Guest guest Posted January 27, 2003 Report Share Posted January 27, 2003 Dear Cynthia, Sateesh, and Zoran: Is there any chance you could provide more explanation on the role of Navamsa, especially with regard both to transits and the differerence between the Rasi and Navamsa charts and how they interrelate? For example, I have Sun Saturn Pluto and Mercury in H1 (Cancer lagna) but Sun Jupiter Moon and Saturn in H 7 (Leo with Aquarius ascendant). I am self taught in Jyotish, at a beginner's level, and follow this list to learn as much as I can. But sometimes it's very technical, and I would like to know more of the importance of Navamsha. Also is there a site that provides a better explanation? Satyam, Shivam, Sundaram Janna > ______________________ > > Message: 2 > Mon, 27 Jan 2003 02:11:06 +0100 > Zoran Radosavljevic <ahimsa > Re: Cynthia - Navamsas versus Nakshatras > > Om Namo Narayanaya, > Dear Dhira Krishna Dasa, > There are some good effects, yet for Guru in debilitation Navamsa, the only > rescue may come from Chandra, Exaltation lord of Guru. Shani should also be > extremely well placed to help guru debilitation, even though, I repeat > debilitation and Vakra (retrograde) gives some exaltation effects (some, not > completely) > Best wishes > Zoran > > Dhira Krsna BCS wrote: > > > Dear Zoran, > > > > >guru is now in 20 deg. and 20 minutes of Kark which would put it Makara > > >(neecha navamsa), thus his efficiency in the transit is spoilt. > > > > Even when it is retrograde in Navamsa debilitation, thus getting > > neechabhanga? > > > > Your sishya, > > Dhira Krsna dasa > > > > Om Namo Bhagavate Vasudevaya; Hare Krishna; Om Tat Sat > > : gjlist- > > > > > > > > Your use of is subject to > > -- > ZORAN RADOSAVLJEVIC > Jyotish Teacher of Shree Jagannath Vedic Centre > email: ahimsa > web: www.sjvc.co.yu > > > > > ______________________ > > > Om Namo Narayanya, > Dear Cynthia and Sateesh, > I meant cancer rashi, so you should use the same sign where graha is placed in transit in rashi. For example, My friend gave birth to a child when Guru was transiting Capricorn rashi some times back (I think it was 1986). Her saptamsa lagna is Virgo, and Guru was transiting capricorn (the same rashi as in rashi chart-suggested by Sage Bhrigu), which was Saptamsa 5th house, and 5th house from Chandra and Guru who are placed in lagna saptamsa. Rahu was transititing aries over natal saptamsa ketu, while ketu was transtiting natal saptamsa rahu. Shani was transitting 3rd house (scorpio) over saptamsa lagna lord budh. So we had both shani and guru touching the significations of the 5th house in Saptamsa Kundhali. In this way, the child was born. > Hope this helps. > Zoran > cynthianovak wrote: > > Dear ZoronI am trying to follow is Kark short for karakumsa? Any chance you could make this even more simple for those of us who are simple minded? If you could give birth data and an example I think I could put the pieces together. I would really like to use the divisional charts more than I have thus far.cynthia > - > Zoran Radosavljevic > gjlist > Friday, January 24, 2003 12:54 PM > Re: [GJ] Cynthia - Navamsas versus Nakshatras > Om Namo Narayanaya, > Dear Sateesh, > Transits are seen in Navamsa. I have wrote an article on it, and not only in Navamsa, but in other divisional charts. There are two methods: > 1. See the exact longitude of Graha and find its navamsa placement For Example: > guru is now in 20 deg. and 20 minutes of Kark which would put it Makara (neecha navamsa), thus his efficiency in the transit is spoilt. > 2. Another method is from Sage Bhrigu. Look at the same time of guru's transit in Navamsa kundhali. So guru would be transiting kark rashi in your navamsa kundhali. Read the effects accordingly. > This is very important topic, and I am glad you initiated it// > Best wishes > Zoran > Sateesh Batas wrote: > > Dear Cynthia and List, You are probably aware how much stress I put on the Navamsa (strength) of the various Transit planets, in addition to the Sign they are in in the main chart. I realise you and most Astrologers on the Lists instead (or maybe in addition) look at the D1 Transits plus the NAKSHATRAS, rather than the Navamsa strength. I am slowly learning about the effects in different Nakshatras - although the transits in Navamsa seems easier - because that is purely a STRENGTH based quality. Nakshatra TRs seem to be CHARACTER quality. Hope I am making sense in what I am asking - do you disregard the D9 strength/sign of a TR planet in favour of looking at the Nakshatra a planet is transiting through? Or do you use both? Thanks - Sateesh. > --- -- ________ Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Mail.com http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup Meet Singles http://corp.mail.com/lavalife Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.