Re[2]: KSY

[Guest guest]

Dear Jagmeet,

 

> KSY-KAL SARPA YOGA-ALL PLANETS BETWEEN KETU AND RAHU

 

> KAY-KAL AMRIT YOGA-ALL PLANETS BETWEEN RAHU AND KETU

 

Thank you very much for explanations. The only thing which I don't understand

is how do you define the difference between those two yogas: by the direction

of nodes motion ?

 

Valerie

[Guest guest]

Dear Valeri,

Please find a sample Rashi chart of KSY.Rahu is the leading planet.

 

Natal Chart

 

February 14, 1964Time: 4:28:00Time Zone: 5:30:00 (East

of GMT)Longitude: 75 E 47' 00"Latitude: 31 N 01' 00"Altitude: 0.00

meters

 

 

Rasi

+--------------+| \ / \

Mnd Glk / || \ Mer / \ HL / || \

/ \ / || \ / Ket \ /

||Mar \ / \ / ||Sun Moo x Asc

x ||Sat / \ / \ || /

\ / \ || / \ / \

|| / Ven \ 9 / \ || / \

/ \ || Jup x || \

/ \ / || \ AL / \

/ || \ / \ / || \ /

\ / || \ / \ / ||

x Rah x || / \ /

\ || / \ / \ || / \

/ \ || / \ / GL \ || /

\ / \

|+--------------+

 

 

EXAMPLE OF BROKEN KAY IS GIVEN BELOW.KETU IS LEADING

The following is an event chart and I had asked if KSY/KAY apply to event

charts.Gurudeva was kind to have answered with the followin reply,"Donate a bag

of rice on Monday for langar(community kitchen)."

In light of his above reply I understand that KSY/KAY apply to event charts also.

Natal Chart

 

September 26, 1982Time: 11:45:41Time Zone: 5:30:00

(East of GMT)Longitude: 76 E 40' 00"Latitude: 30 N 42' 00"

 

 

Rasi

+--------------+| \ Ket / \

/ || \ Moo / \ Jup / || \

/ \ / || \ / Mar \ /

||AL \ / \ / Sat ||Mnd Glk x Asc

x MerR Sun || / \ / \ || /

\ GL / \ || / \ / \

|| / \ 8 / \ || / \

/ \ || HL x Ven || \

/ \ / || \ / \

/ || \ / \ / || \ /

\ / || \ / \ / ||

x x || / \ /

\ || / \ / \ || / \

/ \ || / \ / Rah \ || /

\ / \

|+--------------+

I hope this has helped.

With regards,

Jagmeet

[Guest guest]

Namasthe,

 

I think the other way is correct.

 

KSY-KAL SARPA YOGA-ALL PLANETS BETWEEN RAHU AND

KETU

 

KAY-KAL AMRIT YOGA- ALL PLANETS BETWEEN KETU AND

RAHU

 

Guruji's correct me if I am wrong.

 

Saikumar

 

 

--- ÷ÁÌÅÒÉÑ ìÉ×ÉÎÁ <livina wrote:

> Dear Jagmeet,

>

> > KSY-KAL SARPA YOGA-ALL PLANETS BETWEEN KETU AND

> RAHU

>

> > KAY-KAL AMRIT YOGA-ALL PLANETS BETWEEN RAHU AND

> KETU

>

> Thank you very much for explanations. The only thing

> which I don't understand

> is how do you define the difference between those

> two yogas: by the direction

> of nodes motion ?

>

> Valerie

>

>

> ------------------------ Sponsor

>

>

>

> Your use of is subject to

>

>

>

 

 

 

 

Health - your guide to health and wellness

http://health.

[Guest guest]

Dear Dr Banerjee,

 

Thank you! Thats the first time I have been able to really understand this. What

a practical way of showing it.

