Badhakesh in Dustana (was Natural vs functional)

[Guest guest]

Dear Sanjay and List,

Is it good to have badhakesh in Dustana, as you mentioned it is good

in 12th house?

 

Best Regards,

Venkateswara Reddy

> Om Gurave Namah

> Dear Nimmi,

> A slight viewpoint there at Jupiter. In fact the best placement for

> Mercurial ascendants is Jupiter in the twelfth house, perhaps

better than

> the Mahapurusha Yoga in seventh or tenth house also. I have always

betted

> blindly on such a placement of Jupiter to give best results. Cases:

My

> mother Virgo with Jup in 12; Narasimha Rao (ex PM of India) same

Virgo with

> Jup in 12; Sarat Gemini with Jup in 12 and so many more. reason-Best

> placement for Badhakesh is the 12th house..

> Regards

> Sanjay

> -

> "Nimmi Ragavan" <106350.3660@c...>

> <sjvc>

> Tuesday, January 22, 2002 12:09 AM

> Re: [sjvc] Re: Natural vs functional

>

>

> Hi Zeljka,

>

> I must agree with you. I also have mithuna lagna and Guru is in the

12th

> house. My AK is also Mangal and it too is in the 12th.

>

> In Mangal dasa (at birth) I had a twisted foot, that required

surgery to

> correct and apparently there was some danger of gangrene(aspect of

rahu on

> 12th from 8th?) - the reason for it affecting the body may be the

close

> conjunction between Mangal in the last degree of the 12th and

mercury in the

> 1st degree of the 1st house. However, the foot healed perfectly (I

suspect

> due to the presence of Jupiter in the 12th and the exchange between

mangal

> and 12th ruler venus in the 11th).

>

> Jupiter dasa was pretty good for me too, brought me marriage and

gave me a

> number of opportunities, mainly to do with education and a career

(10th lord

> in 12th, in main and sub of Jupiter). And Jupiter is not that well

placed in

> my chart. It did bring about a divorce as well and some health

problems(7th

> ruler in 12th and sub period of 12th ruler venus).

>

> Best wishes,

>

> Nimmi Ragavan

>

> -

> <zzeljka@n...>

> <sjvc>

> Monday, January 21, 2002 9:05 AM

> [sjvc] Re: Natural vs functional

>

>

> >

> > Namaste

> > Dear Solai,

> >

> > With regards to natural and functional nature of grahas, i have

some

> questions

> > in my mind.

> >

> > I'm Mithuna lagna, therefore Guru is a functional malefic. Since

he is 2nd

> bhava,

> > there is no neecha on Kendrahipastya Dosha. I'm currently running

Gu

> mahadasha

> > (Gu-Sa), but since i've entered Gu mahadasha, nothing malefic

happened to

> me

> > (yet), on the contrary: my activity in spirituality enhanced

enormously -

> i've

> > started to study jyotish, to meditate, to do my Sadhana

regularly - i met

> my

> > partner (future husband) who is also very spiritual, my material

status

> also

> > improved a great deal, i got a house i'm currently living in. The

> situation

> > in my company is not very great, but i don't work extremely hard,

nor do i

> have

> > an extremely bad salary - i do very well with my collegues and

associates

> at

> > work. Do Guru's great avasthas nullify its functional malevolence

(uccha

> in

> > 5 vargas) or is there something else i don't see? I notice much

more

> suffering

> > during Budh bhuktis, and Budh is lagnesh and vargottama.

> >

> > Second thing: my AK is Mangal. Being a natural malefic, he lords

6th and

> 11th

> > bhava, so he becomes the first grade malefic. Plus he is

retrograde in the

> 4th

> > bhava. During Mangal mahadasha i excelled in school and in sports

and in

> music

> > - practically in everything i did at that time. It is true that

at the

> beginning

> > of Mangal mahadasha my parents divorced (Mangal being in the 4th

bhava),

> but

> > i cannot recollect any bigger evil during that time. I have

always been

> physically

> > healthy, i've never had any bigger injury or accident. Why is

that? I

> wandered

> > whether it is because of Chandra - being in dik bala in 4th bhava

and

> being

> > Mangal's nakshatra dispositor and Guru's bhava dispositor - or

because of

> the

> > 4th lord Budh being lagnesh (yet in 12th bhava)? Thanks very much

for the

> reply.

> >

> >

> > My birth data:

> > May 20th 1967, 6:15 am, Cakovec, Croatia (no summer time)

> > TZ +1, 46N23, 16E26

> > Lagna 6:15:25 Mithuna

> >

> > Jai Guru Dev

> > zeljka

> >

> > --

> > Besplatni e-mail - http://webmail.iskon.hr/

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Your use of is subject to

 

> >

> >

>

>

>

>

> Your use of is subject to

 

>

>

>

> _______

>

> Get your free @ address at

[Guest guest]

om gurave namah

------------------------

Dear Venkateswara,

Let us start listing the remedies we have to do for different house

placement sof the Badhakesh and only in the 12th house is it mentioned that

no remedy is required. Thus, this is the best placement by itself. If

Jupiter is alone, all the more better.

