Guest guest Posted February 14, 2002 Report Share Posted February 14, 2002 Dean Nicholas you <<The Uttara Phalguna section of Leo only spans 3 degrees 20 minutes out of 360 degrees so roughy you would only expect 1 in 100 persons to have the moon there >> me Thank you very much for your correction. I am glad to meet someone that knows about statistics. I did not take into consideration the navamsas for this matter and therefore my mistake, apart that i do not know much about statistics. Because there a 108 navamsas or padas regarding the naksatras, can we say that the Uttara Phalguna section in Leo is expected in 1 to 108 persons? If this is the case then we should expect 5 charts with the moon in this section in 540 charts (108 X 5 = 540) (This note is for those that do not know, so they can follow the conversation if they are interested.). Therefore, in my collection of 604 charts i would expect 5 charts to have this average. Although i do have only 1 chart instead of 5 i do not think that i have a high significance here because my collection should be at least 10,000 charts before i really see a good significance. But it helps in my small collection to appreciate some things. Please correct me if this is the case. If that is the case then constellations 3 Aries/ 7 Cancer/ 12 Leo/16 Scorpio / 21 Sagittarius / and 25 Pisces will have the same expectancy. According to my collection, i got 9 charts in 3 Aries; 7 in 7 Cancer; 1 in 12 Leo; 7 in 16 Sco; 5 in 21 Sag; and 3 in 25 Pisces. Extending the idea to the rest of the naksatras. Naksatras 1/2/4/6/8/9/10/11/13/15/17/18/19/20/22/24/26/and 27 or 18 naksatras in total, belong in their full length to a single sign. Should i say that the average to be born with the moon in any of those naksatras is 1:27? Naksatras 5/14/ and 23 have 2 padas in one sign and the other two padas in the next sign. We have only 3 naksatras in this group and all of them are ruled by Mars. Therefore, we have 6 naksatras-signs in this group. Should i say that the average for this naksatra-sign should be 1: 54? There are 6 constellations that have only one pada in one sign as we have seen already. They are naksatras 3/7/12/16/21/ and 25. The last group are 6 naksatras that have 3 padas in one sign. They are 3/7/12/16/21/ and 25. you <<Another point is that the length of rising time varies from one place to the next . In the Northern hemisphere the signs Cancer to Sagittarius rise longer and Capricorn to Gemini shorter . This is reversed in the Southern Hemisphere .. It gets most skewed as you approach the poles>> me A very interesting point, which i not doubt changes the statistical approach as well in regard to times of birth. you <<I did my degree in statistics .Like accounting it seems like common sense but can be highly complex>> me I know it can be highly complex. Perhaps you later can explain to us about the accounting done by the Enron company. It was a very complex thing to do but apparently most of the American Corporations follow that fragile but profitable system. I do not understand much about accounting but i have read that the current estimates for S&P 500 corporations are that they have collectively earned about $410 billion in 2001 when using the pro forma accounting method. However, when using GAAP, they have collectively earned about $240 billion. I do not understand much about that but it seems to be a huge gap in real earnings and "inflated earnings". All this can send the wrong signals to those that do not know much about accounting and many investor can fall a victim. I have read as well that the current valuation of the Dow Industrials, would fall to 5825 if the real report was implemented and the Dow would decline to 3300. An astrologer should have a knowledge of all this in order to give better predictions