Guest guest Posted January 1, 2006 Report Share Posted January 1, 2006 Dear All, a few days ago there was an interesting programme on TV about place names and relationship with ones fortunes. Lately some of Indian cities' names have been changed e.g. Madras became Chennai, Bombay became Mumbai, Calcutta was renamed Kolkata and Now Bangalore will be changed to Bengaluru. It was suggested that ever since Madras became Chennai its fortunes have changed and it has faced many problems like Tsunami and flooding etc. Also it was said that peoples rashi if it does not match with the place name, then residing in such a place would not be advantageous. What are your views on the subject Do you to these views? Regards, Neena Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 1, 2006 Report Share Posted January 1, 2006 Dear Neena, You're absolutely correct! Changing the name of a City, Country, or a business, or of a person produces a new chart. In the case of a person, the birth chart remains the primary one of course, but the new (name) chart should also be read in conjunction. I often wish I had known what I know now before I married this last time...I would certainly have chosen a more auspicious time :-) If we had the date/time when these new (city) names were implemented we could study these charts in light of the tsunami etc.. Best Wishes, Mrs. Wendy http://JyotishVidya.com ______________________________ - "neenako" <neenako <jyotish-vidya> Sunday, January 01, 2006 6:02 PM Place names Dear All, a few days ago there was an interesting programme on TV about place names and relationship with ones fortunes. Lately some of Indian cities' names have been changed e.g. Madras became Chennai, Bombay became Mumbai, Calcutta was renamed Kolkata and Now Bangalore will be changed to Bengaluru. It was suggested that ever since Madras became Chennai its fortunes have changed and it has faced many problems like Tsunami and flooding etc. Also it was said that peoples rashi if it does not match with the place name, then residing in such a place would not be advantageous. What are your views on the subject Do you to these views? Regards, Neena Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 1, 2006 Report Share Posted January 1, 2006 Dear neena, Change of names may effect fortunes of political fortunes of the parties in rule.where as the people residing by birth have no relation these temporal changes.During evolution these names for places must have undergone lot of changes which never impact on the fortunes of the place nor people born around.These are mere alphabets.may be in numerology one would like to find some meaning not in jyotish. krishnan neenako <neenako wrote: Dear All, a few days ago there was an interesting programme on TV about place names and relationship with ones fortunes. Lately some of Indian cities' names have been changed e.g. Madras became Chennai, Bombay became Mumbai, Calcutta was renamed Kolkata and Now Bangalore will be changed to Bengaluru. It was suggested that ever since Madras became Chennai its fortunes have changed and it has faced many problems like Tsunami and flooding etc. Also it was said that peoples rashi if it does not match with the place name, then residing in such a place would not be advantageous. What are your views on the subject Do you to these views? Regards, Neena Astrology chart Vedic astrology Personal reading Visit your group "jyotish-vidya" on the web. jyotish-vidya Photos Ring in the New Year with Photo Calendars. Add photos, events, holidays, whatever. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 1, 2006 Report Share Posted January 1, 2006 Dear Mrs Wendy ji, As part of mundane astrology the significance given to name a country,region and the fate of the leaders change if it involves only if the longittudes and lattitudes change.For Ex:GDR ,seperation and unification are based on the original name but not any other issue.Likewise formation of Bangaladesh,has not undergone much change as it was earlier East Pakistan. Names now revised and being accepted in the context of neena's discussion were the names which are in vogue in litteral sense and even in local languages are also written so.Officially not amended.Now amendments are now being made in tune with the wish of people. krishnan Wendy Vasicek <jyotish wrote: Dear Neena, You're absolutely correct! Changing the name of a City, Country, or a business, or of a person produces a new chart. In the case of a person, the birth chart remains the primary one of course, but the new (name) chart should also be read in conjunction. I often wish I had known what I know now before I married this last time...I would certainly have chosen a more auspicious time :-) If we had the date/time when these new (city) names were implemented we could study these charts in light of the tsunami etc.. Best Wishes, Mrs. Wendy http://JyotishVidya.com ______________________________ - "neenako" <neenako <jyotish-vidya> Sunday, January 01, 2006 6:02 PM Place names Dear All, a few days ago there was an interesting programme on TV about place names and relationship with ones fortunes. Lately some of Indian cities' names have been changed e.g. Madras became Chennai, Bombay became Mumbai, Calcutta was renamed Kolkata and Now Bangalore will be changed to Bengaluru. It was suggested that ever since Madras became Chennai its fortunes have changed and it has faced many problems like Tsunami and flooding etc. Also it was said that peoples rashi if it does not match with the place name, then residing in such a place would not be advantageous. What are your views on the subject Do you to these views? Regards, Neena Astrology chart Vedic astrology Personal reading Visit your group "jyotish-vidya" on the web. jyotish-vidya for Good - Make a difference this year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 1, 2006 Report Share Posted January 1, 2006 Krishnan, Well then, perhaps I should scrap the Zimbabwe chart altogether, shouldn't I... No change in longitude or latitude, only change in name from Rhodesia to Zimbabwe. Hmmm... guess I'd better write back to my friend (in Zimbabwe) and tell her to disregard the chart I sent her...seems a bit of a pity though as it correctly predicts the troubles that have befallen that beautiful country. She Wrote: >>I actualy found your original chart on Zim the other day while I was looking for other things but can I heck find a date on it other than of course 18/4/80 But I rekon it must be at least 5/6 years old & my goodness is it correct .<< For those interested the chart for Zimbabwe and the one for Rhodesia (UDI) are given below. Rhodesia (UDI) Nov 11 1965 (13:00) Salisbury, Rhodesia (now known as Harare, Zimbabwe) Zimbabwe (Independence) Apr 18 1980 (00:00) Harare, Zimbabwe The chart for Bangladesh is also widely used by astrologers, although you say, Krishnan, that such a chart is not valid because it was formally known as East Pakistan?? Your reasoning baffles me... We also find in ancient texts that a change of name blesses one with a new horoscope...the story of Abraham who was instructed to change his wife's name in order for her to conceive a child is a well-known example...there are other examples. This is practiced still today in Kabbalistic astrology. Best Wishes, Mrs. Wendy http://JyotishVidya.com ______________________________ - "vattem krishnan" <bursar_99 <jyotish-vidya> Monday, January 02, 2006 12:23 AM Re: Place names Dear Mrs Wendy ji, As part of mundane astrology the significance given to name a country,region and the fate of the leaders change if it involves only if the longittudes and lattitudes change.For Ex:GDR ,seperation and unification are based on the original name but not any other issue.Likewise formation of Bangaladesh,has not undergone much change as it was earlier East Pakistan. Names now revised and being accepted in the context of neena's discussion were the names which are in vogue in litteral sense and even in local languages are also written so.Officially not amended.Now amendments are now being made in tune with the wish of people. krishnan Wendy Vasicek <jyotish wrote: Dear Neena, You're absolutely correct! Changing the name of a City, Country, or a business, or of a person produces a new chart. In the case of a person, the birth chart remains the primary one of course, but the new (name) chart should also be read in conjunction. I often wish I had known what I know now before I married this last time...I would certainly have chosen a more auspicious time :-) If we had the date/time when these new (city) names were implemented we could study these charts in light of the tsunami etc.. Best Wishes, Mrs. Wendy http://JyotishVidya.com ______________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.