Guest guest Posted May 8, 2006 Report Share Posted May 8, 2006 ear friend, I am yet to cast and read the charts provided by you. But let me tell two general points with regard to the suicides: The first one is to do with the natal chart of the native. Generally, the Lagna Lord will be a malefic for the native. This happens to tarus and the four 'corner' lagnas. Also, the Moon must be severely afflicted. If moon is severly afflicted, it can also indicate a possibility of Balarishta, though in Balarishta, the connection of Mars with certain Houses is compulsory. In other words, the Moons position will be alike in both Balarishta and suicide cases. The second point is to do with the transits. The Tr Lagna lord should be cruelly aspecting himself in the natal chart. Sometimes, this position can be taken by AK but then, AK should be AK for the transit chart also. Hope this helps, Kishore patnaik jyotish-vidya, Uttara <muttaraphalguni wrote: > > Dear Patrice and All, > > I have an added commentary to my last post. It is a social science theory but I think adds to the astrological reasoning behind some charts we encounter. Especially our families. > > Like your mother who is a Gemini, My mother has a Gemini Sun. I often say she talks out of both sides of her mouth. She is also very autocratic and opinionated. She too grew up in an era where people just got on with things and didn't talk or dwell on them openly. I have often found this to be a direct reaction to the severity of the depression era of the 30's and then the atrocities of World War 11. Actually, Alcoholic Anonymous grew out of this depression era, teaching men how to cope better with events and things in their lives that were bigger than them. That's where the 12-step program came to say that one was "powerless over" and taught fraternity of likeness and support. It was a kind of new religion to help pull men from the depths of despair. > > Unfortunately, your Grandfather never experienced this or his stoic Denmark ancestry lead him to be his own person. > > Then the war came and life changed. Young Men left home and often didn't return. Or, men returned never to be the same again. Those that did survive the hell came back with a new outlook on life and the majority got on with life. Never to develop fraternity again. > > Women during the war came out of the house and into the factory to work – to help supply the goods needed for war. That is where women wearing pants developed and was allowed. Every thing was rationed, so material for clothing was harder and sturdier – so pants came into being and were cheaper. Also in factory work, pants were need for safety and endurance rather than dresses. Pants became the uniform of the War. > > Once the war ended there was a backlash on the concept of "being powerless". All of a sudden being in control of ones life became an obsession in self-help advice and personal stories of people overcoming adversity for peace and contentment. Personal prosperity was touted everywhere. Women went back to their kitchens, dresses, and deferring roles. > > However, do you remember growing up how we the baby boomers were raised and what expectations were required? There were four themes going on. One to have a more relaxed permissive society, (this is where entitlement was bred – don't you just love Dr Spock) two, the sky's the limit, three, gratefulness was instilled instead of apathy. And, four, mothers were quietly behind closed doors raising their daughters to be more of their own person and equal to men. The fifty's believed it. The sixty's teenagers rebelled against the fifties restrictions, the seventies; married Women were screaming for their autonomy and the eighties saw young college degreed women in the workplace. The nineties reaped the backlash and the 21-century so far in America is entitled happy and throwing all the common sense rules for civility out the window. > > So, when we look at out mothers and hear their stories it really was a different time of living and thinking and believing. I think the more adversity and sacrifice they encountered and the more deferment required, the more they built their own reservoirs for survival. There are some who were able to keep their capacity to nurture and empathize, but all too often like my mother their stoicness, severe expectation, and rule has kept them safe and protected. And like my mother and some others I know, they became very narcissistic. > > My mother could have been a better mother to my adopted sister, but in reality, my mother's thinking and feeling was and is one where she provided this child with a better life and gave her opportunities and education and a roof over her head that my sister has never been able to return in kindness to my mother. As far as having any empathy for a broken soul theory – there is none. That and my mother's intolerance of my sister's chaotic inner soul is written off as complete belligerence and added to that, she is not connected to my mother in any depth because as my mother says, this child is not of her blood. Gad, what a mess and a terrible fall out for two lives with completely different experiences. > > I am looking forward to 2012. I think the current tide will change, as it ultimately will. In the meantime, we have to slop through another six years. I hope my mother isn't living then. She like my mother in law need to go their graves to find peace and happiness. > > As Always, > Uttara > > > > "Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate, our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light, not our darkness, that most frightens us. There is nothing enlightened about shrinking so that other people won't feel insecure around you...As we let our own light shine, we unconsciously give other people permission to do the same. As we are liberated from our own fear, our presence automatically liberates others." from A Return To Love: by Marianne Williamson Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 8, 2006 Report Share Posted May 8, 2006 ||Hare Rama Krsna|| Dear Kishore, Namaskar Check for Jupiter or Moon associating with the third from arudha lagna. These give self-consciousness/willingness or emotional distress at the time of death. What is YOUR condition for balarishta? Also you haven't elaborated on your timing of the birth of certain souls from your last mail. Best wishes, *** Visti Larsen For services and articles visit: http://srigaruda.com *** [] On Behalf Of kishore mohan 08 May 2006 19:22 [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message posted in jyotish vidya ear friend, I am yet to cast and read the charts provided by you. But let me tell two general points with regard to the suicides: The first one is to do with the natal chart of the native. Generally, the Lagna Lord will be a malefic for the native. This happens to tarus and the four 'corner' lagnas. Also, the Moon must be severely afflicted. If moon is severly afflicted, it can also indicate a possibility of Balarishta, though in Balarishta, the connection of Mars with certain Houses is compulsory. In other words, the Moons position will be alike in both Balarishta and suicide cases. The second point is to do with the transits. The Tr Lagna lord should be cruelly aspecting himself in the natal chart. Sometimes, this position can be taken by AK but then, AK should be AK for the transit chart also. Hope this helps, Kishore patnaik jyotish-vidya, Uttara <muttaraphalguni wrote: > > Dear Patrice and All, > > I have an added commentary to my last post. It is a social science theory but I think adds to the astrological reasoning behind some charts we encounter. Especially our families. > > Like your mother who is a Gemini, My mother has a Gemini Sun. I often say she talks out of both sides of her mouth. She is also very autocratic and opinionated. She too grew up in an era where people just got on with things and didn't talk or dwell on them openly. I have often found this to be a direct reaction to the severity of the depression era of the 30's and then the atrocities of World War 11. Actually, Alcoholic Anonymous grew out of this depression era, teaching men how to cope better with events and things in their lives that were bigger than them. That's where the 12-step program came to say that one was "powerless over" and taught fraternity of likeness and support. It was a kind of new religion to help pull men from the depths of despair. > > Unfortunately, your Grandfather never experienced this or his stoic Denmark ancestry lead him to be his own person. > > Then the war came and life changed. Young Men left home and often didn't return. Or, men returned never to be the same again. Those that did survive the hell came back with a new outlook on life and the majority got on with life. Never to develop fraternity again. > > Women during the war came out of the house and into the factory to work – to help supply the goods needed for war. That is where women wearing pants developed and was allowed. Every thing was rationed, so material for clothing was harder and sturdier – so pants came into being and were cheaper. Also in factory work, pants were need for safety and endurance rather than dresses. Pants became the uniform of the War. > > Once the war ended there was a backlash on the concept of "being powerless". All of a sudden being in control of ones life became an obsession in self-help advice and personal stories of people overcoming adversity for peace and contentment. Personal prosperity was touted everywhere. Women went back to their kitchens, dresses, and deferring roles. > > However, do you remember growing up how we the baby boomers were raised and what expectations were required? There were four themes going on. One to have a more relaxed permissive society, (this is where entitlement was bred – don't you just love Dr Spock) two, the sky's the limit, three, gratefulness was instilled instead of apathy. And, four, mothers were quietly behind closed doors raising their daughters to be more of their own person and equal to men. The fifty's believed it. The sixty's teenagers rebelled against the fifties restrictions, the seventies; married Women were screaming for their autonomy and the eighties saw young college degreed women in the workplace. The nineties reaped the backlash and the 21-century so far in America is entitled happy and throwing all the common sense rules for civility out the window. > > So, when we look at out mothers and hear their stories it really was a different time of living and thinking and believing. I think the more adversity and sacrifice they encountered and the more deferment required, the more they built their own reservoirs for survival. There are some who were able to keep their capacity to nurture and empathize, but all too often like my mother their stoicness, severe expectation, and rule has kept them safe and protected. And like my mother and some others I know, they became very narcissistic. > > My mother could have been a better mother to my adopted sister, but in reality, my mother's thinking and feeling was and is one where she provided this child with a better life and gave her opportunities and education and a roof over her head that my sister has never been able to return in kindness to my mother. As far as having any empathy for a broken soul theory – there is none. That and my mother's intolerance of my sister's chaotic inner soul is written off as complete belligerence and added to that, she is not connected to my mother in any depth because as my mother says, this child is not of her blood. Gad, what a mess and a terrible fall out for two lives with completely different experiences. > > I am looking forward to 2012. I think the current tide will change, as it ultimately will. In the meantime, we have to slop through another six years. I hope my mother isn't living then. She like my mother in law need to go their graves to find peace and happiness. > > As Always, > Uttara > > > > "Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate, our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light, not our darkness, that most frightens us. There is nothing enlightened about shrinking so that other people won't feel insecure around you...As we let our own light shine, we unconsciously give other people permission to do the same. As we are liberated from our own fear, our presence automatically liberates others." from A Return To Love: by Marianne Williamson ~ om tat sat ~ Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram. Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna' (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said that the human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals. (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading today Links Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 9, 2006 Report Share Posted May 9, 2006 Dear visti, Namaskar. Thanks for the combination. If you are saying about the Hanumanji taking over as the current Brahma, I have no clue about it. It is only a polular belief. Please elaborate on the question if I misunderstood. Kishore patnaik , "Visti Larsen" <visti wrote: > > ||Hare Rama Krsna|| > Dear Kishore, Namaskar > Check for Jupiter or Moon associating with the third from arudha lagna. > These give self-consciousness/willingness or emotional distress at the time > of death. > > What is YOUR condition for balarishta? Also you haven't elaborated on your > timing of the birth of certain souls from your last mail. > Best wishes, > *** > Visti Larsen > For services and articles visit: > http://srigaruda.com > *** > > > [] On > Behalf Of kishore mohan > 08 May 2006 19:22 > > [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message posted in jyotish > vidya > > ear friend, > > > I am yet to cast and read the charts provided by you. But let me tell > two general points with regard to the suicides: > > > The first one is to do with the natal chart of the native. Generally, > the Lagna Lord will be a malefic for the native. This happens to > tarus and the four 'corner' lagnas. Also, the Moon must be severely > afflicted. If moon is severly afflicted, it can also indicate a > possibility of Balarishta, though in Balarishta, the connection of > Mars with certain Houses is compulsory. In other words, the Moons > position will be alike in both Balarishta and suicide cases. > > The second point is to do with the transits. The Tr Lagna lord should > be cruelly aspecting himself in the natal chart. Sometimes, this > position can be taken by AK but then, AK should be AK for the transit > chart also. > > Hope this helps, > > Kishore patnaik > > > jyotish-vidya, Uttara <muttaraphalguni@> wrote: > > > > Dear Patrice and All, > > > > I have an added commentary to my last post. It is a social > science theory but I think adds to the astrological reasoning behind > some charts we encounter. Especially our families. > > > > Like your mother who is a Gemini, My mother has a Gemini Sun. I > often say she talks out of both sides of her mouth. She is also very > autocratic and opinionated. She too grew up in an era where people > just got on with things and didn't talk or dwell on them openly. I > have often found this to be a direct reaction to the severity of the > depression era of the 30's and then the atrocities of World War 11. > Actually, Alcoholic Anonymous grew out of this depression era, > teaching men how to cope better with events and things in their lives > that were bigger than them. That's where the 12-step program came to > say that one was "powerless over" and taught fraternity of likeness > and support. It was a kind of new religion to help pull men from the > depths of despair. > > > > Unfortunately, your Grandfather never experienced this or his > stoic Denmark ancestry lead him to be his own person. > > > > Then the war came and life changed. Young Men left home and often > didn't return. Or, men returned never to be the same again. Those > that did survive the hell came back with a new outlook on life and the > majority got on with life. Never to develop fraternity again. > > > > Women during the war came out of the house and into the factory to > work – to help supply the goods needed for war. That is where women > wearing pants developed and was allowed. Every thing was rationed, so > material for clothing was harder and sturdier – so pants came into > being and were cheaper. Also in factory work, pants were need for > safety and endurance rather than dresses. Pants became the uniform of > the War. > > > > Once the war ended there was a backlash on the concept of "being > powerless". All of a sudden being in control of ones life became an > obsession in self-help advice and personal stories of people > overcoming adversity for peace and contentment. Personal prosperity > was touted everywhere. Women went back to their kitchens, dresses, > and deferring roles. > > > > However, do you remember growing up how we the baby boomers were > raised and what expectations were required? There were four themes > going on. One to have a more relaxed permissive society, (this is > where entitlement was bred – don't you just love Dr Spock) two, the > sky's the limit, three, gratefulness was instilled instead of apathy. > And, four, mothers were quietly behind closed doors raising their > daughters to be more of their own person and equal to men. The > fifty's believed it. The sixty's teenagers rebelled against the > fifties restrictions, the seventies; married Women were screaming for > their autonomy and the eighties saw young college degreed women in the > workplace. The nineties reaped the backlash and the 21-century so > far in America is entitled happy and throwing all the common sense > rules for civility out the window. > > > > So, when we look at out mothers and hear their stories it really > was a different time of living and thinking and believing. I think > the more adversity and sacrifice they encountered and the more > deferment required, the more they built their own reservoirs for > survival. There are some who were able to keep their capacity to > nurture and empathize, but all too often like my mother their > stoicness, severe expectation, and rule has kept them safe and > protected. And like my mother and some others I know, they became > very narcissistic. > > > > My mother could have been a better mother to my adopted sister, > but in reality, my mother's thinking and feeling was and is one where > she provided this child with a better life and gave her opportunities > and education and a roof over her head that my sister has never been > able to return in kindness to my mother. As far as having any empathy > for a broken soul theory – there is none. That and my mother's > intolerance of my sister's chaotic inner soul is written off as > complete belligerence and added to that, she is not connected to my > mother in any depth because as my mother says, this child is not of > her blood. Gad, what a mess and a terrible fall out for two lives > with completely different experiences. > > > > I am looking forward to 2012. I think the current tide will > change, as it ultimately will. In the meantime, we have to slop > through another six years. I hope my mother isn't living then. She > like my mother in law need to go their graves to find peace and happiness. > > > > As Always, > > Uttara > > > > > > > > "Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate, our > deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light, > not our darkness, that most frightens us. There is nothing enlightened > about shrinking so that other people won't feel insecure around > you...As we let our own light shine, we unconsciously give other > people permission to do the same. As we are liberated from our own > fear, our presence automatically liberates others." from A Return To > Love: by Marianne Williamson ~ om tat sat ~ > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram. > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna' > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said that the > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals. > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading today > Links > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 9, 2006 Report Share Posted May 9, 2006 ||Hare Rama Krsna|| Dear Kishore, Namaskar If the Brahma has to change then the creation must also. Then in that case we should have experienced pralaya over the last few years already... Can't really accept that. Best wishes, *** Visti Larsen For services and articles visit: http://srigaruda.com *** [] On Behalf Of kishore mohan 09 May 2006 08:44 Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message posted in jyotish vidya Dear visti, Namaskar. Thanks for the combination. If you are saying about the Hanumanji taking over as the current Brahma, I have no clue about it. It is only a polular belief. Please elaborate on the question if I misunderstood. Kishore patnaik , "Visti Larsen" <visti wrote: > > ||Hare Rama Krsna|| > Dear Kishore, Namaskar > Check for Jupiter or Moon associating with the third from arudha lagna. > These give self-consciousness/willingness or emotional distress at the time > of death. > > What is YOUR condition for balarishta? Also you haven't elaborated on your > timing of the birth of certain souls from your last mail. > Best wishes, > *** > Visti Larsen > For services and articles visit: > http://srigaruda.com > *** > > > [] On > Behalf Of kishore mohan > 08 May 2006 19:22 > > [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message posted in jyotish > vidya > > ear friend, > > > I am yet to cast and read the charts provided by you. But let me tell > two general points with regard to the suicides: > > > The first one is to do with the natal chart of the native. Generally, > the Lagna Lord will be a malefic for the native. This happens to > tarus and the four 'corner' lagnas. Also, the Moon must be severely > afflicted. If moon is severly afflicted, it can also indicate a > possibility of Balarishta, though in Balarishta, the connection of > Mars with certain Houses is compulsory. In other words, the Moons > position will be alike in both Balarishta and suicide cases. > > The second point is to do with the transits. The Tr Lagna lord should > be cruelly aspecting himself in the natal chart. Sometimes, this > position can be taken by AK but then, AK should be AK for the transit > chart also. > > Hope this helps, > > Kishore patnaik > > > jyotish-vidya, Uttara <muttaraphalguni@> wrote: > > > > Dear Patrice and All, > > > > I have an added commentary to my last post. It is a social > science theory but I think adds to the astrological reasoning behind > some charts we encounter. Especially our families. > > > > Like your mother who is a Gemini, My mother has a Gemini Sun. I > often say she talks out of both sides of her mouth. She is also very > autocratic and opinionated. She too grew up in an era where people > just got on with things and didn't talk or dwell on them openly. I > have often found this to be a direct reaction to the severity of the > depression era of the 30's and then the atrocities of World War 11. > Actually, Alcoholic Anonymous grew out of this depression era, > teaching men how to cope better with events and things in their lives > that were bigger than them. That's where the 12-step program came to > say that one was "powerless over" and taught fraternity of likeness > and support. It was a kind of new religion to help pull men from the > depths of despair. > > > > Unfortunately, your Grandfather never experienced this or his > stoic Denmark ancestry lead him to be his own person. > > > > Then the war came and life changed. Young Men left home and often > didn't return. Or, men returned never to be the same again. Those > that did survive the hell came back with a new outlook on life and the > majority got on with life. Never to develop fraternity again. > > > > Women during the war came out of the house and into the factory to > work – to help supply the goods needed for war. That is where women > wearing pants developed and was allowed. Every thing was rationed, so > material for clothing was harder and sturdier – so pants came into > being and were cheaper. Also in factory work, pants were need for > safety and endurance rather than dresses. Pants became the uniform of > the War. > > > > Once the war ended there was a backlash on the concept of "being > powerless". All of a sudden being in control of ones life became an > obsession in self-help advice and personal stories of people > overcoming adversity for peace and contentment. Personal prosperity > was touted everywhere. Women went back to their kitchens, dresses, > and deferring roles. > > > > However, do you remember growing up how we the baby boomers were > raised and what expectations were required? There were four themes > going on. One to have a more relaxed permissive society, (this is > where entitlement was bred – don't you just love Dr Spock) two, the > sky's the limit, three, gratefulness was instilled instead of apathy. > And, four, mothers were quietly behind closed doors raising their > daughters to be more of their own person and equal to men. The > fifty's believed it. The sixty's teenagers rebelled against the > fifties restrictions, the seventies; married Women were screaming for > their autonomy and the eighties saw young college degreed women in the > workplace. The nineties reaped the backlash and the 21-century so > far in America is entitled happy and throwing all the common sense > rules for civility out the window. > > > > So, when we look at out mothers and hear their stories it really > was a different time of living and thinking and believing. I think > the more adversity and sacrifice they encountered and the more > deferment required, the more they built their own reservoirs for > survival. There are some who were able to keep their capacity to > nurture and empathize, but all too often like my mother their > stoicness, severe expectation, and rule has kept them safe and > protected. And like my mother and some others I know, they became > very narcissistic. > > > > My mother could have been a better mother to my adopted sister, > but in reality, my mother's thinking and feeling was and is one where > she provided this child with a better life and gave her opportunities > and education and a roof over her head that my sister has never been > able to return in kindness to my mother. As far as having any empathy > for a broken soul theory – there is none. That and my mother's > intolerance of my sister's chaotic inner soul is written off as > complete belligerence and added to that, she is not connected to my > mother in any depth because as my mother says, this child is not of > her blood. Gad, what a mess and a terrible fall out for two lives > with completely different experiences. > > > > I am looking forward to 2012. I think the current tide will > change, as it ultimately will. In the meantime, we have to slop > through another six years. I hope my mother isn't living then. She > like my mother in law need to go their graves to find peace and happiness. > > > > As Always, > > Uttara > > > > > > > > "Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate, our > deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light, > not our darkness, that most frightens us. There is nothing enlightened > about shrinking so that other people won't feel insecure around > you...As we let our own light shine, we unconsciously give other > people permission to do the same. As we are liberated from our own > fear, our presence automatically liberates others." from A Return To > Love: by Marianne Williamson ~ om tat sat ~ > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram. > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna' > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said that the > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals. > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading today > Links > ~ om tat sat ~ Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram. Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna' (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said that the human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals. (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading today Links Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 9, 2006 Report Share Posted May 9, 2006 Dear visti, namaskar. everybody has their own theories regarding that. As i said, it is only a popular belief and usually, you can not debate over a belief. regards, Kishore patnaik , "Visti Larsen" <visti wrote: > > ||Hare Rama Krsna|| > Dear Kishore, Namaskar > If the Brahma has to change then the creation must also. Then in that case > we should have experienced pralaya over the last few years already... Can't > really accept that. > Best wishes, > *** > Visti Larsen > For services and articles visit: > http://srigaruda.com > *** > > > [] On > Behalf Of kishore mohan > 09 May 2006 08:44 > > Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message posted in > jyotish vidya > > Dear visti, > > Namaskar. > > Thanks for the combination. > > If you are saying about the Hanumanji taking over as the current > Brahma, I have no clue about it. It is only a polular belief. Please > elaborate on the question if I misunderstood. > > Kishore patnaik > > , "Visti Larsen" <visti@> wrote: > > > > ||Hare Rama Krsna|| > > Dear Kishore, Namaskar > > Check for Jupiter or Moon associating with the third from arudha lagna. > > These give self-consciousness/willingness or emotional distress at > the time > > of death. > > > > What is YOUR condition for balarishta? Also you haven't elaborated > on your > > timing of the birth of certain souls from your last mail. > > Best wishes, > > *** > > Visti Larsen > > For services and articles visit: > > http://srigaruda.com > > *** > > > > > > > [] On > > Behalf Of kishore mohan > > 08 May 2006 19:22 > > > > [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message posted in > jyotish > > vidya > > > > ear friend, > > > > > > I am yet to cast and read the charts provided by you. But let me tell > > two general points with regard to the suicides: > > > > > > The first one is to do with the natal chart of the native. Generally, > > the Lagna Lord will be a malefic for the native. This happens to > > tarus and the four 'corner' lagnas. Also, the Moon must be severely > > afflicted. If moon is severly afflicted, it can also indicate a > > possibility of Balarishta, though in Balarishta, the connection of > > Mars with certain Houses is compulsory. In other words, the Moons > > position will be alike in both Balarishta and suicide cases. > > > > The second point is to do with the transits. The Tr Lagna lord should > > be cruelly aspecting himself in the natal chart. Sometimes, this > > position can be taken by AK but then, AK should be AK for the transit > > chart also. > > > > Hope this helps, > > > > Kishore patnaik > > > > > > jyotish-vidya, Uttara <muttaraphalguni@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Patrice and All, > > > > > > I have an added commentary to my last post. It is a social > > science theory but I think adds to the astrological reasoning behind > > some charts we encounter. Especially our families. > > > > > > Like your mother who is a Gemini, My mother has a Gemini Sun. I > > often say she talks out of both sides of her mouth. She is also very > > autocratic and opinionated. She too grew up in an era where people > > just got on with things and didn't talk or dwell on them openly. I > > have often found this to be a direct reaction to the severity of the > > depression era of the 30's and then the atrocities of World War 11. > > Actually, Alcoholic Anonymous grew out of this depression era, > > teaching men how to cope better with events and things in their lives > > that were bigger than them. That's where the 12-step program came to > > say that one was "powerless over" and taught fraternity of likeness > > and support. It was a kind of new religion to help pull men from the > > depths of despair. > > > > > > Unfortunately, your Grandfather never experienced this or his > > stoic Denmark ancestry lead him to be his own person. > > > > > > Then the war came and life changed. Young Men left home and often > > didn't return. Or, men returned never to be the same again. Those > > that did survive the hell came back with a new outlook on life and the > > majority got on with life. Never to develop fraternity again. > > > > > > Women during the war came out of the house and into the factory to > > work – to help supply the goods needed for war. That is where women > > wearing pants developed and was allowed. Every thing was rationed, so > > material for clothing was harder and sturdier – so pants came into > > being and were cheaper. Also in factory work, pants were need for > > safety and endurance rather than dresses. Pants became the uniform of > > the War. > > > > > > Once the war ended there was a backlash on the concept of "being > > powerless". All of a sudden being in control of ones life became an > > obsession in self-help advice and personal stories of people > > overcoming adversity for peace and contentment. Personal prosperity > > was touted everywhere. Women went back to their kitchens, dresses, > > and deferring roles. > > > > > > However, do you remember growing up how we the baby boomers were > > raised and what expectations were required? There were four themes > > going on. One to have a more relaxed permissive society, (this is > > where entitlement was bred – don't you just love Dr Spock) two, the > > sky's the limit, three, gratefulness was instilled instead of apathy. > > And, four, mothers were quietly behind closed doors raising their > > daughters to be more of their own person and equal to men. The > > fifty's believed it. The sixty's teenagers rebelled against the > > fifties restrictions, the seventies; married Women were screaming for > > their autonomy and the eighties saw young college degreed women in the > > workplace. The nineties reaped the backlash and the 21-century so > > far in America is entitled happy and throwing all the common sense > > rules for civility out the window. > > > > > > So, when we look at out mothers and hear their stories it really > > was a different time of living and thinking and believing. I think > > the more adversity and sacrifice they encountered and the more > > deferment required, the more they built their own reservoirs for > > survival. There are some who were able to keep their capacity to > > nurture and empathize, but all too often like my mother their > > stoicness, severe expectation, and rule has kept them safe and > > protected. And like my mother and some others I know, they became > > very narcissistic. > > > > > > My mother could have been a better mother to my adopted sister, > > but in reality, my mother's thinking and feeling was and is one where > > she provided this child with a better life and gave her opportunities > > and education and a roof over her head that my sister has never been > > able to return in kindness to my mother. As far as having any empathy > > for a broken soul theory – there is none. That and my mother's > > intolerance of my sister's chaotic inner soul is written off as > > complete belligerence and added to that, she is not connected to my > > mother in any depth because as my mother says, this child is not of > > her blood. Gad, what a mess and a terrible fall out for two lives > > with completely different experiences. > > > > > > I am looking forward to 2012. I think the current tide will > > change, as it ultimately will. In the meantime, we have to slop > > through another six years. I hope my mother isn't living then. She > > like my mother in law need to go their graves to find peace and > happiness. > > > > > > As Always, > > > Uttara > > > > > > > > > > > > "Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate, our > > deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light, > > not our darkness, that most frightens us. There is nothing enlightened > > about shrinking so that other people won't feel insecure around > > you...As we let our own light shine, we unconsciously give other > > people permission to do the same. As we are liberated from our own > > fear, our presence automatically liberates others." from A Return To > > Love: by Marianne Williamson > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~ om tat sat ~ > > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram. > > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna' > > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said > that the > > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals. > > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading > today > > Links > > > ~ om tat sat ~ > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram. > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna' > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said that the > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals. > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading today > Links > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 9, 2006 Report Share Posted May 9, 2006 ||Hare Rama Krsna|| Dear Kishore, Namaskar I disagree. As Jyotishas we not only have to understand the time/dasas of humans but the dasas of the entire creation, herein the yugas, manvantaras, kalpas (blinking of brahmas eye) and the first Brahma himself who will live for zillions of human years. By implication the opening and closing of brahmas eye causes the pralaya, so also his reinstatement would imply the same as Brahma embodies the creation itself... we are living in Brahma, so if he is replaced then so is our creation. Best wishes, *** Visti Larsen For services and articles visit: http://srigaruda.com *** [] On Behalf Of kishore mohan 09 May 2006 10:51 Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message posted in jyotish vidya Dear visti, namaskar. everybody has their own theories regarding that. As i said, it is only a popular belief and usually, you can not debate over a belief. regards, Kishore patnaik , "Visti Larsen" <visti wrote: > > ||Hare Rama Krsna|| > Dear Kishore, Namaskar > If the Brahma has to change then the creation must also. Then in that case > we should have experienced pralaya over the last few years already... Can't > really accept that. > Best wishes, > *** > Visti Larsen > For services and articles visit: > http://srigaruda.com > *** > > > [] On > Behalf Of kishore mohan > 09 May 2006 08:44 > > Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message posted in > jyotish vidya > > Dear visti, > > Namaskar. > > Thanks for the combination. > > If you are saying about the Hanumanji taking over as the current > Brahma, I have no clue about it. It is only a polular belief. Please > elaborate on the question if I misunderstood. > > Kishore patnaik > > , "Visti Larsen" <visti@> wrote: > > > > ||Hare Rama Krsna|| > > Dear Kishore, Namaskar > > Check for Jupiter or Moon associating with the third from arudha lagna. > > These give self-consciousness/willingness or emotional distress at > the time > > of death. > > > > What is YOUR condition for balarishta? Also you haven't elaborated > on your > > timing of the birth of certain souls from your last mail. > > Best wishes, > > *** > > Visti Larsen > > For services and articles visit: > > http://srigaruda.com > > *** > > > > > > > [] On > > Behalf Of kishore mohan > > 08 May 2006 19:22 > > > > [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message posted in > jyotish > > vidya > > > > ear friend, > > > > > > I am yet to cast and read the charts provided by you. But let me tell > > two general points with regard to the suicides: > > > > > > The first one is to do with the natal chart of the native. Generally, > > the Lagna Lord will be a malefic for the native. This happens to > > tarus and the four 'corner' lagnas. Also, the Moon must be severely > > afflicted. If moon is severly afflicted, it can also indicate a > > possibility of Balarishta, though in Balarishta, the connection of > > Mars with certain Houses is compulsory. In other words, the Moons > > position will be alike in both Balarishta and suicide cases. > > > > The second point is to do with the transits. The Tr Lagna lord should > > be cruelly aspecting himself in the natal chart. Sometimes, this > > position can be taken by AK but then, AK should be AK for the transit > > chart also. > > > > Hope this helps, > > > > Kishore patnaik > > > > > > jyotish-vidya, Uttara <muttaraphalguni@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Patrice and All, > > > > > > I have an added commentary to my last post. It is a social > > science theory but I think adds to the astrological reasoning behind > > some charts we encounter. Especially our families. > > > > > > Like your mother who is a Gemini, My mother has a Gemini Sun. I > > often say she talks out of both sides of her mouth. She is also very > > autocratic and opinionated. She too grew up in an era where people > > just got on with things and didn't talk or dwell on them openly. I > > have often found this to be a direct reaction to the severity of the > > depression era of the 30's and then the atrocities of World War 11. > > Actually, Alcoholic Anonymous grew out of this depression era, > > teaching men how to cope better with events and things in their lives > > that were bigger than them. That's where the 12-step program came to > > say that one was "powerless over" and taught fraternity of likeness > > and support. It was a kind of new religion to help pull men from the > > depths of despair. > > > > > > Unfortunately, your Grandfather never experienced this or his > > stoic Denmark ancestry lead him to be his own person. > > > > > > Then the war came and life changed. Young Men left home and often > > didn't return. Or, men returned never to be the same again. Those > > that did survive the hell came back with a new outlook on life and the > > majority got on with life. Never to develop fraternity again. > > > > > > Women during the war came out of the house and into the factory to > > work – to help supply the goods needed for war. That is where women > > wearing pants developed and was allowed. Every thing was rationed, so > > material for clothing was harder and sturdier – so pants came into > > being and were cheaper. Also in factory work, pants were need for > > safety and endurance rather than dresses. Pants became the uniform of > > the War. > > > > > > Once the war ended there was a backlash on the concept of "being > > powerless". All of a sudden being in control of ones life became an > > obsession in self-help advice and personal stories of people > > overcoming adversity for peace and contentment. Personal prosperity > > was touted everywhere. Women went back to their kitchens, dresses, > > and deferring roles. > > > > > > However, do you remember growing up how we the baby boomers were > > raised and what expectations were required? There were four themes > > going on. One to have a more relaxed permissive society, (this is > > where entitlement was bred – don't you just love Dr Spock) two, the > > sky's the limit, three, gratefulness was instilled instead of apathy. > > And, four, mothers were quietly behind closed doors raising their > > daughters to be more of their own person and equal to men. The > > fifty's believed it. The sixty's teenagers rebelled against the > > fifties restrictions, the seventies; married Women were screaming for > > their autonomy and the eighties saw young college degreed women in the > > workplace. The nineties reaped the backlash and the 21-century so > > far in America is entitled happy and throwing all the common sense > > rules for civility out the window. > > > > > > So, when we look at out mothers and hear their stories it really > > was a different time of living and thinking and believing. I think > > the more adversity and sacrifice they encountered and the more > > deferment required, the more they built their own reservoirs for > > survival. There are some who were able to keep their capacity to > > nurture and empathize, but all too often like my mother their > > stoicness, severe expectation, and rule has kept them safe and > > protected. And like my mother and some others I know, they became > > very narcissistic. > > > > > > My mother could have been a better mother to my adopted sister, > > but in reality, my mother's thinking and feeling was and is one where > > she provided this child with a better life and gave her opportunities > > and education and a roof over her head that my sister has never been > > able to return in kindness to my mother. As far as having any empathy > > for a broken soul theory – there is none. That and my mother's > > intolerance of my sister's chaotic inner soul is written off as > > complete belligerence and added to that, she is not connected to my > > mother in any depth because as my mother says, this child is not of > > her blood. Gad, what a mess and a terrible fall out for two lives > > with completely different experiences. > > > > > > I am looking forward to 2012. I think the current tide will > > change, as it ultimately will. In the meantime, we have to slop > > through another six years. I hope my mother isn't living then. She > > like my mother in law need to go their graves to find peace and > happiness. > > > > > > As Always, > > > Uttara > > > > > > > > > > > > "Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate, our > > deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light, > > not our darkness, that most frightens us. There is nothing enlightened > > about shrinking so that other people won't feel insecure around > > you...As we let our own light shine, we unconsciously give other > > people permission to do the same. As we are liberated from our own > > fear, our presence automatically liberates others." from A Return To > > Love: by Marianne Williamson > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~ om tat sat ~ > > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram. > > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna' > > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said > that the > > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals. > > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading > today > > Links > > > ~ om tat sat ~ > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram. > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna' > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said that the > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals. > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading today > Links > ~ om tat sat ~ Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram. Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna' (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said that the human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals. (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading today Links Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 9, 2006 Report Share Posted May 9, 2006 dear visti, you are going into the same self centric theory of any scientist. a scientist says his theories are the centre of all the known and unknown and thinks every known phenomenon should be explained by his theories and every unknown phenomenon should be predicted by them. an egoistic scientist rejects any phenomenon that does not fall within the stratum of his theories. this is not a good indication. while it is good to try and explain everything- from anu(atom) to mahan(the infinite)- with in your theories which will help you in your spiritual and academic sojourn, it is utterly undesirable to reject what you can not explain. In any case, as I have said, what I have said is only a belief and those who expound this belief have their own ways of explaining it. I am one of the believers. I can not explain you more on this, as you will not appreiciate my explanations unless you accept my assumptions. Kishore patnaik , "Visti Larsen" <visti wrote: > > ||Hare Rama Krsna|| > Dear Kishore, Namaskar > I disagree. As Jyotishas we not only have to understand the time/dasas of > humans but the dasas of the entire creation, herein the yugas, manvantaras, > kalpas (blinking of brahmas eye) and the first Brahma himself who will live > for zillions of human years. By implication the opening and closing of > brahmas eye causes the pralaya, so also his reinstatement would imply the > same as Brahma embodies the creation itself... we are living in Brahma, so > if he is replaced then so is our creation. > Best wishes, > *** > Visti Larsen > For services and articles visit: > http://srigaruda.com > *** > > > [] On > Behalf Of kishore mohan > 09 May 2006 10:51 > > Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message posted in > jyotish vidya > > Dear visti, > > namaskar. > > everybody has their own theories regarding that. As i said, it is only > a popular belief and usually, you can not debate over a belief. > > regards, > > Kishore patnaik > > , "Visti Larsen" <visti@> wrote: > > > > ||Hare Rama Krsna|| > > Dear Kishore, Namaskar > > If the Brahma has to change then the creation must also. Then in > that case > > we should have experienced pralaya over the last few years > already... Can't > > really accept that. > > Best wishes, > > *** > > Visti Larsen > > For services and articles visit: > > http://srigaruda.com > > *** > > > > > > > [] On > > Behalf Of kishore mohan > > 09 May 2006 08:44 > > > > Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message posted in > > jyotish vidya > > > > Dear visti, > > > > Namaskar. > > > > Thanks for the combination. > > > > If you are saying about the Hanumanji taking over as the current > > Brahma, I have no clue about it. It is only a polular belief. Please > > elaborate on the question if I misunderstood. > > > > Kishore patnaik > > > > , "Visti Larsen" <visti@> wrote: > > > > > > ||Hare Rama Krsna|| > > > Dear Kishore, Namaskar > > > Check for Jupiter or Moon associating with the third from arudha > lagna. > > > These give self-consciousness/willingness or emotional distress at > > the time > > > of death. > > > > > > What is YOUR condition for balarishta? Also you haven't elaborated > > on your > > > timing of the birth of certain souls from your last mail. > > > Best wishes, > > > *** > > > Visti Larsen > > > For services and articles visit: > > > http://srigaruda.com > > > *** > > > > > > > > > > > [] On > > > Behalf Of kishore mohan > > > 08 May 2006 19:22 > > > > > > [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message posted in > > jyotish > > > vidya > > > > > > ear friend, > > > > > > > > > I am yet to cast and read the charts provided by you. But let me tell > > > two general points with regard to the suicides: > > > > > > > > > The first one is to do with the natal chart of the native. Generally, > > > the Lagna Lord will be a malefic for the native. This happens to > > > tarus and the four 'corner' lagnas. Also, the Moon must be severely > > > afflicted. If moon is severly afflicted, it can also indicate a > > > possibility of Balarishta, though in Balarishta, the connection of > > > Mars with certain Houses is compulsory. In other words, the Moons > > > position will be alike in both Balarishta and suicide cases. > > > > > > The second point is to do with the transits. The Tr Lagna lord should > > > be cruelly aspecting himself in the natal chart. Sometimes, this > > > position can be taken by AK but then, AK should be AK for the transit > > > chart also. > > > > > > Hope this helps, > > > > > > Kishore patnaik > > > > > > > > > jyotish-vidya, Uttara <muttaraphalguni@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Patrice and All, > > > > > > > > I have an added commentary to my last post. It is a social > > > science theory but I think adds to the astrological reasoning behind > > > some charts we encounter. Especially our families. > > > > > > > > Like your mother who is a Gemini, My mother has a Gemini Sun. I > > > often say she talks out of both sides of her mouth. She is also very > > > autocratic and opinionated. She too grew up in an era where people > > > just got on with things and didn't talk or dwell on them openly. I > > > have often found this to be a direct reaction to the severity of the > > > depression era of the 30's and then the atrocities of World War 11. > > > Actually, Alcoholic Anonymous grew out of this depression era, > > > teaching men how to cope better with events and things in their lives > > > that were bigger than them. That's where the 12-step program came to > > > say that one was "powerless over" and taught fraternity of likeness > > > and support. It was a kind of new religion to help pull men from the > > > depths of despair. > > > > > > > > Unfortunately, your Grandfather never experienced this or his > > > stoic Denmark ancestry lead him to be his own person. > > > > > > > > Then the war came and life changed. Young Men left home and often > > > didn't return. Or, men returned never to be the same again. Those > > > that did survive the hell came back with a new outlook on life and the > > > majority got on with life. Never to develop fraternity again. > > > > > > > > Women during the war came out of the house and into the factory to > > > work – to help supply the goods needed for war. That is where women > > > wearing pants developed and was allowed. Every thing was rationed, so > > > material for clothing was harder and sturdier – so pants came into > > > being and were cheaper. Also in factory work, pants were need for > > > safety and endurance rather than dresses. Pants became the uniform of > > > the War. > > > > > > > > Once the war ended there was a backlash on the concept of "being > > > powerless". All of a sudden being in control of ones life became an > > > obsession in self-help advice and personal stories of people > > > overcoming adversity for peace and contentment. Personal prosperity > > > was touted everywhere. Women went back to their kitchens, dresses, > > > and deferring roles. > > > > > > > > However, do you remember growing up how we the baby boomers were > > > raised and what expectations were required? There were four themes > > > going on. One to have a more relaxed permissive society, (this is > > > where entitlement was bred – don't you just love Dr Spock) two, the > > > sky's the limit, three, gratefulness was instilled instead of apathy. > > > And, four, mothers were quietly behind closed doors raising their > > > daughters to be more of their own person and equal to men. The > > > fifty's believed it. The sixty's teenagers rebelled against the > > > fifties restrictions, the seventies; married Women were screaming for > > > their autonomy and the eighties saw young college degreed women in the > > > workplace. The nineties reaped the backlash and the 21-century so > > > far in America is entitled happy and throwing all the common sense > > > rules for civility out the window. > > > > > > > > So, when we look at out mothers and hear their stories it really > > > was a different time of living and thinking and believing. I think > > > the more adversity and sacrifice they encountered and the more > > > deferment required, the more they built their own reservoirs for > > > survival. There are some who were able to keep their capacity to > > > nurture and empathize, but all too often like my mother their > > > stoicness, severe expectation, and rule has kept them safe and > > > protected. And like my mother and some others I know, they became > > > very narcissistic. > > > > > > > > My mother could have been a better mother to my adopted sister, > > > but in reality, my mother's thinking and feeling was and is one where > > > she provided this child with a better life and gave her opportunities > > > and education and a roof over her head that my sister has never been > > > able to return in kindness to my mother. As far as having any empathy > > > for a broken soul theory – there is none. That and my mother's > > > intolerance of my sister's chaotic inner soul is written off as > > > complete belligerence and added to that, she is not connected to my > > > mother in any depth because as my mother says, this child is not of > > > her blood. Gad, what a mess and a terrible fall out for two lives > > > with completely different experiences. > > > > > > > > I am