Questions on Planetary Beneficence and Maleficence

[Guest guest]

Dear Vishal,

 

Though it depends on various other factors. Let me give an example.

 

If a Brahmin by nature, is taken up a police job. What will be the effect? 1st

he will not be comfortable. 2nd he will be soft in executing his malefic work.

Again it depends on the placement. If a natural benefic and functional malefic

is placed in 6th house, it is like police constable. Suppose, if he is secret

service officer or CBI staff, where the work needs some intelligence, he will

enjoy the post.

 

Similarly, if a rowdy become the care taker of a temple, what will happen? This

is what happening now-a-days, temple "Dharmakarthas" are appointed by the Govt.

and because of that temples are misused.

 

Thanks

Solai Kannan

vbamba [vbamba (AT) msn (DOT) com]26 December

2001 9:51 AMsjvcSubject: [sjvc] Re: Questions on Planetary

Beneficence and MaleficencePranam Guru Solai,On the same thread ... could you

clarify the impact of an association with a natural malefic vs. a functional

malefic in the Rasi chart. For example Ve a natural benefic is a functional

malefic for Dhanus lagna. What results would association of Ve yield? The same

could also be applied to a natural malefic and a functional benefic (e.g. Ma

for Dhanus).ThanksVishalsjvc, "Solai Kannan" <solai@i...> wrote:>

OHM SHRI RAGAVENDRAYA NAMAH> JAYA JAGANNATHA> > Namaste Beau,> > Mercury is

special planet. It is naturally a benefic, so when it is alone,> it is benefic.

When it conjoins malefics, it is malefic. If it is with> benefics, it is more

benefic. When it conjoins equal number of malefic and> benefic, it depends on

the strength of the conjoining planets. Depending on> stronger of malefics and

benefics conjoined, Mercury's nature varies.> > Then what is mean by Malefic

and Benefic. Benefics are soft satwick teachers> and malefics are hard police.

Both are for the benefit of the native. Both> sets rules and punish us and

appreciates us. But their mode and method is> different. One punish us by

reducing the marks in the class tests and other> punish us by beating.> >

Thanks> Solai Kannan> > > Beau Binder

[bbinder@c...]> 23 December 2001 9:57 PM> Shri Jagannath

Vedic Center class> [sjvc] Re: Questions on Planetary Beneficence

and Maleficence> > > Dear Guru Solaiji,> > Thank you for shedding light on

this; the illustration of the Lady> Pharmacist also made it clearer w.r.t.

the difference between natural vs.> functional planetary state. I still have

a question about finding> Mercury's> natural

beneficence/neutrality/maleficence: Is he naturally benefic,> naturally

neutral, or naturally malefic when conjoined with an equivalent> number of

benefics and malefics in the Rasi chart?> > Thank you for your time and

help,> Beau> > > "Solai Kannan"

<solai@i...>> Sat Dec 22, 2001 11:24 pm> Questions on

Planetary Beneficence and Maleficence> > OHM SHRI RAGAVENDRAYA NAMAH> JAYA

JAGANNATHA> > Namaste Beau,> > 1. Rasi is basic and it is the key for

determination. So, if moon or> mercury> is malefic for Rasi chart, then he is

malefic for the native through out> the> life and through out the divisional

the charts. But, the functionality> varies depending on the placement in the

individual divisional chart. If> moon is malefic as per Rasi chart and if it

is functionally benefic in> divisional chart, he will be naturally malefic,

but, functionally benefic> w.r.t. that divisional chart.> > To understand

better, we have our Lady Pharmacist, she is a very hard and> strict person

with all the staffs, even very senior Directors are afraid> to> talk to her.

But, she is very soft with lower level staffs, without> compromising on the

strictness. So, the strictness is her basic or natural> malefic nature. The

softness with lower level staffs is benefic quality> for> that particular

group or (divisional chart).> > Even this above functionality is applicable

in Rasi chart too.> > 2. Moon:- There are many opinions on its benefic or

malefic determination.> As per Gurudeva, Moon is stronger from the 8 th day

(Ashtami) of waxing> period - Shukla Paksha - to the 8th day (Ashtami) of

waning period -> Krishna> Paksha. It is understandable. During these periods,

moon is relatively> stronger and brighter than the other half. Only when it is

brighter and> stronger he can be benefic. But it is benefic only from Shukla

Paksha> Ekadasi to Krishna Paksha Panchami.> > 3. Mercury:- Your

understanding is correct and your second part of the> question is answered in

1st para. This is applicable not only to Mercury> and> Moon, it is applicable

for all planets.> > Thanks> Solai Kannan> > >

Beau Binder [bbinder@c...]> 22 December 2001 10:59 PM>

Shri Jagannath Vedic Center class> [sjvc] Questions on Planetary

Beneficence and Maleficence> > > namo vaH, gurus and sisyas,> > I have some

questions regarding the determination of Moon's and Mercury's> benefic or

malefic nature in a varga. Could some of you please give me> some>

guidance?> > My current understanding, based on Narasimhaji's book 'Vedic

Astrology: An> Integrated Approach', is that the following rules apply:> >

Jupiter and Venus are always naturally benefic.> Sun, Mars, Saturn, Rahu, and

Ketu are always naturally malefic. (I didn't> see Saturn listed on page 24,

but inferred it's status from other> commentary> in the book.)> > Moon is

naturally benefic when waxing, and naturally benefic when waning.> As this

can only be determined from the rAshi chart configuration, it> seems> that

the Moon's natural state for a particular native is either always> naturally

benefic or naturally malefic in all vargas for that native. Is> this

correct? Also, is it benefic when it is at its fullest and malefic> when

newest, the points at which it is not waxing or waning?> > Mercury is

naturally benefic when alone, or conjoined with more natural> benefics.>

Mercury is naturally malefic when conjoined with more natural malefics.> Is

Mercury's natural beneficence or natural maleficence calculated from> the>

rAshi chart and then maintained throughout the rest of the vargas, or is> it>

recalculated based the placement of the planets in each varga? Also, is>

Mercury benefic, neutral, or malefic when conjoined with an equivalent>

number of benefics and malefics?> > Thank you for your help!> > Best

regards,> Beau> > > > > > > > > > > > Sponsor> > > >

> > > >

-------------------------->

Please note the new International Hospital of Bahrain Email address. It is

changed from> user@t... to user@i...Your use of is subject to

the