Guest guest Posted September 9, 2002 Report Share Posted September 9, 2002 Hey Curtis's letter inspired me to clarify: I'm not a western astrologer, I definitely am finishing and releasing GJ3, I don't think the Western signs work at all, never said they did, I was however defending the awareness of equinoxes as a basis for something, but as far as placing ancient meanings for signs on anything other than the stars, is wrong to me, not only in theory, but in constant correct readings I do (for close friends only). And I constantly see them go, "oh wow, that is so much more right on than that other reading I got" (western). I really therefore believe the only really viable signs are the Vedic ones. However, I know for sure, that there is meaning to our position in the Sun's course of our lives, which affected by the tilt, puts it in variance with the stars. Perhaps you could say, that "this is what you'd be if the current tilt were true"... contemplating in this way will reveal it I feel. This may be too esoteric for many. I'm seeing that the comments back are taking me way too materially. This is not a declaraction of any changes. I would hate to think that some think this means like I might not finish my software. Oh my God, no way. I'm not switching platforms of astrology for myself either. I am saying, that I think, there is something there, which is all too easily cast asunder by Vedantists, in the tracking of the equinoxes and many things banking off of that. That's what I'm saying exactly, exactly that. One sentence really. Peace -- Das Goravani , President 2852 Willamette St, #353 Eugene, Oregon, 97405 USA Voice: or <> Home of "Goravani Jyotish" Vedic Astrology Software , and more... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 9, 2002 Report Share Posted September 9, 2002 We are still in agreement... Martin Das Goravani [] Monday, September 09, 2002 9:39 AM gjlist [GJ] Das, Sanity, Celts and Burning Curtains... Hey Curtis's letter inspired me to clarify: I'm not a western astrologer, I definitely am finishing and releasing GJ3, I don't think the Western signs work at all, never said they did, I was however defending the awareness of equinoxes as a basis for something, but as far as placing ancient meanings for signs on anything other than the stars, is wrong to me, not only in theory, but in constant correct readings I do (for close friends only). And I constantly see them go, "oh wow, that is so much more right on than that other reading I got" (western). I really therefore believe the only really viable signs are the Vedic ones. However, I know for sure, that there is meaning to our position in the Sun's course of our lives, which affected by the tilt, puts it in variance with the stars. Perhaps you could say, that "this is what you'd be if the current tilt were true"... contemplating in this way will reveal it I feel. This may be too esoteric for many. I'm seeing that the comments back are taking me way too materially. This is not a declaraction of any changes. I would hate to think that some think this means like I might not finish my software. Oh my God, no way. I'm not switching platforms of astrology for myself either. I am saying, that I think, there is something there, which is all too easily cast asunder by Vedantists, in the tracking of the equinoxes and many things banking off of that. That's what I'm saying exactly, exactly that. One sentence really. Peace -- Das Goravani , President 2852 Willamette St, #353 Eugene, Oregon, 97405 USA Voice: or <> Home of "Goravani Jyotish" Vedic Astrology Software , and more... Om Namo Bhagavate Vasudevaya; Hare Krishna; Om Tat Sat : gjlist- Your use of is subject to Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.