Guest guest Posted June 22, 2001 Report Share Posted June 22, 2001 Manoj: >1. Are they in all, 2, 4 or 8 brothers and sisters. The most likely number >is 4. Correct! She has two sisters and two brothers. Both sisters are older than she. Please tell us how you arrived at this conclusion. I know that gender is more easily seen in siblings. In her case, older siblings are seen in 11th house. Jupiter is lord and its in Capricorn, a female sign. It is aspected by Venus, another female sign. So two key female influences on older siblings. Does this also account for the number of female older siblings? I don't think it works in such a straightforward way, but it's nice to think it does. Younger siblings are seen in 3rd house, Aries, a male sign. Ruler Mars is in Taurus a female sign with neutered Mercury. Female so far. However it is aspected by Jupiter (male) and Ketu (female) both in female signs. It also aspected from neuter Saturn in a male sign. So aside from the sign on the 3rd cusp and Jupiter's aspect to the lord, not a whole lot of male influence on the 3rd. In navamsha, 3rd lord Mars is in male sign of Leo. > >2. There could be a birth of a younger co-born during 1950 or 1953. True, although I'm not sure of the exact date. > >3. Marriage could be around 25-26 years of age. No, she got married at age 18. > >4. Education could be in scientific area. No, she has no specialized education. > >5. Period beginning 1977 is bad for her husband. No. He died in 1995. Well done on the sibling question though. Chris Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 23, 2001 Report Share Posted June 23, 2001 Christopher Kevill wrote: > Manoj: > > >1. Are they in all, 2, 4 or 8 brothers and sisters. The most likely number > >is 4. > > Correct! She has two sisters and two brothers. Both sisters are older > than she. This makes 5: NOT 2, 4, or 8! ..... Correct? regards Mani Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 26, 2001 Report Share Posted June 26, 2001 Hello Chris, No worries. This happens at times. I was mentioning 18, 25 and 26 but then left it as 18 was too early a date for marriage. This is where the Desh (Society) Kaal (Time) and Patra (person) principle becomes so important. I forgot that I am looking at a chart of a person who is not an Indian and could even be married at an early age like 18 or even less than 18. I am happy with failures than with successes as it is failures which teach you the lessons of life, not the successes. with best wishes, Manoj _______________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.