Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

DR: IRA Rising, Exploiter Dieing

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Eight years of nearly pure pain. Almost died. Sure, I agree, tis fate. Clear

to me, looking at the Indian's way of reading the planets. Tis clear by their

clear way.

 

Sure, you see 4th lord so slammed. It's Moon in Aquarii. Sure, I understand,

but of all astrologers ONLY drew lawrence ever said the simple line "I think

you have stuff to work out about your mother".

 

I would say "Your family of origin and roots are committing suicide!!"

 

That would be my first impression.

 

It's true. The Irish are killing themselves, and my mother and father lived

in pain lifelong. I'm now willing to remember, see it, face it, and face why

MY PARENTS were that way, and so many things.

 

I think IRA should now mean "Irish Recovery Awareness", and I think I'll try

to get it rolling.

 

All the Kings horses and all the kings men, nay, not them, rather finally it

took another suffering irishman to tell me what none else had cared to find

out clearly somehow

 

Hey patty, got GLA oil?

 

ya MAY need it lad or las, just be honest, are ya dark and always in pain?

 

----------------

 

I feel very differently now about farming out our labor to India, like

software, or China, or Mexico. No wonder rich men have no problem with free

trade. No wonder the Vedas say "Do not cross the oceans, big rivers and

mountains". I now understand the effects of exploitation.

 

Crouching Tiger is done resting, and rises, begins to look around.

 

14 days. Tis proven. No SRI's, no pharmacuetical CEO profiting off ME.

 

Noone owns me. Nobody cures me. Need nothing, no addictions. Not sick, not

poor, not needy, not a victim. I can see the writing on the wall, don't think

I need anything at all.

 

Walking free.

 

IRA. Irish Recovery Awareness

 

It's simple. It's natural. It's green. It has no guns. It has love, oil,

organic whole usually raw food, it works, you already own it, it's your

birthright. It's all around you, it's more in the grass on your lawn than at

your local supermarket usually.

 

IRA don't do it again

 

never affirm a race is "inferior", for you starve innocent children by doing

so, so do not hire them and take the profit, for you are then a british man

in India or Ireland in the past, don't do this again, just remember, you've

already been there and done that, how long will you not listen?

 

I have friends now doing this foreign exploitive business slavery. I do not

know why I always avoided it, now I know.

 

If the shoe fits, wear it, and if it's covered with this blood and pain,

throw that shoe and gait asunder...

 

Nike

 

Just do it

 

time to empower, if you can't, at least do not disempower

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

goravani wrote:

 

> never affirm a race is "inferior", for you starve innocent children by doing

> so, so do not hire them and take the profit, for you are then a british man

> in India or Ireland in the past, don't do this again, just remember, you've

> already been there and done that, how long will you not listen?

>

 

Dear Raghu,

 

You are throwing out words like the IRA throw bombs - indiscriminately.

 

1. Hiring children: During my last visit to India - in 1997 - I had some time

to observe and see this problem. Also had to do with groups here in germany who

try to help indian children. It is a vicious circle, The kids are hired for a

pittance. The parents don´t send the kids to schools, but force them to work for

that pittance. Because without that pittance they cannot survive! And there are

not enough schools anyway. Let´s say the US exploiter pays them 5 cents an

hour, it is about 2 dollars for the kid. BUT the local millionaires try to pay

even less! There is a boom in the middle class, the rich get richer anyhow. But

the lowest group is losing out badly. Populationwise this losing section is

perhaps the majority, if one discounts the cities.

 

So the evil of exploitation has become a necessity. If you say you´ll not wear

sealskin so as to save the seals, it is fine. The seal hunters will find some

way of survival. But by stopping the farming out of labour you will suddenly

cut off a sustenance for which the victims have no substitute!

 

2. British in India is not a very good example of exploitation and outrage. They

did not conquer the country, but sort of "bought" it. The good they did - after

the break-up of the super empire of the Moguls - far exceeded the evil. They

discriminated generally, but still honoured the outstanding. But for them you´d

probably have never heard of Krishna or jyothish!......

