Guest guest Posted March 8, 2005 Report Share Posted March 8, 2005 Re Ashataka Varga, there are a couple fields which vary between the Parashari way and the other way, and I have a switch for these in my settings or preferences. Perhaps Haydn's does it the way your GJ is not set. Try finding my switch in Prefs and setting it the other way. Remember to recalculate charts after making such settings changes. Truthfully, I don't currently have the energy to research this. If I can get my energy together for such things, I would be moving on to trying to finish version 3. I have spent quite a bit of time trying to make my shad bala exactly follow the various books on the matter, and the other programs out there. At various times in the 12 yrs I've been doing this, and the 9 years this list has been up, people have posted various comparisons of Shad Bala tween the major programs, and all had various little differences. It used to be found by one and all that my dashas and those of the others matched, that was at one point. I don't know if that's changed. At this time, I have gone through those things before a number of times, and don't have the taste for doing it again, because I am "suffering" a disease of depression- it's hard for me to answer the phone, what to speak of program. So I pick my battles carefully. I'm going to pass on getting back into this one at this time, which I hope is OK with you Bhadra Govinda ji. Thanks, Das Goravani, Pres. Service http://www.dancingmooninc.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 8, 2005 Report Share Posted March 8, 2005 Dear Das Goravani Prabhu, I have had been using Haydn Huntley before I purchased GJ. I was comparing both softwares on their calculations. I find for some charts it shows same Ashtakavarga Calculations, however for some it shows different in these 2 softwares. How is it possible? I understand if it were different for all, may be they are programmed differently. For example take the following case : DOB 09/May/1968, 07-50 AM, Chitradurga, India. Sarvashtaka Varga calculations for house 1 shows 17 and house 12 shows 35 in GJ. Huntley shows 17 for 12 th house and 35 for 11 the house. That is there is a shift of 1 house all the calculations. Now I donot know which is correct? I know many who vouch for Huntley for calculations and similarly many for GJ. Best is you please check and let us know. Also Sadbala Ratios show differently in Huntley and GJ for this case. Saturn 0.88 in GJ where as 1.00 in Huntley etc,. Another example where GJ and Huntley give the same calculations for Sarvashtaka Varga Calculations is ascendent 27 and 12 th house 21 same in GJ and Huntley. Native : DOB : 25/12/1993, 14-10PM, Nanded, India. The shadbala Ratio both in GJ and Huntley is same for this native a very high 1.7 I checked some more natives. It is same in some and different in some!!! Kindly clarify at the earliest. Thanks + Best Regards, YB Prasad. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 10, 2005 Report Share Posted March 10, 2005 Dear Das Goravani Prabhu, Thank you for your prompt response. Sorry to bother you in your present low energy condition. I am not talking about minor differences at decimal level. I have kept the settings in Parasari way only. However I am worried what if the readings of the Ashtaka Varga are wrong in GJ in certain cases. With out comparing with the other software programs I request you to check based on intuition or mathematical calculations whether the for the following chart the Ashtaka Varga scores look OK or not. Let's take for example the following chart. DOB 09/May/1968, 07-50 AM, Chitradurga, India. Sarvashtaka Varga calculations for house 1 shows 17 and house 12 shows 35 in GJ. If over all chart in all houses shows minimum 24 sarvastaka varga score, how can house 1 show only 17? And Take another example DOB 22/Feb/1996, 08-37 AM, Nanded, India GJ gives sarvastaka varga score of 15 for the 11th house. With strong mercury a benfic in the 11 th house 15 score looks low. Please check and tell that for these charts the Sarvastaka Varga score is OK. Thanks + Best Regards, YB Prasad. - "Das Goravani" <> <valist> Tuesday, March 08, 2005 1:34 PM Re: GJ Calculations Clarification Required > > Re Ashataka Varga, there are a couple fields which vary between the > Parashari way and the other way, and I have a switch for these in my > settings or preferences. Perhaps Haydn's does it the way your GJ is not > set. > Try finding