#5 exalted sun - 12th from UL - To Guru Visti Ji

[Guest guest]

Dear Visti, Namaskar,

Would this still be the case if the sun were exalted? Would it be likely that

the Father in Law would pass away? I have this combination myself. I think

Nitin mentioned earlier that the spouse might move away from the father,

perhaps to another country. Something like this I can imagine. Please

clarify.

Sincerely, Michal.

 

() OM TAT SAT () Nitin <sjvc (AT) justnitin (DOT) com> wrote:

||| Hare Rama Krishna |||Dear Visti, Namaskaar. Thanks for your good feedback

and comments. The logic is strong, and gives me another perspective. Best

wishes, Your student,Nitin.|| Namah Shivaaya ||---------- Original Message

-"Visti Larsen"

<visti (AT) (DOT) org>Date: Tue, 14

Dec 2004 12:56:21 +0100>---------- Original Message

->||Hare Rama Krsna||>>Dear Nitin,

Namaskar>>That's not the right logic - then why should Sun in 7th from UL

cause>problems, if 12th from UL cannot? Incase of Sun placed in or lording

the>12th from UL, the father inlaw will EITHER pass away at the time

of>marriage, or distance himself due to being

opposed the marriage.>>Best wishes,>>>>>Visti Larsen>>http://srigaruda.com>>

<visti (AT) srigaruda (DOT) com> visti (AT) srigaruda (DOT) com >> >> >> _____ >>Nitin

[sjvc (AT) justnitin (DOT) com] >14 December 2004 06:21>To:

>[Om Krishna Guru] #2 exalted sun - 12th

from UL - To Guru Visti Ji>> >>>||| Hare Rama Krishna |||>>Dear Neeraj,

Namaskaar. >>Allow me to share some of my understanding, though, you addressed

this to>Visti. >>Here is a Shloka from Maharishi Jaimini's Upadesa

Sutras:>>Chapter I Quarter IV>1.4.3>Natra Ravi Paapah>>Translation: The Sun is

not a malefic for matters concerning the Upa Pada>>While

Maharishi Jaimini was describing the 2nd from the UL in the stanza>previous to

the above, having the Sun in the 12th from the UL could also>simply indicate

that the spouse will move far away from the Father. >>Had the Sun been in the

7th FROM the UL, then the Father-in-law for the>native would have opposed the

institute of marriage. >>Hope some of this helps. >>Best wishes, >Nitin.>>||

Namah Shivaaya ||~ om tat sat ~Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the

Achyuta Ashram. Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama

Krishna'(2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said that

the human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals.(3) Practise

charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading today

Tired of spam?

Mail has the best spam protection around

[Guest guest]

||Hare Rama Krsna||

Dear Michal, Namaskar

Yes even if the Sun is exalted. Point is

that planets in the 12th from UL shows those inlaws who are feeding on the spouse. I.e.

they consider that person as a source of sustenance. When the spouse stops

feeding these people, then enimity occurs and the spouse begins to ignore or

reject these people, as the spouse realizes these people were always wanting

and wanting, and not giving anything in return.

OR

Because the spouse would then be the

sustenance of that particular person, that particular person may pass away.

 

You can also apply this to arudha Lagna

for the native themselves and their family.

Best wishes,

font-weight:bold">

color:#99CC00;font-weight:bold">Visti Larsen

Verdana;color:#99CC00">

color:#99CC00">http://srigaruda.com

color:#99CC00">visti (AT) srigaruda (DOT) com

font-family:Verdana;color:#4E81C4">

 

 

font-family:Tahoma;font-weight:bold">Michal Dziwulski

[nearmichal ]

15 December 2004 11:07

 

Re: [Om Krishna Guru] #5

exalted sun - 12th from UL - To Guru Visti Ji

12.0pt">

12.0pt">() HARE RAMA KRSNA ()

12.0pt">

12.0pt">Dear Visti, Namaskar,

12.0pt">Would this still be the case if the sun were exalted? Would it be

likely that the Father in Law would pass away? I have this combination

myself. I think Nitin mentioned earlier that the spouse might move away

from the father, perhaps to another country. Something like this I can

imagine. Please clarify.

12.0pt">Sincerely, Michal.

12.0pt">

12.0pt">() OM TAT SAT ()

Nitin

<sjvc (AT) justnitin (DOT) com> wrote:

margin-left:3.75pt;margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">

||| Hare Rama Krishna |||

Dear Visti, Namaskaar.

Thanks for your good feedback and comments. The

logic is strong, and gives me another perspective.