 

There were nasty incidents. The first was the Indian mutiny: stupidity a

stubbornness, like that of Custer. The actual real violence was started by the

Indians, not the British, who naturally retaliated with violence. Much later one

or two incidents like Jallianwalabagh. But such things happen in every country,

when there is a revolt. Those massacres were nothing compared to what happened

in the French or Russian revolution.

 

The british kept their finances separate, paid india a compensation for losses

in the war. It was Macaulay who pleaded in the British parliament for home rule

for the Indians, the CCongress party that won independence under Gandhi´s

leadership was founded by an Englishman! Isolated instances of injustice cannot

be taken as the total picture.

 

In contrast to Spain - and Germany - The british, French, the Portuguese and

Dutch, more or less in that order, treated their colonies well, respected and

often promoted local religion and culture. They traded cleverly, but did not

rob!

 

During my first visit to England in 1955 I had certain apprehensions: how would

the British treat me? It was only 7 years since India had become

independent. They treated me as one of them! I thought I´d see "streets of

gold", gold robbed from India. No, I saw a very modest but proud people, living

in very simple quarters. In a london pub I fell into a conversation with a chap

who had some knowledge of history: he said that the British public was happy

that India had gained independence. "I understand you: I too don´t want the

Danes or French ruling over us. We british people believe in our right to rule

over ourselves, and that is why the Magna Carta was signed!"

 

In cotrast to this the most inhuman behaviour of the Moslems - The Pakistanis -

and the equally inhuman retaliation, is the most terrible chapter in india´s

history. No british soldier ever thought of thrusting the meat of a roasted baby

into the mouths of its parents, or raping their children to death in front of

their eyes - things that happened amongst Indians of different "faiths".

 

In africa I was suddenly faced with another chapter of history: the blacks who

were caught and taken to America. The Yanks came and waited on the coast. It was

the people of one african village who fell upon their neighbous, bound them and

sold them to the yanks! - or sold them as slaves to the Arabs. Brother sold

brother and sister into slavery!!!

 

The enemy is not the foreigner, but your own brother!.... and Yourself!

 

What is the Irish problem? The UK does not depend on Ireland. There is no

problem about giving Northern Ireland autonomy - or even permitting it to unite

with Eire. The problem is that there are two groups of people - Catholics and

Protestants. The division is no longer religious, but economical. They have

become guilds, cagey of each other. The british govt. is in a nasty position: if

they withdrew and the Catholics massacred the protestants, it would be "an act

of irresponsibility": they can withdraw only if the groups are ready to live in

peace. All parties are stymied, no one dares to bury the axe.

 

How about shipping primrose oil to Belfast?

 

 

Dear Raghu, I am getting worried about your sanity: your letter about who should

rule and who not! Today it is almost impossible to find people without

addictions. And the Kshatriyas of today do not fight by the rules of Dharma,

but are trained ruthless killers and assassins. Even in the days of dharma

Sisupala went killing infants! No, my friend, caste does not differentiate us.

Only love. How much we feel and give. Each of us is Arjuna. Our conscience is

Krishna. We need Arjunas who listen to their conscience!

 

 

Om shanthi, shanthi, shanthihi!

 

Love

Mani

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

> I have friends now doing this foreign exploitive business slavery. I do not

> know why I always avoided it, now I know.

>

> If the shoe fits, wear it, and if it's covered with this blood and pain,

> throw that shoe and gait asunder...

>

> Nike

>

> Just do it

>

> time to empower, if you can't, at least do not disempower

>

>

>

>

> gjlist-

>

>

>

> Your use of is subject to

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

gjlist, subra@t... wrote:

 

And the Kshatriyas of today do not fight by the rules of

Dharma,

> but are trained ruthless killers and assassins. Even in the days of

dharma

> Sisupala went killing infants! No, my friend, caste does not

differentiate us.

> Only love. How much we feel and give. Each of us is Arjuna. