RE: [SJC: Achyuta Gurukul] Narayana Interpretation! - toVisti JI

[Guest guest]

|Hare Rama

Krsna|

Dear Rafal,

Namaskar

Good

questions.

font-family:"URW Palladio IT";color:navy">a)

color:navy">Yes we do, unless 7th lord is in Lagna or Lagna lord is

in 7th.

font-family:"URW Palladio IT";color:navy">b)

color:navy">No we don’t.

font-family:"URW Palladio IT";color:navy">c)

color:navy">Until recently I didn’t think we did the same in the

divisions, but Guruji has taught otherwise recently.

Best wishes,

bold">Visti Larsen

color:#4E81C4">

visti (AT) (DOT) org

Verdana;color:#4E81C4">

padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm">

 

 

 

font-family:Tahoma;font-weight:bold">jyotraff

[jyotraff ]

13 November 2004 09:57

 

[sJC: Achyuta Gurukul]

Narayana Interpretation! - toVisti JI

12.0pt">

font-family:"Courier New"">

Dear VistiJI!

Pranam!

I have doubts , please clarify few cases:

a/

When the 7th sign from Lagna starting sign then we

interpret the

7th from dasa is that right ?

b/ we interpret 7th from dasa also for antyar also

for pratyantar

is that right ?

c/ in divisional we also interpreting 7th from

dasa or this only

applies to Rasi ?

thank You,

yor servant

Rafal

[Om Kleem

Krishnaaya Jagannathaaya namah]

Send a blank mail

To :

-

To :

 

__________ NOD32 1.915 (20041102) Information __________

This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.

http://www.nod32.com

Attachment: (image/jpeg) image001.jpg [not stored]

[Guest guest]

Hare Krsna

Pranamas.

 

 

 

>

> a) Yes we do, unless 7th lord is in Lagna or Lagna lord is

in 7th.

>

> b) No we don't.

 

 

So when I have Dasa of Le-Pi-Ta so there is Dasa (Aq-Pi-Ta)

Am i right ? Maha- changes but antar/pratyar- stays the same.

 

 

 

 

 

>

> c) Until recently I didn't think we did the same in the

divisions, but

> Guruji has taught otherwise recently.

 

So HOW YOU INTERPRET DASAS IN D-N now?

 

 

Please let me know of any changes about this.

 

 

 

With regards ,

ys Rafal