looking forward to 2012. I think the current tide will > > > change, as it ultimately will. In the meantime, we have to slop > > > through another six years. I hope my mother isn't living then. She > > > like my mother in law need to go their graves to find peace and > > happiness. > > > > > > > > As Always, > > > > Uttara > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate, our > > > deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light, > > > not our darkness, that most frightens us. There is nothing enlightened > > > about shrinking so that other people won't feel insecure around > > > you...As we let our own light shine, we unconsciously give other > > > people permission to do the same. As we are liberated from our own > > > fear, our presence automatically liberates others." from A Return To > > > Love: by Marianne Williamson > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~ om tat sat ~ > > > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram. > > > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna' > > > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said > > that the > > > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals. > > > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading > > today > > > Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~ om tat sat ~ > > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram. > > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna' > > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said > that the > > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals. > > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading > today > > Links > > > ~ om tat sat ~ > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram. > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna' > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said that the > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals. > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading today > Links > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 9, 2006 Report Share Posted May 9, 2006 ||Hare Rama Krsna|| Dear Kishore, Namaskar The rishis explained this theory in all the puranas and also the Guru of this parampara (sri achyuta dasa) has also talked about its relevance. It is used for prediction and if you think the rishis are self-centric when trying to predict the tides of humanity then i can't help you. I'm not rejecting other theories, otherwise i wouldn't even bring up the topic. Instead i wanto know which evolution theory could accept this to be true, and understand the background. As far as i know there are two theories which have their main difference in the understanding of the length of the year of Gods, but i don't believe that this theory accomedates the change of Brahma occuring any time soon. If you can't answer then don't answer instead of getting personal. Best wishes, *** Visti Larsen For services and articles visit: http://srigaruda.com *** [] On Behalf Of kishore mohan 09 May 2006 11:36 Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message posted in jyotish vidya dear visti, you are going into the same self centric theory of any scientist. a scientist says his theories are the centre of all the known and unknown and thinks every known phenomenon should be explained by his theories and every unknown phenomenon should be predicted by them. an egoistic scientist rejects any phenomenon that does not fall within the stratum of his theories. this is not a good indication. while it is good to try and explain everything- from anu(atom) to mahan(the infinite)- with in your theories which will help you in your spiritual and academic sojourn, it is utterly undesirable to reject what you can not explain. In any case, as I have said, what I have said is only a belief and those who expound this belief have their own ways of explaining it. I am one of the believers. I can not explain you more on this, as you will not appreiciate my explanations unless you accept my assumptions. Kishore patnaik , "Visti Larsen" <visti wrote: > > ||Hare Rama Krsna|| > Dear Kishore, Namaskar > I disagree. As Jyotishas we not only have to understand the time/dasas of > humans but the dasas of the entire creation, herein the yugas, manvantaras, > kalpas (blinking of brahmas eye) and the first Brahma himself who will live > for zillions of human years. By implication the opening and closing of > brahmas eye causes the pralaya, so also his reinstatement would imply the > same as Brahma embodies the creation itself... we are living in Brahma, so > if he is replaced then so is our creation. > Best wishes, > *** > Visti Larsen > For services and articles visit: > http://srigaruda.com > *** > > > [] On > Behalf Of kishore mohan > 09 May 2006 10:51 > > Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message posted in > jyotish vidya > > Dear visti, > > namaskar. > > everybody has their own theories regarding that. As i said, it is only > a popular belief and usually, you can not debate over a belief. > > regards, > > Kishore patnaik > > , "Visti Larsen" <visti@> wrote: > > > > ||Hare Rama Krsna|| > > Dear Kishore, Namaskar > > If the Brahma has to change then the creation must also. Then in > that case > > we should have experienced pralaya over the last few years > already... Can't > > really accept that. > > Best wishes, > > *** > > Visti Larsen > > For services and articles visit: > > http://srigaruda.com > > *** > > > > > > > [] On > > Behalf Of kishore mohan > > 09 May 2006 08:44 > > > > Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message posted in > > jyotish vidya > > > > Dear visti, > > > > Namaskar. > > > > Thanks for the combination. > > > > If you are saying about the Hanumanji taking over as the current > > Brahma, I have no clue about it. It is only a polular belief. Please > > elaborate on the question if I misunderstood. > > > > Kishore patnaik > > > > , "Visti Larsen" <visti@> wrote: > > > > > > ||Hare Rama Krsna|| > > > Dear Kishore, Namaskar > > > Check for Jupiter or Moon associating with the third from arudha > lagna. > > > These give self-consciousness/willingness or emotional distress at > > the time > > > of death. > > > > > > What is YOUR condition for balarishta? Also you haven't elaborated > > on your > > > timing of the birth of certain souls from your last mail. > > > Best wishes, > > > *** > > > Visti Larsen > > > For services and articles visit: > > > http://srigaruda.com > > > *** > > > > > > > > > > > [] On > > > Behalf Of kishore mohan > > > 08 May 2006 19:22 > > > > > > [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message posted in > > jyotish > > > vidya > > > > > > ear friend, > > > > > > > > > I am yet to cast and read the charts provided by you. But let me tell > > > two general points with regard to the suicides: > > > > > > > > > The first one is to do with the natal chart of the native. Generally, > > > the Lagna Lord will be a malefic for the native. This happens to > > > tarus and the four 'corner' lagnas. Also, the Moon must be severely > > > afflicted. If moon is severly afflicted, it can also indicate a > > > possibility of Balarishta, though in Balarishta, the connection of > > > Mars with certain Houses is compulsory. In other words, the Moons > > > position will be alike in both Balarishta and suicide cases. > > > > > > The second point is to do with the transits. The Tr Lagna lord should > > > be cruelly aspecting himself in the natal chart. Sometimes, this > > > position can be taken by AK but then, AK should be AK for the transit > > > chart also. > > > > > > Hope this helps, > > > > > > Kishore patnaik > > > > > > > > > jyotish-vidya, Uttara <muttaraphalguni@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Patrice and All, > > > > > > > > I have an added commentary to my last post. It is a social > > > science theory but I think adds to the astrological reasoning behind > > > some charts we encounter. Especially our families. > > > > > > > > Like your mother who is a Gemini, My mother has a Gemini Sun. I > > > often say she talks out of both sides of her mouth. She is also very > > > autocratic and opinionated. She too grew up in an era where people > > > just got on with things and didn't talk or dwell on them openly. I > > > have often found this to be a direct reaction to the severity of the > > > depression era of the 30's and then the atrocities of World War 11. > > > Actually, Alcoholic Anonymous grew out of this depression era, > > > teaching men how to cope better with events and things in their lives > > > that were bigger than them. That's where the 12-step program came to > > > say that one was "powerless over" and taught fraternity of likeness > > > and support. It was a kind of new religion to help pull men from the > > > depths of despair. > > > > > > > > Unfortunately, your Grandfather never experienced this or his > > > stoic Denmark ancestry lead him to be his own person. > > > > > > > > Then the war came and life changed. Young Men left home and often > > > didn't return. Or, men returned never to be the same again. Those > > > that did survive the hell came back with a new outlook on life and the > > > majority got on with life. Never to develop fraternity again. > > > > > > > > Women during the war came out of the house and into the factory to > > > work – to help supply the goods needed for war. That is where women > > > wearing pants developed and was allowed. Every thing was rationed, so > > > material for clothing was harder and sturdier – so pants came into > > > being and were cheaper. Also in factory work, pants were need for > > > safety and endurance rather than dresses. Pants became the uniform of > > > the War. > > > > > > > > Once the war ended there was a backlash on the concept of "being > > > powerless". All of a sudden being in control of ones life became an > > > obsession in self-help advice and personal stories of people > > > overcoming adversity for peace and contentment. Personal prosperity > > > was touted everywhere. Women went back to their kitchens, dresses, > > > and deferring roles. > > > > > > > > However, do you remember growing up how we the baby boomers were > > > raised and what expectations were required? There were four themes > > > going on. One to have a more relaxed permissive society, (this is > > > where entitlement was bred – don't you just love Dr Spock) two, the > > > sky's the limit, three, gratefulness was instilled instead of apathy. > > > And, four, mothers were quietly behind closed doors raising their > > > daughters to be more of their own person and equal to men. The > > > fifty's believed it. The sixty's teenagers rebelled against the > > > fifties restrictions, the seventies; married Women were screaming for > > > their autonomy and the eighties saw young college degreed women in the > > > workplace. The nineties reaped the backlash and the 21-century so > > > far in America is entitled happy and throwing all the common sense > > > rules for civility out the window. > > > > > > > > So, when we look at out mothers and hear their stories it really > > > was a different time of living and thinking and believing. I think > > > the more adversity and sacrifice they encountered and the more > > > deferment required, the more they built their own reservoirs for > > > survival. There are some who were able to keep their capacity to > > > nurture and empathize, but all too often like my mother their > > > stoicness, severe expectation, and rule has kept them safe and > > > protected. And like my mother and some others I know, they became > > > very narcissistic. > > > > > > > > My mother could have been a better mother to my adopted sister, > > > but in reality, my mother's thinking and feeling was and is one where > > > she provided this child with a better life and gave her opportunities > > > and education and a roof over her head that my sister has never been > > > able to return in kindness to my mother. As far as having any empathy > > > for a broken soul theory – there is none. That and my mother's > > > intolerance of my sister's chaotic inner soul is written off as > > > complete belligerence and added to that, she is not connected to my > > > mother in any depth because as my mother says, this child is not of > > > her blood. Gad, what a mess and a terrible fall out for two lives > > > with completely different experiences. > > > > > > > > I am looking forward to 2012. I think the current tide will > > > change, as it ultimately will. In the meantime, we have to slop > > > through another six years. I hope my mother isn't living then. She > > > like my mother in law need to go their graves to find peace and > > happiness. > > > > > > > > As Always, > > > > Uttara > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate, our > > > deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light, > > > not our darkness, that most frightens us. There is nothing enlightened > > > about shrinking so that other people won't feel insecure around > > > you...As we let our own light shine, we unconsciously give other > > > people permission to do the same. As we are liberated from our own > > > fear, our presence automatically liberates others." from A Return To > > > Love: by Marianne Williamson > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~ om tat sat ~ > > > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram. > > > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna' > > > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said > > that the > > > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals. > > > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading > > today > > > Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~ om tat sat ~ > > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram. > > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna' > > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said > that the > > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals. > > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading > today > > Links > > > ~ om tat sat ~ > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram. > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna' > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said that the > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals. > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading today > Links > ~ om tat sat ~ Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram. Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna' (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said that the human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals. (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading today Links Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 9, 2006 Report Share Posted May 9, 2006 Dear visti, first and foremost, I think I have a right to get personal as you were doing the same too sometime back. In any case, I do not criticise the person but only what the person said or thought. Secondly, the basis of all sciences is Vedas and we have got only a 'lesh' of vedas with us. so, we do not know all that what the rshis knew. the puranas are not strict basis of science, as they are more stories, though there is lots of science in them too and we have to utilize this science as the original ' text books' of the science viz the scientific parts of vedas are not given unto us. Otherwise, the science and scientific theories given in puranas are incidental. they are more of an attempt to recall all the stories, whether true or symbolic, told in the ancient times and hence, the name puranas-the ancient lore. of course, you should not mistake me that i am rejecting puranas as a source of science, Noway, infact, I have groups like Vedic history and Ancient India which attempt to look at Indian History as told in the Vedas and puranas and other scriptures. But, if you want to look at science only on the basis of puranas, there is lots of vedic science which is not told in puranas and I hope you realise that. Btw, you are right that I dont want to tell the answer to your question only because it depends a lot on the belief., which you may share. I hope you take in the most positive spirit as I have no intention of hurting anyone, much less yourself. Kishore patnaik , "Visti Larsen" <visti wrote: > > ||Hare Rama Krsna|| > Dear Kishore, Namaskar > The rishis explained this theory in all the puranas and also the Guru of > this parampara (sri achyuta dasa) has also talked about its relevance. It is > used for prediction and if you think the rishis are self-centric when trying > to predict the tides of humanity then i can't help you. > I'm not rejecting other theories, otherwise i wouldn't even bring up the > topic. Instead i wanto know which evolution theory could accept this to be > true, and understand the background. As far as i know there are two theories > which have their main difference in the understanding of the length of the > year of Gods, but i don't believe that this theory accomedates the change of > Brahma occuring any time soon. > If you can't answer then don't answer instead of getting personal. > Best wishes, > *** > Visti Larsen > For services and articles visit: > http://srigaruda.com > *** > > > [] On > Behalf Of kishore mohan > 09 May 2006 11:36 > > Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message posted in > jyotish vidya > > dear visti, > > you are going into the same self centric theory of any scientist. > a scientist says his theories are the centre of all the known and > unknown and thinks every known phenomenon should be explained by his > theories and every unknown phenomenon should be predicted by them. an > egoistic scientist rejects any phenomenon that does not fall within > the stratum of his theories. this is not a good indication. > > while it is good to try and explain everything- from anu(atom) to > mahan(the infinite)- with in your theories which will help you in your > spiritual and academic sojourn, it is utterly undesirable to reject > what you can not explain. > > In any case, as I have said, what I have said is only a belief and > those who expound this belief have their own ways of explaining it. I > am one of the believers. I can not explain you more on this, as you > will not appreiciate my explanations unless you accept my assumptions. > > Kishore patnaik > > , "Visti Larsen" <visti@> wrote: > > > > ||Hare Rama Krsna|| > > Dear Kishore, Namaskar > > I disagree. As Jyotishas we not only have to understand the > time/dasas of > > humans but the dasas of the entire creation, herein the yugas, > manvantaras, > > kalpas (blinking of brahmas eye) and the first Brahma himself who > will live > > for zillions of human years. By implication the opening and closing of > > brahmas eye causes the pralaya, so also his reinstatement would > imply the > > same as Brahma embodies the creation itself... we are living in > Brahma, so > > if he is replaced then so is our creation. > > Best wishes, > > *** > > Visti Larsen > > For services and articles visit: > > http://srigaruda.com > > *** > > > > > > > [] On > > Behalf Of kishore mohan > > 09 May 2006 10:51 > > > > Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message posted in > > jyotish vidya > > > > Dear visti, > > > > namaskar. > > > > everybody has their own theories regarding that. As i said, it is only > > a popular belief and usually, you can not debate over a belief. > > > > regards, > > > > Kishore patnaik > > > > , "Visti Larsen" <visti@> wrote: > > > > > > ||Hare Rama Krsna|| > > > Dear Kishore, Namaskar > > > If the Brahma has to change then the creation must also. Then in > > that case > > > we should have experienced pralaya over the last few years > > already... Can't > > > really accept that. > > > Best wishes, > > > *** > > > Visti Larsen > > > For services and articles visit: > > > http://srigaruda.com > > > *** > > > > > > > > > > > [] On > > > Behalf Of kishore mohan > > > 09 May 2006 08:44 > > > > > > Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message > posted in > > > jyotish vidya > > > > > > Dear visti, > > > > > > Namaskar. > > > > > > Thanks for the combination. > > > > > > If you are saying about the Hanumanji taking over as the current > > > Brahma, I have no clue about it. It is only a polular belief. Please > > > elaborate on the question if I misunderstood. > > > > > > Kishore patnaik > > > > > > , "Visti Larsen" <visti@> wrote: > > > > > > > > ||Hare Rama Krsna|| > > > > Dear Kishore, Namaskar > > > > Check for Jupiter or Moon associating with the third from arudha > > lagna. > > > > These give self-consciousness/willingness or emotional distress at > > > the time > > > > of death. > > > > > > > > What is YOUR condition for balarishta? Also you haven't elaborated > > > on your > > > > timing of the birth of certain souls from your last mail. > > > > Best wishes, > > > > *** > > > > Visti Larsen > > > > For services and articles visit: > > > > http://srigaruda.com > > > > *** > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [] On > > > > Behalf Of kishore mohan > > > > 08 May 2006 19:22 > > > > > > > > [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message posted in > > > jyotish > > > > vidya > > > > > > > > ear friend, > > > > > > > > > > > > I am yet to cast and read the charts provided by you. But let me > tell > > > > two general points with regard to the suicides: > > > > > > > > > > > > The first one is to do with the natal chart of the native. > Generally, > > > > the Lagna Lord will be a malefic for the native. This happens to > > > > tarus and the four 'corner' lagnas. Also, the Moon must be severely > > > > afflicted. If moon is severly afflicted, it can also indicate a > > > > possibility of Balarishta, though in Balarishta, the connection of > > > > Mars with certain Houses is compulsory. In other words, the Moons > > > > position will be alike in both Balarishta and suicide cases. > > > > > > > > The second point is to do with the transits. The Tr Lagna lord > should > > > > be cruelly aspecting himself in the natal chart. Sometimes, this > > > > position can be taken by AK but then, AK should be AK for the > transit > > > > chart also. > > > > > > > > Hope this helps, > > > > > > > > Kishore patnaik > > > > > > > > > > > > jyotish-vidya, Uttara <muttaraphalguni@> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Dear Patrice and All, > > > > > > > > > > I have an added commentary to my last post. It is a social > > > > science theory but I think adds to the astrological reasoning behind > > > > some charts we encounter. Especially our families. > > > > > > > > > > Like your mother who is a Gemini, My mother has a Gemini > Sun. I > > > > often say she talks out of both sides of her mouth. She is also > very > > > > autocratic and opinionated. She too grew up in an era where people > > > > just got on with things and didn't talk or dwell on them openly. I > > > > have often found this to be a direct reaction to the severity of the > > > > depression era of the 30's and then the atrocities of World War 11. > > > > Actually, Alcoholic Anonymous grew out of this depression era, > > > > teaching men how to cope better with events and things in their > lives > > > > that were bigger than them. That's where the 12-step program > came to > > > > say that one was "powerless over" and taught fraternity of likeness > > > > and support. It was a kind of new religion to help pull men > from the > > > > depths of despair. > > > > > > > > > > Unfortunately, your Grandfather never experienced this or his > > > > stoic Denmark ancestry lead him to be his own person. > > > > > > > > > > Then the war came and life changed. Young Men left home and > often > > > > didn't return. Or, men returned never to be the same again. Those > > > > that did survive the hell came back with a new outlook on life > and the > > > > majority got on with life. Never to develop fraternity again. > > > > > > > > > > Women during the war came out of the house and into the > factory to > > > > work – to help supply the goods needed for war. That is where women > > > > wearing pants developed and was allowed. Every thing was > rationed, so > > > > material for clothing was harder and sturdier – so pants came into > > > > being and were cheaper. Also in factory work, pants were need for > > > > safety and endurance rather than dresses. Pants became the > uniform of > > > > the War. > > > > > > > > > > Once the war ended there was a backlash on the concept of "being > > > > powerless". All of a sudden being in control of ones life became an > > > > obsession in self-help advice and personal stories of people > > > > overcoming adversity for peace and contentment. Personal prosperity > > > > was touted everywhere. Women went back to their kitchens, dresses, > > > > and deferring roles. > > > > > > > > > > However, do you remember growing up how we the baby boomers were > > > > raised and what expectations were required? There were four themes > > > > going on. One to have a more relaxed permissive society, (this is > > > > where entitlement was bred – don't you just love Dr Spock) two, the > > > > sky's the limit, three, gratefulness was instilled instead of > apathy. > > > > And, four, mothers were quietly behind closed doors raising their > > > > daughters to be more of their own person and equal to men. The > > > > fifty's believed it. The sixty's teenagers rebelled against the > > > > fifties restrictions, the seventies; married Women were > screaming for > > > > their autonomy and the eighties saw young college degreed women > in the > > > > workplace. The nineties reaped the backlash and the 21-century so > > > > far in America is entitled happy and throwing all the common sense > > > > rules for civility out the window. > > > > > > > > > > So, when we look at out mothers and hear their stories it really > > > > was a different time of living and thinking and believing. I think > > > > the more adversity and sacrifice they encountered and the more > > > > deferment required, the more they built their own reservoirs for > > > > survival. There are some who were able to keep their capacity to > > > > nurture and empathize, but all too often like my mother their > > > > stoicness, severe expectation, and rule has kept them safe and > > > > protected. And like my mother and some others I know, they became > > > > very narcissistic. > > > > > > > > > > My mother could have been a better mother to my adopted sister, > > > > but in reality, my mother's thinking and feeling was and is one > where > > > > she provided this child with a better life and gave her > opportunities > > > > and education and a roof over her head that my sister has never been > > > > able to return in kindness to my mother. As far as having any > empathy > > > > for a broken soul theory – there is none. That and my mother's > > > > intolerance of my sister's chaotic inner soul is written off as > > > > complete belligerence and added to that, she is not connected to my > > > > mother in any depth because as my mother says, this child is not of > > > > her blood. Gad, what a mess and a terrible fall out for two lives > > > > with completely different experiences. > > > > > > > > > > I am looking forward to 2012. I think the current tide will > > > > change, as it ultimately will. In the meantime, we have to slop > > > > through another six years. I hope my mother isn't living then. She > > > > like my mother in law need to go their graves to find peace and > > > happiness. > > > > > > > > > > As Always, > > > > > Uttara > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate, our > > > > deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our > light, > > > > not our darkness, that most frightens us. There is nothing > enlightened > > > > about shrinking so that other people won't feel insecure around > > > > you...As we let our own light shine, we unconsciously give other > > > > people permission to do the same. As we are liberated from our own > > > > fear, our presence automatically liberates others." from A > Return To > > > > Love: by Marianne Williamson > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~ om tat sat ~ > > > > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram. > > > > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna' > > > > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said > > > that the > > > > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals. > > > > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading > > > today > > > > Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~ om tat sat ~ > > > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram. > > > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna' > > > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said > > that the > > > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals. > > > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading > > today > > > Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~ om tat sat ~ > > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram. > > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna' > > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said > that the > > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals. > > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading > today > > Links > > > ~ om tat sat ~ > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram. > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna' > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said that the > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals. > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading today > Links > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 9, 2006 Report Share Posted May 9, 2006 ||Hare Rama Krsna|| Dear Kishore, Namaskar Leaving personal issues aside, i must make something clear. You said: the puranas are not strict basis of science, as they are more stories, though there is lots of science in them too and we have to utilize this science as the original ' text books' of the science viz the scientific parts of vedas are not given unto us. If they are the original text books as you say then they are a STRICT BASIS OF SCIENCE. The Narada purana is the basis of ALOT of astrology as is the Agni Purana. Your statement is negating your second statement: Otherwise, the science and scientific theories given in puranas are incidental. they are more of an attempt to recall all the stories, whether true or symbolic, told in the ancient times and hence, the name puranas-the ancient lore. So if i read the Narada Purana that gives the exact ammount of days in a Chaturyuga as 1.577.917.828 civil (savana) days, and proceeds to give the methods of defining the solar and lunar months and days with calculations, then what exactly is incidental? When Agni Purana gives astrological timing methods to decide when a person will die, then what stories are being told? If you haven’t read them then you cannot be blamed, but then we all can learn more everyday can’t we? You said: But, if you want to look at science only on the basis of puranas, there is lots of vedic science which is not told in puranas and I hope you realise that. Now WHO would restrict themself to reading only books written by Shakespeare or by David Frawley when you have such large compendiums of knowledge elsewhere. Comeon Kishore, where are you going with this statement? The members of these lists are always dwelving deep into Parasara’s Hora Shastra, Puranas, Gita, Vedas, Upanishads, etc. Infact based on your previous question regarding Vimshottari Dasa calculation i almost thought you had never opened an astrology book! I know this can only be a wrong thought, but you do suprise me sometimes and i felt i had to point that out to you... afterall we must be serious in this study of Jyotish if we are to offer our assistance to those who need it. Best wishes and blessings, *** Visti Larsen For services and articles visit: http://srigaruda.com *** [] On Behalf Of kishore mohan 09 May 2006 12:01 Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message posted in jyotish vidya Dear visti, first and foremost, I think I have a right to get personal as you were doing the same too sometime back. In any case, I do not criticise the person but only what the person said or thought. Secondly, the basis of all sciences is Vedas and we have got only a 'lesh' of vedas with us. so, we do not know all that what the rshis knew. the puranas are not strict basis of science, as they are more stories, though there is lots of science in them too and we have to utilize this science as the original ' text books' of the science viz the scientific parts of vedas are not given unto us. Otherwise, the science and scientific theories given in puranas are incidental. they are more of an attempt to recall all the stories, whether true or symbolic, told in the ancient times and hence, the name puranas-the ancient lore. of course, you should not mistake me that i am rejecting puranas as a source of science, Noway, infact, I have groups like Vedic history and Ancient India which attempt to look at Indian History as told in the Vedas and puranas and other scriptures. But, if you want to look at science only on the basis of puranas, there is lots of vedic science which is not told in puranas and I hope you realise that. Btw, you are right that I dont want to tell the answer to your question only because it depends a lot on the belief., which you may share. I hope you take in the most positive spirit as I have no intention of hurting anyone, much less yourself. Kishore patnaik , "Visti Larsen" <visti wrote: > > ||Hare Rama Krsna|| > Dear Kishore, Namaskar > The rishis explained this theory in all the puranas and also the Guru of > this parampara (sri achyuta dasa) has also talked about its relevance. It is > used for prediction and if you think the rishis are self-centric when trying > to predict the tides of humanity then i can't help you. > I'm not rejecting other theories, otherwise i wouldn't even bring up the > topic. Instead i wanto know which evolution theory could accept this to be > true, and understand the background. As far as i know there are two theories > which have their main difference in the understanding of the length of the > year of Gods, but i don't believe that this theory accomedates the change of > Brahma occuring any time soon. > If you can't answer then don't answer instead of getting personal. > Best wishes, > *** > Visti Larsen > For services and articles visit: > http://srigaruda.com > *** > > > [] On > Behalf Of kishore mohan > 09 May 2006 11:36 > > Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message posted in > jyotish vidya > > dear visti, > > you are going into the same self centric theory of any scientist. > a scientist says his theories are the centre of all the known and > unknown and thinks every known phenomenon should be explained by his > theories and every unknown phenomenon should be predicted by them. an > egoistic scientist rejects any phenomenon that does not fall within > the stratum of his theories. this is not a good indication. > > while it is good to try and explain everything- from anu(atom) to > mahan(the infinite)- with in your theories which will help you in your > spiritual and academic sojourn, it is utterly undesirable to reject > what you can not explain. > > In any case, as I have said, what I have said is only a belief and > those who expound this belief have their own ways of explaining it. I > am one of the believers. I can not explain you more on this, as you > will not appreiciate my explanations unless you accept my assumptions. > > Kishore patnaik > > , "Visti Larsen" <visti@> wrote: > > > > ||Hare Rama Krsna|| > > Dear Kishore, Namaskar > > I disagree. As Jyotishas we not only have to understand the > time/dasas of > > humans but the dasas of the entire creation, herein the yugas, > manvantaras, > > kalpas (blinking of brahmas eye) and the first Brahma himself who > will live > > for zillions of human years. By implication the opening and closing of > > brahmas eye causes the pralaya, so also his reinstatement would > imply the > > same as Brahma embodies the creation itself... we are living in > Brahma, so > > if he is replaced then so is our creation. > > Best wishes, > > *** > > Visti Larsen > > For services and articles visit: > > http://srigaruda.com > > *** > > > > > > > [] On > > Behalf Of kishore mohan > > 09 May 2006 10:51 > > > > Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message posted in > > jyotish vidya > > > > Dear visti, > > > > namaskar. > > > > everybody has their own theories regarding that. As i said, it is only > > a popular belief and usually, you can not debate over a belief. > > > > regards, > > > > Kishore patnaik > > > > , "Visti Larsen" <visti@> wrote: > > > > > > ||Hare Rama Krsna|| > > > Dear Kishore, Namaskar > > > If the Brahma has to change then the creation must also. Then in > > that case > > > we should have experienced pralaya over the last few years > > already... Can't > > > really accept that. > > > Best wishes, > > > *** > > > Visti Larsen > > > For services and articles visit: > > > http://srigaruda.com > > > *** > > > > > > > > > > > [] On > > > Behalf Of kishore mohan > > > 09 May 2006 08:44 > > > > > > Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message > posted in > > > jyotish vidya > > > > > > Dear visti, > > > > > > Namaskar. > > > > > > Thanks for the combination. > > > > > > If you are saying about the Hanumanji taking over as the current > > > Brahma, I have no clue about it. It is only a polular belief. Please > > > elaborate on the question if I misunderstood. > > > > > > Kishore patnaik > > > > > > , "Visti Larsen" <visti@> wrote: > > > > > > > > ||Hare Rama Krsna|| > > > > Dear Kishore, Namaskar > > > > Check for Jupiter or Moon associating with the third from arudha > > lagna. > > > > These give self-consciousness/willingness or emotional distress at > > > the time > > > > of death. > > > > > > > > What is YOUR condition for balarishta? Also you haven't elaborated > > > on your > > > > timing of the birth of certain souls from your last mail. > > > > Best wishes, > > > > *** > > > > Visti Larsen > > > > For services and articles visit: > > > > http://srigaruda.com > > > > *** > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [] On > > > > Behalf Of kishore mohan > > > > 08 May 2006 19:22 > > > > > > > > [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message posted in > > > jyotish > > > > vidya > > > > > > > > ear friend, > > > > > > > > > > > > I am yet to cast and read the charts provided by you. But let me > tell > > > > two general points with regard to the suicides: > > > > > > > > > > > > The first one is to do with the natal chart of the native. > Generally, > > > > the Lagna Lord will be a malefic for the native. This happens to > > > > tarus and the four 'corner' lagnas. Also, the Moon must be severely > > > > afflicted. If moon is severly afflicted, it can also indicate a > > > > possibility of Balarishta, though in Balarishta, the connection of > > > > Mars with certain Houses is compulsory. In other words, the Moons > > > > position will be alike in both Balarishta and suicide cases. > > > > > > > > The second point is to do with the transits. The Tr Lagna lord > should > > > > be cruelly aspecting himself in the natal chart. Sometimes, this > > > > position can be taken by AK but then, AK should be AK for the > transit > > > > chart also. > > > > > > > > Hope this helps, > > > > > > > > Kishore patnaik > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In jyotish-vidya, Uttara <muttaraphalguni@> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Dear Patrice and All, > > > > > > > > > > I have an added commentary to my last post. It is a social > > > > science theory but I think adds to the astrological reasoning behind > > > > some charts we encounter. Especially our families. > > > > > > > > > > Like your mother who is a Gemini, My mother has a Gemini > Sun. I > > > > often say she talks out of both sides of her mouth. She is also > very > > > > autocratic and opinionated. She too grew up in an era where people > > > > just got on with things and didn't talk or dwell on them openly. I > > > > have often found this to be a direct reaction to the severity of the > > > > depression era of the 30's and then the atrocities of World War 11. > > > > Actually, Alcoholic Anonymous grew out of this depression era, > > > > teaching men how to cope better with events and things in their > lives > > > > that were bigger than them. That's where the 12-step program > came to > > > > say that one was "powerless over" and taught fraternity of likeness > > > > and support. It was a kind of new religion to help pull men > from the > > > > depths of despair. > > > > > > > > > > Unfortunately, your Grandfather never experienced this or his > > > > stoic Denmark ancestry lead him to be his own person. > > > > > > > > > > Then the war came and life changed. Young Men left home and > often > > > > didn't return. Or, men returned never to be the same again. Those > > > > that did survive the hell came back with a new outlook on life > and the > > > > majority got on with life. Never to develop fraternity again. > > > > > > > > > > Women during the war came out of the house and into the > factory to > > > > work – to help supply the goods needed for war. That is where women > > > > wearing pants developed and was allowed. Every thing was > rationed, so > > > > material for clothing was harder and sturdier – so pants came into > > > > being and were cheaper. Also in factory work, pants were need for > > > > safety and endurance rather than dresses. Pants became the > uniform of > > > > the War. > > > > > > > > > > Once the war ended there was a backlash on the concept of "being > > > > powerless". All of a sudden being in control of ones life became an > > > > obsession in self-help advice and personal stories of people > > > > overcoming adversity for peace and contentment. Personal prosperity > > > > was touted everywhere. Women went back to their kitchens, dresses, > > > > and deferring roles. > > > > > > > > > > However, do you remember growing up how we the baby boomers were > > > > raised and what expectations were required? There were four themes > > > > going on. One to have a more relaxed permissive society, (this is > > > > where entitlement was bred – don't you just love Dr Spock) two, the > > > > sky's the limit, three, gratefulness was instilled instead of > apathy. > > > > And, four, mothers were quietly behind closed doors raising their > > > > daughters to be more of their own person and equal to men. The > > > > fifty's believed it. The sixty's teenagers rebelled against the > > > > fifties restrictions, the seventies; married Women were > screaming for > > > > their autonomy and the eighties saw young college degreed women > in the > > > > workplace. The nineties reaped the backlash and the 21-century so > > > > far in America is entitled happy and throwing all the common sense > > > > rules for civility out the window. > > > > > > > > > > So, when we look at out mothers and hear their stories it really > > > > was a different time of living and thinking and believing. I think > > > > the more adversity and sacrifice they encountered and the more > > > > deferment required, the more they built their own reservoirs for > > > > survival. There are some who were able to keep their capacity to > > > > nurture and empathize, but all too often like my mother their > > > > stoicness, severe expectation, and rule has kept them safe and > > > > protected. And like my mother and some others I know, they became > > > > very narcissistic. > > > > > > > > > > My mother could have been a better mother to my adopted sister, > > > > but in reality, my mother's thinking and feeling was and is one > where > > > > she provided this child with a better life and gave her > opportunities > > > > and education and a roof over her head that my sister has never been > > > > able to return in kindness to my mother. As far as having any > empathy > > > > for a broken soul theory – there is none. That and my mother's > > > > intolerance of my sister's chaotic inner soul is written off as > > > > complete belligerence and added to that, she is not connected to my > > > > mother in any depth because as my mother says, this child is not of > > > > her blood. Gad, what a mess and a terrible fall out for two lives > > > > with completely different experiences. > > > > > > > > > > I am looking forward to 2012. I think the current tide will > > > > change, as it ultimately will. In the meantime, we have to slop > > > > through another six years. I hope my mother isn't living then. She > > > > like my mother in law need to go their graves to find peace and > > > happiness. > > > > > > > > > > As Always, > > > > > Uttara > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate, our > > > > deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our > light, > > > > not our darkness, that most frightens us. There is nothing > enlightened > > > > about shrinking so that other people won't feel insecure around > > > > you...As we let our own light shine, we unconsciously give other > > > > people permission to do the same. As we are liberated from our own > > > > fear, our presence automatically liberates others." from A > Return To > > > > Love: by Marianne Williamson > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~ om tat sat ~ > > > > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram. > > > > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna' > > > > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said > > > that the > > > > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals. > > > > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading > > > today > > > > Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~ om tat sat ~ > > > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram. > > > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna' > > > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said > > that the > > > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals. > > > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading > > today > > > Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~ om tat sat ~ > > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram. > > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna' > > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said > that the > > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals. > > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading > today > > Links > > > > > > > > > > ~ om tat sat ~ > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram. > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna' > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said that the > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals. > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading today > Links > ------------------------ Sponsor --------------------~--> You can search right from your browser? It's easy and it's free. See how. http://us.click./_7bhrC/NGxNAA/yQLSAA/C9XolB/TM --~-> ~ om tat sat ~ Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram. Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna' (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said that the human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals. (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading today <*> / <*> To from this group, send an email to: <*> Your Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 9, 2006 Report Share Posted May 9, 2006 dear visti, I let your smirks pass. when you can not read a simple message from a person like me, then why talk of puranas and vedas? I want you to read my message once more and comment. Kishore patnaik , "Visti Larsen" <visti wrote: > > ||Hare Rama Krsna|| > > Dear Kishore, Namaskar > > Leaving personal issues aside, i must make something clear. > > You said: > > the puranas are not strict basis of science, as they are more > > stories, though there is lots of science in them too and we have to > > utilize this science as the original ' text books' of the science viz > > the scientific parts of vedas are not given unto us. > > > > If they are the original text books as you say then they are a STRICT BASIS > OF SCIENCE. The Narada purana is the basis of ALOT of astrology as is the > Agni Purana. Your statement is negating your second statement: > > > > Otherwise, the science and scientific theories given in puranas are > incidental. they > > are more of an attempt to recall all the stories, whether true or > > symbolic, told in the ancient times and hence, the name puranas-the > > ancient lore. > > > > So if i read the Narada Purana that gives the exact ammount of days in a > Chaturyuga as 1.577.917.828 civil (savana) days, and proceeds to give the > methods of defining the solar and lunar months and days with calculations, > then what exactly is incidental? When Agni Purana gives astrological timing > methods to decide when a person will die, then what stories are being told? > If you haven't read them then you cannot be blamed, but then we all can > learn more everyday can't we? > > > > You said: > > But, if you want to look at science only on the basis of puranas, > > there is lots of vedic science which is not told in puranas and I hope > > you realise that. > > > > Now WHO would restrict themself to reading only books written by Shakespeare > or by David Frawley when you have such large compendiums of knowledge > elsewhere. Comeon Kishore, where are you going with this statement? The > members of these lists are always dwelving deep into Parasara's Hora > Shastra, Puranas, Gita, Vedas, Upanishads, etc. Infact based on your > previous question regarding Vimshottari Dasa calculation i almost thought > you had never opened an astrology book! I know this can only be a wrong > thought, but you do suprise me sometimes and i felt i had to point that out > to you... afterall we must be serious in this study of Jyotish if we are to > offer our assistance to those who need it. > > Best wishes and blessings, > > *** > > Visti Larsen > > For services and articles visit: > > http://srigaruda.com > > *** > > > > > [] On > Behalf Of kishore mohan > 09 May 2006 12:01 > > Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message posted in > jyotish vidya > > > > Dear visti, > > > > first and foremost, I think I have a right to get personal as you were > > doing the same too sometime back. In any case, I do not criticise the > > person but only what the person said or thought. > > > > Secondly, the basis of all sciences is Vedas and we have got only a > > 'lesh' of vedas with us. so, we do not know all that what the rshis > > knew. the puranas are not strict basis of science, as they are more > > stories, though there is lots of science in them too and we have to > > utilize this science as the original ' text books' of the science viz > > the scientific parts of vedas are not given unto us. Otherwise, the > > science and scientific theories given in puranas are incidental. they > > are more of an attempt to recall all the stories, whether true or > > symbolic, told in the ancient times and hence, the name puranas-the > > ancient lore. of course, you should not mistake me that i am > > rejecting puranas as a source of science, Noway, infact, I have groups > > like Vedic history and Ancient India which attempt to look at Indian > > History as told in the Vedas and puranas and other scriptures. > > > > But, if you want to look at science only on the basis of puranas, > > there is lots of vedic science which is not told in puranas and I hope > > you realise that. > > > > Btw, you are right that I dont want to tell the answer to your > > question only because it depends a lot on the belief., which you may > > share. > > > > I hope you take in the most positive spirit as I have no intention of > > hurting anyone, much less yourself. > > > > Kishore patnaik > > > , "Visti Larsen" <visti@> wrote: > > > > > > ||Hare Rama Krsna|| > > > Dear Kishore, Namaskar > > > The rishis explained this theory in all the puranas and also the Guru of > > > this parampara (sri achyuta dasa) has also talked about its > > relevance. It is > > > used for prediction and if you think the rishis are self-centric > > when trying > > > to predict the tides of humanity then i can't help you. > > > I'm not rejecting other theories, otherwise i wouldn't even bring up the > > > topic. Instead i wanto know which evolution theory could accept this > > to be > > > true, and understand the background. As far as i know there are two > > theories > > > which have their main difference in the understanding of the length > > of the > > > year of Gods, but i don't believe that this theory accomedates the > > change of > > > Brahma occuring any time soon. > > > If you can't answer then don't answer instead of getting personal. > > > Best wishes, > > > *** > > > Visti Larsen > > > For services and articles visit: > > > http://srigaruda.com > > > *** > > > > > > > > > > > [] On > > > Behalf Of kishore mohan > > > 09 May 2006 11:36 > > > > > > Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message posted in > > > jyotish vidya > > > > > > dear visti, > > > > > > you are going into the same self centric theory of any scientist. > > > a scientist says his theories are the centre of all the known and > > > unknown and thinks every known phenomenon should be explained by his > > > theories and every unknown phenomenon should be predicted by them. an > > > egoistic scientist rejects any phenomenon that does not fall within > > > the stratum of his theories. this is not a good indication. > > > > > > while it is good to try and explain everything- from anu(atom) to > > > mahan(the infinite)- with in your theories which will help you in your > > > spiritual and academic sojourn, it is utterly undesirable to reject > > > what you can not explain. > > > > > > In any case, as I have said, what I have said is only a belief and > > > those who expound this belief have their own ways of explaining it. I > > > am one of the believers. I can not explain you more on this, as you > > > will not appreiciate my explanations unless you accept my assumptions. > > > > > > Kishore patnaik > > > > > > , "Visti Larsen" <visti@> wrote: > > > > > > > > ||Hare Rama Krsna|| > > > > Dear Kishore, Namaskar > > > > I disagree. As Jyotishas we not only have to understand the > > > time/dasas of > > > > humans but the dasas of the entire creation, herein the yugas, > > > manvantaras, > > > > kalpas (blinking of brahmas eye) and the first Brahma himself who > > > will live > > > > for zillions of human years. By implication the opening and closing of > > > > brahmas eye causes the pralaya, so also his reinstatement would > > > imply the > > > > same as Brahma embodies the creation itself... we are living in > > > Brahma, so > > > > if he is replaced then so is our creation. > > > > Best wishes, > > > > *** > > > > Visti Larsen > > > > For services and articles visit: > > > > http://srigaruda.com > > > > *** > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [] On > > > > Behalf Of kishore mohan > > > > 09 May 2006 10:51 > > > > > > > > Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message > > posted in > > > > jyotish vidya > > > > > > > > Dear visti, > > > > > > > > namaskar. > > > > > > > > everybody has their own theories regarding that. As i said, it is only > > > > a popular belief and usually, you can not debate over a belief. > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > Kishore patnaik > > > > > > > > , "Visti Larsen" <visti@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > ||Hare Rama Krsna|| > > > > > Dear Kishore, Namaskar > > > > > If the Brahma has to change then the creation must also. Then in > > > > that case > > > > > we should have experienced pralaya over the last few years > > > > already... Can't > > > > > really accept that. > > > > > Best wishes, > > > > > *** > > > > > Visti Larsen > > > > > For services and articles visit: > > > > > http://srigaruda.com > > > > > *** > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [] On > > > > > Behalf Of kishore mohan > > > > > 09 May 2006 08:44 > > > > > > > > > > Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message > > > posted in > > > > > jyotish vidya > > > > > > > > > > Dear visti, > > > > > > > > > > Namaskar. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the combination. > > > > > > > > > > If you are saying about the Hanumanji taking over as the current > > > > > Brahma, I have no clue about it. It is only a polular belief. Please > > > > > elaborate on the question if I misunderstood. > > > > > > > > > > Kishore patnaik > > > > > > > > > > , "Visti Larsen" <visti@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > ||Hare Rama Krsna|| > > > > > > Dear Kishore, Namaskar > > > > > > Check for Jupiter or Moon associating with the third from arudha > > > > lagna. > > > > > > These give self-consciousness/willingness or emotional distress at > > > > > the time > > > > > > of death. > > > > > > > > > > > > What is YOUR condition for balarishta? Also you haven't elaborated > > > > > on your > > > > > > timing of the birth of certain souls from your last mail. > > > > > > Best wishes, > > > > > > *** > > > > > > Visti Larsen > > > > > > For services and articles visit: > > > > > > http://srigaruda.com > > > > > > *** > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [] On > > > > > > Behalf Of kishore mohan > > > > > > 08 May 2006 19:22 > > > > > > > > > > > > [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message > > posted in > > > > > jyotish > > > > > > vidya > > > > > > > > > > > > ear friend, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am yet to cast and read the charts provided by you. But let me > > > tell > > > > > > two general points with regard to the suicides: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The first one is to do with the natal chart of the native. > > > Generally, > > > > > > the Lagna Lord will be a malefic for the native. This happens to > > > > > > tarus and the four 'corner' lagnas. Also, the Moon must be > > severely > > > > > > afflicted. If moon is severly afflicted, it can also indicate a > > > > > > possibility of Balarishta, though in Balarishta, the connection of > > > > > > Mars with certain Houses is compulsory. In other words, the Moons > > > > > > position will be alike in both Balarishta and suicide cases. > > > > > > > > > > > > The second point is to do with the transits. The Tr Lagna lord > > > should > > > > > > be cruelly aspecting himself in the natal chart. Sometimes, this > > > > > > position can be taken by AK but then, AK should be AK for the > > > transit > > > > > > chart also. > > > > > > > > > > > > Hope this helps, > > > > > > > > > > > > Kishore patnaik > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > jyotish-vidya, Uttara <muttaraphalguni@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Patrice and All, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have an added commentary to my last post. It is a social > > > > > > science theory but I think adds to the astrological reasoning > > behind > > > > > > some charts we encounter. Especially our families. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Like your mother who is a Gemini, My mother has a Gemini > > > Sun. I > > > > > > often say she talks out of both sides of her mouth. She is also > > > very > > > > > > autocratic and opinionated. She too grew up in an era where > > people > > > > > > just got on with things and didn't talk or dwell on them > > openly. I > > > > > > have often found this to be a direct reaction to the severity > > of the > > > > > > depression era of the 30's and then the atrocities of World > > War 11. > > > > > > Actually, Alcoholic Anonymous grew out of this depression era, > > > > > > teaching men how to cope better with events and things in their > > > lives > > > > > > that were bigger than them. That's where the 12-step program > > > came to > > > > > > say that one was "powerless over" and taught fraternity of > > likeness > > > > > > and support. It was a kind of new religion to help pull men > > > from the > > > > > > depths of despair. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Unfortunately, your Grandfather never experienced this or his > > > > > > stoic Denmark ancestry lead him to be his own person. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Then the war came and life changed. Young Men left home and > > > often > > > > > > didn't return. Or, men returned never to be the same again. Those > > > > > > that did survive the hell came back with a new outlook on life > > > and the > > > > > > majority got on with life. Never to develop fraternity again. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Women during the war came out of the house and into the > > > factory to > > > > > > work - to help supply the goods needed for war. That is where > > women > > > > > > wearing pants developed and was allowed. Every thing was > > > rationed, so > > > > > > material for clothing was harder and sturdier - so pants came into > > > > > > being and were cheaper. Also in factory work, pants were need for > > > > > > safety and endurance rather than dresses. Pants became the > > > uniform of > > > > > > the War. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Once the war ended there was a backlash on the concept of > > "being > > > > > > powerless". All of a sudden being in control of ones life > > became an > > > > > > obsession in self-help advice and personal stories of people > > > > > > overcoming adversity for peace and contentment. Personal > > prosperity > > > > > > was touted everywhere. Women went back to their kitchens, > > dresses, > > > > > > and deferring roles. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > However, do you remember growing up how we the baby > > boomers were > > > > > > raised and what expectations were required? There were four > > themes > > > > > > going on. One to have a more relaxed permissive society, (this is > > > > > > where entitlement was bred - don't you just love Dr Spock) > > two, the > > > > > > sky's the limit, three, gratefulness was instilled instead of > > > apathy. > > > > > > And, four, mothers were quietly behind closed doors raising > > their > > > > > > daughters to be more of their own person and equal to men. The > > > > > > fifty's believed it. The sixty's teenagers rebelled against the > > > > > > fifties restrictions, the seventies; married Women were > > > screaming for > > > > > > their autonomy and the eighties saw young college degreed women > > > in the > > > > > > workplace. The nineties reaped the backlash and the > > 21-century so > > > > > > far in America is entitled happy and throwing all the common sense > > > > > > rules for civility out the window. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, when we look at out mothers and hear their stories it > > really > > > > > > was a different time of living and thinking and believing. I > > think > > > > > > the more adversity and sacrifice they encountered and the more > > > > > > deferment required, the more they built their own reservoirs for > > > > > > survival. There are some who were able to keep their capacity to > > > > > > nurture and empathize, but all too often like my mother their > > > > > > stoicness, severe expectation, and rule has kept them safe and > > > > > > protected. And like my mother and some others I know, they became > > > > > > very narcissistic. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My mother could have been a better mother to my adopted > > sister, > > > > > > but in reality, my mother's thinking and feeling was and is one > > > where > > > > > > she provided this child with a better life and gave her > > > opportunities > > > > > > and education and a roof over her head that my sister has > > never been > > > > > > able to return in kindness to my mother. As far as having any > > > empathy > > > > > > for a broken soul theory - there is none. That and my mother's > > > > > > intolerance of my sister's chaotic inner soul is written off as > > > > > > complete belligerence and added to that, she is not connected > > to my > > > > > > mother in any depth because as my mother says, this child is > > not of > > > > > > her blood. Gad, what a mess and a terrible fall out for two lives > > > > > > with completely different experiences. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am looking forward to 2012. I think the current tide will > > > > > > change, as it ultimately will. In the meantime, we have to slop > > > > > > through another six years. I hope my mother isn't living > > then. She > > > > > > like my mother in law need to go their graves to find peace and > > > > > happiness. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As Always, > > > > > > > Uttara > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate, our > > > > > > deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our > > > light, > > > > > > not our darkness, that most frightens us. There is nothing > > > enlightened > > > > > > about shrinking so that other people won't feel insecure around > > > > > > you...As we let our own light shine, we unconsciously give other > > > > > > people permission to do the same. As we are liberated from > > our own > > > > > > fear, our presence automatically liberates others." from A > > > Return To > > > > > > Love: by Marianne Williamson > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~ om tat sat ~ > > > > > > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram. > > > > > > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna' > > > > > > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said > > > > > that the > > > > > > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals. > > > > > > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart > > reading > > > > > today > > > > > > Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~ om tat sat ~ > > > > > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram. > > > > > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna' > > > > > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said > > > > that the > > > > > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals. > > > > > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading > > > > today > > > > > Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~ om tat sat ~ > > > > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram. > > > > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna' > > > > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said > > > that the > > > > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals. > > > > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading > > > today > > > > Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~ om tat sat ~ > > > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram. > > > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna' > > > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said > > that the > > > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals. > > > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading > > today > > > Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~ om tat sat ~ > > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram. > > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna' > > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said that the > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals. > > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading today > > Links > > > > / > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 9, 2006 Report Share Posted May 9, 2006 ||Hare Rama Krsna|| Dear Kishore, Namaskar Now, are you claiming me to be illiterate? Am i supposed to read the words you write or am I to 'guess' the gist of your statements. Please Kishore, you are prolonging this more than necessary, If you agreed with me all along just admit your momentary lapse when you chose your words, or go read those puranas and vimshottari calculations which you maybe lacking in. There is no more astrology in this thread, so this discussion should be done for now. Best wishes, *** Visti Larsen For services and articles visit: http://srigaruda.com *** [] On Behalf Of kishore mohan 09 May 2006 13:05 Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message posted in jyotish vidya dear visti, I let your smirks pass. when you can not read a simple message from a person like me, then why talk of puranas and vedas? I want you to read my message once more and comment. Kishore patnaik , "Visti Larsen" <visti wrote: > > ||Hare Rama Krsna|| > > Dear Kishore, Namaskar > > Leaving personal issues aside, i must make something clear. > > You said: > > the puranas are not strict basis of science, as they are more > > stories, though there is lots of science in them too and we have to > > utilize this science as the original ' text books' of the science viz > > the scientific parts of vedas are not given unto us. > > > > If they are the original text books as you say then they are a STRICT BASIS > OF SCIENCE. The Narada purana is the basis of ALOT of astrology as is the > Agni Purana. Your statement is negating your second statement: > > > > Otherwise, the science and scientific theories given in puranas are > incidental. they > > are more of an attempt to recall all the stories, whether true or > > symbolic, told in the ancient times and hence, the name puranas-the > > ancient lore. > > > > So if i read the Narada Purana that gives the exact ammount of days in a > Chaturyuga as 1.577.917.828 civil (savana) days, and proceeds to give the > methods of defining the solar and lunar months and days with calculations, > then what exactly is incidental? When Agni Purana gives astrological timing > methods to decide when a person will die, then what stories are being told? > If you haven't read them then you cannot be blamed, but then we all can > learn more everyday can't we? > > > > You said: > > But, if you want to look at science only on the basis of puranas, > > there is lots of vedic science which is not told in puranas and I hope > > you realise that. > > > > Now WHO would restrict themself to reading only books written by Shakespeare > or by David Frawley when you have such large compendiums of knowledge > elsewhere. Comeon Kishore, where are you going with this statement? The > members of these lists are always dwelving deep into Parasara's Hora > Shastra, Puranas, Gita, Vedas, Upanishads, etc. Infact based on your > previous question regarding Vimshottari Dasa calculation i almost thought > you had never opened an astrology book! I know this can only be a wrong > thought, but you do suprise me sometimes and i felt i had to point that out > to you... afterall we must be serious in this study of Jyotish if we are to > offer our assistance to those who need it. > > Best wishes and blessings, > > *** > > Visti Larsen > > For services and articles visit: > > http://srigaruda.com > > *** > > > > > [] On > Behalf Of kishore mohan > 09 May 2006 12:01 > > Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message posted in > jyotish vidya > > > > Dear visti, > > > > first and foremost, I think I have a right to get personal as you were > > doing the same too sometime back. In any case, I do not criticise the > > person but only what the person said or thought. > > > > Secondly, the basis of all sciences is Vedas and we have got only a > > 'lesh' of vedas with us. so, we do not know all that what the rshis > > knew. the puranas are not strict basis of science, as they are more > > stories, though there is lots of science in them too and we have to > > utilize this science as the original ' text books' of the science viz > > the scientific parts of vedas are not given unto us. Otherwise, the > > science and scientific theories given in puranas are incidental. they > > are more of an attempt to recall all the stories, whether true or > > symbolic, told in the ancient times and hence, the name puranas-the > > ancient lore. of course, you should not mistake me that i am > > rejecting puranas as a source of science, Noway, infact, I have groups > > like Vedic history and Ancient India which attempt to look at Indian > > History as told in the Vedas and puranas and other scriptures. > > > > But, if you want to look at science only on the basis of puranas, > > there is lots of vedic science which is not told in puranas and I hope > > you realise that. > > > > Btw, you are right that I dont want to tell the answer to your > > question only because it depends a lot on the belief., which you may > > share. > > > > I hope you take in the most positive spirit as I have no intention of > > hurting anyone, much less yourself. > > > > Kishore patnaik > > > , "Visti Larsen" <visti@> wrote: > > > > > > ||Hare Rama Krsna|| > > > Dear Kishore, Namaskar > > > The rishis explained this theory in all the puranas and also the Guru of > > > this parampara (sri achyuta dasa) has also talked about its > > relevance. It is > > > used for prediction and if you think the rishis are self-centric > > when trying > > > to predict the tides of humanity then i can't help you. > > > I'm not rejecting other theories, otherwise i wouldn't even bring up the > > > topic. Instead i wanto know which evolution theory could accept this > > to be > > > true, and understand the background. As far as i know there are two > > theories > > > which have their main difference in the understanding of the length > > of the > > > year of Gods, but i don't believe that this theory accomedates the > > change of > > > Brahma occuring any time soon. > > > If you can't answer then don't answer instead of getting personal. > > > Best wishes, > > > *** > > > Visti Larsen > > > For services and articles visit: > > > http://srigaruda.com > > > *** > > > > > > > > > > > [] On > > > Behalf Of kishore mohan > > > 09 May 2006 11:36 > > > > > > Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message posted in > > > jyotish vidya > > > > > > dear visti, > > > > > > you are going into the same self centric theory of any scientist. > > > a scientist says his theories are the centre of all the known and > > > unknown and thinks every known phenomenon should be explained by his > > > theories and every unknown phenomenon should be predicted by them. an > > > egoistic scientist rejects any phenomenon that does not fall within > > > the stratum of his theories. this is not a good indication. > > > > > > while it is good to try and explain everything- from anu(atom) to > > > mahan(the infinite)- with in your theories which will help you in your > > > spiritual and academic sojourn, it is utterly undesirable to reject > > > what you can not explain. > > > > > > In any case, as I have said, what I have said is only a belief and > > > those who expound this belief have their own ways of explaining it. I > > > am one of the believers. I can not explain you more on this, as you > > > will not appreiciate my explanations unless you accept my assumptions. > > > > > > Kishore patnaik > > > > > > , "Visti Larsen" <visti@> wrote: > > > > > > > > ||Hare Rama Krsna|| > > > > Dear Kishore, Namaskar > > > > I disagree. As Jyotishas we not only have to understand the > > > time/dasas of > > > > humans but the dasas of the entire creation, herein the yugas, > > > manvantaras, > > > > kalpas (blinking of brahmas eye) and the first Brahma himself who > > > will live > > > > for zillions of human years. By implication the opening and closing of > > > > brahmas eye causes the pralaya, so also his reinstatement would > > > imply the > > > > same as Brahma embodies the creation itself... we are living in > > > Brahma, so > > > > if he is replaced then so is our creation. > > > > Best wishes, > > > > *** > > > > Visti Larsen > > > > For services and articles visit: > > > > http://srigaruda.com > > > > *** > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [] On > > > > Behalf Of kishore mohan > > > > 09 May 2006 10:51 > > > > > > > > Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message > > posted in > > > > jyotish vidya > > > > > > > > Dear visti, > > > > > > > > namaskar. > > > > > > > > everybody has their own theories regarding that. As i said, it is only > > > > a popular belief and usually, you can not debate over a belief. > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > Kishore patnaik > > > > > > > > , "Visti Larsen" <visti@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > ||Hare Rama Krsna|| > > > > > Dear Kishore, Namaskar > > > > > If the Brahma has to change then the creation must also. Then in > > > > that case > > > > > we should have experienced pralaya over the last few years > > > > already... Can't > > > > > really accept that. > > > > > Best wishes, > > > > > *** > > > > > Visti Larsen > > > > > For services and articles visit: > > > > > http://srigaruda.com > > > > > *** > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [] On > > > > > Behalf Of kishore mohan > > > > > 09 May 2006 08:44 > > > > > > > > > > Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message > > > posted in > > > > > jyotish vidya > > > > > > > > > > Dear visti, > > > > > > > > > > Namaskar. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the combination. > > > > > > > > > > If you are saying about the Hanumanji taking over as the current > > > > > Brahma, I have no clue about it. It is only a polular belief. Please > > > > > elaborate on the question if I misunderstood. > > > > > > > > > > Kishore patnaik > > > > > > > > > > , "Visti Larsen" <visti@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > ||Hare Rama Krsna|| > > > > > > Dear Kishore, Namaskar > > > > > > Check for Jupiter or Moon associating with the third from arudha > > > > lagna. > > > > > > These give self-consciousness/willingness or emotional distress at > > > > > the time > > > > > > of death. > > > > > > > > > > > > What is YOUR condition for balarishta? Also you haven't elaborated > > > > > on your > > > > > > timing of the birth of certain souls from your last mail. > > > > > > Best wishes, > > > > > > *** > > > > > > Visti Larsen > > > > > > For services and articles visit: > > > > > > http://srigaruda.com > > > > > > *** > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [] On > > > > > > Behalf Of kishore mohan > > > > > > 08 May 2006 19:22 > > > > > > > > > > > > [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message > > posted in > > > > > jyotish > > > > > > vidya > > > > > > > > > > > > ear friend, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am yet to cast and read the charts provided by you. But let me > > > tell > > > > > > two general points with regard to the suicides: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The first one is to do with the natal chart of the native. > > > Generally, > > > > > > the Lagna Lord will be a malefic for the native. This happens to > > > > > > tarus and the four 'corner' lagnas. Also, the Moon must be > > severely > > > > > > afflicted. If moon is severly afflicted, it can also indicate a > > > > > > possibility of Balarishta, though in Balarishta, the connection of > > > > > > Mars with certain Houses is compulsory. In other words, the Moons > > > > > > position will be alike in both Balarishta and suicide cases. > > > > > > > > > > > > The second point is to do with the transits. The Tr Lagna lord > > > should > > > > > > be cruelly aspecting himself in the natal chart. Sometimes, this > > > > > > position can be taken by AK but then, AK should be AK for the > > > transit > > > > > > chart also. > > > > > > > > > > > > Hope this helps, > > > > > > > > > > > > Kishore patnaik > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > jyotish-vidya, Uttara <muttaraphalguni@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Patrice and All, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have an added commentary to my last post. It is a social > > > > > > science theory but I think adds to the astrological reasoning > > behind > > > > > > some charts we encounter. Especially our families. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Like your mother who is a Gemini, My mother has a Gemini > > > Sun. I > > > > > > often say she talks out of both sides of her mouth. She is also > > > very > > > > > > autocratic and opinionated. She too grew up in an era where > > people > > > > > > just got on with things and didn't talk or dwell on them > > openly. I > > > > > > have often found this to be a direct reaction to the severity > > of the > > > > > > depression era of the 30's and then the atrocities of World > > War 11. > > > > > > Actually, Alcoholic Anonymous grew out of this depression era, > > > > > > teaching men how to cope better with events and things in their > > > lives > > > > > > that were bigger than them. That's where the 12-step program > > > came to > > > > > > say that one was "powerless over" and taught fraternity of > > likeness > > > > > > and support. It was a kind of new religion to help pull men > > > from the > > > > > > depths of despair. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Unfortunately, your Grandfather never experienced this or his > > > > > > stoic Denmark ancestry lead him to be his own person. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Then the war came and life changed. Young Men left home and > > > often > > > > > > didn't return. Or, men returned never to be the same again. Those > > > > > > that did survive the hell came back with a new outlook on life > > > and the > > > > > > majority got on with life. Never to develop fraternity again. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Women during the war came out of the house and into the > > > factory to > > > > > > work - to help supply the goods needed for war. That is where > > women > > > > > > wearing pants developed and was allowed. Every thing was > > > rationed, so > > > > > > material for clothing was harder and sturdier - so pants came into > > > > > > being and were cheaper. Also in factory work, pants were need for > > > > > > safety and endurance rather than dresses. Pants became the > > > uniform of > > > > > > the War. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Once the war ended there was a backlash on the concept of > > "being > > > > > > powerless". All of a sudden being in control of ones life > > became an > > > > > > obsession in self-help advice and personal stories of people > > > > > > overcoming adversity for peace and contentment. Personal > > prosperity > > > > > > was touted everywhere. Women went back to their kitchens, > > dresses, > > > > > > and deferring roles. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > However, do you remember growing up how we the baby > > boomers were > > > > > > raised and what expectations were required? There were four > > themes > > > > > > going on. One to have a more relaxed permissive society, (this is > > > > > > where entitlement was bred - don't you just love Dr Spock) > > two, the > > > > > > sky's the limit, three, gratefulness was instilled instead of > > > apathy. > > > > > > And, four, mothers were quietly behind closed doors raising > > their > > > > > > daughters to be more of their own person and equal to men. The > > > > > > fifty's believed it. The sixty's teenagers rebelled against the > > > > > > fifties restrictions, the seventies; married Women were > > > screaming for > > > > > > their autonomy and the eighties saw young college degreed women > > > in the > > > > > > workplace. The nineties reaped the backlash and the > > 21-century so > > > > > > far in America is entitled happy and throwing all the common sense > > > > > > rules for civility out the window. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, when we look at out mothers and hear their stories it > > really > > > > > > was a different time of living and thinking and believing. I > > think > > > > > > the more adversity and sacrifice they encountered and the more > > > > > > deferment required, the more they built their own reservoirs for > > > > > > survival. There are some who were able to keep their capacity to > > > > > > nurture and empathize, but all too often like my mother their > > > > > > stoicness, severe expectation, and rule has kept them safe and > > > > > > protected. And like my mother and some others I know, they became > > > > > > very narcissistic. