[SJC: Achyuta Gurukul] Yogi Karve/ Ayanamsa

[Guest guest]

Dear Visti,

 

Namaste.

 

>Usually i find trouble with the position of the nodes position in

>the charts, arising from the definition of the Mean Nodes.

 

Does it look like they should be higher in degrees than the Lahiri

calculation is giving? I also was reading a book on the nakshatras, which

explains meaning of all planets including nodes in the different pada of

each nakshatra and it looks like my ayanamsa calculation scores better.

The reasoning I followed is that in Vedic times, the reference for the 0°

Aries wasn't Chitra naksatra, but rather Revati naksatra, which was 10'

before the 0 Aries point. Now the question is, where exactly was the star

of Revati within the naksatra band of 13°20'? I accept 27° Pisces because

that's the point of highest exaltation for Venus. Venus represents sex

life, and this desire is fullfilled when Venus reaches the naksatra of

Revati, which signifies the same (union). Thus I came to my calculation by

taking the Sassanian ayanamsa, and subtracting 3° from it. Now we can

experiment with it....

 

>As per Varahamihiras - Surya Siddhanta, the Nodes are to be calculated

>with their mean progression from the end of Satya Yuga. Have you

>experimented with this calculation?

 

I don't have this book. Do you have a copy in electronic format? Also, the

question is from the end of which Satya Yuga. We have gone through 28

already in this kalpa of Lord Brahma. Isn't it from the first? Quite

difficult, since we do not even know exactly the start of this Kali Yuga.

Personally I do not accept the date of 5,102 BC. I suppose it is about

1,200 years less. Check the 12th canto of Srimad Bhagavatam where the

dynasties in the Kali yuga are enumerated. I believe we are in the period

described in the verse where is mentioned the rule of Yavanas, followed by

the rule of some number of Maula kings (the Gandhi dynasty?).

 

I would look up the verse no., but I'm in a hurry now to go visit my

father who is in hospital. It's the 2nd or 3rd chapter.

 

Yours,

Dhira Krsna dasa,

Jyotishi

http://www.radhadesh.com

[Guest guest]

Jaya Jagannatha

 

Dear Kå

 

love,

 

Swee

swee

www.brihaspati.net

 

 

 

Dhira Krsna BCS [Dhira.Krsna.BCS]

08 March 2004 09:40

 

[sJC: Achyuta Gurukul] Yogi Karve/ Ayanamsa

 

Dear Visti,

 

Namaste.

 

>Usually i find trouble with the position of the nodes position in

>the charts, arising from the definition of the Mean Nodes.

 

Does it look like they should be higher in degrees than the Lahiri

calculation is giving? I also was reading a book on the nakshatras,

which

explains meaning of all planets including nodes in the different pada of

each nakshatra and it looks like my ayanamsa calculation scores better.

The reasoning I followed is that in Vedic times, the reference for the

0°

Aries wasn't Chitra naksatra, but rather Revati naksatra, which was 10'

before the 0 Aries point. Now the question is, where exactly was the

star

of Revati within the naksatra band of 13°20'? I accept 27° Pisces

because

that's the point of highest exaltation for Venus. Venus represents sex

life, and this desire is fullfilled when Venus reaches the naksatra of

Revati, which signifies the same (union). Thus I came to my calculation

by

taking the Sassanian ayanamsa, and subtracting 3° from it. Now we can

experiment with it....

 

>As per Varahamihiras - Surya Siddhanta, the Nodes are to be calculated

>with their mean progression from the end of Satya Yuga. Have you

>experimented with this calculation?

 

I don't have this book. Do you have a copy in electronic format? Also,

the

question is from the end of which Satya Yuga. We have gone through 28

already in this kalpa of Lord Brahma. Isn't it from the first? Quite

difficult, since we do not even know exactly the start of this Kali

Yuga.

Personally I do not accept the date of 5,102 BC. I suppose it is about

1,200 years less. Check the 12th canto of Srimad Bhagavatam where the

dynasties in the Kali yuga are enumerated. I believe we are in the

period

described in the verse where is mentioned the rule of Yavanas, followed

by

the rule of some number of Maula kings (the Gandhi dynasty?).

 

I would look up the verse no., but I'm in a hurry now to go visit my

father who is in hospital. It's the 2nd or 3rd chapter.

 

Yours,

Dhira Krsna dasa,

Jyotishi

http://www.radhadesh.com

 

 

[Om Kleem Krishnaaya Jagannathaaya namah]

Send a blank mail

To : -

To :

Links