Guest guest Posted December 14, 2004 Report Share Posted December 14, 2004 ||| Hare Rama Krishna ||| Dear Visti, Namaskaar. Thanks for your good feedback and comments. The logic is strong, and gives me another perspective. Best wishes, Your student, Nitin. || Namah Shivaaya || -- "Visti Larsen" <visti Tue, 14 Dec 2004 12:56:21 +0100 >-- >||Hare Rama Krsna|| > >Dear Nitin, Namaskar > >That's not the right logic - then why should Sun in 7th from UL cause >problems, if 12th from UL cannot? Incase of Sun placed in or lording the >12th from UL, the father inlaw will EITHER pass away at the time of >marriage, or distance himself due to being opposed the marriage. > >Best wishes, > > > > >Visti Larsen > >http://srigaruda.com > > <visti visti > > > > > > _____ > >Nitin [sjvc] >14 December 2004 06:21 > >[Om Krishna Guru] #2 exalted sun - 12th from UL - To Guru Visti Ji > > > > >||| Hare Rama Krishna ||| > >Dear Neeraj, Namaskaar. > >Allow me to share some of my understanding, though, you addressed this to >Visti. > >Here is a Shloka from Maharishi Jaimini's Upadesa Sutras: > >Chapter I Quarter IV >1.4.3 >Natra Ravi Paapah > >Translation: The Sun is not a malefic for matters concerning the Upa Pada > >While Maharishi Jaimini was describing the 2nd from the UL in the stanza >previous to the above, having the Sun in the 12th from the UL could also >simply indicate that the spouse will move far away from the Father. > >Had the Sun been in the 7th FROM the UL, then the Father-in-law for the >native would have opposed the institute of marriage. > >Hope some of this helps. > >Best wishes, >Nitin. > >|| Namah Shivaaya || Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.