GJ List Quiz #4 (follow up to Quiz #1)/Answer

[Guest guest]

Hi everyone,

 

I guess the prospects of marriage Feb. 1968 are strong when

considered by the method outlined by Pt. Sanjayrath.( i hope i didn't

screw up in looking up the chart of the native / reading the post of

shri.rath)

 

The second from UL is Aries. The seventh lord in d-1 happens to be

the Sun and in navamsa it happens to be mercury. Jupiter, happens to

be in Leo during the whole of 1968, starting sep. 1967.

Thereby aspecting the second from UL, by graha and rasi drishti,

Mercury the 7th lord in navamsa, is in aquarious, since jan 1968, and

the sun arrives into the aq. on the 13/14th of feb. 1968, which i

guess fortified marriage, gaining the aspect of jupiter. ( I guess it

would also make sense to take the graha drishti between planetary

aspects and rasi drishti for plantary-sign aspects)

 

All the conditions that pt. Sanjay rath, mentions seem to be

satisfied here.

 

Could someone appraise this interpretation as right / wrong.

 

warm Regards and respect,

Karthik

[Guest guest]

Dear Karthik,

You should have mailed this BEFORE Chris gave us an answer, now it's too

late. Would you like a second chance with another chart?

Regards and love,

Liliana

 

 

 

>rastapoppolous

>gjlist

>gjlist

>[gjlist] GJ List Quiz #4 (follow up to Quiz #1)/Answer

>Sat, 23 Jun 2001 23:21:46 -0000

>MIME-Version: 1.0

>X-Originating-IP: 130.127.3.2

>Received: from [64.211.240.232] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id

>MHotMailBCFE6F88007A40042A2440D3F0E8750019; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 16:21:57 -0700

>Received: from [10.1.4.54] by fk. with NNFMP; 23 Jun 2001

>23:21:47 -0000

>Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_3); 23 Jun 2001 23:21:46 -0000

>Received: (qmail 83340 invoked from network); 23 Jun 2001 23:21:46 -0000

>Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l8. with QMQP; 23 Jun

>2001 23:21:46 -0000

>Received: from unknown (HELO mq.) (10.1.1.36) by mta1 with SMTP;

>23 Jun 2001 23:21:46 -0000

>Received: from [10.1.2.4] by mq. with NNFMP; 23 Jun 2001

>23:21:46 -0000

>From sentto-490438-6044-993338507-astrolila Sat, 23 Jun 2001 16:22:48 -0700

>X-eGroups-Return:

>sentto-490438-6044-993338507-astrolila=hotmail.com (AT) returns (DOT)

>X-Sender: rastapoppolous

>X-Apparently-gjlist

>X-eGroups-Return: rastapoppolous

>Message-ID: <9h38aa+hju2 (AT) eGroups (DOT) com>

>User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82

>X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster

>Mailing-List: list gjlist; contact

>gjlist-owner

>Delivered-mailing list gjlist

>Precedence: bulk

>List-Un: <gjlist>

>

>Hi everyone,

>

> I guess the prospects of marriage Feb. 1968 are strong when

>considered by the method outlined by Pt. Sanjayrath.( i hope i didn't

>screw up in looking up the chart of the native / reading the post of

>shri.rath)

>

>The second from UL is Aries. The seventh lord in d-1 happens to be

>the Sun and in navamsa it happens to be mercury. Jupiter, happens to

>be in Leo during the whole of 1968, starting sep. 1967.

>Thereby aspecting the second from UL, by graha and rasi drishti,

>Mercury the 7th lord in navamsa, is in aquarious, since jan 1968, and

>the sun arrives into the aq. on the 13/14th of feb. 1968, which i

>guess fortified marriage, gaining the aspect of jupiter. ( I guess it

>would also make sense to take the graha drishti between planetary

>aspects and rasi drishti for plantary-sign aspects)

>

> All the conditions that pt. Sanjay rath, mentions seem to be

>satisfied here.

>

>Could someone appraise this interpretation as right / wrong.

>

>warm Regards and respect,

>Karthik

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>gjlist-

>

>

>

>Your use of is subject to

>

>

 

_______________________

Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

[Guest guest]

Dear Liliana,

I am aware of the answer, and i did mail my incorrect answer, to

Mr.Kevill, before the correct answer was posted. I just wanted to

know if this is the right way of approaching the chart.

Regards,

Karthik

 

gjlist, "Liliana Sucur Perisic" <astrolila@h...> wrote:

> Dear Karthik,

> You should have mailed this BEFORE Chris gave us an answer, now

it's too

> late. Would you like a second chance with another chart?