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My mother could have been a better mother to my adopted > > sister, > > > > > > but in reality, my mother's thinking and feeling was and is one > > > where > > > > > > she provided this child with a better life and gave her > > > opportunities > > > > > > and education and a roof over her head that my sister has > > never been > > > > > > able to return in kindness to my mother. As far as having any > > > empathy > > > > > > for a broken soul theory - there is none. That and my mother's > > > > > > intolerance of my sister's chaotic inner soul is written off as > > > > > > complete belligerence and added to that, she is not connected > > to my > > > > > > mother in any depth because as my mother says, this child is > > not of > > > > > > her blood. Gad, what a mess and a terrible fall out for two lives > > > > > > with completely different experiences. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am looking forward to 2012. I think the current tide will > > > > > > change, as it ultimately will. In the meantime, we have to slop > > > > > > through another six years. I hope my mother isn't living > > then. She > > > > > > like my mother in law need to go their graves to find peace and > > > > > happiness. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As Always, > > > > > > > Uttara > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate, our > > > > > > deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our > > > light, > > > > > > not our darkness, that most frightens us. There is nothing > > > enlightened > > > > > > about shrinking so that other people won't feel insecure around > > > > > > you...As we let our own light shine, we unconsciously give other > > > > > > people permission to do the same. As we are liberated from > > our own > > > > > > fear, our presence automatically liberates others." from A > > > Return To > > > > > > Love: by Marianne Williamson > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~ om tat sat ~ > > > > > > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram. > > > > > > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna' > > > > > > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said > > > > > that the > > > > > > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals. > > > > > > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart > > reading > > > > > today > > > > > > Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~ om tat sat ~ > > > > > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram. > > > > > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna' > > > > > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said > > > > that the > > > > > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals. > > > > > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading > > > > today > > > > > Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~ om tat sat ~ > > > > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram. > > > > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna' > > > > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said > > > that the > > > > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals. > > > > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading > > > today > > > > Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~ om tat sat ~ > > > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram. > > > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna' > > > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said > > that the > > > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals. > > > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading > > today > > > Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~ om tat sat ~ > > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram. > > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna' > > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said that the > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals. > > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading today > > Links > > > > / > > > > > > > > > ~ om tat sat ~ Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram. Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna' (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said that the human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals. (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading today Links Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 9, 2006 Report Share Posted May 9, 2006 ||Jai Ramakrishna|| Dear Vistiji & Kishoreji, Please forgive this intervention, but I agree both we Kishoreji & Vistiji , in one point that Our Puranas are not "Story-tellers" but they stories are made with a scientific bend. We can talk of many stories from Vishnu Purana, Narada Purana, Skanda Purana,etc. We cannot say that those are texts of science directly, but they guide us the path of science & how thing goes.. Wish you all success, . , "Visti Larsen" <visti wrote: > > > ||Hare Rama Krsna|| > Dear Kishore, Namaskar > Now, are you claiming me to be illiterate? > Am i supposed to read the words you write or am I to 'guess' the gist of > your statements. Please Kishore, you are prolonging this more than > necessary, If you agreed with me all along just admit your momentary lapse > when you chose your words, or go read those puranas and vimshottari > calculations which you maybe lacking in. > > There is no more astrology in this thread, so this discussion should be done > for now. > Best wishes, > *** > Visti Larsen > For services and articles visit: > http://srigaruda.com > *** > > > [] On > Behalf Of kishore mohan > 09 May 2006 13:05 > > Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message posted in > jyotish vidya > > dear visti, > > I let your smirks pass. when you can not read a simple message from a > person like me, then why talk of puranas and vedas? I want you to read > my message once more and comment. > > > > > Kishore patnaik > , "Visti Larsen" <visti@> wrote: > > > > ||Hare Rama Krsna|| > > > > Dear Kishore, Namaskar > > > > Leaving personal issues aside, i must make something clear. > > > > You said: > > > > the puranas are not strict basis of science, as they are more > > > > stories, though there is lots of science in them too and we have to > > > > utilize this science as the original ' text books' of the science viz > > > > the scientific parts of vedas are not given unto us. > > > > > > > > If they are the original text books as you say then they are a > STRICT BASIS > > OF SCIENCE. The Narada purana is the basis of ALOT of astrology as > is the > > Agni Purana. Your statement is negating your second statement: > > > > > > > > Otherwise, the science and scientific theories given in puranas are > > incidental. they > > > > are more of an attempt to recall all the stories, whether true or > > > > symbolic, told in the ancient times and hence, the name puranas- the > > > > ancient lore. > > > > > > > > So if i read the Narada Purana that gives the exact ammount of days in a > > Chaturyuga as 1.577.917.828 civil (savana) days, and proceeds to > give the > > methods of defining the solar and lunar months and days with > calculations, > > then what exactly is incidental? When Agni Purana gives astrological > timing > > methods to decide when a person will die, then what stories are > being told? > > If you haven't read them then you cannot be blamed, but then we all can > > learn more everyday can't we? > > > > > > > > You said: > > > > But, if you want to look at science only on the basis of puranas, > > > > there is lots of vedic science which is not told in puranas and I hope > > > > you realise that. > > > > > > > > Now WHO would restrict themself to reading only books written by > Shakespeare > > or by David Frawley when you have such large compendiums of knowledge > > elsewhere. Comeon Kishore, where are you going with this statement? The > > members of these lists are always dwelving deep into Parasara's Hora > > Shastra, Puranas, Gita, Vedas, Upanishads, etc. Infact based on your > > previous question regarding Vimshottari Dasa calculation i almost > thought > > you had never opened an astrology book! I know this can only be a wrong > > thought, but you do suprise me sometimes and i felt i had to point > that out > > to you... afterall we must be serious in this study of Jyotish if we > are to > > offer our assistance to those who need it. > > > > Best wishes and blessings, > > > > *** > > > > Visti Larsen > > > > For services and articles visit: > > > > http://srigaruda.com > > > > *** > > > > > > > > > > > [] On > > Behalf Of kishore mohan > > 09 May 2006 12:01 > > > > Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message posted in > > jyotish vidya > > > > > > > > Dear visti, > > > > > > > > first and foremost, I think I have a right to get personal as you were > > > > doing the same too sometime back. In any case, I do not criticise the > > > > person but only what the person said or thought. > > > > > > > > Secondly, the basis of all sciences is Vedas and we have got only a > > > > 'lesh' of vedas with us. so, we do not know all that what the rshis > > > > knew. the puranas are not strict basis of science, as they are more > > > > stories, though there is lots of science in them too and we have to > > > > utilize this science as the original ' text books' of the science viz > > > > the scientific parts of vedas are not given unto us. Otherwise, the > > > > science and scientific theories given in puranas are incidental. they > > > > are more of an attempt to recall all the stories, whether true or > > > > symbolic, told in the ancient times and hence, the name puranas- the > > > > ancient lore. of course, you should not mistake me that i am > > > > rejecting puranas as a source of science, Noway, infact, I have groups > > > > like Vedic history and Ancient India which attempt to look at Indian > > > > History as told in the Vedas and puranas and other scriptures. > > > > > > > > But, if you want to look at science only on the basis of puranas, > > > > there is lots of vedic science which is not told in puranas and I hope > > > > you realise that. > > > > > > > > Btw, you are right that I dont want to tell the answer to your > > > > question only because it depends a lot on the belief., which you may > > > > share. > > > > > > > > I hope you take in the most positive spirit as I have no intention of > > > > hurting anyone, much less yourself. > > > > > > > > Kishore patnaik > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , "Visti Larsen" <visti@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > ||Hare Rama Krsna|| > > > > > Dear Kishore, Namaskar > > > > > The rishis explained this theory in all the puranas and also the > Guru of > > > > > this parampara (sri achyuta dasa) has also talked about its > > > > relevance. It is > > > > > used for prediction and if you think the rishis are self- centric > > > > when trying > > > > > to predict the tides of humanity then i can't help you. > > > > > I'm not rejecting other theories, otherwise i wouldn't even bring > up the > > > > > topic. Instead i wanto know which evolution theory could accept this > > > > to be > > > > > true, and understand the background. As far as i know there are two > > > > theories > > > > > which have their main difference in the understanding of the length > > > > of the > > > > > year of Gods, but i don't believe that this theory accomedates the > > > > change of > > > > > Brahma occuring any time soon. > > > > > If you can't answer then don't answer instead of getting personal. > > > > > Best wishes, > > > > > *** > > > > > Visti Larsen > > > > > For services and articles visit: > > > > > http://srigaruda.com > > > > > *** > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [] On > > > > > Behalf Of kishore mohan > > > > > 09 May 2006 11:36 > > > > > > > > > > Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message > posted in > > > > > jyotish vidya > > > > > > > > > > dear visti, > > > > > > > > > > you are going into the same self centric theory of any scientist. > > > > > a scientist says his theories are the centre of all the known and > > > > > unknown and thinks every known phenomenon should be explained by his > > > > > theories and every unknown phenomenon should be predicted by them. an > > > > > egoistic scientist rejects any phenomenon that does not fall within > > > > > the stratum of his theories. this is not a good indication. > > > > > > > > > > while it is good to try and explain everything- from anu(atom) to > > > > > mahan(the infinite)- with in your theories which will help you in your > > > > > spiritual and academic sojourn, it is utterly undesirable to reject > > > > > what you can not explain. > > > > > > > > > > In any case, as I have said, what I have said is only a belief and > > > > > those who expound this belief have their own ways of explaining it. I > > > > > am one of the believers. I can not explain you more on this, as you > > > > > will not appreiciate my explanations unless you accept my > assumptions. > > > > > > > > > > Kishore patnaik > > > > > > > > > > , "Visti Larsen" <visti@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > ||Hare Rama Krsna|| > > > > > > Dear Kishore, Namaskar > > > > > > I disagree. As Jyotishas we not only have to understand the > > > > > time/dasas of > > > > > > humans but the dasas of the entire creation, herein the yugas, > > > > > manvantaras, > > > > > > kalpas (blinking of brahmas eye) and the first Brahma himself who > > > > > will live > > > > > > for zillions of human years. By implication the opening and > closing of > > > > > > brahmas eye causes the pralaya, so also his reinstatement would > > > > > imply the > > > > > > same as Brahma embodies the creation itself... we are living in > > > > > Brahma, so > > > > > > if he is replaced then so is our creation. > > > > > > Best wishes, > > > > > > *** > > > > > > Visti Larsen > > > > > > For services and articles visit: > > > > > > http://srigaruda.com > > > > > > *** > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [] On > > > > > > Behalf Of kishore mohan > > > > > > 09 May 2006 10:51 > > > > > > > > > > > > Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message > > > > posted in > > > > > > jyotish vidya > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear visti, > > > > > > > > > > > > namaskar. > > > > > > > > > > > > everybody has their own theories regarding that. As i said, it > is only > > > > > > a popular belief and usually, you can not debate over a belief. > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > Kishore patnaik > > > > > > > > > > > > , "Visti Larsen" <visti@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ||Hare Rama Krsna|| > > > > > > > Dear Kishore, Namaskar > > > > > > > If the Brahma has to change then the creation must also. Then in > > > > > > that case > > > > > > > we should have experienced pralaya over the last few years > > > > > > already... Can't > > > > > > > really accept that. > > > > > > > Best wishes, > > > > > > > *** > > > > > > > Visti Larsen > > > > > > > For services and articles visit: > > > > > > > http://srigaruda.com > > > > > > > *** > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [] On > > > > > > > Behalf Of kishore mohan > > > > > > > 09 May 2006 08:44 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message > > > > > posted in > > > > > > > jyotish vidya > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear visti, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namaskar. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the combination. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you are saying about the Hanumanji taking over as the current > > > > > > > Brahma, I have no clue about it. It is only a polular belief. > Please > > > > > > > elaborate on the question if I misunderstood. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kishore patnaik > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , "Visti Larsen" <visti@> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ||Hare Rama Krsna|| > > > > > > > > Dear Kishore, Namaskar > > > > > > > > Check for Jupiter or Moon associating with the third from arudha > > > > > > lagna. > > > > > > > > These give self-consciousness/willingness or emotional > distress at > > > > > > > the time > > > > > > > > of death. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What is YOUR condition for balarishta? Also you haven't > elaborated > > > > > > > on your > > > > > > > > timing of the birth of certain souls from your last mail. > > > > > > > > Best wishes, > > > > > > > > *** > > > > > > > > Visti Larsen > > > > > > > > For services and articles visit: > > > > > > > > http://srigaruda.com > > > > > > > > *** > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [] On > > > > > > > > Behalf Of kishore mohan > > > > > > > > 08 May 2006 19:22 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message > > > > posted in > > > > > > > jyotish > > > > > > > > vidya > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ear friend, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am yet to cast and read the charts provided by you. But let me > > > > > tell > > > > > > > > two general points with regard to the suicides: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The first one is to do with the natal chart of the native. > > > > > Generally, > > > > > > > > the Lagna Lord will be a malefic for the native. This > happens to > > > > > > > > tarus and the four 'corner' lagnas. Also, the Moon must be > > > > severely > > > > > > > > afflicted. If moon is severly afflicted, it can also indicate a > > > > > > > > possibility of Balarishta, though in Balarishta, the > connection of > > > > > > > > Mars with certain Houses is compulsory. In other words, the > Moons > > > > > > > > position will be alike in both Balarishta and suicide cases. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The second point is to do with the transits. The Tr Lagna lord > > > > > should > > > > > > > > be cruelly aspecting himself in the natal chart. Sometimes, this > > > > > > > > position can be taken by AK but then, AK should be AK for the > > > > > transit > > > > > > > > chart also. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hope this helps, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kishore patnaik > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > jyotish-vidya, Uttara <muttaraphalguni@> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Patrice and All, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have an added commentary to my last post. It is a social > > > > > > > > science theory but I think adds to the astrological reasoning > > > > behind > > > > > > > > some charts we encounter. Especially our families. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Like your mother who is a Gemini, My mother has a Gemini > > > > > Sun. I > > > > > > > > often say she talks out of both sides of her mouth. She is also > > > > > very > > > > > > > > autocratic and opinionated. She too grew up in an era where > > > > people > > > > > > > > just got on with things and didn't talk or dwell on them > > > > openly. I > > > > > > > > have often found this to be a direct reaction to the severity > > > > of the > > > > > > > > depression era of the 30's and then the atrocities of World > > > > War 11. > > > > > > > > Actually, Alcoholic Anonymous grew out of this depression era, > > > > > > > > teaching men how to cope better with events and things in their > > > > > lives > > > > > > > > that were bigger than them. That's where the 12-step program > > > > > came to > > > > > > > > say that one was "powerless over" and taught fraternity of > > > > likeness > > > > > > > > and support. It was a kind of new religion to help pull men > > > > > from the > > > > > > > > depths of despair. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Unfortunately, your Grandfather never experienced this > or his > > > > > > > > stoic Denmark ancestry lead him to be his own person. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Then the war came and life changed. Young Men left home and > > > > > often > > > > > > > > didn't return. Or, men returned never to be the same again. > Those > > > > > > > > that did survive the hell came back with a new outlook on life > > > > > and the > > > > > > > > majority got on with life. Never to develop fraternity again. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Women during the war came out of the house and into the > > > > > factory to > > > > > > > > work - to help supply the goods needed for war. That is where > > > > women > > > > > > > > wearing pants developed and was allowed. Every thing was > > > > > rationed, so > > > > > > > > material for clothing was harder and sturdier - so pants > came into > > > > > > > > being and were cheaper. Also in factory work, pants were > need for > > > > > > > > safety and endurance rather than dresses. Pants became the > > > > > uniform of > > > > > > > > the War. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Once the war ended there was a backlash on the concept of > > > > "being > > > > > > > > powerless". All of a sudden being in control of ones life > > > > became an > > > > > > > > obsession in self-help advice and personal stories of people > > > > > > > > overcoming adversity for peace and contentment. Personal > > > > prosperity > > > > > > > > was touted everywhere. Women went back to their kitchens, > > > > dresses, > > > > > > > > and deferring roles. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > However, do you remember growing up how we the baby > > > > boomers were > > > > > > > > raised and what expectations were required? There were four > > > > themes > > > > > > > > going on. One to have a more relaxed permissive society, > (this is > > > > > > > > where entitlement was bred - don't you just love Dr Spock) > > > > two, the > > > > > > > > sky's the limit, three, gratefulness was instilled instead of > > > > > apathy. > > > > > > > > And, four, mothers were quietly behind closed doors raising > > > > their > > > > > > > > daughters to be more of their own person and equal to men. The > > > > > > > > fifty's believed it. The sixty's teenagers rebelled against the > > > > > > > > fifties restrictions, the seventies; married Women were > > > > > screaming for > > > > > > > > their autonomy and the eighties saw young college degreed women > > > > > in the > > > > > > > > workplace. The nineties reaped the backlash and the > > > > 21-century so > > > > > > > > far in America is entitled happy and throwing all the common > sense > > > > > > > > rules for civility out the window. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, when we look at out mothers and hear their stories it > > > > really > > > > > > > > was a different time of living and thinking and believing. I > > > > think > > > > > > > > the more adversity and sacrifice they encountered and the more > > > > > > > > deferment required, the more they built their own reservoirs for > > > > > > > > survival. There are some who were able to keep their > capacity to > > > > > > > > nurture and empathize, but all too often like my mother their > > > > > > > > stoicness, severe expectation, and rule has kept them safe and > > > > > > > > protected. And like my mother and some others I know, they > became > > > > > > > > very narcissistic. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My mother could have been a better mother to my adopted > > > > sister, > > > > > > > > but in reality, my mother's thinking and feeling was and is one > > > > > where > > > > > > > > she provided this child with a better life and gave her > > > > > opportunities > > > > > > > > and education and a roof over her head that my sister has > > > > never been > > > > > > > > able to return in kindness to my mother. As far as having any > > > > > empathy > > > > > > > > for a broken soul theory - there is none. That and my mother's > > > > > > > > intolerance of my sister's chaotic inner soul is written off as > > > > > > > > complete belligerence and added to that, she is not connected > > > > to my > > > > > > > > mother in any depth because as my mother says, this child is > > > > not of > > > > > > > > her blood. Gad, what a mess and a terrible fall out for two > lives > > > > > > > > with completely different experiences. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am looking forward to 2012. I think the current tide will > > > > > > > > change, as it ultimately will. In the meantime, we have to slop > > > > > > > > through another six years. I hope my mother isn't living > > > > then. She > > > > > > > > like my mother in law need to go their graves to find peace and > > > > > > > happiness. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As Always, > > > > > > > > > Uttara > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Our deepest fear is not that we are > inadequate, our > > > > > > > > deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our > > > > > light, > > > > > > > > not our darkness, that most frightens us. There is nothing > > > > > enlightened > > > > > > > > about shrinking so that other people won't feel insecure around > > > > > > > > you...As we let our own light shine, we unconsciously give other > > > > > > > > people permission to do the same. As we are liberated from > > > > our own > > > > > > > > fear, our presence automatically liberates others." from A > > > > > Return To > > > > > > > > Love: by Marianne Williamson > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~ om tat sat ~ > > > > > > > > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram. > > > > > > > > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna' > > > > > > > > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said > > > > > > > that the > > > > > > > > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals. > > > > > > > > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart > > > > reading > > > > > > > today > > > > > > > > Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~ om tat sat ~ > > > > > > > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram. > > > > > > > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna' > > > > > > > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said > > > > > > that the > > > > > > > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals. > > > > > > > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart > reading > > > > > > today > > > > > > > Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~ om tat sat ~ > > > > > > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram. > > > > > > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna' > > > > > > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said > > > > > that the > > > > > > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals. > > > > > > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading > > > > > today > > > > > > Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~ om tat sat ~ > > > > > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram. > > > > > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna' > > > > > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said > > > > that the > > > > > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals. > > > > > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading > > > > today > > > > > Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~ om tat sat ~ > > > > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram. > > > > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna' > > > > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said > that the > > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals. > > > > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading > today > > > > Links > > > > > > > > / > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~ om tat sat ~ > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram. > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna' > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said that the > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals. > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading today > Links > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 10, 2006 Report Share Posted May 10, 2006 Dear gaurav, namaskar. I have repeatedly refused to be dragged into contoversy, inspite of provocation, because picking on the virtual selves that the other persons sometimes assume to be, is not a very good idea simply the time is not worth it. By his own admission, Mr visti larsen did not go beyond the BPHS and I have nothing to comment on his understanding of the sacred texts. On the other hand, the two extremes of understanding of the puranas and related texts are to throw them out as a result of wild imagination of good old idle indians on one hand and to say that they are the ultimate in understanding the creation and science on the other. Both are wrong. They are the efforts of our forefathers to recreate the Old stories and in the process, so much of sciences and technology have been touched. I dont think you would want to take a good story on aeroplane as a text book in aeronautics, just because it recounts several Engineering facts. I want you to understand that the facts aout the science and technology are absolutely incidental and unfortunately, we are trying to understand about the science and techology of the yesteryears based on this folklore, only because the actual ancient text books are lost to posterity. If I am not clear in what I am saying, please be patient to ask and I will be happy to elaborate. regards, Kishore patnaik , "" <gg_0202 wrote: > > ||Jai Ramakrishna|| > Dear Vistiji & Kishoreji, > Please forgive this intervention, but I agree both we Kishoreji & > Vistiji , in one point that Our Puranas are not "Story-tellers" but > they stories are made with a scientific bend. We can talk of many > stories from Vishnu Purana, Narada Purana, Skanda Purana,etc. We > cannot say that those are texts of science directly, but they guide > us the path of science & how thing goes.. > Wish you all success, > . > > > , "Visti Larsen" <visti@> > wrote: > > > > > > ||Hare Rama Krsna|| > > Dear Kishore, Namaskar > > Now, are you claiming me to be illiterate? > > Am i supposed to read the words you write or am I to 'guess' the > gist of > > your statements. Please Kishore, you are prolonging this more than > > necessary, If you agreed with me all along just admit your > momentary lapse > > when you chose your words, or go read those puranas and vimshottari > > calculations which you maybe lacking in. > > > > There is no more astrology in this thread, so this discussion > should be done > > for now. > > Best wishes, > > *** > > Visti Larsen > > For services and articles visit: > > http://srigaruda.com > > *** > > > > > > > [] On > > Behalf Of kishore mohan > > 09 May 2006 13:05 > > > > Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message > posted in > > jyotish vidya > > > > dear visti, > > > > I let your smirks pass. when you can not read a simple message > from a > > person like me, then why talk of puranas and vedas? I want you to > read > > my message once more and comment. > > > > > > > > > > Kishore patnaik > > , "Visti Larsen" <visti@> wrote: > > > > > > ||Hare Rama Krsna|| > > > > > > Dear Kishore, Namaskar > > > > > > Leaving personal issues aside, i must make something clear. > > > > > > You said: > > > > > > the puranas are not strict basis of science, as they are more > > > > > > stories, though there is lots of science in them too and we have > to > > > > > > utilize this science as the original ' text books' of the > science viz > > > > > > the scientific parts of vedas are not given unto us. > > > > > > > > > > > > If they are the original text books as you say then they are a > > STRICT BASIS > > > OF SCIENCE. The Narada purana is the basis of ALOT of astrology > as > > is the > > > Agni Purana. Your statement is negating your second statement: > > > > > > > > > > > > Otherwise, the science and scientific theories given in puranas > are > > > incidental. they > > > > > > are more of an attempt to recall all the stories, whether true or > > > > > > symbolic, told in the ancient times and hence, the name puranas- > the > > > > > > ancient lore. > > > > > > > > > > > > So if i read the Narada Purana that gives the exact ammount of > days in a > > > Chaturyuga as 1.577.917.828 civil (savana) days, and proceeds to > > give the > > > methods of defining the solar and lunar months and days with > > calculations, > > > then what exactly is incidental? When Agni Purana gives > astrological > > timing > > > methods to decide when a person will die, then what stories are > > being told? > > > If you haven't read them then you cannot be blamed, but then we > all can > > > learn more everyday can't we? > > > > > > > > > > > > You said: > > > > > > But, if you want to look at science only on the basis of puranas, > > > > > > there is lots of vedic science which is not told in puranas and > I hope > > > > > > you realise that. > > > > > > > > > > > > Now WHO would restrict themself to reading only books written by > > Shakespeare > > > or by David Frawley when you have such large compendiums of > knowledge > > > elsewhere. Comeon Kishore, where are you going with this > statement? The > > > members of these lists are always dwelving deep into Parasara's > Hora > > > Shastra, Puranas, Gita, Vedas, Upanishads, etc. Infact based on > your > > > previous question regarding Vimshottari Dasa calculation i almost > > thought > > > you had never opened an astrology book! I know this can only be > a wrong > > > thought, but you do suprise me sometimes and i felt i had to > point > > that out > > > to you... afterall we must be serious in this study of Jyotish > if we > > are to > > > offer our assistance to those who need it. > > > > > > Best wishes and blessings, > > > > > > *** > > > > > > Visti Larsen > > > > > > For services and articles visit: > > > > > > http://srigaruda.com > > > > > > *** > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [] On > > > Behalf Of kishore mohan > > > 09 May 2006 12:01 > > > > > > Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message > posted in > > > jyotish vidya > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear visti, > > > > > > > > > > > > first and foremost, I think I have a right to get personal as > you were > > > > > > doing the same too sometime back. In any case, I do not > criticise the > > > > > > person but only what the person said or thought. > > > > > > > > > > > > Secondly, the basis of all sciences is Vedas and we have got > only a > > > > > > 'lesh' of vedas with us. so, we do not know all that what the > rshis > > > > > > knew. the puranas are not strict basis of science, as they are > more > > > > > > stories, though there is lots of science in them too and we have > to > > > > > > utilize this science as the original ' text books' of the > science viz > > > > > > the scientific parts of vedas are not given unto us. Otherwise, > the > > > > > > science and scientific theories given in puranas are incidental. > they > > > > > > are more of an attempt to recall all the stories, whether true or > > > > > > symbolic, told in the ancient times and hence, the name puranas- > the > > > > > > ancient lore. of course, you should not mistake me that i am > > > > > > rejecting puranas as a source of science, Noway, infact, I have > groups > > > > > > like Vedic history and Ancient India which attempt to look at > Indian > > > > > > History as told in the Vedas and puranas and other scriptures. > > > > > > > > > > > > But, if you want to look at science only on the basis of puranas, > > > > > > there is lots of vedic science which is not told in puranas and > I hope > > > > > > you realise that. > > > > > > > > > > > > Btw, you are right that I dont want to tell the answer to your > > > > > > question only because it depends a lot on the belief., which you > may > > > > > > share. > > > > > > > > > > > > I hope you take in the most positive spirit as I have no > intention of > > > > > > hurting anyone, much less yourself. > > > > > > > > > > > > Kishore patnaik > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , "Visti Larsen" <visti@> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ||Hare Rama Krsna|| > > > > > > > Dear Kishore, Namaskar > > > > > > > The rishis explained this theory in all the puranas and also > the > > Guru of > > > > > > > this parampara (sri achyuta dasa) has also talked about its > > > > > > relevance. It is > > > > > > > used for prediction and if you think the rishis are self- > centric > > > > > > when trying > > > > > > > to predict the tides of humanity then i can't help you. > > > > > > > I'm not rejecting other theories, otherwise i wouldn't even > bring > > up the > > > > > > > topic. Instead i wanto know which evolution theory could > accept this > > > > > > to be > > > > > > > true, and understand the background. As far as i know there > are two > > > > > > theories > > > > > > > which have their main difference in the understanding of the > length > > > > > > of the > > > > > > > year of Gods, but i don't believe that this theory accomedates > the > > > > > > change of > > > > > > > Brahma occuring any time soon. > > > > > > > If you can't answer then don't answer instead of getting > personal. > > > > > > > Best wishes, > > > > > > > *** > > > > > > > Visti Larsen > > > > > > > For services and articles visit: > > > > > > > http://srigaruda.com > > > > > > > *** > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [] On > > > > > > > Behalf Of kishore mohan > > > > > > > 09 May 2006 11:36 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message > > posted in > > > > > > > jyotish vidya > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dear visti, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > you are going into the same self centric theory of any > scientist. > > > > > > > a scientist says his theories are the centre of all the known > and > > > > > > > unknown and thinks every known phenomenon should be explained > by his > > > > > > > theories and every unknown phenomenon should be predicted by > them. an > > > > > > > egoistic scientist rejects any phenomenon that does not fall > within > > > > > > > the stratum of his theories. this is not a good indication. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > while it is good to try and explain everything- from anu(atom) > to > > > > > > > mahan(the infinite)- with in your theories which will help you > in your > > > > > > > spiritual and academic sojourn, it is utterly undesirable to > reject > > > > > > > what you can not explain. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In any case, as I have said, what I have said is only a belief > and > > > > > > > those who expound this belief have their own ways of > explaining it. I > > > > > > > am one of the believers. I can not explain you more on this, > as you > > > > > > > will not appreiciate my explanations unless you accept my > > assumptions. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kishore patnaik > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , "Visti Larsen" <visti@> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ||Hare Rama Krsna|| > > > > > > > > Dear Kishore, Namaskar > > > > > > > > I disagree. As Jyotishas we not only have to understand the > > > > > > > time/dasas of > > > > > > > > humans but the dasas of the entire creation, herein the > yugas, > > > > > > > manvantaras, > > > > > > > > kalpas (blinking of brahmas eye) and the first Brahma > himself who > > > > > > > will live > > > > > > > > for zillions of human years. By implication the opening and > > closing of > > > > > > > > brahmas eye causes the pralaya, so also his reinstatement > would > > > > > > > imply the > > > > > > > > same as Brahma embodies the creation itself... we are living > in > > > > > > > Brahma, so > > > > > > > > if he is replaced then so is our creation. > > > > > > > > Best wishes, > > > > > > > > *** > > > > > > > > Visti Larsen > > > > > > > > For services and articles visit: > > > > > > > > http://srigaruda.com > > > > > > > > *** > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [] On > > > > > > > > Behalf Of kishore mohan > > > > > > > > 09 May 2006 10:51 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a > message > > > > > > posted in > > > > > > > > jyotish vidya > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear visti, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > namaskar. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > everybody has their own theories regarding that. As i said, > it > > is only > > > > > > > > a popular belief and usually, you can not debate over a > belief. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kishore patnaik > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , "Visti Larsen" <visti@> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ||Hare Rama Krsna|| > > > > > > > > > Dear Kishore, Namaskar > > > > > > > > > If the Brahma has to change then the creation must also. > Then in > > > > > > > > that case > > > > > > > > > we should have experienced pralaya over the last few years > > > > > > > > already... Can't > > > > > > > > > really accept that. > > > > > > > > > Best wishes, > > > > > > > > > *** > > > > > > > > > Visti Larsen > > > > > > > > > For services and articles visit: > > > > > > > > > http://srigaruda.com > > > > > > > > > *** > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [] On > > > > > > > > > Behalf Of kishore mohan > > > > > > > > > 09 May 2006 08:44 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a > message > > > > > > > posted in > > > > > > > > > jyotish vidya > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear visti, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namaskar. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the combination. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you are saying about the Hanumanji taking over as the > current > > > > > > > > > Brahma, I have no clue about it. It is only a polular > belief. > > Please > > > > > > > > > elaborate on the question if I misunderstood. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kishore patnaik > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , "Visti Larsen" > <visti@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ||Hare Rama Krsna|| > > > > > > > > > > Dear Kishore, Namaskar > > > > > > > > > > Check for Jupiter or Moon associating with the third > from arudha > > > > > > > > lagna. > > > > > > > > > > These give self-consciousness/willingness or emotional > > distress at > > > > > > > > > the time > > > > > > > > > > of death. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What is YOUR condition for balarishta? Also you haven't > > elaborated > > > > > > > > > on your > > > > > > > > > > timing of the birth of certain souls from your last mail. > > > > > > > > > > Best wishes, > > > > > > > > > > *** > > > > > > > > > > Visti Larsen > > > > > > > > > > For services and articles visit: > > > > > > > > > > http://srigaruda.com > > > > > > > > > > *** > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [] On > > > > > > > > > > Behalf Of kishore mohan > > > > > > > > > > 08 May 2006 19:22 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a > message > > > > > > posted in > > > > > > > > > jyotish > > > > > > > > > > vidya > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ear friend, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am yet to cast and read the charts provided by you. > But let me > > > > > > > tell > > > > > > > > > > two general points with regard to the suicides: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The first one is to do with the natal chart of the > native. > > > > > > > Generally, > > > > > > > > > > the Lagna Lord will be a malefic for the native. This > > happens to > > > > > > > > > > tarus and the four 'corner' lagnas. Also, the Moon must > be > > > > > > severely > > > > > > > > > > afflicted. If moon is severly afflicted, it can also > indicate a > > > > > > > > > > possibility of Balarishta, though in Balarishta, the > > connection of > > > > > > > > > > Mars with certain Houses is compulsory. In other words, > the > > Moons > > > > > > > > > > position will be alike in both Balarishta and suicide > cases. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The second point is to do with the transits. The Tr > Lagna lord > > > > > > > should > > > > > > > > > > be cruelly aspecting himself in the natal chart. > Sometimes, this > > > > > > > > > > position can be taken by AK but then, AK should be AK > for the > > > > > > > transit > > > > > > > > > > chart also. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hope this helps, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kishore patnaik > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > jyotish-vidya, Uttara > <muttaraphalguni@> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Patrice and All, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have an added commentary to my last post. It is a > social > > > > > > > > > > science theory but I think adds to the astrological > reasoning > > > > > > behind > > > > > > > > > > some charts we encounter. Especially our families. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Like your mother who is a Gemini, My mother has a > Gemini > > > > > > > Sun. I > > > > > > > > > > often say she talks out of both sides of her mouth. She > is also > > > > > > > very > > > > > > > > > > autocratic and opinionated. She too grew up in an era > where > > > > > > people > > > > > > > > > > just got on with things and didn't talk or dwell on them > > > > > > openly. I > > > > > > > > > > have often found this to be a direct reaction to the > severity > > > > > > of the > > > > > > > > > > depression era of the 30's and then the atrocities of > World > > > > > > War 11. > > > > > > > > > > Actually, Alcoholic Anonymous grew out of this > depression era, > > > > > > > > > > teaching men how to cope better with events and things > in their > > > > > > > lives > > > > > > > > > > that were bigger than them. That's where the 12-step > program > > > > > > > came to > > > > > > > > > > say that one was "powerless over" and taught fraternity > of > > > > > > likeness > > > > > > > > > > and support. It was a kind of new religion to help pull > men > > > > > > > from the > > > > > > > > > > depths of despair. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Unfortunately, your Grandfather never experienced > this > > or his > > > > > > > > > > stoic Denmark ancestry lead him to be his own person. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Then the war came and life changed. Young Men left > home and > > > > > > > often > > > > > > > > > > didn't return. Or, men returned never to be the same > again. > > Those > > > > > > > > > > that did survive the hell came back with a new outlook > on life > > > > > > > and the > > > > > > > > > > majority got on with life. Never to develop fraternity > again. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Women during the war came out of the house and into > the > > > > > > > factory to > > > > > > > > > > work - to help supply the goods needed for war. That is > where > > > > > > women > > > > > > > > > > wearing pants developed and was allowed. Every thing was > > > > > > > rationed, so > > > > > > > > > > material for clothing was harder and sturdier - so pants > > came into > > > > > > > > > > being and were cheaper. Also in factory work, pants were > > need for > > > > > > > > > > safety and endurance rather than dresses. Pants became > the > > > > > > > uniform of > > > > > > > > > > the War. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Once the war ended there was a backlash on the > concept of > > > > > > "being > > > > > > > > > > powerless". All of a sudden being in control of ones life > > > > > > became an > > > > > > > > > > obsession in self-help advice and personal stories of > people > > > > > > > > > > overcoming adversity for peace and contentment. Personal > > > > > > prosperity > > > > > > > > > > was touted everywhere. Women went back to their > kitchens, > > > > > > dresses, > > > > > > > > > > and deferring roles. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > However, do you remember growing up how we the baby > > > > > > boomers were > > > > > > > > > > raised and what expectations were required? There were > four > > > > > > themes > > > > > > > > > > going on. One to have a more relaxed permissive society, > > (this is > > > > > > > > > > where entitlement was bred - don't you just love Dr > Spock) > > > > > > two, the > > > > > > > > > > sky's the limit, three, gratefulness was instilled > instead of > > > > > > > apathy. > > > > > > > > > > And, four, mothers were quietly behind closed doors > raising > > > > > > their > > > > > > > > > > daughters to be more of their own person and equal to > men. The > > > > > > > > > > fifty's believed it. The sixty's teenagers rebelled > against the > > > > > > > > > > fifties restrictions, the seventies; married Women were > > > > > > > screaming for > > > > > > > > > > their autonomy and the eighties saw young college > degreed women > > > > > > > in the > > > > > > > > > > workplace. The nineties reaped the backlash and the > > > > > > 21-century so > > > > > > > > > > far in America is entitled happy and throwing all the > common > > sense > > > > > > > > > > rules for civility out the window. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, when we look at out mothers and hear their > stories it > > > > > > really > > > > > > > > > > was a different time of living and thinking and > believing. I > > > > > > think > > > > > > > > > > the more adversity and sacrifice they encountered and > the more > > > > > > > > > > deferment required, the more they built their own > reservoirs for > > > > > > > > > > survival. There are some who were able to keep their > > capacity to > > > > > > > > > > nurture and empathize, but all too often like my mother > their > > > > > > > > > > stoicness, severe expectation, and rule has kept them > safe and > > > > > > > > > > protected. And like my mother and some others I know, > they > > became > > > > > > > > > > very narcissistic. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My mother could have been a better mother to my > adopted > > > > > > sister, > > > > > > > > > > but in reality, my mother's thinking and feeling was and > is one > > > > > > > where > > > > > > > > > > she provided this child with a better life and gave her > > > > > > > opportunities > > > > > > > > > > and education and a roof over her head that my sister has > > > > > > never been > > > > > > > > > > able to return in kindness to my mother. As far as > having any > > > > > > > empathy > > > > > > > > > > for a broken soul theory - there is none. That and my > mother's > > > > > > > > > > intolerance of my sister's chaotic inner soul is written > off as > > > > > > > > > > complete belligerence and added to that, she is not > connected > > > > > > to my > > > > > > > > > > mother in any depth because as my mother says, this > child is > > > > > > not of > > > > > > > > > > her blood. Gad, what a mess and a terrible fall out for > two > > lives > > > > > > > > > > with completely different experiences. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am looking forward to 2012. I think the current > tide will > > > > > > > > > > change, as it ultimately will. In the meantime, we have > to slop > > > > > > > > > > through another six years. I hope my mother isn't living > > > > > > then. She > > > > > > > > > > like my mother in law need to go their graves to find > peace and > > > > > > > > > happiness. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As Always, > > > > > > > > > > > Uttara > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Our deepest fear is not that we are > > inadequate, our > > > > > > > > > > deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It > is our > > > > > > > light, > > > > > > > > > > not our darkness, that most frightens us. There is > nothing > > > > > > > enlightened > > > > > > > > > > about shrinking so that other people won't feel insecure > around > > > > > > > > > > you...As we let our own light shine, we unconsciously > give other > > > > > > > > > > people permission to do the same. As we are liberated > from > > > > > > our own > > > > > > > > > > fear, our presence automatically liberates others." > from A > > > > > > > Return To > > > > > > > > > > Love: by Marianne Williamson > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~ om tat sat ~ > > > > > > > > > > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta > Ashram. > > > > > > > > > > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama > Krishna' > > > > > > > > > > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great > who said > > > > > > > > > that the > > > > > > > > > > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals. > > > > > > > > > > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free > chart > > > > > > reading > > > > > > > > > today > > > > > > > > > > Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~ om tat sat ~ > > > > > > > > > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta > Ashram. > > > > > > > > > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama > Krishna' > > > > > > > > > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great > who said > > > > > > > > that the > > > > > > > > > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals. > > > > > > > > > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free > chart > > reading > > > > > > > > today > > > > > > > > > Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~ om tat sat ~ > > > > > > > > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram. > > > > > > > > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama > Krishna' > > > > > > > > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who > said > > > > > > > that the > > > > > > > > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals. > > > > > > > > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart > reading > > > > > > > today > > > > > > > > Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~ om tat sat ~ > > > > > > > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram. > > > > > > > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama > Krishna' > > > > > > > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who > said > > > > > > that the > > > > > > > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals. > > > > > > > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart > reading > > > > > > today > > > > > > > Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~ om tat sat ~ > > > > > > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram. > > > > > > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna' > > > > > > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said > > that the > > > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals. > > > > > > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart > reading > > today > > > > > > Links > > > > > > > > > > > > / > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~ om tat sat ~ > > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram. > > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna' > > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said > that the > > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals. > > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart > reading today > > Links > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 10, 2006 Report Share Posted May 10, 2006 *|| OM MAHAGANAPATAYE NAMAH ||*"Om Namah Shivaaya Omkareshvaraaya Om Om Sah". Hariom, Dear Friends, With due respects , to all the participants, i would like to submit, After veda in post vedic period there was transformation with evolution of collective consciousness of People in this part of asia( jamboo dwipa) and methods of imparting knowledge registered total shift anf gestalt in conveying the cosmic facts and social phenoenon. Like three dimensional exposition started as a model to depicit by contemprary teachers to explain deities/ god , Idol worship set in , so also after upnishidic model story telling become part of curriculam.The old method of Teaching by wrote learning was taken over by Puranic story.As Memory functions by association each story had hidden facts of cosmos for students to understand the sublime trouth, Moth to mouth teaching continued till they were reduced in writing.At those time we did not develop language as rich and abstract as it is today so to a non initiate they are just stories but to a mind who has key to interprate it siply is imbibed with an scientific facts. Thus truly all purans are not History as understood by some but are scientific like book of seers reduced to level of understanding to common people of those times. Hope what i write is tkaen as a missing gap giving rise to mis understanding.In light of my understanding i feel Both Visti and Kishore are right and continue to bless the group with their wisdom. || May all people be happy ||OM TAT SATR.C.Srivastava .swami_rcs mob 9412268768http://www.cosmograce.comhttp://www.cosmograce.blogspot.com - kishore mohan Wednesday, May 10, 2006 7:27 PM Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message posted in jyotish vidya Dear gaurav, namaskar. I have repeatedly refused to be dragged into contoversy, inspite ofprovocation, because picking on the virtual selves that the otherpersons sometimes assume to be, is not a very good idea simply thetime is not worth it. By his own admission, Mr visti larsen did not go beyond the BPHS and Ihave nothing to comment on his understanding of the sacred texts. On the other hand, the two extremes of understanding of the puranasand related texts are to throw them out as a result of wildimagination of good old idle indians on one hand and to say that theyare the ultimate in understanding the creation and science on the other. Both are wrong. They are the efforts of our forefathers to recreatethe Old stories and in the process, so much of sciences and technologyhave been touched. I dont think you would want to take a good story onaeroplane as a text book in aeronautics, just because it recountsseveral Engineering facts. I want you to understand that the factsaout the science and technology are absolutely incidental andunfortunately, we are trying to understand about the science andtechology of the yesteryears based on this folklore, only because theactual ancient text books are lost to posterity. If I am not clear in what I am saying, please be patient to ask and Iwill be happy to elaborate. regards, Kishore patnaik --- In , "" <gg_0202 wrote:>> ||Jai Ramakrishna||> Dear Vistiji & Kishoreji,> Please forgive this intervention, but I agree both we Kishoreji & > Vistiji , in one point that Our Puranas are not "Story-tellers" but > they stories are made with a scientific bend. We can talk of many > stories from Vishnu Purana, Narada Purana, Skanda Purana,etc. We > cannot say that those are texts of science directly, but they guide > us the path of science & how thing goes..