With best wishes

Sanjay Rath

http://sanjayrath.tripod.com

-

"venkateshwara_reddy" <venkateshwara_reddy

<sjvc>

Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:35 PM

[sjvc] Badhakesh in Dustana (was Re: Natural vs functional)

 

 

Dear Sanjay and List,

Is it good to have badhakesh in Dustana, as you mentioned it is good

in 12th house?

 

Best Regards,

Venkateswara Reddy

> Om Gurave Namah

> Dear Nimmi,

> A slight viewpoint there at Jupiter. In fact the best placement for

> Mercurial ascendants is Jupiter in the twelfth house, perhaps

better than

> the Mahapurusha Yoga in seventh or tenth house also. I have always

betted

> blindly on such a placement of Jupiter to give best results. Cases:

My

> mother Virgo with Jup in 12; Narasimha Rao (ex PM of India) same

Virgo with

> Jup in 12; Sarat Gemini with Jup in 12 and so many more. reason-Best

> placement for Badhakesh is the 12th house..

> Regards

> Sanjay

> -

> "Nimmi Ragavan" <106350.3660@c...>

> <sjvc>

> Tuesday, January 22, 2002 12:09 AM

> Re: [sjvc] Re: Natural vs functional

>

>

> Hi Zeljka,

>

> I must agree with you. I also have mithuna lagna and Guru is in the

12th

> house. My AK is also Mangal and it too is in the 12th.

>

> In Mangal dasa (at birth) I had a twisted foot, that required

surgery to

> correct and apparently there was some danger of gangrene(aspect of

rahu on

> 12th from 8th?) - the reason for it affecting the body may be the

close

> conjunction between Mangal in the last degree of the 12th and

mercury in the

> 1st degree of the 1st house. However, the foot healed perfectly (I

suspect

> due to the presence of Jupiter in the 12th and the exchange between

mangal

> and 12th ruler venus in the 11th).

>

> Jupiter dasa was pretty good for me too, brought me marriage and

gave me a

> number of opportunities, mainly to do with education and a career

(10th lord

> in 12th, in main and sub of Jupiter). And Jupiter is not that well

placed in

> my chart. It did bring about a divorce as well and some health

problems(7th

> ruler in 12th and sub period of 12th ruler venus).

>

> Best wishes,

>

> Nimmi Ragavan

>

> -

> <zzeljka@n...>

> <sjvc>

> Monday, January 21, 2002 9:05 AM

> [sjvc] Re: Natural vs functional

>

>

> >

> > Namaste

> > Dear Solai,

> >

> > With regards to natural and functional nature of grahas, i have

some

> questions

> > in my mind.

> >

> > I'm Mithuna lagna, therefore Guru is a functional malefic. Since

he is 2nd

> bhava,

> > there is no neecha on Kendrahipastya Dosha. I'm currently running

Gu

> mahadasha

> > (Gu-Sa), but since i've entered Gu mahadasha, nothing malefic

happened to

> me

> > (yet), on the contrary: my activity in spirituality enhanced

enormously -

> i've

> > started to study jyotish, to meditate, to do my Sadhana

regularly - i met

> my

> > partner (future husband) who is also very spiritual, my material

status

> also

> > improved a great deal, i got a house i'm currently living in. The

> situation

> > in my company is not very great, but i don't work extremely hard,

nor do i

> have

> > an extremely bad salary - i do very well with my collegues and

associates

> at

> > work. Do Guru's great avasthas nullify its functional malevolence

(uccha

> in

> > 5 vargas) or is there something else i don't see? I notice much

more

> suffering

> > during Budh bhuktis, and Budh is lagnesh and vargottama.

> >

> > Second thing: my AK is Mangal. Being a natural malefic, he lords

6th and

> 11th

> > bhava, so he becomes the first grade malefic. Plus he is

retrograde in the

> 4th

> > bhava. During Mangal mahadasha i excelled in school and in sports

and in

> music

> > - practically in everything i did at that time. It is true that

at the

> beginning

> > of Mangal mahadasha my parents divorced (Mangal being in the 4th

bhava),

> but

> > i cannot recollect any bigger evil during that time. I have

always been

> physically

> > healthy, i've never had any bigger injury or accident. Why is

that? I

> wandered

> > whether it is because of Chandra - being in dik bala in 4th bhava

and

> being

> > Mangal's nakshatra dispositor and Guru's bhava dispositor - or

because of

> the

> > 4th lord Budh being lagnesh (yet in 12th bhava)? Thanks very much

for the

> reply.

