Mahadasha of the Atmakaraka (for Ashutosh and all)

[Guest guest]

Namaste Ashutosh,

 

Thanks for your feedback. You're right about Mercury in my chart.

It is also in a neechabhanga status in the navamsa. Nonetheless, I'm

hoping that there will be positive aspects to this period since

Mercury is posited on the 11th house from the arudha lagna.

 

Further, we should all note that Mercury is a significator for

relatives. And sure enough, some of my relatives have betrayed me!

 

As posted earlier, this scenario is hauntingly similar to the family

dispute that led to the war on Kurukshetra.

 

Regards,

 

John R.

 

 

 

valist, "astrologerashutosh"

<astrologerashutosh wrote:

>

> Dear John,

>

> The atmakarak is usually, for most people, is a

planet which is nearing the end of the sign in degrees, thus

considered old and weak. Thats why this theory by Sanjay Rath is

applicable to some extent. But, atmakarak, if reasonably strong and

yogakarak, gives very good results in its dasha.

>

> If we leave aside the concept of atmakarak, the mercury is

a functional malefic in your horoscope. The disputes and legal fights

are naturally expected from the twelfth and third lord.

>

> Regards,

>

> Ashutosh

>

>

> -

> John

> valist

> Friday, 24 February, 2006 01:07

> Mahadasha of the Atmakaraka

>

>

> To all members:

>

> According to Sanjay Rath, the mahadasha of the Atmakaraka is

difficult

> and a challenging one. After analyzing my chart, I would have to

> agree. For me, the mahadasha of Mercury, the atmakaraka, started

on

> February 12, 2006 after rectification. I've come to the

realization

> that during this period I have to do what I believe to be just

and

> fair. This is the message I'm getting from the soul, the

atmakaraka.

> There were will opposition and challenges. But, as the B Gita

teaches,

> the task must be done.

>

> Specifically, on the date given above, I attended a funeral

ceremony of

> my uncle who had died in the Philippines. My cousins living in

> California retrieved the body back from overseas to be buried in

San

> Francisco, CA. Our culture in the Philippines, which is

predominantly

> Christian, does not accept cremation as an alternative to burial.

>

> During the gathering of friends and relatives, I found out that

my

> cousins in the Philippines had issued a "fatwah" against me.

This was

> an implied threat that I should not go back to my hometown.

> Apparently, this was in retaliation for withholding the money

that I

> kept for another uncle who had died many years ago. They were

> expecting me to distribute the inheritance money to the

relatives. In

> terms of American dollars, the amount is not significant.

>

> I purposely withheld the money to force my cousins to let me take

title

> to a house property which my parents owned. My parents died many

ago.

> However, my cousins determined that the land was on ancestral

> property. As such, they determined that I was not entitled to

owning

> the land.

>

> The value of the house and lot is not important to me. I am

trying to

> address an issue of justice, equity, and the rule of law. I am

willing

> to have a legal court determine who is the legal owner of the

> property. However, my cousins are not willing to do that. They

> are "proclaiming" that the property is theirs.

>

> Hence, we have a dilemma put forth during the period of Mercury,

the

> atmakaraka. My other relatives here in the United States

recommended

> that I relinquish the land. However, I believe that idea,

although

> convenient, is avoiding the main issue. We will see what else

will

> unfold in the near future.

>

> Regards,

>

> John R.

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>