Guest guest Posted December 13, 2004 Report Share Posted December 13, 2004 ||| Hare Rama Krishna ||| Dear Neeraj, Namaskaar. Allow me to share some of my understanding, though, you addressed this to Visti. Here is a Shloka from Maharishi Jaimini’s Upadesa Sutras: Chapter I Quarter IV 1.4.3 Natra Ravi Paapah Translation: The Sun is not a malefic for matters concerning the Upa Pada While Maharishi Jaimini was describing the 2nd from the UL in the stanza previous to the above, having the Sun in the 12th from the UL could also simply indicate that the spouse will move far away from the Father. Had the Sun been in the 7th FROM the UL, then the Father-in-law for the native would have opposed the institute of marriage. Hope some of this helps. Best wishes, Nitin. || Namah Shivaaya || ======================= ~ Om Namah Shivaya ~ Respected Gurudeva, Sun in 12th from UL shows differences with father in law, or father in law cease to exist. If an exalted sun is there in 12th from UL, do we need to change the interpretation or the results will be same. Regards, Neeraj Gupta ===== http://www.neerajgupta.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 14, 2004 Report Share Posted December 14, 2004 ||Hare Rama Krsna|| Dear Nitin, Namaskar That’s not the right logic – then why should Sun in 7th from UL cause problems, if 12th from UL cannot? Incase of Sun placed in or lording the 12th from UL, the father inlaw will EITHER pass away at the time of marriage, or distance himself due to being opposed the marriage. Best wishes, font-weight:bold"> color:#99CC00;font-weight:bold">Visti Larsen Verdana;color:#99CC00"> color:#99CC00">http://srigaruda.com color:#99CC00">visti (AT) srigaruda (DOT) com font-family:Verdana;color:#4E81C4"> font-family:Tahoma;font-weight:bold">Nitin [sjvc (AT) justnitin (DOT) com] 14 December 2004 06:21 [Om Krishna Guru] #2 exalted sun - 12th from UL - To Guru Visti Ji 12.0pt"> font-family:"Courier New""> ||| Hare Rama Krishna ||| Dear Neeraj, Namaskaar. Allow me to share some of my understanding, though, you addressed this to Visti. Here is a Shloka from Maharishi Jaimini’s Upadesa Sutras: Chapter I Quarter IV 1.4.3 Natra Ravi Paapah Translation: The Sun is not a malefic for matters concerning the Upa Pada While Maharishi Jaimini was describing the 2nd from the UL in the stanza previous to the above, having the Sun in the 12th from the UL could also simply indicate that the spouse will move far away from the Father. Had the Sun been in the 7th FROM the UL, then the Father-in-law for the native would have opposed the institute of marriage. Hope some of this helps. Best wishes, Nitin. || Namah Shivaaya || ======================= ~ Om Namah Shivaya ~ Respected Gurudeva, Sun in 12th from UL shows differences with father in law, or father in law cease to exist. If an exalted sun is there in 12th from UL, do we need to change the interpretation or the results will be same. Regards, Neeraj Gupta ===== http://www.neerajgupta.com ~ om tat sat ~ 10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New""> Thank you for maintaining the decorum of the Achyuta Ashram. Reminders: (1) Recite the Shadakshari Mantra 'Hare Rama Krishna' (2) Try to become Vegetarian - remember Akbar the Great who said that the human stomach should not become a graveyard for animals. (3) Practise charity in thought and deed - do one free chart reading today __________ NOD32 1.915 (20041102) Information __________ This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. http://www.nod32.com Attachment: (image/jpeg) image001.jpg [not stored] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.