Best wishes,

Your student,

Nitin.

|| Namah Shivaaya ||

---------- Original Message

-

"Visti Larsen"

<visti (AT) (DOT) org>

 

Tue, 14 Dec 2004 12:56:21 +0100

>--

>||Hare Rama Krsna||

>

>Dear Nitin, Namaskar

>

>That's not the right logic - then why should

Sun in 7th from UL cause

>problems, if 12th from UL cannot? Incase of

Sun placed in or lording the

>12th from UL, the father inlaw will EITHER

pass away at the time of

>marriage, or distance himself due to being

opposed the marriage.

>

>Best wishes,

>

>

>

>

>Visti Larsen

>

>http://srigaruda.com

>

> <visti (AT) srigaruda (DOT) com>

visti (AT) srigaruda (DOT) com

>

>

>

>

>

> _____

>

>Nitin [sjvc (AT) justnitin (DOT) com]

>14 December 2004 06:21

>

>[Om Krishna Guru] #2 exalted sun -

12th from UL - To Guru Visti Ji

>

>

>

>

>||| Hare Rama Krishna

|||

>

>Dear Neeraj, Namaskaar.

>

>Allow me to share some of my understanding,

though, you addressed this to

>Visti.

>

>Here is a Shloka from Maharishi Jaimini's

Upadesa Sutras:

>

>Chapter I Quarter IV

>1.4.3

>Natra Ravi Paapah

>

>Translation: The Sun is not a malefic for

matters concerning the Upa Pada

>

>While Maharishi Jaimini was describing the 2nd

from the UL in the stanza

>previous to the above, having the Sun in the

12th from the UL could also

>simply indicate that the spouse will move far

away from the Father.

>

>Had the Sun been in the 7th FROM the UL, then

the Father-in-law for the

>native would have opposed the institute of

marriage.

>

>Hope some of this helps.

>

>Best wishes,

>Nitin.

>

>|| Namah Shivaaya ||

~ om tat sat

~

10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"">

Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the

Achyuta Ashram.

Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare

Rama Krishna'

(2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the

Great who said that the human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals.

(3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one

free chart reading today

 

 

 

 

~

om tat sat ~

Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the

Achyuta Ashram.

Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare

Rama Krishna'

(2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the

Great who said that the human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals.

(3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one

free chart reading today

__________ NOD32 1.915 (20041102) Information __________

This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.

http://www.nod32.com

Attachment: (image/jpeg) image001.jpg [not stored]

[Guest guest]

~ Om Namah Shivaya ~

 

Respected Gurudeva,

 

Namakar,

 

Can there be any remedy to minimize the enemity or

relations with father in law (or any other as per

planets placed in 12th from UL). Will propitating the

planets in 12th from UL will help.

 

Ofcourse, nobody would want their inlaws to suffer, as

the spouse is their source of sustenance. They too

belong to the whole commutive family and no body want

to give pains to their near and dear ones.

 

Warm Regards,

 

Neeraj Gupta

 

 

--- Visti Larsen <visti wrote:

 

> ||Hare Rama Krsna||

>

> Dear Michal, Namaskar

>

> Yes even if the Sun is exalted. Point is that

> planets in the 12th from UL

> shows those inlaws who are feeding on the spouse.

> I.e. they consider that

> person as a source of sustenance. When the spouse

> stops feeding these

> people, then enimity occurs and the spouse begins to

> ignore or reject these

> people, as the spouse realizes these people were

> always wanting and wanting,

> and not giving anything in return.

>

> OR

>

> Because the spouse would then be the sustenance of

> that particular person,

> that particular person may pass away.

>

>

>

> You can also apply this to arudha Lagna for the

> native themselves and their

> family.

>

> Best wishes,

>

>

>

>

> Visti Larsen

>

> http://srigaruda.com

>

> <visti visti

>

>

>

>

>

> _____

>

> Michal Dziwulski [nearmichal]

>

> 15 December 2004 11:07

>

> Re: [Om Krishna Guru] #5 exalted sun - 12th

> from UL - To Guru Visti

> Ji

>

>

>

> () HARE RAMA KRSNA ()

>

>

>

> Dear Visti, Namaskar,

>

> Would this still be the case if the sun were

> exalted? Would it be likely

> that the Father in Law would pass away? I have this

> combination myself. I

> think Nitin mentioned earlier that the spouse might

> move away from the

> father, perhaps to another country. Something like

> this I can imagine.

> Please clarify.

>

> Sincerely, Michal.

