Guest guest Posted November 27, 2004 Report Share Posted November 27, 2004 ... hamsasso.aham .. Dear Freedom, You've brought out some nice points. I've been unable to find any source that talks about "time" clearly. Time may not make sense at the level of the jivaatma, but this does not imply that time does not exist there. It reminds me of the famous question, "If a tree falls, and there is noone to hear it, does it make a sound?" > Akasha is connected to the Atma level, vayu to the chitta level, etc This is different than what I was taught. The jivatma, or the causal body, is a function of avidya. It comes from the rajasic and tamasic aspects of prakriti (no relation to tattwas) >From the combined sattwic portions of all five subtle tattwas comes the antahkarana. (I don't mean to imply that what you said is wrong; just different) > In Shoola dashas it is only Jupiter (Jiva/Akasha) and the AK (the Atma) > that can hold off death (Shani/Time/Vayu) from destroying the body. > They are the only things that have power over 'our time'. I doubt any of the grahas can prevent the destruction of the body. The best they can do is continue to yoke the pranas (vayu) to the body. It is certainly logical that only the subtler tattwa (akasha - Jupiter) can affect it. Saturn grossifies our prarabdha karma, and makes us experience it now, while the benefic Jupiter delays the fructification of it. But we have no choice: the prarabdha karma must be experienced by us in this life. It is often likened to an arrow that has already left the bow. I happened across this little gem today: yaamiShuM girishanta haste bibharshyastave . shivaaM giritra taaM kuru maa hi.m siiH puruShaM jagat . O Girishanta (Rudra), the arrow which you hold in hand for shooting, make that auspicious, O Giritra, do not injure any person and the world. ajit freedom [freedom] Mon 11/22/2004 5:06 PM Ajit Krishnan Indirect basis, logic: Shani is connected to Time and it is Shani who rules Vayu. In Ayurveda school I was taught that the tattvas come about into manifestation in order of Akash, Vayu, Agni, Jala, Prthvi (in order of density). Akasha is connected to the Atma level, vayu to the chitta level, etc. Time is experienced by the body and mind (the denser levels). What is time at the level of the Atma. Has your Atma ever been in a rush to get anywhere. Atma (Akasha) is beyond the 'dimensions' of time (vayu). It is hard for our 'mind' to understand but this is a basic teaching of the Atma beyond the physical constraints of time and space, I'm sure you could give more quotes than I about the freedom from constraints given to the Atma written in Shastra. In Shoola dashas it is only Jupiter (Jiva/Akasha) and the AK (the Atma) that can hold off death (Shani/Time/Vayu) from destroying the body. They are the only things that have power over 'our time'. I don't mind if you post on the list, it gives more people the ability to interact and learn, and I always enjoy everyone's opinion. Namah Sivaya Ajit Krishnan Monday, November 22, 2004 7:36 PM freedom ... hamsasso.aham .. Let me ask my question directly: I expected that time would accompany akasha, and not vayu. i.e. time would accompany creation, no matter how subtle it was. You pointed out that movement only comes with vayu, and hence time was associated with vayu. If you have a shastric basis for this, could you please share it with me? Thanks, ajit freedom [freedom] Monday, November 22, 2004 4:15 PM Ajit Krishnan Hare Rama Krsna Why assume it never differentiates itself? I have seen much theory on whether there is still a prana that exists after pralaya to create again or whether even this primal prana returns back to the unmanifest. Beyond philosophy what is the practical application of it though? Maybe it has a deeper meaning when dealing with Samadhi yoga, but only my thought. If a thought crosses the mind in deep meditation it disturbs the subtlety of the breath which disturbs the stillness of the body. How can one movement into manifestation not turn into others? How or why would akasha come and not the rest of creation since creation is latent in the akasha? Namah Sivaya Ajit Krishnan Monday, November 22, 2004 3:18 PM freedom ... hamsasso.aham .. Dear Freedom, Let's assume that Akasha never differentiates itself. i.e. we have the following sequence of events. pralaya --> creation of akasha --> pralaya (destruction of akasha) --> Since Vayu doesn't exist here, are you saying that time wouldn't exist either? ajit "freedom" <freedom@s...> Date: Mon Nov 22, 2004 11:19 am Subject: RE: |Sri Varaha| Akasha Tattva Hare Rama Krsna Its good you don't believe that there IS Shunya, because it doesn't exist, that's the whole concept. Akash (space) was first to evolve, then when that space began to move it became vayu. Motion created time. Time is connected to Vayu (Shani). Time exists within Akash just like everything else does. Namah Sivaya Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.