 

Pranams

Robyn

 

-

Dr.D.Banerjee

sjvc

Friday, May 03, 2002 7:51 AM

Re: Re[2]: [sjvc] KSY

Hare Rama Krishna---------------------------Dear Valerie,Put your finger on

Ketu, then move it zodiacally upto Rahu in the rasichart; if all the planets

are situated between Ketu and Rahu , thenKalasarpa yoga is formed.Put your

finger on Rahu, then move it zodiacally upto Ketu in the rasichart; if all the

planets are situated between Rahu and ketu, then Kalaamrita yoga is

formed.RegardsDilip Banerjee.-"÷ÁÌÅÒÉÑ ìÉ×ÉÎÁ"

<livina (AT) mail (DOT) ru><sjvc>Thursday, May 02, 2002 9:50

AMRe[2]: [sjvc] KSY> Dear Jagmeet,>> > KSY-KAL SARPA YOGA-ALL PLANETS

BETWEEN KETU AND RAHU>> > KAY-KAL AMRIT YOGA-ALL PLANETS BETWEEN RAHU AND

KETU>> Thank you very much for explanations. The only thing which I

don'tunderstand> is how do you define the difference between those two yogas:

by thedirection> of nodes motion ?>> Valerie>>>>>> Your use of is

subject to >>------------------------

Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->Buy Stock for $4and no minimums.FREE

Money

2002.http://us.click./orkH0C/n97DAA/Ey.GAA/XUWolB/TM---~->

Your use of is subject to

[Guest guest]

Dear Dilipji,

 

Let us say that there are no planets between Rahu and Ketu but there is

Lagna/Ascendant sign. Can Lagna then be treated as a planet? In such a case

will the KSY or KAY be nullified or its effects minimised?

 

regards,

vishwa.

 

 

>"Dr.D.Banerjee" <drdilip

>sjvc

><sjvc>

>Re: Re[2]: [sjvc] KSY

>Thu, 2 May 2002 22:51:33 -0700

>

>Hare Rama Krishna

>---------------------------

>Dear Valerie,

>

>Put your finger on Ketu, then move it zodiacally upto Rahu in the rasi

>chart; if all the planets are situated between Ketu and Rahu , then

>Kalasarpa yoga is formed.

>

>Put your finger on Rahu, then move it zodiacally upto Ketu in the rasi

>chart; if all the planets are situated between Rahu and ketu, then Kala

>amrita yoga is formed.

>

>Regards

>Dilip Banerjee.

>-

>"÷ÁÌÅÒÉÑ ìÉ×ÉÎÁ" <livina

><sjvc>

>Thursday, May 02, 2002 9:50 AM

>Re[2]: [sjvc] KSY

>

>

> > Dear Jagmeet,

> >

> > > KSY-KAL SARPA YOGA-ALL PLANETS BETWEEN KETU AND RAHU

> >

> > > KAY-KAL AMRIT YOGA-ALL PLANETS BETWEEN RAHU AND KETU

> >

> > Thank you very much for explanations. The only thing which I don't

>understand

> > is how do you define the difference between those two yogas: by the

>direction

> > of nodes motion ?

> >

> > Valerie

> >

 

 

_______________

Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com

[Guest guest]

Hare Rama Krishna

---------------------------

Dear Valerie,

 

Put your finger on Ketu, then move it zodiacally upto Rahu in the rasi

chart; if all the planets are situated between Ketu and Rahu , then

Kalasarpa yoga is formed.

 

Put your finger on Rahu, then move it zodiacally upto Ketu in the rasi

chart; if all the planets are situated between Rahu and ketu, then Kala

amrita yoga is formed.

 

Regards

Dilip Banerjee.

-

"÷ÁÌÅÒÉÑ ìÉ×ÉÎÁ" <livina

<sjvc>

Thursday, May 02, 2002 9:50 AM

Re[2]: [sjvc] KSY

 

 

> Dear Jagmeet,

>

> > KSY-KAL SARPA YOGA-ALL PLANETS BETWEEN KETU AND RAHU

>

> > KAY-KAL AMRIT YOGA-ALL PLANETS BETWEEN RAHU AND KETU

>

> Thank you very much for explanations. The only thing which I don't

understand

> is how do you define the difference between those two yogas: by the

direction

> of nodes motion ?

>

> Valerie

>

>

>

>

>

> Your use of is subject to

>

>

[Guest guest]

Hare Rama Krishna

----------------------

Namaste Robyn

 

This is one of the marvelous teachings of our Gurudev Pt. Sanjayji.

