Guest guest Posted December 27, 2001 Report Share Posted December 27, 2001 Dear Natabara and Wendy Another point is that Melbourne Australia where I post from is 16 hours "ahead" of the East Coast of the US and 19 hours ahead of the West Coast ..This may explain why some responses arrive before the original (unless we have a bunch of psychics ) . With sometimes jumbling the order if you only log in once in a day it can be confusing what was said first .Some correspondents may also be very busy and unable to resond immediately or may respond to something said days before . The nature of the medium is that it is brief and usually quickly written and therefore things may appear blunt or tactless . Also whatever planetary configuration you describe unfavorably someone out there amongst 577 rs will surely have it . So most of the writers have been here a while and are well aware of the confusions and misunderstandings that can arise using e-mail .So Dasji once offered the advice to think carefully before writing something provocative or sarcastic or launching a personal attack . Despite the weaknesses of the medium there has been some very good material posted and this is a great forum for astrologers to bounce ideas around with each other . Best Wishes Nicholas >"natabara" <natabara >gjlist >"GJlist" <gjlist> >[GJ] GH = Libra Lagna >Thu, 27 Dec 2001 08:44:03 -0000 > >Wendy > >Wendy, i have read your email few times and i think that there must be a >mistake in quotation. You say that Venus must occupy a trine. But the >yoga indicated does not mention that. > >Might I suggest that you read the posts thoroughly before you post your >reply :-) > >Thank you for your suggestion, i should have added specifically > >But the yoga indicated does not mention that (specifically). Or meaning >that the formula does not mention Venus as you say. I know that you can >read the astrological formulas but while reading C' posting nowhere i could >read that she was refering to that specific formula. Obviously, your >intuition told you that and that is why you was applying the formula to her >chart. > >Unless c was refering to my posting to volker and quoting his posting, but >the post is not clear because it seems to me that c's post was sent to >Nicholas and not to the list. All that i could do is to post about aspects >to clarify the thought. > ><<Of course, in this instance, Venus is ascendant lord's >dispositor...kindly read the yoga again and Cynthia's erroneous >interpretation of it :-)>> > >Yes i agree that you know how to read astro formulas but like i say >Nicholas posting about c's email is not very clear if c was really >referring to that yoga. > >I am worried because i can see from Nicholas post that he is quoting C's >but nowhere in my postings from the GJLIST i have her posting. Few days >ago i discovered that some of my posting took almost 48 hours in appearing >in the GJLIst and now C' posting is apparently missing. Have a look below. > >Because i did not get the original posting of C i could only read the >quotation from Nicholas as you can see below. > >Now look at this Wendy, i think that i discover the trouble. Nicholas >posted GH = on 22 Dec at 19:11 quoting Cynthia's posting from the 23 Dec at >3:39. > >Your posting which i have answered was posted on 23 Dec at 2:58 and >displayed on my computer on 24 Dec at 13:52. > >Finally Cynthia's posting came to my computer on 24 Dec at 14:40 having >been sent (according to here) on 22 Dec at 16:39. > >So, there must be some computer gosth somewhere. In this way i thought >that C's email was directed to Nicholas and that is why i did not answer. > >And there is more. It is 26 Dec 20:06 GMT and i read that ravindramani >posted about my email ASPECTS on 26 Dec at 3:57 but i have not got it yet. >I have posted ASPECTS on 24 dec at 10:56 GMT. According to my computer, i >sent 5 emails on ASPECTS in 2 minutes??? >**** >Dear Cynthia >Please supply full birth details >Nicholas > - > cynthia novak > gjlist > Sunday, December 23, 2001 3:39 AM > Re: [GJ] GH = Libra Lagna > > > OK, you've gotten my interest. Tell me what I'm doing wrong here. > > My ASC lord is Saturn, it is exalted in the 10th and the dispositor is >Venus who is trined by Jupiter. > > isn't Jupiter the only graha that can throw a trine???? > > If this is true...where's my financial abundance??? > > BTW, I have never felt poor even though I have often had very little >money to just scrape by. > > Perhaps it is a perception thing even if it is not literal. > > c > > > - > natabara > GJlist > Friday, December 21, 2001 4:00 AM > [GJ] GH = Libra Lagna > > > Dear Volker > > <<Now I found in Shuka Nadi (translated by venerable R.Santhanam) > the following statement (Capitel 2, Dhana Bhava, Sloka 37 c.): > > "One will be extremely wealthy if, the ascendent lord is in > exaltation while his dispositor is in a trine." > > This is just the combination you can find in GH`s chart using Libra >Ascendent with > Venus, Lagna Lord in exaltation and its dispositor Jupiter in the 9. >house.>> > > Thank you very much for the tip. I will put this on my files for >further reference. > > I do not have that book although i have Bhrigu Nandi Nadi by R.G.Rao. > > Best wishes > Natabara Das > > > _______________ Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.