Achyuta Gurukul] CLARIFICATION -- TO SANJAY

[Guest guest]

|Hare Rama Krishna|

Dear Pierre,

Keep in mind that the Rasi dristi of Grahas on the 2nd from AL can cause

poverty. Graha dristi of malefics may indicate people who desire to cause ones

poverty... different situation.

Best wishesVisti---Sri Jagannath Center: http://.orgBhagavad Purana:

http://www.srimadbhagavatam.orgiTRANS 99 Font: http://www.omkarananda-ashram.org

-

Pierre-Olivier Loisel

 

Wednesday, June 25, 2003 4:46 PM

[sJC: Achyuta Gurukul] CLARIFICATION -- TO SANJAY

Dear Sanjayji,Namaste!You didn't answer my question below. Language is a

barrier. There was no offence from me. I have an immense faith in you (why is

it so...?). My books on western astrology etc... have gone to the rubbish for a

long time.When a student is getting lost in front of certain equations on the

blackboard, that doesn't make him call the theory of Relativity in question nor

his teacher's authority.Now, I am trying to digest the basics and only a typo

makes me sunk.On argala for instance, I learnt from you that Rahu casts an

aspect on "the one and the same" 12th/2nd house counted from it. But your

reading of Queen Victoria's chart in COVA p.85 says the second house from AL is

unaspected by any malefic (while Rahu precisely conjoins AL).Such a

drishti/sight cannot be obstructed. Can it be? At the most it could be

weakened. Or is there a mistake?Of course, these are details. I am sorry.Yours

very truly,Pierre-Olivier Loisel,

"Pierre-Olivier Loisel" <poloisel@a...> wrote:> Namaste Sanjayji,> > In JMUS

pp. 96-97 you wrote that « AL in Pisces unconjoined and > unaspected shows

birth in poverty. »> > Pisces is having the argala of Capricorn with Saturn,

Moon and Rahu > in it. > I understand argala is not a condition.> > Saturn

aspects AL by graha drishti. > Is the conjuction a condition i.e. could you

have written « AL in > Pisces unconjoined AND unaspected… » ?> > Permit me to

leave your father : would you just say then « AL > unconjoined AND unaspected…

» or do Pisces or 11th house matter ?> > To understand also the way you teach

and to adapt…> > Yours respectfully,> Pierre-Olivier Loisel> > > Natal Chart> >

November 12, 1934> Time: 18:19:00> Time Zone:

5:30:00 (East of GMT)> Place: 85 E 50' 00", 20 N 30' 00">

Cuttack, India> > > +--------------+> |AL

| |As GL |Md |> | | |Gk |

|> | | | | |> | |

| | |> | | | |

|> |-----------+-----------------------+-----------|> | |

|Ke |> | | | |> |

| | |> | |

| |> | | | |> |-----------|

Rasi |-----------|> |Mo Sa | |Ma

|> |Ra | | |> | |

| |> | | | |> |

| | |>

|-----------+-----------------------+-----------|> | |HL |Su

Me | |> | | |Ju Ve | |> |

| | | |> | | | |

|> | | | | |>

+--------------+[Om Kleem Krishnaaya

Jagannathaaya namah]Send a blank mailTo :

-To :

Your use of is subject

to the