Dasas, Special lagnas

[Guest guest]

While applying various dasas/ lagnas, I encountered the problem of integrating opossite info.

 

When I studied Niryaana Shoola Dasa, Shoola Dasa,

examples first, and couple of charts from my immediate

experience- all fit well- yes,deaths did happend as per rules given

 

Then I went to predict step by step my own death. All taken into account,

'middle-life'' span /up to 64/ indicated. Trishoolas calculated- perfect fit.

 

While I was thinking of relaxing on my retirement planning, buying all those

books, discs, softwares,

I always wanted to have, doing all those volunteer things ..etc

 

a discussion re longevity, cause of death, circumstances of death, appeared

/GWBush/, which was

focused on Arooda lagna, 3rd, 8th AL house, aspects to Lagna----timing derived

from that too, manner as well..

 

Then I studied J.Upadesa Sutras, and by following all the steps recommended, from Arooda Lagna,

number of indicators confirm long-life span

------------

This seems to be simpler than most other things, and I use this as an example to

ask the question- when things like this happen,

which prediction should be accepted-

I noticed that in discussion on GWB death, ONLY AL was used- why is that?

 

Should our first level referrence in this matter be Lagna, or Arooda?

Sure, my major concern is if we are theorethically allowed to jump from one set

to another, we can succesfully "predict" everything

BUT after-the fact. I belive it's not the case, and that I am just missing info

on how to make the decission before-the-fact.

---

SPECIAL LAGNAS:I learnt that if Special Lagna's effects are to be felt in

personal life, it has to have contact/aspect with Lagna.

Results promissed are to be expected when /Narayana/ rasi aspecting them comes- clear.

 

If there is no contact whith Lagna, it's said, than another person will

experience promisses /I expect that to happen as per timing given above/

In determining ''OTHER'' should that be one signified by the House whose Lord

has aspect with S.L, or house where it's placed, or both.

 

For example, I have Hora Lagna in conj. with Mars in 4th House, Cn Lagna- Lord

of 5th and 10th in 4th- mars doesn't aspect lagna.

Who is going to experience this? Or, is this interpretation correct

/By the way, Hora lagna Conjucts mars in various Divisional charts- can anybody

tell me what that means?

 

Or, My Ghatika lagna Conj. Moon in Rashi and many divsional- how do I go about that ?

 

GL/Moon combo aspects lagna- so it's clear. But who is ''Mars"- 5th house, 4th

/10th?who/ house...or..

 

I would appreciate your comments.

Thanks,

Anna

 

 

Swee

Web Hosting - establish your business online