about the fluctuation of the stock market. We do not need to be astrologers to predict that once the real reports are implemented by law, the stock markets are going to dive deep. This is only one of the effects caused by the investigations done to the Enron company. Much more is to come, just wait and see. Best wishes Natabara Das Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 14, 2002 Report Share Posted February 14, 2002 Dear Natabara I'll attempt to answer your questions Because there a 108 navamsas or padas regarding the naksatras, can we say that the Uttara Phalguna section in Leo is expected in 1 to 108 persons? APPROXIMATELY BUT THERE ARE DIFFERENT LENGTHS OF RISING TIMES FOR DIFFERENT RASIS If this is the case then we should expect 5 charts with the moon in this section in 540 charts (108 X 5 = 540) (This note is for those that do not know, so they can follow the conversation if they are interested.). Therefore, in my collection of 604 charts i would expect 5 charts to have this average. Although i do have only 1 chart instead of 5 i do not think that i have a high significance here because my collection should be at least 10,000 charts before i really see a good significance. But it helps in my small collection to appreciate some things. Please correct me if this is the case. THE PROBLEM HERE IS THAT WITH ANY DATA QUIRKY THINGS WILL COME UP THE METHODOLOGY IS TO TEST THE HYPOTHESIS ON A SECOND SET OF DATA If that is the case then constellations 3 Aries/ 7 Cancer/ 12 Leo/16 Scorpio / 21 Sagittarius / and 25 Pisces will have the same expectancy. According to my collection, i got 9 charts in 3 Aries; 7 in 7 Cancer; 1 in 12 Leo; 7 in 16 Sco; 5 in 21 Sag; and 3 in 25 Pisces. Extending the idea to the rest of the naksatras. Naksatras 1/2/4/6/8/9/10/11/13/15/17/18/19/20/22/24/26/and 27 or 18 naksatras in total, belong in their full length to a single sign. Should i say that the average to be born with the moon in any of those naksatras is 1:27? APPROXIMATELY BUT SEE NOTE ABOVE Naksatras 5/14/ and 23 have 2 padas in one sign and the other two padas in the next sign. We have only 3 naksatras in this group and all of them are ruled by Mars. Therefore, we have 6 naksatras-signs in this group. Should i say that the average for this naksatra-sign should be 1: 54? AS ABOVE me I know it can be highly complex. Perhaps you later can explain to us about the accounting done by the Enron company. It was a very complex thing to do but apparently most of the American Corporations follow that fragile but profitable system. IT IS HIGHLY COMPLEX .THE SHORT OF IT IS THEY WERE ABLE TO PUT THEIR LIABILITIES OFF SHEET INFLATING THEIR PROFITS .ONE OF THE MAIN REASONS FOR THIS IS THAT AS THE SHARE PRICE ROSE THE EXECUTIVES GOT FAT BONUSES . THE NEXT QUESTION IS WHY ARTHUR ANDERSEN DID NOT PULL THEM UP ON THIS .THE ANSWER TO THIS IS THAT AA WERE ALSO DOING LUCRATIVE CONSULTATION WORK WHICH IS A CONFLICT OF INTEREST WITH THEIR AUDITING WORK ENRONS WHOLE BUSINESS WAS HIGHLY LEVERAGED BASED ON SPECULATIVE ASSESSMENTS OF FUTURE PRICES .IT SEEMS THAT THIS WAS DICEY WHILE THE ECONOMY WAS STRONG BUT CATASTROPHIC ONCE THE ECONOMY TURNED SOUR .A LEVERAGED DEAL IS ONE IN WHICH ONLY A SMALL AMOUNT OF MONEY IS PUT FORWARD ON A MUCH LARGER DEAL USUALLY 5 PER CENT OF COMPANIES ARE EXPECTED TO HAVE FALSE ACCOUNTS DESPITE THE OUTSIDE AUDITING .THE INCENTIVE INCREASED THOUGH WITH BONUSES FOR RISES IN THE SHARE PRICE . THE STOCK MARKET BOOM FROM 1997 TO MARCH 2000 HAS AN AIR OF UNREALITY ABOUT IT . SO IN BOTH STATISTICS AND ACCOUNTING A LOT OF CHEATING GOES ON ACCOUNTING WHICH SHOULD BE ABOUT ADDING TOGETHER NUMBERS GETS SO CONFUSING THAT AA COULD NOT PROPERLY UNDERSTAND WHAT WAS GOING ON AT ENRON HOPE THIS HELPS NICHOLAS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.