Achyuta Gurukul] Functional vs Natural Malefics

[Guest guest]

Dear Sameer,

 

The natural malefic, even when in a position to cause some natives good,

can't hide its stripes. Let me try and convey this using a cricketing

example. Assume there's a batter who's a Cn asc with Ma in 10h. He's likely

to be without peers in bravery, a Ma trait, and a good battler at the

crease. That still might not stop him being black and blue from ball hits

around the body. The charts of Mohinder Amarnath, an Aq native with Ma in

10h or even Sachin, a Cn native with exalted Ma in 7h should provide a clue;

never ones to blink first.

 

Quite the same for Li natives and Sa. These chaps would have it good if Sa

is placed favorably but will invariably have nothing coming on a platter;

they'll have to strive at it real hard.

 

And remember that a yogakaraka is one who has the potential to confer good

yogas; its placement vis-a-vis the lagna is what decides whether at all

it'll deliver, above all else.

 

Cheers,

 

Ramapriya

hubli

 

-

"Sameer Sawhney" <icecoolsam

<vedic astrology>; <>

Thursday, April 22, 2004 11:33 PM

[sJC: Achyuta Gurukul] Functional vs Natural Malefics

 

 

> Respected Gurus,

>

> Planets assume the role of either functional benefics/malefics based upon

> their lordships over

> certain houses in a natal chart. So if a natural malefic like Mars is

> functionally benefic for a

> particular lagna(say Cancer) then do we consider its natural maleficness

at

> all while analaysing charts.

>

> In other words will it ever cause any harm due to its natural maleficness

?

>

> Thanks,

> Sameer