> >

> >

> > My birth data:

> > May 20th 1967, 6:15 am, Cakovec, Croatia (no summer time)

> > TZ +1, 46N23, 16E26

> > Lagna 6:15:25 Mithuna

> >

> > Jai Guru Dev

> > zeljka

> >

> > --

> > Besplatni e-mail - http://webmail.iskon.hr/

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Your use of is subject to

 

> >

> >

>

>

>

>

> Your use of is subject to

 

>

>

>

> _______

>

> Get your free @ address at

 

 

 

 

 

Your use of is subject to

 

 

 

_______

 

Get your free @ address at

[Guest guest]

Dear Sanjay,

My Mercury is in 4rth in Pises along with exalted Venus and Ketu and

aspected by Jupiter from 12th house.

Will it require any remedy?I am in Mercury dasha.

Thanking you sincerely

Sudhir Bhusari.

 

-

"Sanjay Rath" <sanjayrath

<sjvc>

Friday, January 25, 2002 4:42 PM

Re: [sjvc] Badhakesh in Dustana (was Re: Natural vs functional)

 

 

> om gurave namah

> ------------------------

> Dear Venkateswara,

> Let us start listing the remedies we have to do for different house

> placement sof the Badhakesh and only in the 12th house is it mentioned

that

> no remedy is required. Thus, this is the best placement by itself. If

> Jupiter is alone, all the more better.

> With best wishes

> Sanjay Rath

> http://sanjayrath.tripod.com

> -

> "venkateshwara_reddy" <venkateshwara_reddy

> <sjvc>

> Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:35 PM

> [sjvc] Badhakesh in Dustana (was Re: Natural vs functional)

>

>

> Dear Sanjay and List,

> Is it good to have badhakesh in Dustana, as you mentioned it is good

> in 12th house?

>

> Best Regards,

> Venkateswara Reddy

> > Om Gurave Namah

> > Dear Nimmi,

> > A slight viewpoint there at Jupiter. In fact the best placement for

> > Mercurial ascendants is Jupiter in the twelfth house, perhaps

> better than

> > the Mahapurusha Yoga in seventh or tenth house also. I have always

> betted

> > blindly on such a placement of Jupiter to give best results. Cases:

> My

> > mother Virgo with Jup in 12; Narasimha Rao (ex PM of India) same

> Virgo with

> > Jup in 12; Sarat Gemini with Jup in 12 and so many more. reason-Best

> > placement for Badhakesh is the 12th house..

> > Regards

> > Sanjay

> > -

> > "Nimmi Ragavan" <106350.3660@c...>

> > <sjvc>

> > Tuesday, January 22, 2002 12:09 AM

> > Re: [sjvc] Re: Natural vs functional

> >

> >

> > Hi Zeljka,

> >

> > I must agree with you. I also have mithuna lagna and Guru is in the

> 12th

> > house. My AK is also Mangal and it too is in the 12th.

> >

> > In Mangal dasa (at birth) I had a twisted foot, that required

> surgery to

> > correct and apparently there was some danger of gangrene(aspect of

> rahu on

> > 12th from 8th?) - the reason for it affecting the body may be the

> close

> > conjunction between Mangal in the last degree of the 12th and

> mercury in the

> > 1st degree of the 1st house. However, the foot healed perfectly (I

> suspect

> > due to the presence of Jupiter in the 12th and the exchange between

> mangal

> > and 12th ruler venus in the 11th).

> >

> > Jupiter dasa was pretty good for me too, brought me marriage and

> gave me a

> > number of opportunities, mainly to do with education and a career

> (10th lord

> > in 12th, in main and sub of Jupiter). And Jupiter is not that well

> placed in

> > my chart. It did bring about a divorce as well and some health

> problems(7th

> > ruler in 12th and sub period of 12th ruler venus).

> >

> > Best wishes,

> >

> > Nimmi Ragavan

> >

> > -

> > <zzeljka@n...>

> > <sjvc>

> > Monday, January 21, 2002 9:05 AM

> > [sjvc] Re: Natural vs functional

> >

> >

> > >

> > > Namaste

> > > Dear Solai,

> > >

> > > With regards to natural and functional nature of grahas, i have

> some

> > questions

> > > in my mind.

> > >

> > > I'm Mithuna lagna, therefore Guru is a functional malefic. Since

> he is 2nd

> > bhava,

> > > there is no neecha on Kendrahipastya Dosha. I'm currently running

> Gu

> > mahadasha

> > > (Gu-Sa), but since i've entered Gu mahadasha, nothing malefic

> happened to

> > me

> > > (yet), on the contrary: my activity in spirituality enhanced

> enormously -

> > i've

> > > started to study jyotish, to meditate, to do my Sadhana

> regularly - i met

> > my

> > > partner (future husband) who is also very spiritual, my material

> status

> > also

> > > improved a great deal, i got a house i'm currently living in. The

> > situation

> > > in my company is not very great, but i don't work extremely hard,

> nor do i

> > have

> > > an extremely bad salary - i do very well with my collegues and

> associates

> > at

> > > work. Do Guru's great avasthas nullify its functional malevolence

> (uccha

> > in

> > > 5 vargas) or is there something else i don't see? I notice much

> more

> > suffering

> > > during Budh bhuktis, and Budh is lagnesh and vargottama.

> > >

> > > Second thing: my AK is Mangal. Being a natural malefic, he lords

> 6th and

> > 11th

> > > bhava, so he becomes the first grade malefic. Plus he is

> retrograde in the

> > 4th

> > > bhava. During Mangal mahadasha i excelled in school and in sports

> and in

> > music

> > > - practically in everything i did at that time. It is true that

> at the

> > beginning

> > > of Mangal mahadasha my parents divorced (Mangal being in the 4th

> bhava),

> > but

> > > i cannot recollect any bigger evil during that time. I have

> always been

> > physically

> > > healthy, i've never had any bigger injury or accident. Why is

> that? I

> > wandered

> > > whether it is because of Chandra - being in dik bala in 4th bhava

> and

> > being

> > > Mangal's nakshatra dispositor and Guru's bhava dispositor - or

> because of

> > the

> > > 4th lord Budh being lagnesh (yet in 12th bhava)? Thanks very much

> for the

> > reply.

> > >

> > >

> > > My birth data:

> > > May 20th 1967, 6:15 am, Cakovec, Croatia (no summer time)

> > > TZ +1, 46N23, 16E26

> > > Lagna 6:15:25 Mithuna

> > >

> > > Jai Guru Dev

> > > zeljka

> > >

> > > --

> > > Besplatni e-mail - http://webmail.iskon.hr/

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Your use of is subject to

>

> > >

> > >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Your use of is subject to

>

> >

> >

> >

> > _______

> >

> > Get your free @ address at

>

>

>

>

>

> Your use of is subject to

>

>

>

> _______

>

> Get your free @ address at

>

>

>

>

>

> Your use of is subject to

>

>

>

Attachment: (application/octet-stream) sudhirbhusari.jhd [not stored]

[Guest guest]

Dear Sanjay,

My badhakesh is Mercury which is in 4rth house in Pises along with exaltet

Venus and Ketu and aspected by Jupitor from 12th house.Will it require any

remedy?

I am reading your answers and mail regularly.

 

-

"Sanjay Rath" <sanjayrath

<sjvc>

Friday, January 25, 2002 4:42 PM

Re: [sjvc] Badhakesh in Dustana (was Re: Natural vs functional)

 

 

> om gurave namah

> ------------------------

> Dear Venkateswara,

> Let us start listing the remedies we have to do for different house

> placement sof the Badhakesh and only in the 12th house is it mentioned

that

> no remedy is required. Thus, this is the best placement by itself. If

> Jupiter is alone, all the more better.

> With best wishes

> Sanjay Rath

> http://sanjayrath.tripod.com

> -

> "venkateshwara_reddy" <venkateshwara_reddy

> <sjvc>

> Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:35 PM

> [sjvc] Badhakesh in Dustana (was Re: Natural vs functional)

>

>

> Dear Sanjay and List,

> Is it good to have badhakesh in Dustana, as you mentioned it is good

> in 12th house?

>

> Best Regards,

> Venkateswara Reddy

> > Om Gurave Namah

> > Dear Nimmi,

> > A slight viewpoint there at Jupiter. In fact the best placement for

> > Mercurial ascendants is Jupiter in the twelfth house, perhaps

> better than

> > the Mahapurusha Yoga in seventh or tenth house also. I have always

> betted

> > blindly on such a placement of Jupiter to give best results. Cases:

> My

> > mother Virgo with Jup in 12; Narasimha Rao (ex PM of India) same

> Virgo with

> > Jup in 12; Sarat Gemini with Jup in 12 and so many more. reason-Best

> > placement for Badhakesh is the 12th house..

> > Regards

> > Sanjay

> > -

> > "Nimmi Ragavan" <106350.3660@c...>

> > <sjvc>

> > Tuesday, January 22, 2002 12:09 AM

> > Re: [sjvc] Re: Natural vs functional

> >

> >

> > Hi Zeljka,

> >

> > I must agree with you. I also have mithuna lagna and Guru is in the

> 12th

> > house. My AK is also Mangal and it too is in the 12th.

