person doing well in career-SOME Facts

[Guest guest]

Hi all

 

Today I was observing charts of Indira Gandhi & Bush

on

http://www.journalofastrology.com/ARTICLES/bush.htm

 

It is mentioned that :-

Both (indira and bush) have Karka (Cancer) lagna with

Saturn in it and both have Mars, the tenth lord,

vargottama in Simha (Leo)

 

--> Similarity between two of them and this person is

that three of them have saturn in 1st house with mars

in 2nd house. Also BUSH has kal saarpa yoga!

 

Presence of tenth lord in 2nd (income) directly points

to money abudance.

 

thanks

angel

 

 

 

 

 

--- "V. Vasudev Acharya" <acharya.vasudev

wrote:

 

> Hi!

> Mrs. Wendy,

> Greetings! Once again.

>

> Where did I show disrespect to Pt. G.K.Ojha,it is

> only that I don't

> to his views,and this in my opinion is not

> the disrespect.

> I never said a bad word abour the eminent scholar.

>

> Why are you diverting the topic from Pt. G.K.Ojha to

>

> Parashara.Infact it was you who questioned the

> authenticity of said

> shloka.Did I accuse you for showing the disrespect

> to sage

> Parashara.? I didn't.

> You have every right either to agree or disagree

> with the sage and I

> respect your right to do the same.

>

> In you last post you said that you were leaving the

> topic

> there.Please let ne allow to the same,because we are

> streching it

> too far,I think.

>

> I widh to devote my time to learn something else

> from this group.

>

> Thank you very much.

>

> Acharya Vasudev

> http://www.acharyavasudev.com

> acharya.vasudev

>

>

> jyotish-vidya, "Wendy

> Vasicek" <wenvas@j...>

> wrote:

> > Mr. V. Vasudev,

> >

> > Please don't put words in my mouth. I did NOT say

> that 'the

> eminent

> > scholar Pt. G.K. Ojha was not aware of that

> sloka'... I in fact

> said

> > just the opposite i.e;

> > 'I also find it hard to believe that such an

> eminent astrologer as

> > G.K. Ojha who had studied sanskrit works on

> astrology since 1927

> > (and who's opinion I value highly) was not aware

> of the sloka you

> > refer to'.

> > I also did NOT deny the slokas existance (how

> could I do that?). I

> > simply questioned it's authenticity and questioned

> also the reason

> > why that particular sloka has not been included in

> any of the

> > subsequent editions of BPHS which are widely used

> as jyotish text

> > books today??

> >

> > Might I remind you that this topic came to light

> (between us) when

> > you wrote to me privately requesting my comments

> on an article you

> > had written about Pope Benedict XVI in which you

> stated that the

> > aspect of Rahu on Jupiter makes him inclined

> towards occult

> > sciences. This statement alone is so far from the

> truth it's

> > laughable. He would be the last person on the face

> of God's earth

> > who would ever be inclined towards occult

> sciences...if you had

> done

> > your research properly you would know that the

> Church (of which he

> > is the spiritual leader) is totally opposed to

> such

> > things...totally, totally, totally!! It was then

> that I said to

> you

> > (privately) that 'unfortunately your comment,

> based on the aspect

> of

> > Rahu, is based on a false premise'. You then saw

> fit to accuse me

> of

> > saying this on the list...not true! What is said

> in private should

> > remain private Mr. Vasudev.

> >

> > It may, or may not, be of interest to know that I,

> on the other

> > hand, with Rahu conjunct Jupiter, have devoted the

> best part of

> the

> > last 20 yrs to the study of occult sciences. I

> know of many fine

> > astrologers with Rahu/Jupiter conjunction. PB XVI

> however is not

> one

> > of them I assure you. He is staunchly

> conservative, a

> traditionalist

> > in the truest sense who determinately upholds the

> traditions of

> the

> > church (including it's opposition to occult

> sciences). This we

> see,

> > surely, with Jupiter in his own constellation

> occupying Saturn's

> > sign in lagna...a strong disciplinarian no doubt.

> But one who

> flirts

> > with occult sciences? - never!

> >

> > So much for your (supposed) Rahu aspect!

> >

> > Your (below) comment suggests that Pt. Ojha

> (simply) learnt his

> > astrological skills through study at BHU (Banaras

> Hindu

> University)

> > whereas in fact he came from a long and

> distinguished line of

> > astrologers (parampara).

> >

> > You Wrote:

> > "The said edition is just out of print but not

> unobtainable.You may

> > find that in many libraries,specially in BHU,

> where Shree

> > G.K.Ojha,Pt.Seetaram Jha,Pt Jeevnath Jha.Pt

> Muralidhar Jha and

> other

> > scholars taught and learnt their astrological

> skills."

> >

> > Here is a quote from the website of Pandit

> AshuTosh Ojha:

> > "Ojha is from a renowned family of astrologers

> descended directly

> > from the family of personal astrologers to the

> ancient kings of

> > India. He is from a family of Tantrik pure

> Brahmins from the East,

> > called Mithila, where Raja Janak, the learned

> father of Devi Sita,

> > wife of Rama ruled. His forefathers were Gurus of

> the Maharajas of

> > Alwar, an erstwhile Hindu Kingdom in the South

> West of New Delhi.

> > The Rulers of Alwar were Suryanyavanshi (the

> Descendents of the

> SUN)

> > and from the family of Lord Rama.

> >

> > Pandit Ojha's forefathers were learned scholars

> and recitors of

> the

> > Vedas. His father Pandit Gopesh Kumar Ojha had a

> degree in Law and

> > Masters degree in Sanskrit. He was a judge in

> India and wrote more

> > than 20 books in English, Sanskrit and Hindi on

> various mystical

> > subjects besides Astrology, Palmistry and

> Numerology.

> >

> > Ojha's grandfather Pandit Rama Bhadra Ojha

> M.A.L.L.B. was Chief

> > Justice of the High Court of India and a learned

> person of great

> > linguistic ability conversant in Sanskrit,

> Persian, Hindi, English

> > and many other languages."

> >

> > I just find it totally incredible that you can

> dismiss so

> > disrespectfully the wisdom of this most eminent

> astrologer who

> tells

> > us emphatically that the nodes neither aspect nor

> are they

> aspected.

> > This, of course, is not my only source as I was

> also taught the

> same

> > thing when I studied at 'Maharishi Jyotish' back

> in 1988.

> >

> > Thank You,

> > Mrs. Wendy

>

=== message truncated ===

 

 

many thanks

angel goel

===================

 

 

 

 

Discover

Have fun online with music videos, cool games, IM and more. Check it out!

http://discover./online.html