Achyuta Gurukul] Does planet status change in divisional charts?

[Guest guest]

Dear Anando,

 

Yes the status of a planet can change in divisional charts; d-1 remains the

overriding reflection, nonetheless, and shouldn't be ignored. Since each

d-chart relates to a specific area of life, a planet's beneficence or

maleficence would obviously be pertinent to that sphere.

 

Take as an example someone with a Vi asc in d-1 and Cn asc in d-10. The effect

of Ma for the native's career (as far as his achievements and career go) would

be dramatically different from its effect overall.

 

This I think is one of the major reasons why gem prescriptions are limited to

planetary indications of d-1. In the earlier example, unless Ma in d-1 is

favorably placed (say, in 10th with Su, forming a vry), wearing a coral

wouldn't be in the least advisable.

 

And you're right about the paksha thing. Like retrogression, some things just

can't be reckoned from d-charts, case-by-case - not unless one's ready for

nonsensical results.

 

Cheers,

 

Ramapriya

 

-

"anando63" <anandobanerjee (AT) hotmail (DOT) com>

<>

Friday, March 26, 2004 6:10 PM

[sJC: Achyuta Gurukul] Does planet status change in divisional charts?

> Namaskar,> If a planet has malefic status in the D-1 chart (e.g. Jupiter in a

quadrant), can the status change in other D charts? If so, what about the moon?

Obviously, D chart placement will not change Sukla Paksha or Krishna Paksha. Or,

are there other points to consider?> Anando

--

This e-mail and any attachments are confidential; they are for the use of the

named recipient(s) only. If you have received this e-mail in error, do not copy

or disclose its contents and please notify the sender immediately and then

delete it. Email transmission is not a secure means of communication nor is it

guaranteed to be error free; emails can be intercepted, lost, destroyed,

corrupted or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability

for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message which arise as a

result of e-mail transmission, nor does it accept liability for any loss or

damage caused by viruses.

This e-mail message has been scanned for Viruses and Content and cleared by

MailMarshal - For more information please visit www.marshalsoftware.com

--

[Guest guest]

|Hare Rama Krishna|

Dear Ramapriya and list, Namaskar.

My comments bellow in caps.

Best wishes, Visti.

, "Ramapriya D" <hubli@h...>

wrote:

> Dear Anando,

>

> Yes the status of a planet can change in divisional charts; d-1

remains the overriding reflection, nonetheless, and shouldn't be

ignored. Since each d-chart relates to a specific area of life, a

planet's beneficence or maleficence would obviously be pertinent to

that sphere.

>

> Take as an example someone with a Vi asc in d-1 and Cn asc in d-

10. The effect of Ma for the native's career (as far as his

achievements and career go) would be dramatically different from its

effect overall.

>

> This I think is one of the major reasons why gem prescriptions are

limited to planetary indications of d-1. In the earlier example,

unless Ma in d-1 is favorably placed (say, in 10th with Su, forming

a vry), wearing a coral wouldn't be in the least advisable.

>

 

VISTI: THEN HOW DO YOU RECONCILE THE FACT THAT PARASARA MUNI AS WELL

AS OTHER AUTHORS LAID ALOT OF WEIGHT ON THE LORD OF THE 22ND

DREKKANA? BASED ON THE LAGNA CHANGING IN THE VARGAS, THE 22ND

DREKKANA, 64TH NAVAMSA WOULD CHANGE AND WOULD ALTER THE CHARACHTER

OF A GRAHA FROM SAY - A MERE 4TH LORD TO KHARESH! IF THE RASI WAS

THE SOLE DETERMINOR THEN THE KHARESH WOULD NEVER HAVE SUCH A STRONG

SAY IN A PERSONS LIFE. OR TAKE THE LORD OF THE 2ND HOUSE IN THE

SOMMANATH DREKKANA. SUCH A GRAHA WOULD NEVER BE INCLINED TO GIVE

MARRIAGE, NO MATTER WHERE IT IS PLACED IN THE RASI CHART. IN THIS

WAY ONE SHOULD WEIGH THE VARGAS ESPECIALLY THE DREKKANA, NAVAMSA AND

SHASTYAMSA. HENCE BECAUSE OF THE IMPORTANCE OF THE VARGA, YOUR

DASAMSA EXAMPLE IS STILL VALID.

 

> And you're right about the paksha thing. Like retrogression, some

things just can't be reckoned from d-charts, case-by-case - not

unless one's ready for nonsensical results.

 

VISTI: THE NONSENSE ARISES FROM THE JYOTISHI NOT JYOTISH ITSELF.

PLEASE READ SARVATHA CHINTAMANI AND JATAKA PARIJATA SINCERELY TO

UNDERSTAND THE DEPTH OF THE VARGAS AND HOW TO UNDERSTAND THE

IMPORTANCE OF THE RASI. RASI IS DEFINITELY EXTREMELY IMPORTANT, BUT

ONLY TO A CERTAIN POINT, AFTER WHICH VARGAS ARE NECESSARY.

 

> Cheers,

>

> Ramapriya

>

> -

> "anando63" <anandobanerjee@h...>

> <>

> Friday, March 26, 2004 6:10 PM

> [sJC: Achyuta Gurukul] Does planet status change in

divisional charts?

>

>

> > Namaskar,

>

> > If a planet has malefic status in the D-1 chart (e.g. Jupiter in

a quadrant), can the status change in other D charts? If so, what

about the moon? Obviously, D chart placement will not change Sukla

Paksha or Krishna Paksha. Or, are there other points to consider?

>

> > Anando

>

>

#####################################################################

################

> This e-mail and any attachments are confidential; they are for the

use of

>

> the named recipient(s) only. If you have received this e-mail in

error, do

>

> not copy or disclose its contents and please notify the sender

immediately

>

> and then delete it. Email transmission is not a secure means of

>

> communication nor is it guaranteed to be error free; emails can be

>

> intercepted, lost, destroyed, corrupted or contain viruses. the

sender

>

> therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in

the

>

> contents of this message which arise as a result of e-mail

transmission, nor

>

> does it accept liability for any loss or damage caused by viruses.

>

> Dodsal Pte Ltd.

>

>

> This e-mail message has been scanned for Viruses and Content and

cleared

> by MailMarshal

>

#####################################################################

################