> >

> > In Mangal dasa (at birth) I had a twisted foot, that required

> surgery to

> > correct and apparently there was some danger of gangrene(aspect of

> rahu on

> > 12th from 8th?) - the reason for it affecting the body may be the

> close

> > conjunction between Mangal in the last degree of the 12th and

> mercury in the

> > 1st degree of the 1st house. However, the foot healed perfectly (I

> suspect

> > due to the presence of Jupiter in the 12th and the exchange between

> mangal

> > and 12th ruler venus in the 11th).

> >

> > Jupiter dasa was pretty good for me too, brought me marriage and

> gave me a

> > number of opportunities, mainly to do with education and a career

> (10th lord

> > in 12th, in main and sub of Jupiter). And Jupiter is not that well

> placed in

> > my chart. It did bring about a divorce as well and some health

> problems(7th

> > ruler in 12th and sub period of 12th ruler venus).

> >

> > Best wishes,

> >

> > Nimmi Ragavan

> >

> > -

> > <zzeljka@n...>

> > <sjvc>

> > Monday, January 21, 2002 9:05 AM

> > [sjvc] Re: Natural vs functional

> >

> >

> > >

> > > Namaste

> > > Dear Solai,

> > >

> > > With regards to natural and functional nature of grahas, i have

> some

> > questions

> > > in my mind.

> > >

> > > I'm Mithuna lagna, therefore Guru is a functional malefic. Since

> he is 2nd

> > bhava,

> > > there is no neecha on Kendrahipastya Dosha. I'm currently running

> Gu

> > mahadasha

> > > (Gu-Sa), but since i've entered Gu mahadasha, nothing malefic

> happened to

> > me

> > > (yet), on the contrary: my activity in spirituality enhanced

> enormously -

> > i've

> > > started to study jyotish, to meditate, to do my Sadhana

> regularly - i met

> > my

> > > partner (future husband) who is also very spiritual, my material

> status

> > also

> > > improved a great deal, i got a house i'm currently living in. The

> > situation

> > > in my company is not very great, but i don't work extremely hard,

> nor do i

> > have

> > > an extremely bad salary - i do very well with my collegues and

> associates

> > at

> > > work. Do Guru's great avasthas nullify its functional malevolence

> (uccha

> > in

> > > 5 vargas) or is there something else i don't see? I notice much

> more

> > suffering

> > > during Budh bhuktis, and Budh is lagnesh and vargottama.

> > >

> > > Second thing: my AK is Mangal. Being a natural malefic, he lords

> 6th and

> > 11th

> > > bhava, so he becomes the first grade malefic. Plus he is

> retrograde in the

> > 4th

> > > bhava. During Mangal mahadasha i excelled in school and in sports

> and in

> > music

> > > - practically in everything i did at that time. It is true that

> at the

> > beginning

> > > of Mangal mahadasha my parents divorced (Mangal being in the 4th

> bhava),

> > but

> > > i cannot recollect any bigger evil during that time. I have

> always been

> > physically

> > > healthy, i've never had any bigger injury or accident. Why is

> that? I

> > wandered

> > > whether it is because of Chandra - being in dik bala in 4th bhava

> and

> > being

> > > Mangal's nakshatra dispositor and Guru's bhava dispositor - or

> because of

> > the

> > > 4th lord Budh being lagnesh (yet in 12th bhava)? Thanks very much

> for the

> > reply.

> > >

> > >

> > > My birth data:

> > > May 20th 1967, 6:15 am, Cakovec, Croatia (no summer time)

> > > TZ +1, 46N23, 16E26

> > > Lagna 6:15:25 Mithuna

> > >

> > > Jai Guru Dev

> > > zeljka

> > >

> > > --

> > > Besplatni e-mail - http://webmail.iskon.hr/

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Your use of is subject to

>

> > >

> > >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Your use of is subject to

>

> >

> >

> >

> > _______

> >

> > Get your free @ address at

>

>

>

>

>

> Your use of is subject to

>

>

>

> _______

>

> Get your free @ address at

>

>

>

>

>

> Your use of is subject to

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

om gurave namah

------------------------

Dear Sudhir,

Yes, very much as the badhak is debilitated. Check the Navamsa position and

see which sign it is in. From such signs the obstruction will come.

With best wishes

Sanjay Rath

http://sanjayrath.tripod.com

-

"sudhir" <sudhir

<sjvc>

Saturday, January 26, 2002 9:19 PM

Re: [sjvc] Badhakesh in Dustana (was Re: Natural vs functional)

 

 

Dear Sanjay,

My badhakesh is Mercury which is in 4rth house in Pises along with exaltet

Venus and Ketu and aspected by Jupitor from 12th house.Will it require any

remedy?