>

>

>

> () OM TAT SAT ()

>

> Nitin <sjvc wrote:

>

> ||| Hare Rama Krishna |||

>

> Dear Visti, Namaskaar.

>

> Thanks for your good feedback and comments. The

> logic is strong, and gives

> me another perspective.

>

> Best wishes,

>

> Your student,

> Nitin.

>

> || Namah Shivaaya ||

>

> ---------- Original Message

> -

> "Visti Larsen" <visti

>

> Tue, 14 Dec 2004 12:56:21 +0100

>

> >---------- Original Message

> -

>

> >||Hare Rama Krsna||

> >

> >Dear Nitin, Namaskar

> >

> >That's not the right logic - then why should Sun in

> 7th from UL cause

> >problems, if 12th from UL cannot? Incase of Sun

> placed in or lording the

> >12th from UL, the father inlaw will EITHER pass

> away at the time of

> >marriage, or distance himself due to being opposed

> the marriage.

> >

> >Best wishes,

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >Visti Larsen

> >

> >http://srigaruda.com <http://srigaruda.com/>

> >

> > <visti visti

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > _____

> >

> >Nitin [sjvc]

> >14 December 2004 06:21

> >

> >[Om Krishna Guru] #2 exalted sun - 12th

> from UL - To Guru Visti Ji

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >||| Hare Rama Krishna |||

> >

> >Dear Neeraj, Namaskaar.

> >

> >Allow me to share some of my understanding, though,

> you addressed this to

> >Visti.

> >

> >Here is a Shloka from Maharishi Jaimini's Upadesa

> Sutras:

> >

> >Chapter I Quarter IV

> >1.4.3

> >Natra Ravi Paapah

> >

> >Translation: The Sun is not a malefic for matters

> concerning the Upa Pada

> >

> >While Maharishi Jaimini was describing the 2nd from

> the UL in the stanza

> >previous to the above, having the Sun in the 12th

> from the UL could also

> >simply indicate that the spouse will move far away

> from the Father.

> >

> >Had the Sun been in the 7th FROM the UL, then the

> Father-in-law for the

> >native would have opposed the institute of

> marriage.

> >

> >Hope some of this helps.

> >

> >Best wishes,

> >Nitin.

> >

> >|| Namah Shivaaya ||

>

>

> ~ om tat sat ~

> Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta

> Ashram.

> Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare

> Rama Krishna'

> (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the

> Great who said that the

> human stomach should not become a graveyard for

> animals.

> (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one

> free chart reading today

>

>

>

>

>

> Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam

> protection around

>

>

> ~ om tat sat ~

>

=== message truncated ===

 

 

=====

http://www.neerajgupta.com

 

 

 

 

 

The all-new My - What will yours do?

 

[Guest guest]

||Hare Rama Krsna||

Dear Neeraj, Namaskar

Just try to be nice to those people…

if that doesn’t work then we do have some powerful dasamahavidya mantras

to get over the problem… but better to take those as a last resort.

Best wishes,

font-weight:bold">

color:#99CC00;font-weight:bold">Visti Larsen

Verdana;color:#99CC00">

color:#99CC00">http://srigaruda.com

color:#99CC00">visti (AT) srigaruda (DOT) com

font-family:Verdana;color:#4E81C4">

 

 

font-family:Tahoma;font-weight:bold">Neeraj Gupta

[gupta_neeraj_2000 ]

21 December 2004 08:28

 

RE: [Om Krishna Guru] #5

exalted sun - 12th from UL - To Guru Visti Ji

12.0pt">

10.0pt">~ Om Namah Shivaya ~

Respected Gurudeva,

Namakar,

Can there be any remedy to minimize the enemity or

relations with father in law (or any other as per

planets placed in 12th from UL). Will propitating

the

planets in 12th from UL will help.

Ofcourse, nobody would want their inlaws to

suffer, as

the spouse is their source of sustenance.

They too

belong to the whole commutive family and no body

want

to give pains to their near and dear ones.

Warm Regards,

Neeraj Gupta

--- Visti Larsen <visti (AT) (DOT) org>

wrote:

> ||Hare Rama Krsna||

>

> Dear Michal, Namaskar

>

> Yes even if the Sun is exalted. Point is that

> planets in the 12th from UL

> shows those inlaws who are feeding on the

spouse.

> I.e. they consider that

> person as a source of sustenance. When the

spouse

> stops feeding these

> people, then enimity occurs and the spouse

begins to

> ignore or reject these

> people, as the spouse realizes these people

were

> always wanting and wanting,

> and not giving anything in return.

