Does anyone have birth data

[Guest guest]

Dear All

I have searched in vain for the birth data of the2 sons of Saddam Hussein and

the new leaders of North and South Korea. Would any of you have this data?

 

Thank you

cynthia

-

Wendy Vasicek

gjlist

Saturday, December 28, 2002 5:27 AM

[GJ] Fw: Clearing a few myths about Cloning!!!

Dear Dr. Satya,

 

>>>>Cloning: In contrast, Cloning is a form of Asexual production (contrast it

with **sexual **reproduction as in the case of identical twins). Unlike a twin,

a clone will carry the genome of only ONE PARENT (or donor). While identical

twins are GENETICALLY IDENTICAL and have the same genome, clones share the same

nuclear DNA only. They DO NOT SHARE THE SAME MITOCHONDRIAL DNA. But identical

twins share even this.<<<<

 

When sperm and egg fuse to form a diploid zygote, the new individual gets half

of its nuclear genetic information, 23 chromosomes, from each parent. That

50/50 split is the basis of Mendelian inheritance. However, due to the sheer

size of the egg cell, all (or nearly all) of the mitochondria in the embryo

come from the mother. In other words, mitochondrial inheritance is maternal,

and that's why Leber's is passed only from mother to child.

 

With all due respect is it not so that all offspring (from one mother) carry the

same mtDNA? It's irrelevant whether they're twins or not. Of course I'm not a

geneticist and totally reliant on the research I've done since this news (of

cloned infant) first hit the headlines.

 

>>>>If this is the case with identical twins who share even the mitochondrial

DNA, it doesn't need a Watson to guess what thecase would be with clones who do

NOT share the mitochondrial DNA and just share the nuclear DNA.<<<<

 

To my mind, for siblings not to carry the same mtDNA, they would need to have

different mothers...is this not so? Also, considering that the cloned infant is

an exact (genetic) replica of the (mother) donor, would the infant also not

carry the same mtDna as the donor? Please do correct me if I'm wrong.

 

>>>>In spite of sharing the same mitochondrial DNA too, it is well known that

Identical twins are neither physically nor behaviorally identical to each

other. They differ in their belief systems and values as well as

preferences<<<<

 

According to my limited understanding the inherited genetic code passed on from

parents to offspring is what determines our histrionic, gender, and ethnic

identity. I believe however its the cosmic blueprint (parabdha karma) coded

into the DNA at birth that makes us all unique. If this were not so the divine

science of jyotish would not be the window of creative intelligence (natural

law) that it is. To determine anything about the native at all we would all

have to be geneticists.

 

A soul is born with a parabdha karma (the karma it is destined to experience in

this life). When the Atman creates a new human life, the karma for that life is

coded into the DNA...is this not so? This, to my mind, is the main reason that

organ recipients, of genetically matched (as close as possible) organs, have to

take powerful immune-suppressant drugs for the rest of their lives. The

rejection is due not so much to the mismatched genes but to the incompatible

parabdha karma present in the donor organ's DNA.

 

Of course, as I said, I'm not a geneticist and I trust you'll correct me if my

understanding is incorrect.

 

Best Wishes,Wendyhttp://www.ganesh-astro.iinet.net.auOm Namo Bhagavate

Vasudevaya; Hare Krishna; Om Tat Sat:

gjlist-http://www.goravani.comYour use of

is subject to the