Guest guest Posted June 12, 2001 Report Share Posted June 12, 2001 Dear Chris and others, What I see about the quiz method is this: When Chris proposed my name as a possible master of ceremonies, I begged for time, seein a great responsibility. Sorry, Chris, you have taken the easy way out: posed a query, waited for answers and published the answer on the deadline. Practically no work involved! It is NOT so simple as that! 1. Whoever poses a quiz cannot participate, knowing the answer already! So a permanent Major Domo (MD) can never try and learn. 2. Many who´d like to try are afraid of being exposed as failures. 3. Every published answer influences later efforts. If I first read a certain solution, with logical arguments, I am prejudiced: CANNOT think AGAINST that. 4. As at present, we have no chance for a second effort. We are not striving to win a prize, but to learn and refine our methods. 5. The right way would be for a person to pose a quiz and also be MD. All answers go to the MD directly. The MD answers individually, saying, "Right" "hot", "Irrelevant", "cold" or "Try more positive (or negative)!" etc. to help without revealing too much. Then the MD publishes the answer - with or without his or her analysis, for the MD need not be an expert at all!" - as well as all the letters - ANONYMOUS! vOnly the text. So nobody WHO goofed it! 6. One quiz a month is enough, OR, if we want 2 a month. Too much will reduce the attention paid, for all of you have to earn your living! One is good enough, I think. But during that month the poser of the Quiz should promise to be MD! 7. We must now decide whose question should be posed. You could get a period when nobody volunteers, or a time when 50 are ready to do so! So we need a small committee or some system to decide. Let us say Chris is Major MD for three months. His successor can be chosen before the expiry time. This MMD decides in favour of the first person who offers a quiz: in a letter to the list or to direct. Naturally after that that person is the MD. If no offers come in within 2 days of the month, the MMD has to pose a quiz! If he or she cannot, then go begging for a case amongst the regular contributors on the list! Please comment! regards Mani Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 12, 2001 Report Share Posted June 12, 2001 Namaste Mani, Your suggestion of sending replies to MD seems to be a good idea, but what = if one wants to learn from others analysis. The idea of posting quiz/puzzle = is not only to improve ourself but to help others along the way, after all t= his is a list-group, where ideas etc are exchanged. If somebody is worried a= bout getting biased by others attempt, let them not read it. As simple as th= at. So in my opinion we should continue in the current manner. Regards Narayan gjlist, subra@t... wrote: > Dear Chris and others, > > What I see about the quiz method is this: > > When Chris proposed my name as a possible master of ceremonies, I begged = for > time, seein a great responsibility. Sorry, Chris, you have taken the easy= way > out: posed a query, waited for answers and published the answer on the de= adline. > Practically no work involved! It is NOT so simple as that! > > 1. Whoever poses a quiz cannot participate, knowing the answer already! S= o a > permanent Major Domo (MD) can never try and learn. > > 2. Many who´d like to try are afraid of being exposed as failures. > > 3. Every published answer influences later efforts. If I first read a cer= tain > solution, with logical arguments, I am prejudiced: CANNOT think AGAINST t= hat. > > 4. As at present, we have no chance for a second effort. We are not striv= ing to > win a prize, but to learn and refine our methods. > > 5. The right way would be for a person to pose a quiz and also be MD. All= > answers go to the MD directly. The MD answers individually, saying, "Righ= t" > "hot", "Irrelevant", "cold" or "Try more positive (or negative)!" etc. to= help > without revealing too much. > > Then the MD publishes the answer - with or without his or her analysis, f= or the > MD need not be an expert at all!" - as well as all the letters - ANONYMOU= S! > vOnly the text. So nobody WHO goofed it! > > 6. One quiz a month is enough, OR, if we want 2 a month. Too much will re= duce > the attention paid, for all of you have to earn your living! One is good = enough, > I think. But during that month the poser of the Quiz should promise to be= MD! > > 7. We must now decide whose question should be posed. You could get a pe= riod > when nobody volunteers, or a time when 50 are ready to do so! > > So we need a small committee or some system to decide. Let us say Chris i= s Major > MD for three months. His successor can be chosen before the expiry time. = This > MMD decides in favour of the first person who offers a quiz: in a letter = to the > list or to direct. Naturally after that that person is the MD. If no off= ers > come in within 2 days of the month, the MMD has to pose a quiz! If he or = she > cannot, then go begging for a case amongst the regular contributors on th= e list! > > Please comment! > > regards > Mani Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 12, 2001 Report Share Posted June 12, 2001 Om Krsnaaya Namah Hi Mani! Here's my opinions on the various suggestions you put forward with regards to the runnning of the blind tests: > > 1. Whoever poses a quiz cannot participate, knowing the answer > already! So a > permanent Major Domo (MD) can never try and learn. > Agreed. This is unfair, and means someone has to miss out on the fun! > 2. Many who´d like to try are afraid of being exposed as failures. I don't think this is such a serious problem. As Chris said, anyone who wished to do so could have written to him