Guest guest Posted March 15, 2006 Report Share Posted March 15, 2006 Dear Ramesh-ji, namaskar. One quick hint. Ask the native if he was delivered by forceps/Cesarean section or if there was some complications at the time of delivery/birth. Nodes in the Navamsa lagna shows just that. Hope this hint helps a little in your analysis. Best wishes, Sourav ============================================= , "Ramesh F. Gangaramani" <ramesh.gangaramani wrote:>> || Satyam Bruyat Priyam Bruyat ||> > Dear Gurus and Members,> > I need help in confirming D9 and D10 lagna of this native.> > > January 17, 1976> Time: 8:50:00> Time Zone: 5:30:00 (East of GMT)> Place: 82 E 41' 00", 22 N 21' 00"> Korba, India> > The known facts are as follows;> 1. Nature: Gentle, Soft spoken and tall. > 2. Marriage date: 8th Dec 2003, love marriage.> 3. Profession: Computer engineer working in call centers, odd working hours> (4pm to 3 am)> 4. Job start: 1st job: Oct 30 2000 - Oct 24 2003, 2nd job: Oct 27 2003 -> Current> > D9: The reason for doubt related to lagna is because of Ketu in 12H and only> Saturn in trine. Considering his education and career, one would expect to> see planets like Rahu, Ketu, Mercury in trines! > > Sun's progression technique: He got married when he was running 28th year.> Progressed Sun in D9 would then be in Aries. Requirement of Sun having rashi> drishti on 7H is not fulfilled. Now this does not get validated even by> shifting lagna by 1 rashi on either side.> > He was running Mercury-Sun-Venus-Ketu dasa at the time of marriage. Though> Mercury is 7L, it does not have association or aragala with D9 lagna. It> actually has virodha aragala. Sun should have association/ aragala with 7L> Mercury which is also not the case. This gets validated if lagna is shifted> to Capricorn.> > D9 ND was of Ta-Le- Sc. Taurus MD could be ok with current lagna as well as> with lagna shifted by 1 rashi on either side. Rashi drishti of Venus is> missing on MD, AD and PD rashis, a factor that would not change with lagna> correction.> > On the date of marriage Jupiter was transiting through Leo and Saturn> through Gemini. Jupiter does aspect the D9 lagna but Saturn too comes to 7H.> I am not sure if Saturn's transit through 7H would give marriage (though in> this case Saturn is the dispositor of D1 7L).> > D10: With Aries lagna Sun is 5L. First job was in Merc-Ven-Sun dasa. Second> job start was in Merc-Sun-Ven dasa. Now Venus is aspected by Sun 5L, so the> Aries lagna could be right. Mercury in 10H matches with call center related> job but there is no influence of Rahu, Ketu to show computers. I am also> looking for indications that show abnormal working hours! The native is> looking for a change to a job that may have normal working hours.> > I shall appreciate inputs that may help the native and improve my learning.> > Thanks and regards,> Ramesh> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 15, 2006 Report Share Posted March 15, 2006 || Satyam Bruyat Priyam Bruyat || Dear Sourav, Thank you for your mail. Will try and find out. Best Wishes, Ramesh [] On Behalf Of SouravWednesday, March 15, 2006 10:27 PMTo: Subject: [Om Krishna Guru] Re: Confirmation of D9 and D10 lagna || Hare Rama Krishna || Dear Ramesh-ji, namaskar. One quick hint. Ask the native if he was delivered by forceps/Cesarean section or if there was some complications at the time of delivery/birth. Nodes in the Navamsa lagna shows just that. Hope this hint helps a little in your analysis. Best wishes, Sourav ============================================= , "Ramesh F. Gangaramani" <ramesh.gangaramani wrote:>> || Satyam Bruyat Priyam Bruyat ||> > Dear Gurus and Members,> > I need help in confirming D9 and D10 lagna of this native.> > > January 17, 1976> Time: 8:50:00> Time Zone: 5:30:00 (East of GMT)> Place: 82 E 41' 00", 22 N 21' 00"> Korba, India> > The known facts are as follows;> 1. Nature: Gentle, Soft spoken and tall. > 2. Marriage date: 8th Dec 2003, love marriage.> 3. Profession: Computer engineer working in call centers, odd working hours> (4pm to 3 am)> 4. Job start: 1st job: Oct 30 2000 - Oct 24 2003, 2nd job: Oct 27 2003 -> Current> > D9: The reason for doubt related to lagna is because of Ketu in 12H and only> Saturn in trine. Considering his education and career, one would expect to> see planets like Rahu, Ketu, Mercury in trines! > > Sun's progression technique: He got married when he was running 28th year.> Progressed Sun in D9 would then be in Aries. Requirement of Sun having rashi> drishti on 7H is not fulfilled. Now this does not get validated even by> shifting lagna by 1 rashi on either side.> > He was running Mercury-Sun-Venus-Ketu dasa at the time of marriage. Though> Mercury is 7L, it does not have association or aragala with D9 lagna. It> actually has virodha aragala. Sun should have association/ aragala with 7L> Mercury which is also not the case. This gets validated if lagna is shifted> to Capricorn.> > D9 ND was of Ta-Le- Sc. Taurus MD could be ok with current lagna as well as> with lagna shifted by 1 rashi on either side. Rashi drishti of Venus is> missing on MD, AD and PD rashis, a factor that would not change with lagna> correct ion.> > On the date of marriage Jupiter was transiting through Leo and Saturn> through Gemini. Jupiter does aspect the D9 lagna but Saturn too comes to 7H.> I am not sure if Saturn's transit through 7H would give marriage (though in> this case Saturn is the dispositor of D1 7L).> > D10: With Aries lagna Sun is 5L. First job was in Merc-Ven-Sun dasa. Second> job start was in Merc-Sun-Ven dasa. Now Venus is aspected by Sun 5L, so the> Aries lagna could be right. Mercury in 10H matches with call center related> job but there is no influence of Rahu, Ketu to show computers. I am also> looking for indications that show abnormal working hours! The native is> looking for a change to a job that may have normal working hours.