RE: transits of Rahu and Ketu

[Guest guest]

Greetings all,

 

This note and several of the others from this morning have gotten me to thinking...

 

When reading a chart for CURRENT times, does one use the CURRENT location

of the person concerned? Or do you stick with the BIRTH LOCATION? Or both?

 

It seems to me you would use the current location of the individual as the effects

of the stars, planets, what-have-you, by definition, could NOT be the same if say,

one traveled from New York to Tokyo, or San Francisco. Much has been made of

the changes resulting from having small differences in the TIME of birth; LOCATION

of birth obviously makes a tremendous difference. So why would not the same hold

true for life events?

 

I look forward to hearing your answers...

 

Best regards,

Martin

cynthia novak

[cynthianovak (AT) sbcglobal (DOT) net]Tuesday, September 24, 2002 9:57 AMTo:

gjlistSubject: [GJ] transits of Rahu and Ketu

Dear All

I know we talked about this earlier this year, I just wanted to share a personal

experience. I've just had Rahu transit my Mercury. I watched both the mean and

the true transits and found that the approach was much more intense than the

actual transit. The difference between the mean and true transiting was

several days, but the approach of several degrees was much more troublesome to

phones, computer, phone mines and all sorts of communication than the exact

transits were, In fact, several degrees approaching was the worst of all.

 

Any of you had similar or different experiences? I know this will really shift

the way I work with clients. I've noticed this with the approaching transits

to the Moon, There they are felt far ahead of the acutal transit and during

the actual final pass there is often a resolution to the problem. I had not

watched it with a less sensitive placement.

 

cynthiaOm Namo Bhagavate Vasudevaya; Hare Krishna; Om Tat SatTo ,

send an email to: gjlist-http://www.goravani.comYour use

of is subject to the

[Guest guest]

Dear Cynthia,

 

Applying TRs have tended to be more impacting than separating/exact - I guess

the impact depends on the speed of the applying planet of course, too.

 

Sateesh.

 

========

 

- cynthia novak

gjlist

Tuesday, September 24, 2002 3:57 PM

[GJ] transits of Rahu and Ketu

Dear All

I know we talked about this earlier this year, I just wanted to share a personal

experience. I've just had Rahu transit my Mercury. I watched both the mean and

the true transits and found that the approach was much more intense than the

actual transit. The difference between the mean and true transiting was

several days, but the approach of several degrees was much more troublesome to

phones, computer, phone mines and all sorts of communication than the exact

transits were, In fact, several degrees approaching was the worst of all.

 

Any of you had similar or different experiences? I know this will really shift

the way I work with clients. I've noticed this with the approaching transits

to the Moon, There they are felt far ahead of the acutal transit and during

the actual final pass there is often a resolution to the problem. I had not

watched it with a less sensitive placement.

 

 

---Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.Checked by AVG anti-virus system

(http://www.grisoft.com).Version: 6.0.391 / Virus Database: 222 - Release Date:

19/09/2002