scientist.> > > > > > > a scientist says

his theories are the centre of all the known > and> > > > > > > unknown and

thinks every known phenomenon should be explained > by his> > > > > > >

theories and every unknown phenomenon should be predicted by > them. an> > > >

> > > egoistic scientist rejects any phenomenon that does not fall > within> >

> > > > > the stratum of his theories. this is not a good indication. > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > while it is good to try and explain everything- from anu(atom)

> to> > > > > > > mahan(the infinite)- with in your theories which will help you

> in your> > > > > > > spiritual and academic sojourn, it is utterly undesirable

to > reject> > > > > > > what you can not explain. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

In any case, as I have said, what I have said is only a belief > and> > > > > >

> those who expound this belief have their own ways of > explaining it. I> > > >

> > > am one of the believers. I can not explain you more on this, > as you> > >

> > > > will not appreiciate my explanations unless you accept my> >

assumptions. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kishore patnaik > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > , "Visti Larsen" <visti@> > wrote:> >

> > > > > >> > > > > > > > ||Hare Rama Krsna||> > > > > > > > Dear Kishore,

Namaskar> > > > > > > > I disagree. As Jyotishas we not only have to understand

the> > > > > > > time/dasas of> > > > > > > > humans but the dasas of the entire

creation, herein the > yugas,> > > > > > > manvantaras,> > > > > > > > kalpas

(blinking of brahmas eye) and the first Brahma > himself who> > > > > > > will

live> > > > > > > > for zillions of human years. By implication the opening

and> > closing of> > > > > > > > brahmas eye causes the pralaya, so also his

reinstatement > would> > > > > > > imply the> > > > > > > > same as Brahma

embodies the creation itself... we are living > in> > > > > > > Brahma, so> > >

> > > > > if he is replaced then so is our creation.> > > > > > > > Best

wishes,> > > > > > > > ***> > > > > > > > Visti Larsen> > > > > > > > For

services and articles visit: > > > > > > > > http://srigaruda.com> > > > > > >

> ***> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

[] On> > > > > > > > Behalf Of kishore

mohan> > > > > > > > 09 May 2006 10:51> > > > > > > > To:

> > > > > > > > Re: [Om Krishna Guru]

Factors for suicide - a > message> > > > > > posted in> > > > > > > > jyotish

vidya> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear visti, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> namaskar. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > everybody has their own theories

regarding that. As i said, > it> > is only> > > > > > > > a popular belief and

usually, you can not debate over a > belief. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kishore patnaik > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > , "Visti Larsen" <visti@> >

wrote:> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > ||Hare Rama Krsna||> > > > > > > > >

Dear Kishore, Namaskar> > > > > > > > > If the Brahma has to change then the

creation must also. > Then in> > > > > > > > that case> > > > > > > > > we

should have experienced pralaya over the last few years> > > > > > > >

already... Can't> > > > > > > > > really accept that.> > > > > > > > > Best

wishes,> > > > > > > > > ***> > > > > > > > > Visti Larsen> > > > > > > > > For

services and articles visit: > > > > > > > > > http://srigaruda.com> > > > > > >

> > ***> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

[] On> > > > > > > > > Behalf Of kishore

mohan> > > > > > > > > 09 May 2006 08:44> > > > > > > > > To:

> > > > > > > > > Re: [Om Krishna Guru]

Factors for suicide - a > message> > > > > > > posted in> > > > > > > > >

jyotish vidya> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear visti, > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Namaskar. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the

combination. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you are saying about the

Hanumanji taking over as the > current> > > > > > > > > Brahma, I have no clue

about it. It is only a polular > belief.> > Please> > > > > > > > > elaborate

on the question if I misunderstood. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kishore

patnaik > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ,

"Visti Larsen" > <visti@>> > wrote:> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > ||Hare

Rama Krsna||> > > > > > > > > > Dear Kishore, Namaskar> > > > > > > > > > Check

for Jupiter or Moon associating with the third > from arudha> > > > > > > >

lagna.> > > > > > > > > > These give self-consciousness/willingness or

emotional> > distress at> > > > > > > > > the time> > > > > > > > > > of

death.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What is YOUR condition for

balarishta? Also you haven't> > elaborated> > > > > > > > > on your> > > > > >

> > > > timing of the birth of certain souls from your last mail.> > > > > > >

> > > Best wishes,> > > > > > > > > > ***> > > > > > > > > > Visti Larsen> > >

> > > > > > > For services and articles visit: > > > > > > > > > >

http://srigaruda.com> > > > > > > > > > ***> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

[] On> > > > > > > > > > Behalf Of kishore

mohan> > > > > > > > > > 08 May 2006 19:22> > > > > > > > > > To:

> > > > > > > > > > [Om Krishna Guru]