>

> OR

>

> Because the spouse would then be the

sustenance of

> that particular person,

> that particular person may pass away.

>

>

>

> You can also apply this to arudha Lagna for

the

> native themselves and their

> family.

>

> Best wishes,

>

>

>

>

> Visti Larsen

>

> http://srigaruda.com

>

> <visti (AT) srigaruda (DOT) com>

visti (AT) srigaruda (DOT) com

>

>

>

>

>

> _____

>

> Michal Dziwulski

[nearmichal ]

>

> 15 December 2004 11:07

>

> Re: [Om Krishna Guru] #5 exalted sun

- 12th

> from UL - To Guru Visti

> Ji

>

>

>

> () HARE RAMA KRSNA ()

>

>

>

> Dear Visti, Namaskar,

>

> Would this still be the case if the sun were

> exalted? Would it be likely

> that the Father in Law would pass away?

I have this

> combination myself. I

> think Nitin mentioned earlier that the spouse

might

> move away from the

> father, perhaps to another country.

Something like

> this I can imagine.

> Please clarify.

>

> Sincerely, Michal.

>

>

>

> () OM TAT SAT

()

>

> Nitin <sjvc (AT) justnitin (DOT) com> wrote:

>

> ||| Hare Rama Krishna

|||

>

> Dear Visti, Namaskaar.

>

> Thanks for your good feedback and comments.

The

> logic is strong, and gives

> me another perspective.

>

> Best wishes,

>

> Your student,

> Nitin.

>

> || Namah Shivaaya ||

>

> ---------- Original Message

> -

> "Visti Larsen"

<visti (AT) (DOT) org>

>

> Tue, 14 Dec 2004 12:56:21 +0100

>

> >---------- Original Message

> -

>

> >||Hare Rama Krsna||

> >

> >Dear Nitin, Namaskar

> >

> >That's not the right logic - then why

should Sun in

> 7th from UL cause

> >problems, if 12th from UL cannot? Incase

of Sun

> placed in or lording the

> >12th from UL, the father inlaw will

EITHER pass

> away at the time of

> >marriage, or distance himself due to

being opposed

> the marriage.

> >

> >Best wishes,

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >Visti Larsen

> >

> >http://srigaruda.com

<http://srigaruda.com/>

> >

> > <visti (AT) srigaruda (DOT) com>

visti (AT) srigaruda (DOT) com

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > _____

> >

> >Nitin [sjvc (AT) justnitin (DOT) com]

> >14 December 2004 06:21

> >

> >[Om Krishna Guru] #2 exalted sun

- 12th

> from UL - To Guru Visti Ji

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >||| Hare Rama Krishna

|||

> >

> >Dear Neeraj, Namaskaar.

> >

> >Allow me to share some of my

understanding, though,

> you addressed this to

> >Visti.

> >

> >Here is a Shloka from Maharishi Jaimini's

Upadesa

> Sutras:

> >

> >Chapter I Quarter IV

> >1.4.3

> >Natra Ravi Paapah

> >

> >Translation: The Sun is not a malefic for

matters

> concerning the Upa Pada

> >

> >While Maharishi Jaimini was describing

the 2nd from

> the UL in the stanza

> >previous to the above, having the Sun in

the 12th

> from the UL could also

> >simply indicate that the spouse will move

far away

> from the Father.

> >

> >Had the Sun been in the 7th FROM the UL,

then the

> Father-in-law for the

> >native would have opposed the institute

of

> marriage.

> >

> >Hope some of this helps.

> >

> >Best wishes,

> >Nitin.

> >

> >|| Namah Shivaaya ||

>

>

> ~ om tat sat ~

> Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the

Achyuta

> Ashram.

> Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra

'Hare

> Rama Krishna'

> (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar

the

> Great who said that the

> human stomach should not become a graveyard

for

> animals.

> (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do

one

> free chart reading today

>

>

>

>

>

> Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam

> protection around

>

>

> ~ om tat sat ~

>

=== message truncated ===

=====

http://www.neerajgupta.com

 

 

The all-new My - What will yours do?

 

~ om tat sat

~

10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"">

Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the

Achyuta Ashram.

Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare

Rama Krishna'

(2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the

Great who said that the human stomach should not become a graveyard for

animals.

(3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one

free chart reading today

__________ NOD32 1.915 (20041102) Information __________

This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.

http://www.nod32.com

Attachment: (image/jpeg) image001.jpg [not stored]