Guest guest Posted October 13, 2001 Report Share Posted October 13, 2001 Hare Krsna Das, At 10:35 PM 10/12/01 -0700, you wrote: >I have watched this lagna be argued about for years in His case, and it >is never fully solved. The lagna question *is* currently being solved vis a vis events. Read Ron Day's post on transits to travel axes during the period of Prabhupada's first travels from India. So far, he has presented the most (and only) arguments favoring the Sg lagna purely on the basis of known events. His research is convincing. There is more, however. There is decisive evidence in favor of Sg lagna using Rasi dasas. I haven't presented them thus far, as most members of the list do not use Rasi dasas. Why rasi dasas? It is because their calculation is based *solely* on the lagna, and not naksatras. Now, if you have a choice between two possible lagnas, then calculation of Narayana dasa (or other rasi dasas like Chara, etc.) will not make sense at all if you calculate from the wrong lagna. Thus, it will be easy to ascertain from the calculation of, and analysis of either Narayana or Chara dasas, or others like Kendradi or Trikona dasa, whether it is Sg or Cp. If there are ears to hear all of this, then I will present it. Best wishes, Robert ===================================== Robert A. Koch, Vedic Astrologer Faculty Member, SJVC and ACVA Phone: 541-318-0248 visit <http://www.robertkoch.com> or e-mail rk. rk and rkoch rkoch Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 13, 2001 Report Share Posted October 13, 2001 Dear Robert, Please take the time to share your knowledge. Thanks, Phyl - Robert A. Koch <rkoch <gjlist> Saturday, October 13, 2001 11:00 AM [gjlist] Easy Lagna resolution > Hare Krsna Das, > > At 10:35 PM 10/12/01 -0700, you wrote: > > >I have watched this lagna be argued about for years in His case, and it > >is never fully solved. > > The lagna question *is* currently being solved vis a vis events. Read Ron > Day's post on transits to travel axes during the period of Prabhupada's > first travels from India. So far, he has presented the most (and only) > arguments favoring the Sg lagna purely on the basis of known events. His > research is convincing. > > There is more, however. There is decisive evidence in favor of Sg lagna > using Rasi dasas. I haven't presented them thus far, as most members of > the list do not use Rasi dasas. Why rasi dasas? It is because their > calculation is based *solely* on the lagna, and not naksatras. Now, if > you have a choice between two possible lagnas, then calculation of Narayana > dasa (or other rasi dasas like Chara, etc.) will not make sense at all if > you calculate from the wrong lagna. Thus, it will be easy to ascertain > from the calculation of, and analysis of either Narayana or Chara dasas, or > others like Kendradi or Trikona dasa, whether it is Sg or Cp. > > If there are ears to hear all of this, then I will present it. > > Best wishes, > Robert > > ===================================== > Robert A. Koch, Vedic Astrologer > Faculty Member, SJVC and ACVA > Phone: 541-318-0248 > visit <http://www.robertkoch.com> or e-mail > rk. rk and > rkoch rkoch > > > > gjlist- > > > > Your use of is subject to > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 14, 2001 Report Share Posted October 14, 2001 Dear Phyl, > Dear Robert, > > Please take the time to share your knowledge. > > Thanks, Phyl If you take the time to study (in depth) BPHS, Jaimini, Saravali, Jataka Parijata etc., then you too will be privy to the same knowledge as all other well-schooled jyotisha. This knowledge is available to us all...anyone can learn this, what cannot be learnt from a book is the ability to see with *clear* eyes.... The truth is, that without the ability to see the horoscope (Rashi), what earthly advantage is there in applying numerous techniques. It takes many years (some say many lifetimes) to master the skill of Rashi interpretation. The sad situation today is that many new students, seduced by knowledge(?), never develop this skill. Best Wishes, Wendy ========================== Wendy Vasicek: Vedic Astrologer http://welcome.to/Vedic Astrology/ wenvas Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 14, 2001 Report Share Posted October 14, 2001 Gidday Robert, I second that. Please elaborate further & do share your knowledge. Jyotish is learned from a parampara - a guru, not merely from books. Unfortunately there are many who do not accept the authority of any bona-fide gurus, but would rather listen to their own minds - the chanchala guru. What suprises me is that there are many "cliff note" astrologers who couldn't less about any real depth in astrology, but would rather propound their dingbat simpleton approach. The simple approach is sometimes the over-simplified approach. ~Justin gjlist, "Phyl Chubb MA" <aboutyou@c...