Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Achyuta Gurukul] Achyuta Gurukul] Achyuta Gurukul] 16th meeting proceedings, mumbai chapter

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

dear rk,

 

my comments are bellow,

 

best wishes

 

jk

-

rkrangan

 

Friday, March 14, 2003 5:03 PM

[sJC: Achyuta Gurukul] Achyuta Gurukul] Re: Achyuta Gurukul] 16th

meeting proceedings, mumbai chapter

Om Gurave NamahOm Namo NarayanayaDear DasguptajiChandrasekar's point on Venus as

a lord of kendra and not occupying its own house is good. I would like to

request him to elaborate on the 'jealousy' factor.But I am also unable to

reckon multiple marriages based on UL and 2nd from UL in this chart. Doesn't

Venus in 12th from UL indicate that he will be ignored by spouse?

VISTI HAS GOT A NICE POINT HERE. IT IS VERY LOGICAL THAT A WEEK UL LORD WILL NOT

BE GOOD FOR MARRIAGE.Saturns aspects the 7th. Jupiter as darakaraka is in

Aquarius with A7 receiving rasi drishti from Rahu and Moon. Mars also aspects

it to ignite matters. Jupiter is in a Venusian sign in D-9 with A7 and aspected

by Rahu. I think his D-30 can throw light on multiple relationships. 7th lord

Venus is in Vrishaba in D-30 alongwith A7. If I have understood correctly, I

think that shows multiple relationships.

AS I UNDERSTAND 6L OF D1 HAS TO HAVE A CONNECTION WITH 8H OR 10H TO SHOW THE

EVILS. ANY THING CONNECTED WITH THAT IN D30 WILL SHOW THE EVIL. OF COURSE I AM

NOT MUCH CONVERSANT WITH D30

A7 in a quadrant from Lagna can make the native very wealthy and famous.

 

I AM NOT AWARE OF THIS REALLY. CAN YOU PLZ TELL WHERE YOU HAVE READ THIS?

 

Venus, Sun and Merc aspecting his 3rd should have bestowed him good faculty in

communication. Lord of 11th from AL is in 12th from Lagna. I think he should

have lost more money and wealth than what he was believed to have made.

 

IT MIGHT BE OTHERWISE. 11L FROM AL IN 2H OF AL MIGHT HAVE BEEN ONE OF THE

FACTORS IN GIVING HIM WEALTHRahu in the 12th from Asc should make him a God

fearing person.

 

THIS IS DEFENITELY NOT THERE. AS I UNDERSTAND..HE DIVORCED HIS LAST WIFE JUST

BECAUSE SHE USED TO BELEIVE IN GOD.I would like to be corrected if my

understanding of the chart is incorrect.Best wishesR. Kasthuri Rangan[Om Kleem

Krishnaaya Jagannathaaya namah]Send a blank mailTo :

-To :

Your use of is subject

to the

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...