Factors for suicide - a > message> > > > > > posted in> > > > > > > > >

jyotish> > > > > > > > > > vidya> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ear

friend,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am yet to

cast and read the charts provided by you. > But let me> > > > > > > tell> > > >

> > > > > > two general points with regard to the suicides:> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The first one is to do with the natal

chart of the > native. > > > > > > > Generally,> > > > > > > > > > the Lagna

Lord will be a malefic for the native. This> > happens to> > > > > > > > > >

tarus and the four 'corner' lagnas. Also, the Moon must > be> > > > > >

severely> > > > > > > > > > afflicted. If moon is severly afflicted, it can

also > indicate a> > > > > > > > > > possibility of Balarishta, though in

Balarishta, the> > connection of> > > > > > > > > > Mars with certain Houses is

compulsory. In other words, > the> > Moons> > > > > > > > > > position will be

alike in both Balarishta and suicide > cases.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > The second point is to do with the transits. The Tr > Lagna lord> > > > >

> > should> > > > > > > > > > be cruelly aspecting himself in the natal chart. >

Sometimes, this> > > > > > > > > > position can be taken by AK but then, AK

should be AK > for the> > > > > > > transit> > > > > > > > > > chart also.> > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hope this helps,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > Kishore patnaik> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > jyotish-vidya, Uttara > <muttaraphalguni@>> > > >

> > > wrote:> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Dear Patrice and All,> >

> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > I have an added commentary to my last

post. It is a > social> > > > > > > > > > science theory but I think adds to

the astrological > reasoning> > > > > > behind> > > > > > > > > > some charts

we encounter. Especially our families.> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >

> Like your mother who is a Gemini, My mother has a > Gemini> > > > > > >

Sun. I> > > > > > > > > > often say she talks out of both sides of her mouth.

She > is also> > > > > > > very> > > > > > > > > > autocratic and opinionated.

She too grew up in an era > where> > > > > > people> > > > > > > > > > just got

on with things and didn't talk or dwell on them> > > > > > openly. I> > > > > >

> > > > have often found this to be a direct reaction to the > severity> > > > >

> of the> > > > > > > > > > depression era of the 30's and then the atrocities

of > World> > > > > > War 11.> > > > > > > > > > Actually, Alcoholic Anonymous

grew out of this > depression era,> > > > > > > > > > teaching men how to cope

better with events and things > in their> > > > > > > lives> > > > > > > > > >

that were bigger than them. That's where the 12-step > program> > > > > > >

came to> > > > > > > > > > say that one was "powerless over" and taught

fraternity > of> > > > > > likeness> > > > > > > > > > and support. It was a

kind of new religion to help pull > men> > > > > > > from the> > > > > > > > >

> depths of despair.> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Unfortunately,

your Grandfather never experienced > this> > or his> > > > > > > > > > stoic

Denmark ancestry lead him to be his own person.> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > >

> > > > > Then the war came and life changed. Young Men left > home and> > >

> > > > often> > > > > > > > > > didn't return. Or, men returned never to be

the same > again.> > Those> > > > > > > > > > that did survive the hell came

back with a new outlook > on life> > > > > > > and the> > > > > > > > > >

majority got on with life. Never to develop fraternity > again.> > > > > > > >

> > >> > > > > > > > > > > Women during the war came out of the house and into

> the> > > > > > > factory to> > > > > > > > > > work - to help supply the goods

needed for war. That is > where> > > > > > women> > > > > > > > > > wearing

pants developed and was allowed. Every thing was> > > > > > > rationed, so> >

> > > > > > > > material for clothing was harder and sturdier - so pants> >

came into> > > > > > > > > > being and were cheaper. Also in factory work,

pants were> > need for> > > > > > > > > > safety and endurance rather than

dresses. Pants became > the> > > > > > > uniform of> > > > > > > > > > the

War.> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Once the war ended there was a

backlash on the > concept of> > > > > > "being> > > > > > > > > > powerless".

All of a sudden being in control of ones life> > > > > > became an> > > > > > >

> > > obsession in self-help advice and personal stories of > people> > > > > >

> > > > overcoming adversity for peace and contentment. Personal> > > > > >

prosperity> > > > > > > > > > was touted everywhere. Women went back to their

> kitchens,> > > > > > dresses,> > > > > > > > > > and deferring roles.> > > >

> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > However, do you remember growing up how we

the baby> > > > > > boomers were> > > > > > > > > > raised and what expectations

were required? There were > four> > > > > > themes> > > > > > > > > > going on.

One to have a more relaxed permissive society,> > (this is> > > > > > > > > >

where entitlement was bred - don't you just love Dr > Spock)> > > > > > two,

the> > > > > > > > > > sky's the limit, three, gratefulness was instilled >

instead of> > > > > > > apathy.> > > > > > > > > > And, four, mothers were

quietly behind closed doors > raising> > > > > > their> > > > > > > > > >

daughters to be more of their own person and equal to > men. The> > > > > > >

> > > fifty's believed it. The sixty's teenagers rebelled > against the> > > >

> > > > > > fifties restrictions, the seventies; married Women were> > > > > > >

screaming for> > > > > > > > > > their autonomy and the eighties saw young

college > degreed women> > > > > > > in the> > > > > > > > > > workplace. The

nineties reaped the backlash and the> > > > > > 21-century so> > > > > > > > > >

far in America is entitled happy and throwing all the > common> > sense> > > > >

> > > > > rules for civility out the window.> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >

> > > So, when we look at out mothers and hear their > stories it> > > > > >

really> > > > > > > > > > was a different time of living and thinking and >

believing. I> > > > > > think> > > > > > > > > > the more adversity and

sacrifice they encountered and > the more> > > > > > > > > > deferment

required, the more they built their own > reservoirs for> > > > > > > > > >

survival. There are some who were able to keep their> > capacity to> > > > > >

> > > > nurture and empathize, but all too often like my mother > their> > > > >

> > > > > stoicness, severe expectation, and rule has kept them > safe and> > >

> > > > > > > protected. And like my mother and some others I know, > they> >

became> > > > > > > > > > very narcissistic.> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >

> > > > My mother could have been a better mother to my > adopted> > > > > >

sister,> > > > > > > > > > but in reality, my mother's thinking and feeling was

and > is one> > > > > > > where> > > > > > > > > > she provided this child with

a better life and gave her> > > > > > > opportunities> > > > > > > > > > and

education and a roof over her head that my sister has> > > > > > never been> >

> > > > > > > > able to return in kindness to my mother. As far as > having

any> > > > > > > empathy> > > > > > > > > > for a broken soul theory - there is

none. That and my > mother's> > > > > > > > > > intolerance of my sister's

chaotic inner soul is written > off as> > > > > > > > > > complete belligerence

and added to that, she is not > connected> > > > > > to my> > > > > > > > > >

mother in any depth because as my mother says, this > child is> > > > > > not

of> > > > > > > > > > her blood. Gad, what a mess and a terrible fall out for

> two> > lives> > > > > > > > > > with completely different experiences.> > > >

> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > I am looking forward to 2012. I think the

current > tide will> > > > > > > > > > change, as it ultimately will. In the

meantime, we have > to slop> > > > > > > > > > through another six years. I

hope my mother isn't living> > > > > > then. She> > > > > > > > > > like my

mother in law need to go their graves to find > peace and> > > > > > > > >

happiness.> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > As Always,> > > > > > >

> > > > Uttara> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >

>> > > > > > > > > > > "Our deepest fear is not that we are> >

inadequate, our> > > > > > > > > > deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond

measure. It > is our> > > > > > > light,> > > > > > > > > > not our darkness,

that most frightens us. There is > nothing> > > > > > > enlightened> > > > > >

> > > > about shrinking so that other people won't feel insecure > around> > >

> > > > > > > you...As we let our own light shine, we unconsciously > give

other> > > > > > > > > > people permission to do the same. As we are liberated

> from> > > > > > our own> > > > > > > > > > fear, our presence automatically

liberates others." > from A> > > > > > > Return To> > > > > > > > > > Love: by

Marianne Williamson> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~

om tat sat ~> > > > > > > > > > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the

Achyuta > Ashram. > > > > > > > > > > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari

Mantra 'Hare Rama > Krishna'> > > > > > > > > > (2) Try to become Vegetarian -

remember Akbar the Great > who said> > > > > > > > > that the> > > > > > > > >

> human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals.> > > > > > > > > >

(3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free > chart> > > > > >

reading> > > > > > > > > today > > > > > > > > > > Links> > > > >

> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~ om tat

sat ~> > > > > > > > > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta >

Ashram. > > > > > > > > > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare

Rama > Krishna'> > > > > > > > > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar

the Great > who said> > > > > > > > that the> > > > > > > > > human stomach

should not become a graveyard for animals.> > > > > > > > > (3) Practise

charity in thought and deed - do one free > chart> > reading> > > > > > > >

today > > > > > > > > > Links> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~ om tat sat ~> > > > > > > > Thank you for

maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram. > > > > > > > > Reminders: (1)

Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama > Krishna'> > > > > > > > (2) Try to

become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who > said> > > > > > > that the>

> > > > > > > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals.> > > > >

> > > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart > reading> >

> > > > > today > > > > > > > > Links> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > ~ om tat sat ~> > > > > > > Thank you for maintaining the

decorum of the Achyuta Ashram. > > > > > > > Reminders: (1) Recite the

Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama > Krishna'> > > > > > > (2) Try to become

Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who > said> > > > > > that the> > > > > >

> human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals.> > > > > > > (3)

Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart > reading> > > > > >

today > > > > > > > Links> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > ~ om tat sat ~> > > > > > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the

Achyuta Ashram. > > > > > > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare

Rama Krishna'> > > > > > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the

Great who said> > that the> > > human stomach should not become a graveyard for

animals.> > > > > > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart

> reading> > today > > > > > > Links> > > > > > > > > > > >

/> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~ om

tat sat ~> > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram. > >

Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna'> > (2) Try to

become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said > that the> > human

stomach should not become a graveyard for animals.> > (3) Practise charity in

thought and deed - do one free chart > reading today > > Links>

>>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...