natabara

[Guest guest]

dear natabara,

i knew that u r goinng to say things about my spelling mistakes

dont u think that getting the gist of the ideas is much more

important than the presentation itself ..and the knowledge not the

language is important ...information can be conveyed in any

language ...but human minds understands thje basic concepts ....i

think always ...

its an assurance from me that in future and infact from in here

itself ..i'd be very much presice and cautious of my spelling

mistakes .

do tell me the country u belong to ...it would help me to know the

cultural inluence on ur mind ..and ur basic philosophy ....as its

said that the effect of the water of the land never dims .and this

<beginning of the sentence with and .....is acceptable these days

....i'm sure u r upgraded too >...and and this also reflects in ur

way of doing predictions as u urself know while predicting that u

have to know "desh ,kal ,patra " meaning country ,time period and

the person u give the prediction to .

while giving predictions of an ancient period or judging history u

have to go back inthat time itself without the knowledge which u

have gained of the present time period .max muller was a pioneer

and he helped to spread the knowledge of vedas and indian

religious texts to the world when indian civilisation and culture

was looked down upon ...and also when india was under british

rule...and the basic concept of british rule was that indian's are

not fit to rule themselves ..also the british culture is more

advanced than any other culture of the world ..

 

as for today it is the indian culture which is giving relief to

the tortured souls throughout the world ..it seems surprising that

u look down upon max muller ..not realising that there were no

english translations and other books available to him at that time

....

today u have many books so u can easily say that he was biased ..i

also know that he never came to india so how can he understand

truely the core of indian culture ,but stil his efforts were

admirable and he struggled a lot to learn sanskrit and spread it

in germany ...we as indians are deeply indebted to him that he was

able to spread to a great extent our thinking to the western

world when we were not able to defend ourselves .

who can afford to be lazy and careless ...have u seen the

lion...his carelessness doesn't mean that he is not the king of

the jungle ..more important is the ideas and not the spellings .

regarding indian authors i had the previlage of seeing many

gurus and the religious texts of many sects of india and i found

that in the religious terms they are still the best as compared to

the west ...i aknowledge the excellence of buddhist and the deep

understanding of these sciences by japan and china ..they are now

the treasure house of the buddhist religion ...and ofcourse tibet

....but reading a book written by western author about indian

religion is like a child giving advice to an old man .

gita has always said that work for the work sake ...u have come to

know about gita from the last 200 years ...but it has been

followed by almost all the people of the country and its a

surprising fact that most of the indian rulers in one way or the

other affected by gita .

most of the gurus worked for the benefit of people and i know that

shri prabhupada became a monk after 50 years of age ....i do not

deny his commentery on gita...but his path was a path of bhakti

yoga as i have seen again n again in isckon temple i do hve his

horoscope also and its given in k n rao's books ..i hope u have

seen it ,but still if u read sant gyaneshwars ...gyaneshwari ..the

maharashtrian saint who lived in 12 ad and died at the age of

around 24 ...or taken samadhi as he...while alive closed himself

into a cave he was a full blown yogi and his guru was one of the

best teachers of yoga ..and then by our former poresident "dr

radhakrishna "he has also written it .if u look at what swami

vivekanand has said about gita ..and his meaning of it u will

realise as the mind so the commentery ..different yogis have

foloowed different four paths of yoga as its already given in gita

..

as regarding the gunas i think that best is always the best

...bible ,gita ,quran and vedas are always the same but people

interpret it ina different way ....were the prophets who wrote or

spoke these words ...were not laying down a broad idealistic

vision for the people ?

and why do u consider them to be the truth or u can say that these

people were above normal beings ...or someone has reached such

hieghts that he becomes an ideal itself ..i think sri k n rao has

reached such hieghts regarding astrology as 2000 years ago

....virihamira had done so ....again virihamira was once a normal

human being ..dont u think that u let the destiny decide aftyer 5o

years who will be considered the best ...i have till this date not

seen someone so good as good in writing books and spreading the

knowledge of astrology to the masses .,..yes i know thwy are many

indian astrologers

who are better than him in astrology but they have not writen the

books and spread the knowledge itself .

as regarding the yoga the middle path is itself written in gita

and our body is still the best teacher the person who does yoga

will automatically know if he is extending his limits and human

knowledge and excellence has been produced by always testing the

beliefs of that particular time period ...so is the case in the

yoga if u test things not just read them u will find that u'll

know many secrests of the yoga itself ..and what i have said was

just a little part of yoga ..it can be done by any normal person

of course if u want to exceed the limits then u need a guru ..guru

basically shortens the path ..do u think eklavya was a fool ?he

considered dronacharya as a guru but never got his teachings from

him ..and still he was able to defeat arjun indirectly ..,.so guru

is always not needed .

i know that isckon is a product of chaitanya mahaprabhus mind

....he gave the broad ideas and the disciple chain implemented it

down the 100 years ..prabhupada himself was givena prediction that

he will build 108 temples .if u read the books of swami

vivekananda and the teachings of paramhansa they potray a

different world ..a world of work for the work sake and not

indulge in arbitrary discussions but to work for the benefit of

the people and help the poor ..u have closed ur mind to the other

influences the best always see both the sides of the coin ..u have

been it seems only been influenced by isckon while vivekanandas

guru also lived like a christian and a muslim to judge the truth

of various religions and the proclaimed that all the religions

lead to the same goal ..though it had been said so since time

immemorial in india ..this is the experience which indians had to

learn again and isckon is nothing but a wave in indian religion

....but it was the influence of vivekananda that india got freedom

....gandhi was deeply influenced by him .

in case u have arguments ...and reasons to justify urself ...do

correspond in a likely manner ....i'd not mind ur ripping my

arguments .

one last thing.... intelligent people always take the best things

from all the best sources and reject what is not correct ....do

read all the books i have refered above ...so that u can ....

i'm more than confident that u'll think broader ...

wishing the best

deepak singh