> > I shall appreciate inputs that may help the native and improve my learning.> > Thanks and regards,> Ramesh> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 15, 2006 Report Share Posted March 15, 2006 II Om Gurave Namah IIHari om , Friend, Dear ramesh ji Nameste, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 15, 2006 Report Share Posted March 15, 2006 color:#FF0080">||Hare Rama Krsna|| Dear Sourav, Namaskar Nodes indicates forceps, or some force used to pull out the child because its delivery is too slow. I.e. in my time the doctors didn’t wanto use the scissor like instrument to pull out the babies, as they had found that it could cause serious damage to the childs head, so instead they used a suction-type instrument and pulled me out. Still it is birth by force/grahana, and is caused by my rahu in navamsa lagna. Cesarian is a different cup of tea and is indicated by Mars – operation. Best wishes, *** 10.0pt;font-family:bookman;color:navy">Visti Larsen 10.0pt;font-family:bookman;color:navy">For services and articles visit: http://srigaruda.com color:navy"> or 10.0pt;font-family:bookman">http://astrovisti.com *** font-family:Tahoma;font-weight:bold"> [] On Behalf Of Sourav 16 March 2006 04:27 [Om Krishna Guru] Re: Confirmation of D9 and D10 lagna 12.0pt"> || Hare Rama Krishna || color:black">Dear Ramesh-ji, namaskar. One quick hint. Ask the native if he was delivered by forceps/Cesarean section or if there was some complications at the time of delivery/birth. Nodes in the Navamsa lagna shows just that. Hope this hint helps a little in your analysis. Best wishes, Sourav ============================================= , "Ramesh F. Gangaramani" <ramesh.gangaramani wrote: > > || Satyam Bruyat Priyam Bruyat || > > Dear Gurus and Members, > > I need help in confirming D9 and D10 lagna of this native. > > > January 17, 1976 > Time: 8:50:00 > Time Zone: 5:30:00 (East of GMT) > Place: 82 E 41' 00", 22 N 21' 00" > Korba, India > > The known facts are as follows; > 1. Nature: Gentle, Soft spoken and tall. > 2. Marriage date: 8th Dec 2003, love marriage. > 3. Profession: Computer engineer working in call centers, odd working hours > (4pm to 3 am) > 4. Job start: 1st job: Oct 30 2000 - Oct 24 2003, 2nd job: Oct 27 2003 - > Current > > D9: The reason for doubt related to lagna is because of Ketu in 12H and only > Saturn in trine. Considering his education and career, one would expect to > see planets like Rahu, Ketu, Mercury in trines! > > Sun's progression technique: He got married when he was running 28th year. > Progressed Sun in D9 would then be in Aries. Requirement of Sun having rashi > drishti on 7H is not fulfilled. Now this does not get validated even by > shifting lagna by 1 rashi on either side. > > He was running Mercury-Sun-Venus-Ketu dasa at the time of marriage. Though > Mercury is 7L, it does not have association or aragala with D9 lagna. It > actually has virodha aragala. Sun should have association/ aragala with 7L > Mercury which is also not the case. This gets validated if lagna is shifted > to Capricorn. > > D9 ND was of Ta-Le- Sc. Taurus MD could be ok with current lagna as well as > with lagna shifted by 1 rashi on either side. Rashi drishti of Venus is > missing on MD, AD and PD rashis, a factor that would not change with lagna > correction. > > On the date of marriage Jupiter was transiting through Leo and Saturn > through Gemini. Jupiter does aspect the D9 lagna but Saturn too comes to 7H. > I am not sure if Saturn's transit through 7H would give marriage (though in > this case Saturn is the dispositor of D1 7L). > > D10: With Aries lagna Sun is 5L. First job was in Merc-Ven-Sun dasa. Second > job start was in Merc-Sun-Ven dasa. Now Venus is aspected by Sun 5L, so the > Aries lagna could be right. Mercury in 10H matches with call center related > job but there is no influence of Rahu, Ketu to show computers. I am also > looking for indications that show abnormal working hours! The native is > looking for a change to a job that may have normal working hours. > > I shall appreciate inputs that may help the native and improve my learning. > > Thanks and regards, > Ramesh > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 31, 2006 Report Share Posted May 31, 2006 Dear Sir, Namaskar. I was just digging up some old mail and found this email. My daughter was born with the use of forceps and vacuum. She was a big baby (and a loooong labor). My husband, who was in the room, noted her time of birth as 9:31 AM and the hospital record shows 9:30 AM. My husband is 100% sure of the time (ofcours, there is a lot of discussion on what exactly is considered as TOB). However, in her navamsa lagna, Sun, Saturn and Mars ® are present. And 12th from navamsa lagna has Rahu, Moon and Venus. So, which is the correct navamsa for her? Here are her birth details: August 10, 2003 at 9:31 AM in Boston, MA (USA). Your reply is very much appreciated. Regards, Srividya --- Visti Larsen <visti (AT) srigaruda (DOT) com> wrote: > ||Hare Rama Krsna|| > > Dear Sourav, Namaskar > > Nodes indicates forceps, or some force used to pull > out the child because > its delivery is too slow. > > I.e. in my time the doctors didn't wanto use the > scissor like instrument to > pull out the babies, as they had found that it could > cause serious damage to > the childs head, so instead they used a suction-type > instrument and pulled > me out. Still it is birth by force/grahana, and is > caused by my rahu in > navamsa lagna. > > > > Cesarian is a different cup of tea and is indicated > by Mars - operation. > > Best wishes, > > *** > > Visti Larsen > > For services and articles visit: > > <http://srigaruda.com> http://srigaruda.com or > <http://astrovisti.com> > http://astrovisti.com > > *** > > _____ > > > [] On > Behalf Of Sourav > 16 March 2006 04:27 > > [Om Krishna Guru] Re: Confirmation of D9 > and D10 lagna > > > > || Hare Rama Krishna || > > Dear Ramesh-ji, > > namaskar. One quick > hint. Ask the native if he > was delivered by forceps/Cesarean section or if > there was some > complications at the time of delivery/birth. Nodes > in the Navamsa lagna > shows just that. Hope this hint helps a little in > your analysis. > > Best wishes, > > Sourav > > ============================================= > > > , "Ramesh F. > Gangaramani" > <ramesh.gangaramani> wrote: > > > > || Satyam Bruyat Priyam Bruyat || > > > > Dear Gurus and Members, > > > > I need help in confirming D9 and D10 lagna of this > native. > > > > > > January 17, 1976 > > Time: 8:50:00 > > Time Zone: 5:30:00 (East of GMT) > > Place: 82 E 41' 00", 22 N 21' 00" > > Korba, India > > > > The known facts are as follows; > > 1. Nature: Gentle, Soft spoken and tall. > > 2. Marriage date: 8th Dec 2003, love marriage. > > 3. Profession: Computer engineer working in call > centers, odd working > hours > > (4pm to 3 am) > > 4. Job start: 1st job: Oct 30 2000 - Oct 24 2003, > 2nd job: Oct 27 2003 - > > Current > > > > D9: The reason for doubt related to lagna is > because of Ketu in 12H and > only > > Saturn in trine. Considering his education and > career, one would expect to > > see planets like Rahu, Ketu, Mercury in trines! > > > > Sun's progression technique: He got married when > he was running 28th year. > > Progressed Sun in D9 would then be in Aries. > Requirement of Sun having > rashi > > drishti on 7H is not fulfilled. Now this does not > get validated even by > > shifting lagna by 1 rashi on either side. > > > > He was running Mercury-Sun-Venus-Ketu dasa at the > time of marriage. Though > > Mercury is 7L, it does not have association or > aragala with D9 lagna. It > > actually has virodha aragala. Sun should have > association/ aragala with 7L > > Mercury which is also not the case. This gets > validated if lagna is > shifted > > to Capricorn. > > > > D9 ND was of Ta-Le- Sc. Taurus MD could be ok with > current lagna as well > as > > with lagna shifted by 1 rashi on either side. > Rashi drishti of Venus is > > missing on MD, AD and PD rashis, a factor that > would not change with lagna > > correction. > > > > On the date of marriage Jupiter was transiting > through Leo and Saturn > > through Gemini. Jupiter does aspect the D9 lagna > but Saturn too comes to > 7H. > > I am not sure if Saturn's transit through 7H would > give marriage (though > in > > this case Saturn is the dispositor of D1 7L). > > > > D10: With Aries lagna Sun is 5L. First job was in > Merc-Ven-Sun dasa. > Second > > job start was in Merc-Sun-Ven dasa. Now Venus is > aspected by Sun 5L, so > the > > Aries lagna could be right. Mercury in 10H matches > with call center > related > > job but there is no influence of Rahu, Ketu to > show computers. I am also > > looking for indications that show abnormal working > hours! The native is > > looking for a change to a job that may have normal > working hours. > > > > I shall appreciate inputs that may help the native > and improve my > learning. > > > > Thanks and regards, > > Ramesh > > > > > > ~ om tat sat ~ > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta > Ashram. > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare > Rama Krishna' > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the > Great who said that the > human stomach should not become a graveyard for > animals. > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one > free chart reading today > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 1, 2006 Report Share Posted June 1, 2006 || hare räma kåñna || Dear Srividya-ji, Namaskar Perhaps I could add my two cents. Given that you are reasonably confident of the birth time, it seems either Aquarius or Pisces navamsa lagna must be correct. Aquarius is lorded by Rahu, and is receiving the graha drsti of Rahu as well, so I would suggest that this is the correct lagna. Pisces lagna has no connection with the nodes. Would you be able to provide yours/your husbands birth data? This is just for learning - I want to compare it to your daughter's D-12 chart. Thank you, Samir At 21:43 31/05/2006, you wrote: >Dear Sir, > >Namaskar. I was just digging up some old mail and >found this email. My daughter was born with the use of >forceps and vacuum. She was a big baby (and a loooong >labor). My husband, who was in the room, noted her >time of birth as 9:31 AM and the hospital record shows >9:30 AM. My husband is 100% sure of the time (ofcours, >there is a lot of discussion on what exactly is >considered as TOB). However, in her navamsa lagna, >Sun, Saturn and Mars ® are present. And 12th from >navamsa lagna has Rahu, Moon and Venus. So, which is >the correct navamsa for her? Here are her birth >details: >August 10, 2003 at 9:31 AM in Boston, MA (USA). > >Your reply is very much appreciated. >Regards, >Srividya > > >--- Visti Larsen <visti (AT) srigaruda (DOT) com> wrote: > > > ||Hare Rama Krsna|| > > > > Dear Sourav, Namaskar > > > > Nodes indicates forceps, or some force used to pull > > out the child because > > its delivery is too slow. > > > > I.e. in my time the doctors didn't wanto use the > > scissor like instrument to > > pull out the babies, as they had found that it could > > cause serious damage