> Wish you all success,> .> > > , "Visti Larsen" <visti@> > wrote:> >> > > > ||Hare Rama Krsna||> > Dear Kishore, Namaskar> > Now, are you claiming me to be illiterate? > > Am i supposed to read the words you write or am I to 'guess' the > gist of> > your statements. Please Kishore, you are prolonging this more than> > necessary, If you agreed with me all along just admit your > momentary lapse> > when you chose your words, or go read those puranas and vimshottari> > calculations which you maybe lacking in.> > > > There is no more astrology in this thread, so this discussion > should be done> > for now.> > Best wishes,> > ***> > Visti Larsen> > For services and articles visit: > > http://srigaruda.com> > ***> > > > > > > [] On> > Behalf Of kishore mohan> > 09 May 2006 13:05> > To: > > Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message > posted in> > jyotish vidya> > > > dear visti, > > > > I let your smirks pass. when you can not read a simple message > from a> > person like me, then why talk of puranas and vedas? I want you to > read> > my message once more and comment. > > > > > > > > > > Kishore patnaik > > --- In , "Visti Larsen" <visti@> wrote:> > >> > > ||Hare Rama Krsna||> > > > > > Dear Kishore, Namaskar> > > > > > Leaving personal issues aside, i must make something clear.> > > > > > You said:> > > > > > the puranas are not strict basis of science, as they are more> > > > > > stories, though there is lots of science in them too and we have > to> > > > > > utilize this science as the original ' text books' of the > science viz> > > > > > the scientific parts of vedas are not given unto us.> > > > > > > > > > > > If they are the original text books as you say then they are a> > STRICT BASIS> > > OF SCIENCE. The Narada purana is the basis of ALOT of astrology > as> > is the> > > Agni Purana. Your statement is negating your second statement:> > > > > > > > > > > > Otherwise, the science and scientific theories given in puranas > are> > > incidental. they> > > > > > are more of an attempt to recall all the stories, whether true or> > > > > > symbolic, told in the ancient times and hence, the name puranas-> the> > > > > > ancient lore.> > > > > > > > > > > > So if i read the Narada Purana that gives the exact ammount of > days in a> > > Chaturyuga as 1.577.917.828 civil (savana) days, and proceeds to> > give the> > > methods of defining the solar and lunar months and days with> > calculations,> > > then what exactly is incidental? When Agni Purana gives > astrological> > timing> > > methods to decide when a person will die, then what stories are> > being told?> > > If you haven't read them then you cannot be blamed, but then we > all can> > > learn more everyday can't we?> > > > > > > > > > > > You said: > > > > > > But, if you want to look at science only on the basis of puranas,> > > > > > there is lots of vedic science which is not told in puranas and > I hope> > > > > > you realise that.> > > > > > > > > > > > Now WHO would restrict themself to reading only books written by> > Shakespeare> > > or by David Frawley when you have such large compendiums of > knowledge> > > elsewhere. Comeon Kishore, where are you going with this > statement? The> > > members of these lists are always dwelving deep into Parasara's > Hora> > > Shastra, Puranas, Gita, Vedas, Upanishads, etc. Infact based on > your> > > previous question regarding Vimshottari Dasa calculation i almost> > thought> > > you had never opened an astrology book! I know this can only be > a wrong> > > thought, but you do suprise me sometimes and i felt i had to > point> > that out> > > to you... afterall we must be serious in this study of Jyotish > if we> > are to> > > offer our assistance to those who need it.> > > > > > Best wishes and blessings,> > > > > > ***> > > > > > Visti Larsen> > > > > > For services and articles visit: > > > > > > http://srigaruda.com> > > > > > ***> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [] On> > > Behalf Of kishore mohan> > > 09 May 2006 12:01> > > To: > > > Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message > posted in> > > jyotish vidya> > > > > > > > > > > > Dear visti, > > > > > > > > > > > > first and foremost, I think I have a right to get personal as > you were> > > > > > doing the same too sometime back. In any case, I do not > criticise the> > > > > > person but only what the person said or thought. > > > > > > > > > > > > Secondly, the basis of all sciences is Vedas and we have got > only a> > > > > > 'lesh' of vedas with us. so, we do not know all that what the > rshis> > > > > > knew. the puranas are not strict basis of science, as they are > more> > > > > > stories, though there is lots of science in them too and we have > to> > > > > > utilize this science as the original ' text books' of the > science viz> > > > > > the scientific parts of vedas are not given unto us. Otherwise, > the> > > > > > science and scientific theories given in puranas are incidental. > they> > > > > > are more of an attempt to recall all the stories, whether true or> > > > > > symbolic, told in the ancient times and hence, the name puranas-> the> > > > > > ancient lore. of course, you should not mistake me that i am> > > > > > rejecting puranas as a source of science, Noway, infact, I have > groups> > > > > > like Vedic history and Ancient India which attempt to look at > Indian> > > > > > History as told in the Vedas and puranas and other scriptures. > > > > > > > > > > > > But, if you want to look at science only on the basis of puranas,> > > > > > there is lots of vedic science which is not told in puranas and > I hope> > > > > > you realise that.> > > > > > > > > > > > Btw, you are right that I dont want to tell the answer to your> > > > > > question only because it depends a lot on the belief., which you > may> > > > > > share. > > > > > > > > > > > > I hope you take in the most positive spirit as I have no > intention of> > > > > > hurting anyone, much less yourself. > > > > > > > > > > > > Kishore patnaik > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In , "Visti Larsen" <visti@> > wrote:> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ||Hare Rama Krsna||> > > > > > > Dear Kishore, Namaskar> > > > > > > The rishis explained this theory in all the puranas and also > the> > Guru of> > > > > > > this parampara (sri achyuta dasa) has also talked about its> > > > > > relevance. It is> > > > > > > used for prediction and if you think the rishis are self-> centric> > > > > > when trying> > > > > > > to predict the tides of humanity then i can't help you.> > > > > > > I'm not rejecting other theories, otherwise i wouldn't even > bring> > up the> > > > > > > topic. Instead i wanto know which evolution theory could > accept this> > > > > > to be> > > > > > > true, and understand the background. As far as i know there > are two> > > > > > theories> > > > > > > which have their main difference in the understanding of the > length> > > > > > of the> > > > > > > year of Gods, but i don't believe that this theory accomedates > the> > > > > > change of> > > > > > > Brahma occuring any time soon.> > > > > > > If you can't answer then don't answer instead of getting > personal.> > > > > > > Best wishes,> > > > > > > ***> > > > > > > Visti Larsen> > > > > > > For services and articles visit: > > > > > > > http://srigaruda.com> > > > > > > ***> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [] On> > > > > > > Behalf Of kishore mohan> > > > > > > 09 May 2006 11:36> > > > > > > To: > > > > > > > Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a message> > posted in> > > > > > > jyotish vidya> > > > > > > > > > > > > > dear visti,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > you are going into the same self centric theory of any > scientist.> > > > > > > a scientist says his theories are the centre of all the known > and> > > > > > > unknown and thinks every known phenomenon should be explained > by his> > > > > > > theories and every unknown phenomenon should be predicted by > them. an> > > > > > > egoistic scientist rejects any phenomenon that does not fall > within> > > > > > > the stratum of his theories. this is not a good indication. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > while it is good to try and explain everything- from anu(atom) > to> > > > > > > mahan(the infinite)- with in your theories which will help you > in your> > > > > > > spiritual and academic sojourn, it is utterly undesirable to > reject> > > > > > > what you can not explain. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In any case, as I have said, what I have said is only a belief > and> > > > > > > those who expound this belief have their own ways of > explaining it. I> > > > > > > am one of the believers. I can not explain you more on this, > as you> > > > > > > will not appreiciate my explanations unless you accept my> > assumptions. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kishore patnaik > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , "Visti Larsen" <visti@> > wrote:> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > ||Hare Rama Krsna||> > > > > > > > Dear Kishore, Namaskar> > > > > > > > I disagree. As Jyotishas we not only have to understand the> > > > > > > time/dasas of> > > > > > > > humans but the dasas of the entire creation, herein the > yugas,> > > > > > > manvantaras,> > > > > > > > kalpas (blinking of brahmas eye) and the first Brahma > himself who> > > > > > > will live> > > > > > > > for zillions of human years. By implication the opening and> > closing of> > > > > > > > brahmas eye causes the pralaya, so also his reinstatement > would> > > > > > > imply the> > > > > > > > same as Brahma embodies the creation itself... we are living > in> > > > > > > Brahma, so> > > > > > > > if he is replaced then so is our creation.> > > > > > > > Best wishes,> > > > > > > > ***> > > > > > > > Visti Larsen> > > > > > > > For services and articles visit: > > > > > > > > http://srigaruda.com> > > > > > > > ***> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [] On> > > > > > > > Behalf Of kishore mohan> > > > > > > > 09 May 2006 10:51> > > > > > > > To: > > > > > > > > Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a > message> > > > > > posted in> > > > > > > > jyotish vidya> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear visti, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > namaskar. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > everybody has their own theories regarding that. As i said, > it> > is only> > > > > > > > a popular belief and usually, you can not debate over a > belief. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kishore patnaik > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , "Visti Larsen" <visti@> > wrote:> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > ||Hare Rama Krsna||> > > > > > > > > Dear Kishore, Namaskar> > > > > > > > > If the Brahma has to change then the creation must also. > Then in> > > > > > > > that case> > > > > > > > > we should have experienced pralaya over the last few years> > > > > > > > already... Can't> > > > > > > > > really accept that.> > > > > > > > > Best wishes,> > > > > > > > > ***> > > > > > > > > Visti Larsen> > > > > > > > > For services and articles visit: > > > > > > > > > http://srigaruda.com> > > > > > > > > ***> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [] On> > > > > > > > > Behalf Of kishore mohan> > > > > > > > > 09 May 2006 08:44> > > > > > > > > To: > > > > > > > > > Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a > message> > > > > > > posted in> > > > > > > > > jyotish vidya> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear visti, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namaskar. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the combination. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you are saying about the Hanumanji taking over as the > current> > > > > > > > > Brahma, I have no clue about it. It is only a polular > belief.> > Please> > > > > > > > > elaborate on the question if I misunderstood. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kishore patnaik > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , "Visti Larsen" > <visti@>> > wrote:> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > ||Hare Rama Krsna||> > > > > > > > > > Dear Kishore, Namaskar> > > > > > > > > > Check for Jupiter or Moon associating with the third > from arudha> > > > > > > > lagna.> > > > > > > > > > These give self-consciousness/willingness or emotional> > distress at> > > > > > > > > the time> > > > > > > > > > of death.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What is YOUR condition for balarishta? Also you haven't> > elaborated> > > > > > > > > on your> > > > > > > > > > timing of the birth of certain souls from your last mail.> > > > > > > > > > Best wishes,> > > > > > > > > > ***> > > > > > > > > > Visti Larsen> > > > > > > > > > For services and articles visit: > > > > > > > > > > http://srigaruda.com> > > > > > > > > > ***> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [] On> > > > > > > > > > Behalf Of kishore mohan> > > > > > > > > > 08 May 2006 19:22> > > > > > > > > > To: > > > > > > > > > > [Om Krishna Guru] Factors for suicide - a > message> > > > > > posted in> > > > > > > > > jyotish> > > > > > > > > > vidya> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ear friend,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am yet to cast and read the charts provided by you. > But let me> > > > > > > tell> > > > > > > > > > two general points with regard to the suicides:> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The first one is to do with the natal chart of the > native. > > > > > > > Generally,> > > > > > > > > > the Lagna Lord will be a malefic for the native. This> > happens to> > > > > > > > > > tarus and the four 'corner' lagnas. Also, the Moon must > be> > > > > > severely> > > > > > > > > > afflicted. If moon is severly afflicted, it can also > indicate a> > > > > > > > > > possibility of Balarishta, though in Balarishta, the> > connection of> > > > > > > > > > Mars with certain Houses is compulsory. In other words, > the> > Moons> > > > > > > > > > position will be alike in both Balarishta and suicide > cases.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The second point is to do with the transits. The Tr > Lagna lord> > > > > > > should> > > > > > > > > > be cruelly aspecting himself in the natal chart. > Sometimes, this> > > > > > > > > > position can be taken by AK but then, AK should be AK > for the> > > > > > > transit> > > > > > > > > > chart also.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hope this helps,> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kishore patnaik> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > jyotish-vidya, Uttara > <muttaraphalguni@>> > > > > > > wrote:> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Dear Patrice and All,> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > I have an added commentary to my last post. It is a > social> > > > > > > > > > science theory but I think adds to the astrological > reasoning> > > > > > behind> > > > > > > > > > some charts we encounter. Especially our families.> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Like your mother who is a Gemini, My mother has a > Gemini> > > > > > > Sun. I> > > > > > > > > > often say she talks out of both sides of her mouth. She > is also> > > > > > > very> > > > > > > > > > autocratic and opinionated. She too grew up in an era > where> > > > > > people> > > > > > > > > > just got on with things and didn't talk or dwell on them> > > > > > openly. I> > > > > > > > > > have often found this to be a direct reaction to the > severity> > > > > > of the> > > > > > > > > > depression era of the 30's and then the atrocities of > World> > > > > > War 11.> > > > > > > > > > Actually, Alcoholic Anonymous grew out of this > depression era,> > > > > > > > > > teaching men how to cope better with events and things > in their> > > > > > > lives> > > > > > > > > > that were bigger than them. That's where the 12-step > program> > > > > > > came to> > > > > > > > > > say that one was "powerless over" and taught fraternity > of> > > > > > likeness> > > > > > > > > > and support. It was a kind of new religion to help pull > men> > > > > > > from the> > > > > > > > > > depths of despair.> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Unfortunately, your Grandfather never experienced > this> > or his> > > > > > > > > > stoic Denmark ancestry lead him to be his own person.> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Then the war came and life changed. Young Men left > home and> > > > > > > often> > > > > > > > > > didn't return. Or, men returned never to be the same > again.> > Those> > > > > > > > > > that did survive the hell came back with a new outlook > on life> > > > > > > and the> > > > > > > > > > majority got on with life. Never to develop fraternity > again.> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Women during the war came out of the house and into > the> > > > > > > factory to> > > > > > > > > > work - to help supply the goods needed for war. That is > where> > > > > > women> > > > > > > > > > wearing pants developed and was allowed. Every thing was> > > > > > > rationed, so> > > > > > > > > > material for clothing was harder and sturdier - so pants> > came into> > > > > > > > > > being and were cheaper. Also in factory work, pants were> > need for> > > > > > > > > > safety and endurance rather than dresses. Pants became > the> > > > > > > uniform of> > > > > > > > > > the War.> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Once the war ended there was a backlash on the > concept of> > > > > > "being> > > > > > > > > > powerless". All of a sudden being in control of ones life> > > > > > became an> > > > > > > > > > obsession in self-help advice and personal stories of > people> > > > > > > > > > overcoming adversity for peace and contentment. Personal> > > > > > prosperity> > > > > > > > > > was touted everywhere. Women went back to their > kitchens,> > > > > > dresses,> > > > > > > > > > and deferring roles.> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > However, do you remember growing up how we the baby> > > > > > boomers were> > > > > > > > > > raised and what expectations were required? There were > four> > > > > > themes> > > > > > > > > > going on. One to have a more relaxed permissive society,> > (this is> > > > > > > > > > where entitlement was bred - don't you just love Dr > Spock)> > > > > > two, the> > > > > > > > > > sky's the limit, three, gratefulness was instilled > instead of> > > > > > > apathy.> > > > > > > > > > And, four, mothers were quietly behind closed doors > raising> > > > > > their> > > > > > > > > > daughters to be more of their own person and equal to > men. The> > > > > > > > > > fifty's believed it. The sixty's teenagers rebelled > against the> > > > > > > > > > fifties restrictions, the seventies; married Women were> > > > > > > screaming for> > > > > > > > > > their autonomy and the eighties saw young college > degreed women> > > > > > > in the> > > > > > > > > > workplace. The nineties reaped the backlash and the> > > > > > 21-century so> > > > > > > > > > far in America is entitled happy and throwing all the > common> > sense> > > > > > > > > > rules for civility out the window.> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > So, when we look at out mothers and hear their > stories it> > > > > > really> > > > > > > > > > was a different time of living and thinking and > believing. I> > > > > > think> > > > > > > > > > the more adversity and sacrifice they encountered and > the more> > > > > > > > > > deferment required, the more they built their own > reservoirs for> > > > > > > > > > survival. There are some who were able to keep their> > capacity to> > > > > > > > > > nurture and empathize, but all too often like my mother > their> > > > > > > > > > stoicness, severe expectation, and rule has kept them > safe and> > > > > > > > > > protected. And like my mother and some others I know, > they> > became> > > > > > > > > > very narcissistic.> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > My mother could have been a better mother to my > adopted> > > > > > sister,> > > > > > > > > > but in reality, my mother's thinking and feeling was and > is one> > > > > > > where> > > > > > > > > > she provided this child with a better life and gave her> > > > > > > opportunities> > > > > > > > > > and education and a roof over her head that my sister has> > > > > > never been> > > > > > > > > > able to return in kindness to my mother. As far as > having any> > > > > > > empathy> > > > > > > > > > for a broken soul theory - there is none. That and my > mother's> > > > > > > > > > intolerance of my sister's chaotic inner soul is written > off as> > > > > > > > > > complete belligerence and added to that, she is not > connected> > > > > > to my> > > > > > > > > > mother in any depth because as my mother says, this > child is> > > > > > not of> > > > > > > > > > her blood. Gad, what a mess and a terrible fall out for > two> > lives> > > > > > > > > > with completely different experiences.> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > I am looking forward to 2012. I think the current > tide will> > > > > > > > > > change, as it ultimately will. In the meantime, we have > to slop> > > > > > > > > > through another six years. I hope my mother isn't living> > > > > > then. She> > > > > > > > > > like my mother in law need to go their graves to find > peace and> > > > > > > > > happiness.> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > As Always,> > > > > > > > > > > Uttara> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > "Our deepest fear is not that we are> > inadequate, our> > > > > > > > > > deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It > is our> > > > > > > light,> > > > > > > > > > not our darkness, that most frightens us. There is > nothing> > > > > > > enlightened> > > > > > > > > > about shrinking so that other people won't feel insecure > around> > > > > > > > > > you...As we let our own light shine, we unconsciously > give other> > > > > > > > > > people permission to do the same. As we are liberated > from> > > > > > our own> > > > > > > > > > fear, our presence automatically liberates others." > from A> > > > > > > Return To> > > > > > > > > > Love: by Marianne Williamson> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~ om tat sat ~> > > > > > > > > > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta > Ashram. > > > > > > > > > > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama > Krishna'> > > > > > > > > > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great > who said> > > > > > > > > that the> > > > > > > > > > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals.> > > > > > > > > > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free > chart> > > > > > reading> > > > > > > > > today > > > > > > > > > > Links> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~ om tat sat ~> > > > > > > > > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta > Ashram. > > > > > > > > > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama > Krishna'> > > > > > > > > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great > who said> > > > > > > > that the> > > > > > > > > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals.> > > > > > > > > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free > chart> > reading> > > > > > > > today > > > > > > > > > Links> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~ om tat sat ~> > > > > > > > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram. > > > > > > > > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama > Krishna'> > > > > > > > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who > said> > > > > > > that the> > > > > > > > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals.> > > > > > > > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart > reading> > > > > > > today > > > > > > > > Links> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~ om tat sat ~> > > > > > > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram. > > > > > > > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama > Krishna'> > > > > > > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who > said> > > > > > that the> > > > > > > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals.> > > > > > > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart > reading> > > > > > today > > > > > > > Links> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~ om tat sat ~> > > > > > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram. > > > > > > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna'> > > > > > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said> > that the> > > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals.> > > > > > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart > reading> > today > > > > > > Links> > > > > > > > > > > > /> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~ om tat sat ~> > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram. > > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna'> > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said > that the> > human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals.> > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart > reading today > > Links> >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.