> wrote: > Dear Robert, > > Please take the time to share your knowledge. > > Thanks, Phyl > > - > Robert A. Koch <rkoch@b...> > <gjlist> > Saturday, October 13, 2001 11:00 AM > [gjlist] Easy Lagna resolution > > > > Hare Krsna Das, > > > > At 10:35 PM 10/12/01 -0700, you wrote: > > > > >I have watched this lagna be argued about for years in His case, and it > > >is never fully solved. > > > > The lagna question *is* currently being solved vis a vis events. Read > Ron > > Day's post on transits to travel axes during the period of Prabhupada's > > first travels from India. So far, he has presented the most (and only) > > arguments favoring the Sg lagna purely on the basis of known events. His > > research is convincing. > > > > There is more, however. There is decisive evidence in favor of Sg lagna > > using Rasi dasas. I haven't presented them thus far, as most members of > > the list do not use Rasi dasas. Why rasi dasas? It is because their > > calculation is based *solely* on the lagna, and not naksatras. Now, if > > you have a choice between two possible lagnas, then calculation of > Narayana > > dasa (or other rasi dasas like Chara, etc.) will not make sense at all if > > you calculate from the wrong lagna. Thus, it will be easy to ascertain > > from the calculation of, and analysis of either Narayana or Chara dasas, > or > > others like Kendradi or Trikona dasa, whether it is Sg or Cp. > > > > If there are ears to hear all of this, then I will present it. > > > > Best wishes, > > Robert > > > > ===================================== > > Robert A. Koch, Vedic Astrologer > > Faculty Member, SJVC and ACVA > > Phone: 541-318-0248 > > visit <http://www.robertkoch.com> or e-mail > > rk@r... rk@r... and > > rkoch@b... rkoch@b... > > > > > > > > gjlist- > > > > > > > > Your use of is subject to > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 14, 2001 Report Share Posted October 14, 2001 Robert, I just got back from a short trip to the country where I did some stargazing. It's a fun hobby. Your rationale behind the use of lagna dashas is very good.I'm all ears. Dharmapada gjlist, "Robert A. Koch" <rkoch@b...> wrote: > Hare Krsna Das, > > At 10:35 PM 10/12/01 -0700, you wrote: > > >I have watched this lagna be argued about for years in His case, and it > >is never fully solved. > > The lagna question *is* currently being solved vis a vis events. Read Ron > Day's post on transits to travel axes during the period of Prabhupada's > first travels from India. So far, he has presented the most (and only) > arguments favoring the Sg lagna purely on the basis of known events. His > research is convincing. > > There is more, however. There is decisive evidence in favor of Sg lagna > using Rasi dasas. I haven't presented them thus far, as most members of > the list do not use Rasi dasas. Why rasi dasas? It is because their > calculation is based *solely* on the lagna, and not naksatras. Now, if > you have a choice between two possible lagnas, then calculation of Narayana > dasa (or other rasi dasas like Chara, etc.) will not make sense at all if > you calculate from the wrong lagna. Thus, it will be easy to ascertain > from the calculation of, and analysis of either Narayana or Chara dasas, or > others like Kendradi or Trikona dasa, whether it is Sg or Cp. > > If there are ears to hear all of this, then I will present it. > > Best wishes, > Robert > > ===================================== > Robert A. Koch, Vedic Astrologer > Faculty Member, SJVC and ACVA > Phone: 541-318-0248 > visit <http://www.robertkoch.com> or e-mail > rk@r... rk@r... and > rkoch@b... rkoch@b... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 14, 2001 Report Share Posted October 14, 2001 Justin, House position, sign position,lordship and a karakatva- these provide the lion's share of indications. What proves this truth is when someone goofs in front of a client because of relying too heavily on secondary indicators such as divisional charts. I say " too " heavily. I am not saying that they have no validity. Dharmapada gjlist, badc00kie wrote: > > Gidday Robert, > > I second that. Please elaborate further & do share your knowledge. > Jyotish is learned from a parampara - a guru, not merely from books. > Unfortunately there are many who do not accept the authority of any > bona-fide gurus, but would rather listen to their own minds - the > chanchala guru. > > What suprises me is that there are many "cliff note" astrologers who > couldn't less about any real depth in astrology, but would rather > propound their dingbat simpleton approach. > > The simple approach is sometimes the over-simplified approach. > > ~Justin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.