to > > the childs head, so instead they used a suction-type > > instrument and pulled > > me out. Still it is birth by force/grahana, and is > > caused by my rahu in > > navamsa lagna. > > > > > > > > Cesarian is a different cup of tea and is indicated > > by Mars - operation. > > > > Best wishes, > > > > *** > > > > Visti Larsen > > > > For services and articles visit: > > > > <http://srigaruda.com> http://srigaruda.com or > > <http://astrovisti.com> > > http://astrovisti.com > > > > *** > > > > _____ > > > > > > [] On > > Behalf Of Sourav > > 16 March 2006 04:27 > > > > [Om Krishna Guru] Re: Confirmation of D9 > > and D10 lagna > > > > > > > > || Hare Rama Krishna || > > > > Dear Ramesh-ji, > > > > namaskar. One quick > > hint. Ask the native if he > > was delivered by forceps/Cesarean section or if > > there was some > > complications at the time of delivery/birth. Nodes > > in the Navamsa lagna > > shows just that. Hope this hint helps a little in > > your analysis. > > > > Best wishes, > > > > Sourav > > > > ============================================= > > > > > > , "Ramesh F. > > Gangaramani" > > <ramesh.gangaramani wrote: > > > > > > || Satyam Bruyat Priyam Bruyat || > > > > > > Dear Gurus and Members, > > > > > > I need help in confirming D9 and D10 lagna of this > > native. > > > > > > > > > January 17, 1976 > > > Time: 8:50:00 > > > Time Zone: 5:30:00 (East of GMT) > > > Place: 82 E 41' 00", 22 N 21' 00" > > > Korba, India > > > > > > The known facts are as follows; > > > 1. Nature: Gentle, Soft spoken and tall. > > > 2. Marriage date: 8th Dec 2003, love marriage. > > > 3. Profession: Computer engineer working in call > > centers, odd working > > hours > > > (4pm to 3 am) > > > 4. Job start: 1st job: Oct 30 2000 - Oct 24 2003, > > 2nd job: Oct 27 2003 - > > > Current > > > > > > D9: The reason for doubt related to lagna is > > because of Ketu in 12H and > > only > > > Saturn in trine. Considering his education and > > career, one would expect to > > > see planets like Rahu, Ketu, Mercury in trines! > > > > > > Sun's progression technique: He got married when > > he was running 28th year. > > > Progressed Sun in D9 would then be in Aries. > > Requirement of Sun having > > rashi > > > drishti on 7H is not fulfilled. Now this does not > > get validated even by > > > shifting lagna by 1 rashi on either side. > > > > > > He was running Mercury-Sun-Venus-Ketu dasa at the > > time of marriage. Though > > > Mercury is 7L, it does not have association or > > aragala with D9 lagna. It > > > actually has virodha aragala. Sun should have > > association/ aragala with 7L > > > Mercury which is also not the case. This gets > > validated if lagna is > > shifted > > > to Capricorn. > > > > > > D9 ND was of Ta-Le- Sc. Taurus MD could be ok with > > current lagna as well > > as > > > with lagna shifted by 1 rashi on either side. > > Rashi drishti of Venus is > > > missing on MD, AD and PD rashis, a factor that > > would not change with lagna > > > correction. > > > > > > On the date of marriage Jupiter was transiting > > through Leo and Saturn > > > through Gemini. Jupiter does aspect the D9 lagna > > but Saturn too comes to > > 7H. > > > I am not sure if Saturn's transit through 7H would > > give marriage (though > > in > > > this case Saturn is the dispositor of D1 7L). > > > > > > D10: With Aries lagna Sun is 5L. First job was in > > Merc-Ven-Sun dasa. > > Second > > > job start was in Merc-Sun-Ven dasa. Now Venus is > > aspected by Sun 5L, so > > the > > > Aries lagna could be right. Mercury in 10H matches > > with call center > > related > > > job but there is no influence of Rahu, Ketu to > > show computers. I am also > > > looking for indications that show abnormal working > > hours! The native is > > > looking for a change to a job that may have normal > > working hours. > > > > > > I shall appreciate inputs that may help the native > > and improve my > > learning. > > > > > > Thanks and regards, > > > Ramesh > > > > > > > > > > > ~ om tat sat ~ > > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta > > Ashram. > > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare > > Rama Krishna' > > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the > > Great who said that the > > human stomach should not become a graveyard for > > animals. > > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one > > free chart reading today > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 1, 2006 Report Share Posted June 1, 2006 Dear Sir, I have one prediction to make.Pl validate. Between 18-5-2001 and 27-9-2001 the younger brother of the father of the native had a prosperous time. On 6/1/06, Samir Shah <solaris.smoke > wrote: > > || hare räma kåñna || > > Dear Srividya-ji, Namaskar > > Perhaps I could add my two cents. Given that you are reasonably confident > of the birth time, it seems either Aquarius or Pisces navamsa lagna must be > correct. Aquarius is lorded by Rahu, and is receiving the graha drsti of > Rahu as well, so I would suggest that this is the correct lagna. Pisces > lagna has no connection with the nodes. > > Would you be able to provide yours/your husbands birth data? This is just > for learning - I want to compare it to your daughter's D-12 chart. > > Thank you, > > Samir > > > > > At 21:43 31/05/2006, you wrote: > > Dear Sir, > > Namaskar. I was just digging up some old mail and > found this email. My daughter was born with the use of > forceps and vacuum. She was a big baby (and a loooong > labor). My husband, who was in the room, noted her > time of birth as 9:31 AM and the hospital record shows > 9:30 AM. My husband is 100% sure of the time (ofcours, > there is a lot of discussion