Guest guest Posted April 24, 2004 Report Share Posted April 24, 2004 Dear Rama The reason why some people are "not" adviced to invoke some grahas is due to the insecurity factor. I can call it sheer coincidence, but yesterday i was having a long philosophical discussion with a "leo" friend of mine. I told him that there is a possibility that some mantras can destroy the person, make him fall on bed, so that he can "lay" his hands on a spiritual book, and turn "over" a new leaf. but this hard path is not required. Even when one is in sansara, invoking "good for health and wealth" grahas, he still can worship RAMA. All the grahas are avatars of vishnu trying to propel you to him, and thus some use surgical methods, while some give kind gospel. As i am writing this mail, i hear a song of rama playing in background, someone seems to love rama a lot. love partha , "Ramapriya D" <hubli@h...> wrote: > Terrific, Partha. You've made it easier for me to seek an answer to something I've always been addled about... why is it that one's sometimes adviced *not* to propiatiate a graha? The very intent of propitiating is to assuage, isn't it? Why would propitiation turn a graha on a native's heels instead? > Cheers, > Rama > > - > "V.Partha sarathy" <partvinu5> > <> > Saturday, April 24, 2004 8:06 AM > [sJC: Achyuta Gurukul] Re: Achyuta Gurukul] Pls help - reg Gems > > > > Dear Rama and Neeraj > > > > The reason why Red coral is prescribed to Leo natives lies in the > > fact that Mars is the 9th lord who is angry. By wearing his gem > > (Murthy, vigraha, idol, symbol) you are making him pleased to confer > > his blessings. > > best wishes > > partha > > ###################################################################### ############### > This e-mail and any attachments are confidential; they are for the use of > > the named recipient(s) only. If you have received this e-mail in error, do > > not copy or disclose its contents and please notify the sender immediately > > and then delete it. Email transmission is not a secure means of > > communication nor is it guaranteed to be error free; emails can be > > intercepted, lost, destroyed, corrupted or contain viruses. the sender > > therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the > > contents of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission, nor > > does it accept liability for any loss or damage caused by viruses. > > Dodsal Pte Ltd. > > > This e-mail message has been scanned for Viruses and Content and cleared > by MailMarshal > ###################################################################### ############### Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.