Guest guest Posted August 21, 2002 Report Share Posted August 21, 2002 Just an observation from a novice. For many years in the medical arena there have been heated debates about certain measurements used in electrocardiography. These debates deal with how the measurements are done and the resulting debate has crystalized into what has become known as the Gold Standard debate. It goes something like this: If I measure something using standard A and make my determination of illness based upon how the physical state if the patient is based on those measurements, the fact that the ruler is 11" long or 13" long is immaterial. The fact that I always measure the patient with the SAME ruler is, however, very important. Measureing the postitions of the stars and planets, prior to big telescopes was an art. The best european observers, those of Tycho Brae in Copenhagen, could get the positions to only 2' of arc. Now that isn't bad for eyeballing it, but it limited a number of things, like position on the planet (Latitude and Longitued) and the position of the celestial bodies, like planets and stars. If you want a referent to the 2', the moon is about 2" of arc in the heavens as seen from earth. Divide that into 60 bits and you have the approximate human eye resolution. Now here comes the kicker. If the observations, over the ages, of the Jyotishi have been using a specific system, that is an observed planetary locale adjusted for precession (which you can detect using the naked eye over the course of about 100 or so years), and the characteristics of the chart have been intuited and compiled using this system, them "changing the ruler" from one Ayanamsha to another may not be a good ideal, in general. In an experimental sense, it is always interesting to look a new ways to do things, but, sometimes the side effects cannot be pre-determined. For example, in the 70's it was deemed "safe" to test nuclear bombs underground because they could not send radiation into the air. In the 60's, it was thought that the "safe" tranquilizer thalidomide could be given to anyone, including pregnant women. We all know the results. Namaste' John Strange but stupid: "One of the main causes of the fall of the Roman Empire was that, lacking zero, they had no way to indicate successful termination of their C programs" (Weren't Roman C programs always 500 lines long?) John F (Jack) Melka Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.