on what exactly is > considered as TOB). However, in her navamsa lagna, > Sun, Saturn and Mars ® are present. And 12th from > navamsa lagna has Rahu, Moon and Venus. So, which is > the correct navamsa for her? Here are her birth > details: > August 10, 2003 at 9:31 AM in Boston, MA (USA). > > Your reply is very much appreciated. > Regards, > Srividya > > > --- Visti Larsen <visti (AT) srigaruda (DOT) com> wrote: > > > ||Hare Rama Krsna|| > > > > Dear Sourav, Namaskar > > > > Nodes indicates forceps, or some force used to pull > > out the child because > > its delivery is too slow. > > > > I.e. in my time the doctors didn't wanto use the > > scissor like instrument to > > pull out the babies, as they had found that it could > > cause serious damage to > > the childs head, so instead they used a suction-type > > instrument and pulled > > me out. Still it is birth by force/grahana, and is > > caused by my rahu in > > navamsa lagna. > > > > > > > > Cesarian is a different cup of tea and is indicated > > by Mars - operation. > > > > Best wishes, > > > > *** > > > > Visti Larsen > > > > For services and articles visit: > > > > < http://srigaruda.com> http://srigaruda.com or > > < http://astrovisti.com> > > http://astrovisti.com > > > > *** > > > > _____ > > > > > > [ <>] On > > Behalf Of Sourav > > 16 March 2006 04:27 > > > > [Om Krishna Guru] Re: Confirmation of D9 > > and D10 lagna > > > > > > > > || Hare Rama Krishna || > > > > Dear Ramesh-ji, > > > > namaskar. One quick > > hint. Ask the native if he > > was delivered by forceps/Cesarean section or if > > there was some > > complications at the time of delivery/birth. Nodes > > in the Navamsa lagna > > shows just that. Hope this hint helps a little in > > your analysis. > > > > Best wishes, > > > > Sourav > > > > ============================================= > > > > > > , "Ramesh F. > > Gangaramani" > > <ramesh.gangaramani wrote: > > > > > > || Satyam Bruyat Priyam Bruyat || > > > > > > Dear Gurus and Members, > > > > > > I need help in confirming D9 and D10 lagna of this > > native. > > > > > > > > > January 17, 1976 > > > Time: 8:50:00 > > > Time Zone: 5:30:00 (East of GMT) > > > Place: 82 E 41' 00", 22 N 21' 00" > > > Korba, India > > > > > > The known facts are as follows; > > > 1. Nature: Gentle, Soft spoken and tall. > > > 2. Marriage date: 8th Dec 2003, love marriage. > > > 3. Profession: Computer engineer working in call > > centers, odd working > > hours > > > (4pm to 3 am) > > > 4. Job start: 1st job: Oct 30 2000 - Oct 24 2003, > > 2nd job: Oct 27 2003 - > > > Current > > > > > > D9: The reason for doubt related to lagna is > > because of Ketu in 12H and > > only > > > Saturn in trine. Considering his education and > > career, one would expect to > > > see planets like Rahu, Ketu, Mercury in trines! > > > > > > Sun's progression technique: He got married when > > he was running 28th year. > > > Progressed Sun in D9 would then be in Aries. > > Requirement of Sun having > > rashi > > > drishti on 7H is not fulfilled. Now this does not > > get validated even by > > > shifting lagna by 1 rashi on either side. > > > > > > He was running Mercury-Sun-Venus-Ketu dasa at the > > time of marriage. Though > > > Mercury is 7L, it does not have association or > > aragala with D9 lagna. It > > > actually has virodha aragala. Sun should have > > association/ aragala with 7L > > > Mercury which is also not the case. This gets > > validated if lagna is > > shifted > > > to Capricorn. > > > > > > D9 ND was of Ta-Le- Sc. Taurus MD could be ok with > > current lagna as well > > as > > > with lagna shifted by 1 rashi on either side. > > Rashi drishti of Venus is > > > missing on MD, AD and PD rashis, a factor that > > would not change with lagna > > > correction. > > > > > > On the date of marriage Jupiter was transiting > > through Leo and Saturn > > > through Gemini. Jupiter does aspect the D9 lagna > > but Saturn too comes to > > 7H. > > > I am not sure if Saturn's transit through 7H would > > give marriage (though > > in > > > this case Saturn is the dispositor of D1 7L). > > > > > > D10: With Aries lagna Sun is 5L. First job was in > > Merc-Ven-Sun dasa. > > Second > > > job start was in Merc-Sun-Ven dasa. Now Venus is > > aspected by Sun 5L, so > > the > > > Aries lagna could be right. Mercury in 10H matches > > with call center > > related > > > job but there is no influence of Rahu, Ketu to > > show computers. I am also > > > looking for indications that show abnormal working > > hours! The native is > > > looking for a change to a job that may have normal > > working hours. > > > > > > I shall appreciate inputs that may help the native > > and improve my > > learning. > > > > > > Thanks and regards, > > > Ramesh > > > > > > > > > > > ~ om tat sat ~ > > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta > > Ashram. > > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare > > Rama Krishna' > > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the > > Great who said that the > > human stomach should not become a graveyard for > > animals. > > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one > > free chart reading today > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 1, 2006 Report Share Posted June 1, 2006 Dear Sir, Thanks for your reply. My husband's younger brother finished his MD in radiology and had started working in a nearby hospital during that period. Also, he had got engaged in May, 2001 and married in December, 2001. I hope it helps. Regards, Srividya --- Jagannathan Kapisthalam <jagannathankr > wrote: > Dear Sir, > I have one prediction to make.Pl validate. > Between 18-5-2001 and 27-9-2001 the younger brother > of the