> Regards and love,

> Liliana

>

>

>

> >rastapoppolous

> >gjlist

> >gjlist

> >[gjlist] GJ List Quiz #4 (follow up to Quiz #1)/Answer

> >Sat, 23 Jun 2001 23:21:46 -0000

> >MIME-Version: 1.0

> >X-Originating-IP: 130.127.3.2

> >Received: from [64.211.240.232] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id

> >MHotMailBCFE6F88007A40042A2440D3F0E8750019; Sat, 23 Jun 2001

16:21:57 -0700

> >Received: from [10.1.4.54] by fk. with NNFMP; 23 Jun

2001

> >23:21:47 -0000

> >Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_3); 23 Jun 2001 23:21:46 -0000

> >Received: (qmail 83340 invoked from network); 23 Jun 2001

23:21:46 -0000

> >Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l8. with QMQP;

23 Jun

> >2001 23:21:46 -0000

> >Received: from unknown (HELO mq.) (10.1.1.36) by mta1

with SMTP;

> >23 Jun 2001 23:21:46 -0000

> >Received: from [10.1.2.4] by mq. with NNFMP; 23 Jun

2001

> >23:21:46 -0000

> >From sentto-490438-6044-993338507-astrolila Sat, 23 Jun 2001

16:22:48 -0700

> >X-eGroups-Return:

> >sentto-490438-6044-993338507-astrolila=hotmail.com@r...

> >X-Sender: rastapoppolous

> >X-Apparently-gjlist

> >X-eGroups-Return: rastapoppolous

> >Message-ID: <9h38aa+hju2@e...>

> >User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82

> >X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster

> >Mailing-List: list gjlist; contact

> >gjlist-owner

> >Delivered-mailing list gjlist

> >Precedence: bulk

> >List-Un: <gjlist->

> >

> >Hi everyone,

> >

> > I guess the prospects of marriage Feb. 1968 are strong when

> >considered by the method outlined by Pt. Sanjayrath.( i hope i

didn't

> >screw up in looking up the chart of the native / reading the post

of

> >shri.rath)

> >

> >The second from UL is Aries. The seventh lord in d-1 happens to be

> >the Sun and in navamsa it happens to be mercury. Jupiter, happens

to

> >be in Leo during the whole of 1968, starting sep. 1967.

> >Thereby aspecting the second from UL, by graha and rasi drishti,

> >Mercury the 7th lord in navamsa, is in aquarious, since jan 1968,

and

> >the sun arrives into the aq. on the 13/14th of feb. 1968, which i

> >guess fortified marriage, gaining the aspect of jupiter. ( I guess

it

> >would also make sense to take the graha drishti between planetary

> >aspects and rasi drishti for plantary-sign aspects)

> >

> > All the conditions that pt. Sanjay rath, mentions seem to be

> >satisfied here.

> >

> >Could someone appraise this interpretation as right / wrong.

> >

> >warm Regards and respect,

> >Karthik

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >gjlist-

> >

> >

> >

> >Your use of is subject to

 

> >

> >

>

>

____________________

___

> Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at

http://www.hotmail.com.

[Guest guest]

Hi KArthik,

 

Well done. Your explanation of the event is consistent with the teachings of Pt.

Sanjay Rath.

 

But, transits are clinchers, before that one must cross-check with the Dasas to

see if the static promise is present.

 

So try Narayana Dasa, Vimshottari Dasa and see if marriage is promised, further

verify with Varsha Chart.

 

Regards

Narayan

 

 

 

gjlist, rastapoppolous wrote:

> Dear Liliana,

> I am aware of the answer, and i did mail my incorrect answer, to

> Mr.Kevill, before the correct answer was posted. I just wanted to

> know if this is the right way of approaching the chart.

> Regards,

> Karthik

>

> gjlist, "Liliana Sucur Perisic" <astrolila@h...> wrote:

> > Dear Karthik,

> > You should have mailed this BEFORE Chris gave us an answer, now

> it's too

> > late. Would you like a second chance with another chart?