directly. So it's not such a big problem. > > 3. Every published answer influences later efforts. If I first > read a certain > solution, with logical arguments, I am prejudiced: CANNOT think > AGAINST that. > Perhaps analysis should be left till later, if someone got it correct as I think the majority of those who do answer will do so on an astrological basis. Or perhaps if one has a really strong desire to ask something about their analysis such as whether something they saw was correct at some other time or not, maybe they can ask and present their reasons for thinking afterwards. > 4. As at present, we have no chance for a second effort. We are > not striving to > win a prize, but to learn and refine our methods. > > 5. The right way would be for a person to pose a quiz and also be MD. All > answers go to the MD directly. As I said, this is up to the person, but I like seeing the various ways of thinking while the element of mystery is still there. > The MD answers individually, > saying, "Right" > "hot", "Irrelevant", "cold" or "Try more positive (or negative)!" > etc. to help > without revealing too much. I can understand what you mean here, and was dying for the answer to be revealed - a week seemed too long! But I also appreciate that Chris wanted this to be done in a completely scientific manner, and there is only one way to do that - completely blind, so that there is no private gossip or whatever, and so that one doesn't end up guessing so much that there is a high likelihood of being correct e.g. On TV, you often see predictions like "problems related to health, wealth or family." That kinda covers everything. So as much as I'm pulled in both directions, I think completely blind is probably the best way to test our methods. Of course there is nothing stopping an individual from trying a different approach and having a secondary opinion in private, to see whether this other approach is more effective or not. But part of real life astrology is the ability of being able to decide which factors take precedence in different circumstances, and having one answer encourages one to think about other systems more seriously, whereas having lots of chances means one looks at them more whimsically "if not this, then how about this, if not that then what about this etc.". I also think that there should be some definite agreement with regards to what data is posted as standard. On the first day that I got the puzzle, foreign travel (although I didn't see it as going to the extent of emmigration) initially seemed to be a definite possibility based on the horary chart - Movable Lagna, with Lagna Lord in the Movable seventh, in Ithasala yoga with retrograde own house (ninth) Mercury, who was also twelfth Lord, and associated with Rahu. But after Chris said residence at the time of the event was in Manila, well...the prashna chart went down the drain - after all you can't travel while being in the place of birth! So I think we should standardise the data posted and nothing about the circumstaces of the native should be revealed afterwards, as they may influence others either positively or negatively. > > 6. One quiz a month is enough, OR, if we want 2 a month. Too much > will reduce > the attention paid, for all of you have to earn your living! One > is good enough, > I think. But during that month the poser of the Quiz should > promise to be MD! I definitely disagree! :-) I think once a week is just about right (it felt too long waiting for the answer!). It means that those who are going to answer have the time to answer, and others don't have to wait too long in astrological agony. It seems to me that pretty much everyone who would have answered, did so before the deadline, and that sufficient interest was sustained throughout the week. Any more, and people would have forgotten all about it. > > 7. We must now decide whose question should be posed. You could > get a period > when nobody volunteers, or a time when 50 are ready to do so! Why not just first-come, first-serve? Just my thoughts, Pursottam _______ Get your free @ address at Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 12, 2001 Report Share Posted June 12, 2001 Mani: > >2. Many who´d like to try are afraid of being exposed as failures. As Pursottam has said, it's OK to mail me privately. One person did in this case. As they say, "confidentiality assured!" > >3. Every published answer influences later efforts. If I first read a certain >solution, with logical arguments, I am prejudiced: CANNOT think AGAINST that. This is a relevant question. One ongoing quiz I contribute to doesn't post answers. Members are asked to mail to the quizmaster (a permanent one) and he then reveals the answer at a set time and tells who got it right. If you get it wrong, nobody knows about it. I find this isn't as conducive to thinking and learning but it is an alternative to the way we've started here. However, our approach feels more natural, more educational somehow. The other test I regularly participate in does it exactly as we've done it here. Clearly, there are advantages and disadvantages to both approaches. > >4. As at present, we have no chance for a second effort. We are not striving to >win a prize, but to learn and refine our methods. I don't get this. Second efforts can be made on the second quiz. > >5. The right way would be for a person to pose a quiz and also be MD. All >answers go to the MD directly. The MD answers individually, saying, "Right" >"hot", "Irrelevant", "cold" or "Try more positive (or negative)!" etc. to help >without revealing too much. As you know, I strongly object to this approach. It is not impartial as the various hints made to different people could be more revealing or less revealing by chance or by