I am reading your answers and mail regularly.

 

-

"Sanjay Rath" <sanjayrath

<sjvc>

Friday, January 25, 2002 4:42 PM

Re: [sjvc] Badhakesh in Dustana (was Re: Natural vs functional)

 

 

> om gurave namah

> ------------------------

> Dear Venkateswara,

> Let us start listing the remedies we have to do for different house

> placement sof the Badhakesh and only in the 12th house is it mentioned

that

> no remedy is required. Thus, this is the best placement by itself. If

> Jupiter is alone, all the more better.

> With best wishes

> Sanjay Rath

> http://sanjayrath.tripod.com

> -

> "venkateshwara_reddy" <venkateshwara_reddy

> <sjvc>

> Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:35 PM

> [sjvc] Badhakesh in Dustana (was Re: Natural vs functional)

>

>

> Dear Sanjay and List,

> Is it good to have badhakesh in Dustana, as you mentioned it is good

> in 12th house?

>

> Best Regards,

> Venkateswara Reddy

> > Om Gurave Namah

> > Dear Nimmi,

> > A slight viewpoint there at Jupiter. In fact the best placement for

> > Mercurial ascendants is Jupiter in the twelfth house, perhaps

> better than

> > the Mahapurusha Yoga in seventh or tenth house also. I have always

> betted

> > blindly on such a placement of Jupiter to give best results. Cases:

> My

> > mother Virgo with Jup in 12; Narasimha Rao (ex PM of India) same

> Virgo with

> > Jup in 12; Sarat Gemini with Jup in 12 and so many more. reason-Best

> > placement for Badhakesh is the 12th house..

> > Regards

> > Sanjay

> > -

> > "Nimmi Ragavan" <106350.3660@c...>

> > <sjvc>

> > Tuesday, January 22, 2002 12:09 AM

> > Re: [sjvc] Re: Natural vs functional

> >

> >

> > Hi Zeljka,

> >

> > I must agree with you. I also have mithuna lagna and Guru is in the

> 12th

> > house. My AK is also Mangal and it too is in the 12th.

> >

> > In Mangal dasa (at birth) I had a twisted foot, that required

> surgery to

> > correct and apparently there was some danger of gangrene(aspect of

> rahu on

> > 12th from 8th?) - the reason for it affecting the body may be the

> close

> > conjunction between Mangal in the last degree of the 12th and

> mercury in the

> > 1st degree of the 1st house. However, the foot healed perfectly (I

> suspect

> > due to the presence of Jupiter in the 12th and the exchange between

> mangal

> > and 12th ruler venus in the 11th).

> >

> > Jupiter dasa was pretty good for me too, brought me marriage and

> gave me a

> > number of opportunities, mainly to do with education and a career

> (10th lord

> > in 12th, in main and sub of Jupiter). And Jupiter is not that well

> placed in

> > my chart. It did bring about a divorce as well and some health

> problems(7th

> > ruler in 12th and sub period of 12th ruler venus).

> >

> > Best wishes,

> >

> > Nimmi Ragavan

> >

> > -

> > <zzeljka@n...>

> > <sjvc>

> > Monday, January 21, 2002 9:05 AM

> > [sjvc] Re: Natural vs functional

> >

> >

> > >

> > > Namaste

> > > Dear Solai,

> > >

> > > With regards to natural and functional nature of grahas, i have

> some

> > questions

> > > in my mind.

> > >

> > > I'm Mithuna lagna, therefore Guru is a functional malefic. Since

> he is 2nd

> > bhava,

> > > there is no neecha on Kendrahipastya Dosha. I'm currently running

> Gu

> > mahadasha

> > > (Gu-Sa), but since i've entered Gu mahadasha, nothing malefic

> happened to

> > me

> > > (yet), on the contrary: my activity in spirituality enhanced

> enormously -

> > i've

> > > started to study jyotish, to meditate, to do my Sadhana

> regularly - i met

> > my

> > > partner (future husband) who is also very spiritual, my material

> status

> > also

> > > improved a great deal, i got a house i'm currently living in. The

> > situation

> > > in my company is not very great, but i don't work extremely hard,

> nor do i

> > have

> > > an extremely bad salary - i do very well with my collegues and

> associates

> > at

> > > work. Do Guru's great avasthas nullify its functional malevolence

> (uccha

> > in

> > > 5 vargas) or is there something else i don't see? I notice much

> more

> > suffering

> > > during Budh bhuktis, and Budh is lagnesh and vargottama.