> > Regards and love,

> > Liliana

> >

> >

> >

> > >rastapoppolous

> > >gjlist

> > >gjlist

> > >[gjlist] GJ List Quiz #4 (follow up to Quiz #1)/Answer

> > >Sat, 23 Jun 2001 23:21:46 -0000

> > >MIME-Version: 1.0

> > >X-Originating-IP: 130.127.3.2

> > >Received: from [64.211.240.232] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id

> > >MHotMailBCFE6F88007A40042A2440D3F0E8750019; Sat, 23 Jun 2001

> 16:21:57 -0700

> > >Received: from [10.1.4.54] by fk. with NNFMP; 23 Jun

> 2001

> > >23:21:47 -0000

> > >Received: (EGP: mail-7_1_3); 23 Jun 2001 23:21:46 -0000

> > >Received: (qmail 83340 invoked from network); 23 Jun 2001

> 23:21:46 -0000

> > >Received: from unknown (10.1.10.26) by l8. with QMQP;

> 23 Jun

> > >2001 23:21:46 -0000

> > >Received: from unknown (HELO mq.) (10.1.1.36) by mta1

> with SMTP;

> > >23 Jun 2001 23:21:46 -0000

> > >Received: from [10.1.2.4] by mq. with NNFMP; 23 Jun

> 2001

> > >23:21:46 -0000

> > >From sentto-490438-6044-993338507-astrolila Sat, 23 Jun 2001

> 16:22:48 -0700

> > >X-eGroups-Return:

> > >sentto-490438-6044-993338507-astrolila=hotmail.com@r...

> > >X-Sender: rastapoppolous

> > >X-Apparently-gjlist

> > >X-eGroups-Return: rastapoppolous

> > >Message-ID: <9h38aa+hju2@e...>

> > >User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82

> > >X-Mailer: eGroups Message Poster

> > >Mailing-List: list gjlist; contact

> > >gjlist-owner

> > >Delivered-mailing list gjlist

> > >Precedence: bulk

> > >List-Un: <gjlist->

> > >

> > >Hi everyone,

> > >

> > > I guess the prospects of marriage Feb. 1968 are strong when

> > >considered by the method outlined by Pt. Sanjayrath.( i hope i

> didn't

> > >screw up in looking up the chart of the native / reading the post

> of

> > >shri.rath)

> > >

> > >The second from UL is Aries. The seventh lord in d-1 happens to be

> > >the Sun and in navamsa it happens to be mercury. Jupiter, happens

> to

> > >be in Leo during the whole of 1968, starting sep. 1967.

> > >Thereby aspecting the second from UL, by graha and rasi drishti,

> > >Mercury the 7th lord in navamsa, is in aquarious, since jan 1968,

> and

> > >the sun arrives into the aq. on the 13/14th of feb. 1968, which i

> > >guess fortified marriage, gaining the aspect of jupiter. ( I guess

> it

> > >would also make sense to take the graha drishti between planetary

> > >aspects and rasi drishti for plantary-sign aspects)

> > >

> > > All the conditions that pt. Sanjay rath, mentions seem to be

> > >satisfied here.

> > >

> > >Could someone appraise this interpretation as right / wrong.

> > >

> > >warm Regards and respect,

> > >Karthik

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >gjlist-

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >Your use of is subject to

>

> > >

> > >

> >

> >

> ____________________

> ___

> > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at

> http://www.hotmail.com.

[Guest guest]

Dear Karthik:

 

I'm rather skeptical of some of the Jaimini techniques of Sanjay Rath.

They seem overly complicated and I haven't seen a good argument for their

efficacious use. Maybe when some of his students can get some blind

quizzes right, I might be more favourably disposed towards them!

 

As it is, I think you need to expain more of your logic below to those of

us who are unfamiliar with it. Off the top, I'd say you would still need to

explain why it was THIS transit of Sun in Aq and Jupiter in Leo that led to

marriage at this time.

 

I think you still have to show why "standard" rules of interpretation are

insufficient to explain events before you start to invoke more esoteric

factors such as UL (I gather, upapada lagna?) Why should we abandon

standard rules of interpretation? On other words, what's wrong with the

7th house?

 

Chris

 

 

>

> I guess the prospects of marriage Feb. 1968 are strong when

>considered by the method outlined by Pt. Sanjayrath.( i hope i didn't

>screw up in looking up the chart of the native / reading the post of

>shri.rath)

>

>The second from UL is Aries. The seventh lord in d-1 happens to be

>the Sun and in navamsa it happens to be mercury. Jupiter, happens to

>be in Leo during the whole of 1968, starting sep. 1967.

>Thereby aspecting the second from UL, by graha and rasi drishti,

>Mercury the 7th lord in navamsa, is in aquarious, since jan 1968, and

>the sun arrives into the aq. on the 13/14th of feb. 1968, which i

>guess fortified marriage, gaining the aspect of jupiter. ( I guess it

>would also make sense to take the graha drishti between planetary

>aspects and rasi drishti for plantary-sign aspects)

>

> All the conditions that pt. Sanjay rath, mentions seem to be

>satisfied here.

>

>Could someone appraise this interpretation as right / wrong.

>

>warm Regards and respect,

>Karthik

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>gjlist-

>

>

>

>Your use of is subject to

>

>

>

>