Mercury as Badhakesh-dear nicholas and friends

[Guest guest]

dear nicholas

please do not misunderstand me. i am asking questions only to learn

more and basically i always belive that a healthy discussion benifits

the list at large. u are a good astrologer and so are many in this

list. if we participate in interesting topics it would benifit many

young astrologers in this list.

my objectives are always not for my benifit, they are for all.

kind regards

partha

 

gjlist, "Nicholas" <jyotish108@h...> wrote:

> Dear Partha

> If you already have all the answers why do you ask the list ?

> Nicholas

> -

> "partvinu5" <partvinu5>

> <gjlist>

> Tuesday, January 15, 2002 7:59 PM

> Re: [GJ] Mercury as Badhakesh-dear nicholas

>

>

> > dear nicholas

> >

> > yes it is true that in BPHS the great parasara has given the

effects

> > for the placement for various lords.

> >

> > But i have read on different lagnas , their karaktwas, the various

> > lords and their placements.

> >

> > now please note that

> > a) for dhanu lagna-jupiter in 6th gives raja yoga

> > b) for mithuna lagna budha in 12th is considered very good though

for

> > other lagnas it is considered bad.

> > c) badhakesh for vrischika lagna is best placed in 12th huose.

> > d) there are so many concepts that are discussed in uttara-

kalamrita,

> > saravali, jaimini sutras that are corollary to the master classic

of

> > BPHS.

> > e) please go through other classics in which there are chapters on

> > lagna and the placements of different planets are mentioned.

> >

> > apart from reading these classics that i have mentioned i am

mostly

> > quoting from jyotishya ratanavali which is the work of my

> > greatgrandfather. he has translated many classics in my mother

tongue

> > (telugu). i have cheked up and he has not altered anything that is

> > there in the classics. His third volume in exclusively on various

> > lagnas that is very exhaustive.

> >

> > regards

> > partha

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > gjlist, "Nicholas" <jyotish108@h...> wrote:

> > > Dear Partha

> > > My belief is the Lordship of a quadrant is neutral for all

Lagnas .

> > > However when a planet also rules a trine it becomes specially

> > auspicious

> > > (Yoga karaka)

> > > My understanding of the conceptof kendradhipatya yoga is a

planet

> > becomes

> > > weakened by ruling two quadrants .

> > > The four quadrants represent the four pillars of life

> > self ,spouse ,home and

> > > work .When a planet takes on two such large portfolios it is

> > somewhat

> > > overburdened and therefore weakened in it's ability to give

> > results .

> > > There fore I do not see any particular placement as overcoming

this

> > weakness

> > > .

> > > Therefore I would stick to the standard understanding of what

> > constitutes

> > > good placement for quadrant Lords .

> > > To understand the advantages and disadvantages of different

> > placements of

> > > the household Lords I refer you to the chapter in BPHS that

deals

> > with this

> > > subject . I can not claim to improve on this .

> > > As I said Badhaka is not used in Jataka (delineation of the

birth

> > chart)

> > > Best Wishes

> > > Nicholas

> > >

> > > -

> > > "partvinu5" <partvinu5>

> > > <gjlist>

> > > Tuesday, January 15, 2002 7:15 PM

> > > Re: [GJ] Mercury as Badhakesh-dear nicholas

> > >

> > >

> > > > dear nicholas

> > > > i do agree that the quadrant and trine lords are powerful in

> > > > quadrants and trines. but for the mercury lagnas and jupiter

> > lagnas,

> > > > the respective badhakesh could lose their maleficeince to

certain

> > > > extent if they are in dusthansa. isn't it. i have read that

> > mercury

> > > > for dhanu lagna is best placed in 6th then followed by 3rd and

> > then

> > > > konas. this would reduce its malefiecience. could you kindly

> > explain

> > > > me if we do not apply the dusthana concept to janma chart then

> > where

> > > > should we apply it. i mean the kendradhipatya dosha can be

> > reduced by

> > > > placement in which rasis from the lagna???

> > > >

> > > > regards

> > > > partha

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > gjlist, "Nicholas" <jyotish108@h...> wrote:

> > > > > Dear Partha

> > > > > The concept of Badhaka is not used in Jataka (reading of the

> > birth

> > > > > horoscope) . Lords of the quadrants and trines are best

placed

> > in

> > > > trines and

> > > > > quadrants this is where one gets favourable yogas as

described

> > by

> > > > Parasara

> > > > > .It is a weakness of the lord of a trine or quadrant to be

> > placed

> > > > in a

> > > > > dusthana (6,8 or 12) .However for Mercury's lagnas Jupiter

has

> > the

> > > > status of

> > > > > maraka or death wielder which is applicable in it's dashas

or

> > > > bhuktis .For

> > > > > Jupiter's signs Mercury has the status of Maraka .It is not

> > unusual

> > > > for

> > > > > jyotishis to mix up these concepts but hear is the clear

> > > > understanding .

> > > > > Best Wishes

> > > > > Nicholas

> > > > > -

> > > > > "partvinu5" <partvinu5>

> > > > > <gjlist>

> > > > > Tuesday, January 15, 2002 4:52 PM

> > > > > [GJ] Mercury as Badhakesh

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > > dear gurus and friends

> > > > > >

> > > > > > i would like to know if the badhak qualities of a planet

> > > > decreases as

> > > > > > it goes into a kona or dusthana??

> > > > > >

> > > > > > for mithuna jupiter is a badhak, my understanding is that

if

> > > > jupiter

> > > > > > is in dusthana his badhak qualties will decrease. for

kanya

> > lagna

> > > > i

> > > > > > suppose it is the same. placement in kona is also good.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > no my question si for my dhanu lagna mercury is

badhakesh. he

> > is

> > > > > > placed in lagna with 9.95 rupas in shadbala. he is

conjunct

> > > > lagna .

> > > > > > could it behave as a badhakesh(it is in a kona).

> > > > > >

> > > > > > please enlighten me as mecury antar for me in rahu

mahadas is

> > > > going

> > > > > > to start soon.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > regards

> > > > > > partha

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Om Namo Bhagavate Vasudevaya; Hare Krishna; Om Tat Sat

> > > > > > : gjlist-@e...

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Your use of is subject to

> > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Om Namo Bhagavate Vasudevaya; Hare Krishna; Om Tat Sat

> > > > : gjlist-@e...

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Your use of is subject to

> >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Om Namo Bhagavate Vasudevaya; Hare Krishna; Om Tat Sat

> > : gjlist-@e...

> >

> >

> >

> > Your use of is subject to

 

> >

> >

> >