my switch in Prefs and setting it the other way. Remember to > recalculate charts after making such settings changes. > > Truthfully, I don't currently have the energy to research this. > > If I can get my energy together for such things, I would be moving on to > trying to finish version 3. > > I have spent quite a bit of time trying to make my shad bala exactly > follow > the various books on the matter, and the other programs out there. At > various times in the 12 yrs I've been doing this, and the 9 years this > list > has been up, people have posted various comparisons of Shad Bala tween the > major programs, and all had various little differences. > > It used to be found by one and all that my dashas and those of the others > matched, that was at one point. I don't know if that's changed. > > At this time, I have gone through those things before a number of times, > and > don't have the taste for doing it again, because I am "suffering" a > disease > of depression- it's hard for me to answer the phone, what to speak of > program. So I pick my battles carefully. I'm going to pass on getting back > into this one at this time, which I hope is OK with you Bhadra Govinda ji. > > Thanks, > > > Das Goravani, Pres. > > > > > Service > > > > > > http://www.dancingmooninc.com > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 12, 2005 Report Share Posted March 12, 2005 Please help on the following clarification. - "Bhadra Govinda Dasa" <raganuga <valist> Thursday, March 10, 2005 8:28 PM Re: GJ Calculations Clarification Required > Dear Das Goravani Prabhu, > > Thank you for your prompt response. Sorry to bother you in your present > low energy condition. > > I am not talking about minor differences at decimal level. I have kept > the settings in Parasari way only. > > However I am worried what if the readings of the Ashtaka Varga are wrong > in GJ in certain cases. With out comparing with the other software > programs I request you to check based on intuition or mathematical > calculations whether the for the following chart the Ashtaka Varga scores > look OK or not. > > Let's take for example the following chart. > > DOB 09/May/1968, 07-50 AM, > Chitradurga, India. Sarvashtaka Varga calculations for house 1 shows 17 > and house 12 shows 35 in GJ. If over all chart in all houses shows > minimum 24 sarvastaka varga score, how can house 1 show only 17? > > And Take another example > DOB 22/Feb/1996, 08-37 AM, Nanded, India > > GJ gives sarvastaka varga score of 15 for the 11th house. With strong > mercury a benfic in the 11 th house 15 score looks low. > > Please check and tell that for these charts the Sarvastaka Varga score is > OK. > > Thanks + Best Regards, > > YB Prasad. > > - > "Das Goravani" <> > <valist> > Tuesday, March 08, 2005 1:34 PM > Re: GJ Calculations Clarification Required >> >> Re Ashataka Varga, there are a couple fields which vary between the >> Parashari way and the other way, and I have a switch for these in my >> settings or preferences. Perhaps Haydn's does it the way your GJ is not >> set. >> Try finding my switch in Prefs and setting it the other way. Remember to >> recalculate charts after making such settings changes. >> >> Truthfully, I don't currently have the energy to research this. >> >> If I can get my energy together for such things, I would be moving on to >> trying to finish version 3. >> >> I have spent quite a bit of time trying to make my shad bala exactly >> follow >> the various books on the matter, and the other programs out there. At >> various times in the 12 yrs I've been doing this, and the 9 years this >> list >> has been up, people have posted various comparisons of Shad Bala tween >> the >> major programs, and all had various little differences. >> >> It used to be found by one and all that my dashas and those of the others >> matched, that was at one point. I don't know if that's changed. >> >> At this time, I have gone through those things before a number of times, >> and >> don't have the taste for doing it again, because I am "suffering" a >> disease >> of depression- it's hard for me to answer the phone, what to speak of >> program. So I pick my battles carefully. I'm going to pass on getting >> back >> into this one at this time, which I hope is OK with you Bhadra Govinda >> ji. >> >> Thanks, >> >> >> Das Goravani, Pres. >> >> >> >> >> Service >> >> >> >> >> >> http://www.dancingmooninc.com >> >> > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.