RE: LaGrone Jyotish Studio????

[Guest guest]

Mary:

 

I don't know where you got the idea that there is even a concept called

"LaGrone Jyotish Studio". I know that THIS LaGrone never claimed to have

such a product or even be working on such a product.

 

I would be interested in receiving a reference to any such claim.

 

I apologize to Das and all members of this list if my remarks sounded as

though I was "blasting" Das or his work.

 

My statement about Das' program not being finished is based on information

that Das put out himself. It would delight me, no end, to hear that he has

changed his mind; as I have used his products for many years and was eagerly

awaiting version 3, myself. If you are claiming that he intends has

announced his intention to complete this work...at ANY TIME in the future,

then I look forward to the opportunity to use it. He is, indeed, a scholar

and genius...as evidenced by his products that are in the marketplace.

 

David

 

>

>Message: 7

> Fri, 12 Dec 2003 21:36:07 -0800 (PST)

> Mary Quinn <mary1quinn

>RE: Digest Number 1488

>

>"subratad2005"

>

>I believe Jyotish studio, like all complex things will

>take all the time it needs to be completed. "Gone With

>The Wind" took 10 years to write. It went on to be a

>bigger best seller than most books. Just about every

>"Harlequin Romance" you can find at the drug store

>probably took no more than 2 to 3 months to write and

>dang if I can't remember a single title.

>

>It is easy for those of us who don't know how to do

>something to assume that because something is easy to

>use, that it is also easy to create. I can read the

>average sized novel in two nights. I couldn't write

>one to save my life.

>

>I have every confidence in Richard Mackai's abilities

>to finish this job when he's good and ready to do so.

>And if at any moment I doubted, which I don't, I'm

>sure I wouldn't blast this out on his own list. In the

>meantime, I admire his ability to produce what he's

>created so far. It's much more than most people have,

>and certainly far more than I have.

>

>I'm sure he appreciates your eagerly awaiting his

>work. You sound like you really enjoy what he's done

>so far. I suspect you will be more than amply

>rewarded.

>

>However if you get tired of waiting, perhaps you might

>be interested in "LaGrone Jyotish Studio version 1.0".

>I haven't actually heard of it myself, but to go by

>the author's own opinion, it must be fantastic. If

>it's not actually out on the market just yet, I'm sure

>David will have completed it very soon.

>

>

>

>--- David LaGrone <dvdlagr wrote:

> > "subratad2005"

> >

> > I seriously doubt that Goravani Jyotish, version 3,

> > will EVER see the

> > light of day! I understand that Das Goravani is

> > closing up shop and has

> > offered to sell his software.

> >

> > David LaGrone

> > P. O. Box 2339

> > Glen Rose, TX 76043-2339

> >

> > dvdlagr

> >

> >

 

_______________

Cell phone ‘switch’ rules are taking effect — find out more here.

http://special.msn.com/msnbc/consumeradvocate.armx

[Guest guest]

David:

 

You got me fair and square on that one. My apologies.

There is no "LaGrone Jyotish Studio" in existence.

That, I'm afraid, was the point of my comment.

 

I accept your statement that you did not mean to blast

Richard. It just REALLY looked like it to me. Since I

am a lower level spirit and have a completely base

nature, my first reaction was intense anger followed

by a desire to slash out and draw blood. My first

vocabulary choices were few, mostly expletives, and a

couple personal derogatory labels meant to be attached

to you. Oops. Definitely nowhere near the loving

spirit needed to communicate on this list.

 

So I tried again in a more civilized way and was doing

okay but buckled in the end by making the obviously

offensive statement re the imaginary LaGrone software.

I meant to say that you shouldn't talk since you have

never written (to my knowledge) comparable software

and if you tried, it would probably take you longer

than you'd think assuming you to have those

capabilites which I don't happen to have myself.

Either way, neither comment was worthy of being spoken

on this list.

 

You are right.

My apologies to you and to everyone else.

 

Regarding Richard's putting the software up for sale.

Yes, he obviously did on Oct 24.

 

Regarding his intentions to finish JS3, ignoring for

the moment his statement to that effect today (since

it was after your original post), he was asked about

his intentions re JS3 on December 8 - just last week -

and he clearly stated his intention to finish in his

answer.

 

In light of that, your answer in CAPITALS just 4 days

later, struck me as being less friendly than perhaps

you intended. It just struck me that the question was

for Richard to answer and not you, but that if you did

feel an overwhelming need to say something, you could

have answered privately or with less seeming

derogation.

 

So under that light, I could have answered privately

as well. My first answer was public because if there

were no public responses to you, then it would seem

that the "public" doesn't care. This answer is public

because since I was wrong to make the "LaGrone

software" comment and did so publically, I should make

my apologies in the same forum.

 

So, again, for that statement I apologize. And for

apparently misreading your sentiments, I also

apologize. I should have found a better way to voice

my objections to your word choices and choice of

forum. Sorry.

 

 

 

 

New Photos - easier uploading and sharing.