MD bias. The whole idea opens the door to favouritism. And it's not blind anymore either. To be honest, I wouldn't participate in such a quiz. I would say if you wanted to make the quiz easier, then just change the format of the quiz. This is exactly what I will do for Quiz #2 when I'll ask for a date only for a given event. One can also conceive of multiple choice questions, or true false or whatever your imagination can conceive of. But please, no hints! > >Then the MD publishes the answer - with or without his or her analysis, for the >MD need not be an expert at all!" - as well as all the letters - ANONYMOUS! >vOnly the text. So nobody WHO goofed it! I think we have to get over our fear of failure folks. It's good to fail in public. It makes you humble. When failure is shared, then the suffering is halved, or however that phrase goes. We have to get all this mythology about astrologers being know-it-all gods and all that pretentious nonsense from out behind closed doors. Without public testing, it's easier for self-appointed experts to lord techniques and theoretical double-talk over novices. Let the light shine in for all to see. > >6. One quiz a month is enough, OR, if we want 2 a month. Too much will reduce >the attention paid, for all of you have to earn your living! One is good enough, >I think. But during that month the poser of the Quiz should promise to be MD! I'm with Pursottam on this. One week is long enough if you're interested and have time and short enough that you don't forget about it. >So we need a small committee or some system to decide. Let us say Chris is Major >MD for three months. His successor can be chosen before the expiry time. This >MMD decides in favour of the first person who offers a quiz: in a letter to the >list or to direct. I don't really want to go overboard on the organization here. I'm happy to do it for a while since I identify strongly with the goals of testing. On the other hand, I appreciate that others may want to contribute as well and I certainly want to have my kick at the can -- and reveal how lame some of my astrological reasoning can be. In any event, I think it's important to whoever is posting the quiz that week has good clean data and is trustworthy enough not to reveal answers or give hints to other members. To me, impartiality is a concern. I can easily envisage a situation where some unfortunate astrologer is troubled by his or her consistent mistakes on the quiz and starts asking for hints from the that week's quizmaster. If that person happens to be a friend with a sympathetic ear, then the possibility for collusion is all too real. Sorry, but that's my paranoia at work! This raises the importance of the blind aspect to the whole enterprise. People will only participate in a blind test if they're convinced that they've got as good a chance as the next person to get the right answer. I would love to find someone who was beyond reproach (beside me, that is!) so they could administer the thing. As it is, a rotation of quizmasters may be the next best thing. Chris Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 13, 2001 Report Share Posted June 13, 2001 Dear Mani and list members, You have proposed a very well thought out plan. My complements. Please implement at the earliest. Best wishes Anil - <subra <gjlist> Tuesday, 12 June, 2001 12:58 PM Re: [gjlist] GJ List Quiz #1 - general > Dear Chris and others, > > What I see about the quiz method is this: > > When Chris proposed my name as a possible master of ceremonies, I begged for > time, seein a great responsibility. Sorry, Chris, you have taken the easy way > out: posed a query, waited for answers and published the answer on the deadline. > Practically no work involved! It is NOT so simple as that! > > 1. Whoever poses a quiz cannot participate, knowing the answer already! So a > permanent Major Domo (MD) can never try and learn. > > 2. Many who´d like to try are afraid of being exposed as failures. > > 3. Every published answer influences later efforts. If I first read a certain > solution, with logical arguments, I am prejudiced: CANNOT think AGAINST that. > > 4. As at present, we have no chance for a second effort. We are not striving to > win a prize, but to learn and refine our methods. > > 5. The right way would be for a person to pose a quiz and also be MD. All > answers go to the MD directly. The MD answers individually, saying, "Right" > "hot", "Irrelevant", "cold" or "Try more positive (or negative)!" etc. to help > without revealing too much. > > Then the MD publishes the answer - with or without his or her analysis, for the > MD need not be an expert at all!" - as well as all the letters - ANONYMOUS! > vOnly the text. So nobody WHO goofed it! > > 6. One quiz a month is enough, OR, if we want 2 a month. Too much will reduce > the attention paid, for all of you have to earn your living! One is good enough, > I think. But during that month the poser of the Quiz should promise to be MD! > > 7. We must now decide whose question should be posed. You could get a period > when nobody volunteers, or a time when 50 are ready to do so! > > So we need a small committee or some system to decide. Let us say Chris is Major > MD for three months. His successor can be chosen before the expiry time. This > MMD decides in favour of the first person who offers a quiz: in a letter to the > list or to direct. Naturally after that that person is the MD. If no offers > come in within 2 days of the month, the MMD has to pose a quiz! If he or she > cannot, then go begging for a case amongst the regular contributors on the list! > > Please comment! > > regards > Mani > > > > > > gjlist- > > > > Your use of is subject to > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.