Guest guest Posted May 14, 1999 Report Share Posted May 14, 1999 Jaya Jagannath Dear Robert, You missed the point.The dasa of the planets in the Vimsottari scheme is fixed and not variable like the Rasi Dasa. The cyclic order of the dasa is an inherent quality of all dasa irrespective of their type. Try answering the question..What happens if the total of all the twelve rasi dasa is lower than the longevity of the person? Now, we have to go into another cycle. Some astrologers of Bengal have advocated that the period of the dasa for female charts should be calculated from the Lord of the sign to the sign (Bannerjee et. al). This implies that another method of reckoning the period of the dasa is 12 minus the period of the Dasa as normally determined. I have not agreed with this also and have preferred the most logical method of signs gained as taught traditionally. The 12 minus previous period is for the second cycle only. Just because the period of Sagittarius is Zero does not mean that it is absurd. It only shows that the dasa of that sign will not show in the first cycle, and if the longevity is lower than the total of all dasa in the first cycle, then the dasa will not show up in the life. Even in Vimsottari, many Dasa do not show up in one's life. In any case, can you tell me as to what reasons Mr Rao has given to say why Sagittarius cannot be Zero if Jupiter is in Capricorn? Mr Rao's Chara dasa is also going to be incorrect/ different from Parasara if you consider periods as per his New Method. I don't blame Mr Rao as he has clearly given that this is his original research and not the final word as yet. In fact I give him credit for honestly opening his mind. How many of us can do that. Have you seen his version of Mandook dasa? Actually the Dasa outlined in his book is the same as "RASI DASA" outlined by Parasara whereas the REAL Mandooka Dasa is quite different. In fact Mr Rao has differed with the authorities in almost all the dasa systems. Please see this for yourself. If you want I can give the relevant sloka. Mandooka gati or the movement of the Frog is defined as jumping to the third sign whereas Mr Rao uses the Jumping of the dasa to the fourth sign. Can you tell us what Mr Rao explained as the basis of this deviation? I shall be grateful for an insight into his thoughts. Please try the Narayana Dasa for yourself and see the accuracy. A series of articles explaining the Narayana Dasa will be published in the Express Starteller Magazine from June 1999 onwards. Best Wishes, Sanjay Rath ---------------- You Wrote: - > Dear Manoj, > > Namaste! > > Thank you very much for your response to my quandary re: diverging views > and calculations in Jaimini. I tried to present what I saw to be the > disagreements among scholars, but in the end, have to agree with you. I > have used Sri K.N. Rao's system of Chara dasa since he first instructed it > in America, in 1994. I have always received good results using it as so > taught by him. Recently, I also had an argument with Narasimha Rao, who > is a student of Sanjay Rath's, about the "0" years dasa idea, if the lord > of Sagittarius dasa is debilitated. Like you, this does not make sense to > me, even though a "logical" argument is supposedly put forth that if a > dasa does not run in one's life, it will run in the "next cycle". Your > point is good: even if a dasa does not run in a person's life, THE YEARS > OF THE DASA REMAIN FIXED. If we follow Sanjay's view, then 0 years of > Sagittarius dasa, will be followed by 12 years of Sagittarius dasa in the > second cycle. If one does not run the Sun's dasa in Vimsottari, and he > lives past 120, does that mean the next Sun's dasa is going to be 12 > years? This is the sort of logic that is put forward by Sanjay, and I > just can't wrap my mind around it. > > Anyway, in the end, you follow whoever's methods give the best results. I > have taught Chara dasa in the past according to the K.N. Rao method, and > have used it myself, and never felt that something was off with it. It > would be great to get a thread of posts going re: life events in a > person's life, and cross-reference them to Chara dasa. Given time, I > would like to participate in this kind of discussion. > > Thanks for your supportive views, Manoj, it is much appreciated. > Robert > > > > ===================================== > Robert A. Koch, Vedic Astrologer > 760 NW Broken Arrow Rd. > Bend, OR. 97701-9037 > Phone: 541-318-0248 > visit <http://www.robertkoch.com> or e-mail > rk. rk ------ eGroup home: http://www.eGroups.comsjvc http://www.eGroups.com - Simplifying group communications Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.