Not so ineffective

[Guest guest]

Jaya Jaya Jagannath

Dear Ann,

No question is stupid, at least not that when you are exploring a

new area of Jyotish. All questions will have to be answered before any

conclusion is reached. My points for further study: (A)Anyway, have you all

also examined what the standard texts meant by good results for Jupiter and

Day strong planets in the HORA of the SUN and for others in the HORA of the

MOON? How will all that fit into these discussions.(B) What exactly did

PARASARA mean by PARIVRITTIDWAYA.©Why do ONLY the Luminaries Lord the

Hora's while the others except the Luminaries Lord the Trimsamsa?

 

With Regards,

Sanjay Rath

----------------

> Dear Pursottam,

> I will not withdraw my stupid question as yet, but I will try to suggest

> an answer...Please correct me ... The Hora chart is interpreted as one

> would any chart, using the basic guidelines;with the added info of

> Sun/Moon hora used to determine "strength" of planet/placement, within

> that context??

> Maybe my judgement of "ineffective" was a little premature,as we know,

> it's not over 'til the fat lady sings.

> I have a strong 4th house in Rasi and Hora...that is where my money

> disappears into.My home often operates as an unlisted half-way house for

> all sorts, until they can "get on their feet".Also I have a large family

> with all the attendant responsibilities.Perhaps it is the Saturnian gloom

> Das mentioned that causes me to question " What's it all about Alfie"?? At

> this stage of my life I have too many dependants to indulge in the luxury

> of "burn-out".I suppose I should consider myself lucky that I can work.

> Maybe Mercury Dasa will provide some relief?.

> Anyway, I was born in Milura, Victoria, Australia.

> All the Best to You, Ann.

 

------

eGroup home: http://www.eGroups.com/list/sjvc

Free Web-based e-mail groups by eGroups.com