 

All glory to him

 

Regards

Dr. Banerjee

 

-

resimpson

sjvc

Thursday, May 02, 2002 10:58 AM

Re: Re[2]: [sjvc] KSY

Dear Dr Banerjee,

 

Thank you! Thats the first time I have been able to really understand this. What

a practical way of showing it.

 

Pranams

Robyn

 

-

Dr.D.Banerjee

sjvc

Friday, May 03, 2002 7:51 AM

Re: Re[2]: [sjvc] KSY

Hare Rama Krishna---------------------------Dear Valerie,Put your finger on

Ketu, then move it zodiacally upto Rahu in the rasichart; if all the planets

are situated between Ketu and Rahu , thenKalasarpa yoga is formed.Put your

finger on Rahu, then move it zodiacally upto Ketu in the rasichart; if all the

planets are situated between Rahu and ketu, then Kalaamrita yoga is

formed.RegardsDilip Banerjee.-"÷ÁÌÅÒÉÑ ìÉ×ÉÎÁ"

<livina (AT) mail (DOT) ru><sjvc>Thursday, May 02, 2002 9:50

AMRe[2]: [sjvc] KSY> Dear Jagmeet,>> > KSY-KAL SARPA YOGA-ALL PLANETS

BETWEEN KETU AND RAHU>> > KAY-KAL AMRIT YOGA-ALL PLANETS BETWEEN RAHU AND

KETU>> Thank you very much for explanations. The only thing which I

don'tunderstand> is how do you define the difference between those two yogas:

by thedirection> of nodes motion ?>> Valerie>>>>>> Your use of is

subject to >>------------------------

Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->Buy Stock for $4and no minimums.FREE

Money

2002.http://us.click./orkH0C/n97DAA/Ey.GAA/XUWolB/TM---~->

Your use of is subject to Your

use of is subject to the

[Guest guest]

Hare Rama Krishna

----------------------

Namaste Vishwaji

 

No, ascendand is not treated here as planet. But if there is a benefic

placed in the ascendant in the chart with KSY/KAY, the yoga breaks

 

Regards

Dilip Banerjee..

 

 

-

"Vishwa Krishnamurthy" <vishwakasi

<sjvc>

Thursday, May 02, 2002 1:54 PM

Re: Re[2]: [sjvc] KSY

 

 

> Dear Dilipji,

>

> Let us say that there are no planets between Rahu and Ketu but there is

> Lagna/Ascendant sign. Can Lagna then be treated as a planet? In such a

case

> will the KSY or KAY be nullified or its effects minimised?

>

> regards,

> vishwa.

>

>

> >"Dr.D.Banerjee" <drdilip

> >sjvc

> ><sjvc>

> >Re: Re[2]: [sjvc] KSY

> >Thu, 2 May 2002 22:51:33 -0700

> >

> >Hare Rama Krishna

> >---------------------------

> >Dear Valerie,

> >

> >Put your finger on Ketu, then move it zodiacally upto Rahu in the rasi

> >chart; if all the planets are situated between Ketu and Rahu , then

> >Kalasarpa yoga is formed.

> >

> >Put your finger on Rahu, then move it zodiacally upto Ketu in the rasi

> >chart; if all the planets are situated between Rahu and ketu, then Kala

> >amrita yoga is formed.

> >

> >Regards

> >Dilip Banerjee.

> >-

> >"÷ÁÌÅÒÉÑ ìÉ×ÉÎÁ" <livina

> ><sjvc>

> >Thursday, May 02, 2002 9:50 AM

> >Re[2]: [sjvc] KSY

> >

> >

> > > Dear Jagmeet,

> > >

> > > > KSY-KAL SARPA YOGA-ALL PLANETS BETWEEN KETU AND RAHU

> > >

> > > > KAY-KAL AMRIT YOGA-ALL PLANETS BETWEEN RAHU AND KETU

> > >

> > > Thank you very much for explanations. The only thing which I don't

> >understand

> > > is how do you define the difference between those two yogas: by the

> >direction

> > > of nodes motion ?

> > >

> > > Valerie

> > >

>

>

> _______________

> Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com

>

>

>

>

>

> Your use of is subject to

>

>