father of the > native had a prosperous time. > > > On 6/1/06, Samir Shah <solaris.smoke > > wrote: > > > > || hare räma kåñna || > > > > Dear Srividya-ji, Namaskar > > > > Perhaps I could add my two cents. Given that you > are reasonably confident > > of the birth time, it seems either Aquarius or > Pisces navamsa lagna must be > > correct. Aquarius is lorded by Rahu, and is > receiving the graha drsti of > > Rahu as well, so I would suggest that this is the > correct lagna. Pisces > > lagna has no connection with the nodes. > > > > Would you be able to provide yours/your husbands > birth data? This is just > > for learning - I want to compare it to your > daughter's D-12 chart. > > > > Thank you, > > > > Samir > > > > > > > > > > At 21:43 31/05/2006, you wrote: > > > > Dear Sir, > > > > Namaskar. I was just digging up some old mail and > > found this email. My daughter was born with the > use of > > forceps and vacuum. She was a big baby (and a > loooong > > labor). My husband, who was in the room, noted her > > time of birth as 9:31 AM and the hospital record > shows > > 9:30 AM. My husband is 100% sure of the time > (ofcours, > > there is a lot of discussion on what exactly is > > considered as TOB). However, in her navamsa lagna, > > Sun, Saturn and Mars ® are present. And 12th > from > > navamsa lagna has Rahu, Moon and Venus. So, which > is > > the correct navamsa for her? Here are her birth > > details: > > August 10, 2003 at 9:31 AM in Boston, MA (USA). > > > > Your reply is very much appreciated. > > Regards, > > Srividya > > > > > > --- Visti Larsen <visti (AT) srigaruda (DOT) com> wrote: > > > > > ||Hare Rama Krsna|| > > > > > > Dear Sourav, Namaskar > > > > > > Nodes indicates forceps, or some force used to > pull > > > out the child because > > > its delivery is too slow. > > > > > > I.e. in my time the doctors didn't wanto use the > > > scissor like instrument to > > > pull out the babies, as they had found that it > could > > > cause serious damage to > > > the childs head, so instead they used a > suction-type > > > instrument and pulled > > > me out. Still it is birth by force/grahana, and > is > > > caused by my rahu in > > > navamsa lagna. > > > > > > > > > > > > Cesarian is a different cup of tea and is > indicated > > > by Mars - operation. > > > > > > Best wishes, > > > > > > *** > > > > > > Visti Larsen > > > > > > For services and articles visit: > > > > > > < http://srigaruda..com> http://srigaruda.com or > > > < http://astrovisti.com> > > > http://astrovisti.com > > > > > > *** > > > > > > _____ > > > > > > > > > [ > <>] On > > > Behalf Of Sourav > > > 16 March 2006 04:27 > > > > > > [Om Krishna Guru] Re: Confirmation of > D9 > > > and D10 lagna > > > > > > > > > > > > || Hare Rama Krishna || > > > > > > Dear Ramesh-ji, > > > > > > namaskar. One quick > > > hint. Ask the native if he > > > was delivered by forceps/Cesarean section or if > > > there was some > > > complications at the time of delivery/birth. > Nodes > > > in the Navamsa lagna > > > shows just that. Hope this hint helps a little > in > > > your analysis. > > > > > > Best wishes, > > > > > > Sourav > > > > > > ============================================= > > > > > > > > > , "Ramesh F. > > > Gangaramani" > > > <ramesh.gangaramani> wrote: > > > > > > > > || Satyam Bruyat Priyam Bruyat || > > > > > > > > Dear Gurus and Members, > > > > > > > > I need help in confirming D9 and D10 lagna of > this > > > native. > > > > > > > > > > > > January 17, 1976 > > > > Time: 8:50:00 > > > > Time Zone: 5:30:00 (East of GMT) > > > > Place: 82 E 41' 00", 22 N 21' 00" > > > > Korba, India > > > > > > > > The known facts are as follows; > > > > 1. Nature: Gentle, Soft spoken and tall. > > > > 2. Marriage date: 8th Dec 2003, love marriage. > > > > 3. Profession: Computer engineer working in > call > > > centers, odd working > > > hours > > > > (4pm to 3 am) > > > > 4. Job start: 1st job: Oct 30 2000 - Oct 24 > 2003, > > > 2nd job: Oct 27 2003 - > > > > Current > > > > > > > > D9: The reason for doubt related to lagna is > > > because of Ketu in 12H and > > > only > > > > Saturn in trine. Considering his education and > > > career, one would expect to > > > > see planets like Rahu, Ketu, Mercury in > trines! > > > > > > > > Sun's progression technique: He got married > when > > > he was running 28th year. > > > > Progressed Sun in D9 would then be in Aries. > > > Requirement of Sun having > > > rashi > > > > drishti on 7H is not fulfilled. Now this does > not > > > get validated even by > > > > shifting lagna by 1 rashi on either side. > > > > > > > > He was running Mercury-Sun-Venus-Ketu dasa at > the > > > time of marriage. Though > > > > Mercury is 7L, it does not have association or > > > aragala with D9 lagna. It > === message truncated === Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam protection around ~ om tat sat ~ Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram. Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna' (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said that the human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals. (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading today Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 1, 2006 Report Share Posted June 1, 2006 Srividyaji, In my opinion "Kumbha Navamsam" had risen at birth. Regards, Jagannathan. On 6/1/06, Samir Shah <solaris.smoke > wrote: > > || hare räma kåñna || > > Dear Srividya-ji, Namaskar > > Perhaps I could add my two cents. Given that you are reasonably confident > of the birth time, it seems either Aquarius or Pisces navamsa lagna must be > correct. Aquarius is lorded by Rahu, and is receiving the graha drsti of > Rahu as well, so I would suggest that this is the correct lagna. Pisces > lagna has no connection with the nodes. > > Would you be able to provide yours/your husbands birth data? This is just > for learning - I want to compare it to your daughter's D-12 chart. > > Thank you, > > Samir > > > > > > At 21:43 31/05/2006, you wrote: > > Dear Sir, > > Namaskar. I was just digging up some old mail and > found this email. My daughter was born with the use of > forceps and vacuum. She was a big baby (and a loooong > labor). My husband, who was in the room, noted her > time of birth as 9:31 AM and the hospital record shows > 9:30 AM. My husband is 100% sure of the time (ofcours, > there is a lot of discussion on what exactly is > considered as TOB). However, in her navamsa lagna, > Sun, Saturn and Mars ® are present. And 12th from > navamsa lagna has Rahu, Moon and Venus. So, which is > the correct navamsa for her? Here are her birth > details: > August 10, 2003 at 9:31 AM in Boston, MA (USA). > > Your reply is very much appreciated. > Regards, > Srividya > > > --- Visti Larsen <visti (AT) srigaruda (DOT) com> wrote: > > > ||Hare Rama Krsna|| > > > > Dear Sourav, Namaskar > > > > Nodes indicates forceps, or some force used to pull > > out the child because > > its delivery is too slow. > > > > I.e. in my time the doctors didn't wanto use the > > scissor like instrument to > > pull out the babies, as they had found that it could > > cause serious damage to > > the childs head, so instead they used a suction-type > > instrument and pulled > > me out. Still it is birth by force/grahana, and is > > caused by my rahu in > > navamsa lagna. > > > > > > > > Cesarian is a different cup of tea and is indicated > > by Mars - operation. > > > > Best wishes, > > > > *** > > > > Visti Larsen > > > > For services and articles visit: > > > > < http://srigaruda.com> http://srigaruda.com or > > < http://astrovisti.com> > > http://astrovisti.com > > > > *** > > > > _____ > > > > > > [ <>] On > > Behalf Of Sourav > > 16 March 2006 04:27 > > > > [Om Krishna Guru] Re: Confirmation of D9 > > and D10 lagna > > > > > > > > || Hare Rama Krishna || > > > > Dear Ramesh-ji, > > > > namaskar. One quick > > hint. Ask the native if he > > was delivered by forceps/Cesarean section or if > > there was some > > complications at the time of delivery/birth. Nodes > > in the Navamsa lagna > > shows just that. Hope this hint helps a little in > > your analysis. > > > > Best wishes, > > > > Sourav > > > > ============================================= > > > > > > , "Ramesh F. > > Gangaramani" > > <ramesh.gangaramani wrote: > > > > > > || Satyam Bruyat Priyam Bruyat || > > > > > > Dear Gurus and Members, > > > > > > I need help in confirming D9 and D10 lagna of this > > native. > > > > > > > > > January 17, 1976 > > > Time: 8:50:00 > > > Time Zone: 5:30:00 (East of GMT) > > > Place: 82 E 41' 00", 22 N 21' 00" > > > Korba, India > > > > > > The known facts are as follows; > > > 1. Nature: Gentle, Soft spoken and tall. > > > 2. Marriage date: 8th Dec 2003, love marriage. > > > 3. Profession: Computer engineer working in call > > centers, odd working > > hours > > > (4pm to 3 am) > > > 4. Job start: 1st job: Oct 30 2000 - Oct 24 2003, > > 2nd job: Oct 27 2003 - > > > Current > > > > > > D9: The reason for doubt related to lagna is > > because of Ketu in 12H and > > only > > > Saturn in trine. Considering his education and > > career, one would expect to > > > see planets like Rahu, Ketu, Mercury in trines! > > > > > > Sun's progression technique: He got married when > > he was running 28th year. > > > Progressed Sun in D9 would then be in Aries. > > Requirement of Sun having > > rashi > > > drishti on 7H is not fulfilled. Now this does not > > get validated even by > > > shifting lagna by 1 rashi on either side. > > > > > > He was running Mercury-Sun-Venus-Ketu dasa at the > > time of marriage. Though > > > Mercury is 7L, it does not have association or > > aragala with D9 lagna. It > > > actually has virodha aragala. Sun should have > > association/ aragala with 7L > > > Mercury which is also not the case. This gets > > validated if lagna is > > shifted > > > to Capricorn. > > > > > > D9 ND was of Ta-Le- Sc. Taurus MD could be ok with > > current lagna as well > > as > > > with lagna shifted by 1 rashi on either side. > > Rashi drishti of Venus is > > > missing on MD, AD and PD rashis, a factor that > > would not change with lagna > > > correction. > > > > > > On the date of marriage Jupiter was transiting > > through Leo and Saturn > > > through Gemini. Jupiter does aspect the D9 lagna > > but Saturn too comes to > > 7H. > > > I am not sure if Saturn's transit through 7H would > > give marriage (though > > in > > > this case Saturn is the dispositor of D1 7L). > > > > > > D10: With Aries lagna Sun is 5L. First job was in > > Merc-Ven-Sun dasa. > > Second > > > job start was in Merc-Sun-Ven dasa. Now Venus is > > aspected by Sun 5L, so > > the > > > Aries lagna could be right. Mercury in 10H matches > > with call center > > related > > > job but there is no influence of Rahu, Ketu to > > show computers. I am also > > > looking for indications that show abnormal working > > hours! The native is > > > looking for a change to a job that may have normal > > working hours. > > > > > > I shall appreciate inputs that may help the native > > and improve my > > learning. > > > > > > Thanks and regards, > > > Ramesh > > > > > > > > > > > ~ om tat sat ~ > > Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta > > Ashram. > > Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare > > Rama Krishna' > > (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the > > Great who said that the > > human stomach should not become a graveyard for > > animals. > > (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one > > free chart reading today > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 2, 2006 Report Share Posted June 2, 2006 Dear Sir, Thank you very much. Regards, Srividya --- Jagannathan Kapisthalam <jagannathankr > wrote: > Srividyaji, > In my opinion "Kumbha Navamsam" had risen at birth. > Regards, > Jagannathan. > > > On 6/1/06, Samir Shah <solaris.smoke > > wrote: > > > > || hare räma kåñna || > > > > Dear Srividya-ji, Namaskar > > > > Perhaps I could add my two cents. Given that you > are reasonably confident > > of the birth time, it seems either Aquarius or > Pisces navamsa lagna must be > > correct. Aquarius is lorded by Rahu, and is > receiving the graha drsti of > > Rahu as well, so I would suggest that this is the > correct lagna. Pisces > > lagna has no connection with the nodes. > > > > Would you be able to provide yours/your husbands > birth data? This is just > > for learning - I want to compare it to your > daughter's D-12 chart. > > > > Thank you, > > > > Samir > > > > > > > > > > > > At 21:43 31/05/2006, you wrote: > > > > Dear Sir, > > > > Namaskar. I was just digging up some old mail and > > found this email. My daughter was born with the > use of > > forceps and vacuum. She was a big baby (and a > loooong > > labor). My husband, who was in the room, noted her > > time of birth as 9:31 AM and the hospital record > shows > > 9:30 AM. My husband is 100% sure of the time > (ofcours, > > there is a lot of discussion on what exactly is > > considered as TOB). However, in her navamsa lagna, > > Sun, Saturn and Mars ® are present. And 12th > from > > navamsa lagna has Rahu, Moon and Venus. So, which > is > > the correct navamsa for her? Here are her birth > > details: > > August 10, 2003 at 9:31 AM in Boston, MA (USA). > > > > Your reply is very much appreciated. > > Regards, > > Srividya > > > > > > --- Visti Larsen <visti (AT) srigaruda (DOT) com> wrote: > > > > > ||Hare Rama Krsna|| > > > > > > Dear Sourav, Namaskar > > > > > > Nodes indicates forceps, or some force used to > pull > > > out the child because > > > its delivery is too slow. > > > > > > I.e. in my time the doctors didn't wanto use the > > > scissor like instrument to > > > pull out the babies, as they had found that it > could > > > cause serious damage to > > > the childs head, so instead they used a > suction-type > > > instrument and pulled > > > me out. Still it is birth by force/grahana, and > is > > > caused by my rahu in > > > navamsa lagna. > > > > > > > > > > > > Cesarian is a different cup of tea and is > indicated > > > by Mars - operation. > > > > > > Best wishes, > > > > > > *** > > > > > > Visti Larsen > > > > > > For services and articles visit: > > > > > > < http://srigaruda..com> http://srigaruda.com or > > > < http://astrovisti.com> > > > http://astrovisti.com > > > > > > *** > > > > > > _____ > > > > > > > > > [ > <>] On > > > Behalf Of Sourav > > > 16 March 2006 04:27 > > > > > > [Om Krishna Guru] Re: Confirmation of > D9 > > > and D10 lagna > > > > > > > > > > > > || Hare Rama Krishna || > > > > > > Dear Ramesh-ji, > > > > > > namaskar. One quick > > > hint. Ask the native if he > > > was delivered by forceps/Cesarean section or if > > > there was some > > > complications at the time of delivery/birth. > Nodes > > > in the Navamsa lagna > > > shows just that. Hope this hint helps a little > in > > > your analysis. > > > > > > Best wishes, > > > > > > Sourav > > > > > > ============================================= > > > > > > > > > , "Ramesh F. > > > Gangaramani" > > > <ramesh.gangaramani> wrote: > > > > > > > > || Satyam Bruyat Priyam Bruyat || > > > > > > > > Dear Gurus and Members, > > > > > > > > I need help in confirming D9 and D10 lagna of > this > > > native. > > > > > > > > > > > > January 17, 1976 > > > > Time: 8:50:00 > > > > Time Zone: 5:30:00 (East of GMT) > > > > Place: 82 E 41' 00", 22 N 21' 00" > > > > Korba, India > > > > > > > > The known facts are as follows; > > > > 1. Nature: Gentle, Soft spoken and tall. > > > > 2. Marriage date: 8th Dec 2003, love marriage. > > > > 3. Profession: Computer engineer working in > call > > > centers, odd working > > > hours > > > > (4pm to 3 am) > > > > 4. Job start: 1st job: Oct 30 2000 - Oct 24 > 2003, > > > 2nd job: Oct 27 2003 - > > > > Current > > > > > > > > D9: The reason for doubt related to lagna is > > > because of Ketu in 12H and > > > only > > > > Saturn in trine. Considering his education and > > > career, one would expect to > > > > see planets like Rahu, Ketu, Mercury in > trines! > > > > > > > > Sun's progression technique: He got married > when > > > he was running 28th year. > > > > Progressed Sun in D9 would then be in Aries. > > > Requirement of Sun having > > > rashi > > > > drishti on 7H is not fulfilled. Now this does > not > > > get validated even by > > > > shifting lagna by 1 rashi on either side. > > > > > > > > He was running Mercury-Sun-Venus-Ketu dasa at > the > > > time of marriage. Though > > > > Mercury is 7L, it does not have association or > > > aragala with D9 lagna. It > === message truncated === Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam protection around ~ om tat sat ~ Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram. Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna' (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said that the human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals. (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading today Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.