> > >

> > > Second thing: my AK is Mangal. Being a natural malefic, he lords

> 6th and

> > 11th

> > > bhava, so he becomes the first grade malefic. Plus he is

> retrograde in the

> > 4th

> > > bhava. During Mangal mahadasha i excelled in school and in sports

> and in

> > music

> > > - practically in everything i did at that time. It is true that

> at the

> > beginning

> > > of Mangal mahadasha my parents divorced (Mangal being in the 4th

> bhava),

> > but

> > > i cannot recollect any bigger evil during that time. I have

> always been

> > physically

> > > healthy, i've never had any bigger injury or accident. Why is

> that? I

> > wandered

> > > whether it is because of Chandra - being in dik bala in 4th bhava

> and

> > being

> > > Mangal's nakshatra dispositor and Guru's bhava dispositor - or

> because of

> > the

> > > 4th lord Budh being lagnesh (yet in 12th bhava)? Thanks very much

> for the

> > reply.

> > >

> > >

> > > My birth data:

> > > May 20th 1967, 6:15 am, Cakovec, Croatia (no summer time)

> > > TZ +1, 46N23, 16E26

> > > Lagna 6:15:25 Mithuna

> > >

> > > Jai Guru Dev

> > > zeljka

> > >

> > > --

> > > Besplatni e-mail - http://webmail.iskon.hr/

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Your use of is subject to

>

> > >

> > >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Your use of is subject to

>

> >

> >

> >

> > _______

> >

> > Get your free @ address at

>

>

>

>

>

> Your use of is subject to

>

>

>

> _______

>

> Get your free @ address at

>

>

>

>

>

> Your use of is subject to

>

>

>

 

 

 

 

 

Your use of is subject to

 

 

 

_______

 

Get your free @ address at

[Guest guest]

Dear Sanjay,

Hari om,

My badhakesh is Mercury in 4rth house in Pises and in D9 chart it is in 7th

house in Libra and 6th krom AK-Sun.

Please Tell me the Remedy for this placement.

Unfortunately I can not send my chart but will try to sort out the problem.

rest is fine.

Sudhir

-

"Sanjay Rath" <sanjayrath

<sjvc>

Sunday, January 27, 2002 9:21 PM

Re: [sjvc] Badhakesh in Dustana (was Re: Natural vs functional)

 

 

>

> om gurave namah

> ------------------------

> Dear Sudhir,

> Yes, very much as the badhak is debilitated. Check the Navamsa position

and

> see which sign it is in. From such signs the obstruction will come.

> With best wishes

> Sanjay Rath

> http://sanjayrath.tripod.com

> -

> "sudhir" <sudhir

> <sjvc>

> Saturday, January 26, 2002 9:19 PM

> Re: [sjvc] Badhakesh in Dustana (was Re: Natural vs functional)

>

>

> Dear Sanjay,

> My badhakesh is Mercury which is in 4rth house in Pises along with exaltet

> Venus and Ketu and aspected by Jupitor from 12th house.Will it require any

> remedy?

> I am reading your answers and mail regularly.

>

> -

> "Sanjay Rath" <sanjayrath

> <sjvc>

> Friday, January 25, 2002 4:42 PM

> Re: [sjvc] Badhakesh in Dustana (was Re: Natural vs functional)

>

>

> > om gurave namah

> > ------------------------

> > Dear Venkateswara,

> > Let us start listing the remedies we have to do for different house

> > placement sof the Badhakesh and only in the 12th house is it mentioned

> that

> > no remedy is required. Thus, this is the best placement by itself. If

> > Jupiter is alone, all the more better.

> > With best wishes

> > Sanjay Rath

> > http://sanjayrath.tripod.com

> > -

> > "venkateshwara_reddy" <venkateshwara_reddy

> > <sjvc>

> > Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:35 PM

> > [sjvc] Badhakesh in Dustana (was Re: Natural vs functional)

> >

> >

> > Dear Sanjay and List,

> > Is it good to have badhakesh in Dustana, as you mentioned it is good

> > in 12th house?

> >

> > Best Regards,

> > Venkateswara Reddy

> > > Om Gurave Namah

> > > Dear Nimmi,

> > > A slight viewpoint there at Jupiter. In fact the best placement for

> > > Mercurial ascendants is Jupiter in the twelfth house, perhaps

> > better than

> > > the Mahapurusha Yoga in seventh or tenth house also. I have always

> > betted

> > > blindly on such a placement of Jupiter to give best results. Cases:

> > My

> > > mother Virgo with Jup in 12; Narasimha Rao (ex PM of India) same

> > Virgo with

> > > Jup in 12; Sarat Gemini with Jup in 12 and so many more. reason-Best

> > > placement for Badhakesh is the 12th house..

> > > Regards

> > > Sanjay

> > > -

> > > "Nimmi Ragavan" <106350.3660@c...>

> > > <sjvc>

> > > Tuesday, January 22, 2002 12:09 AM

> > > Re: [sjvc] Re: Natural vs functional

> > >

> > >

> > > Hi Zeljka,

> > >

> > > I must agree with you. I also have mithuna lagna and Guru is in the

> > 12th

> > > house. My AK is also Mangal and it too is in the 12th.

> > >

> > > In Mangal dasa (at birth) I had a twisted foot, that required

> > surgery to

> > > correct and apparently there was some danger of gangrene(aspect of

> > rahu on

> > > 12th from 8th?) - the reason for it affecting the body may be the

> > close

> > > conjunction between Mangal in the last degree of the 12th and

> > mercury in the

> > > 1st degree of the 1st house. However, the foot healed perfectly (I

> > suspect

> > > due to the presence of Jupiter in the 12th and the exchange between

> > mangal

> > > and 12th ruler venus in the 11th).

> > >

> > > Jupiter dasa was pretty good for me too, brought me marriage and

> > gave me a

> > > number of opportunities, mainly to do with education and a career

> > (10th lord

> > > in 12th, in main and sub of Jupiter). And Jupiter is not that well

> > placed in

> > > my chart. It did bring about a divorce as well and some health

> > problems(7th

> > > ruler in 12th and sub period of 12th ruler venus).

> > >

> > > Best wishes,

> > >

> > > Nimmi Ragavan

> > >

> > > -

> > > <zzeljka@n...>

> > > <sjvc>

> > > Monday, January 21, 2002 9:05 AM

> > > [sjvc] Re: Natural vs functional

> > >

> > >

> > > >

> > > > Namaste

> > > > Dear Solai,

> > > >

> > > > With regards to natural and functional nature of grahas, i have

> > some

> > > questions

> > > > in my mind.

> > > >

> > > > I'm Mithuna lagna, therefore Guru is a functional malefic. Since

> > he is 2nd

> > > bhava,

> > > > there is no neecha on Kendrahipastya Dosha. I'm currently running

> > Gu

> > > mahadasha

> > > > (Gu-Sa), but since i've entered Gu mahadasha, nothing malefic

> > happened to

> > > me

> > > > (yet), on the contrary: my activity in spirituality enhanced

> > enormously -

> > > i've

> > > > started to study jyotish, to meditate, to do my Sadhana

> > regularly - i met

> > > my

> > > > partner (future husband) who is also very spiritual, my material

> > status

> > > also

> > > > improved a great deal, i got a house i'm currently living in. The

> > > situation

> > > > in my company is not very great, but i don't work extremely hard,

> > nor do i

> > > have

> > > > an extremely bad salary - i do very well with my collegues and

> > associates

> > > at

> > > > work. Do Guru's great avasthas nullify its functional malevolence

> > (uccha

> > > in

> > > > 5 vargas) or is there something else i don't see? I notice much

> > more

> > > suffering

> > > > during Budh bhuktis, and Budh is lagnesh and vargottama.

> > > >

> > > > Second thing: my AK is Mangal. Being a natural malefic, he lords

> > 6th and

> > > 11th

> > > > bhava, so he becomes the first grade malefic. Plus he is

> > retrograde in the

> > > 4th

> > > > bhava. During Mangal mahadasha i excelled in school and in sports

> > and in

> > > music

> > > > - practically in everything i did at that time. It is true that

> > at the

> > > beginning

> > > > of Mangal mahadasha my parents divorced (Mangal being in the 4th

> > bhava),

> > > but

> > > > i cannot recollect any bigger evil during that time. I have

> > always been

> > > physically

> > > > healthy, i've never had any bigger injury or accident. Why is

> > that? I

> > > wandered

> > > > whether it is because of Chandra - being in dik bala in 4th bhava

> > and

> > > being

> > > > Mangal's nakshatra dispositor and Guru's bhava dispositor - or

> > because of

> > > the

> > > > 4th lord Budh being lagnesh (yet in 12th bhava)? Thanks very much

> > for the

> > > reply.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > My birth data:

> > > > May 20th 1967, 6:15 am, Cakovec, Croatia (no summer time)

> > > > TZ +1, 46N23, 16E26

> > > > Lagna 6:15:25 Mithuna

> > > >

> > > > Jai Guru Dev

> > > > zeljka

> > > >

> > > > --

> > > > Besplatni e-mail - http://webmail.iskon.hr/

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Your use of is subject to

> >

> > > >

> > > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Your use of is subject to

> >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > _______

> > >

> > > Get your free @ address at

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Your use of is subject to

 

> >

> >

> >

> > _______

> >

> > Get your free @ address at

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Your use of is subject to

 

> >

> >

> >

>

>

>

>

>

> Your use of is subject to

>

>

>

> _______

>

> Get your free @ address at

>

>

>

>

>

> Your use of is subject to

>

>

>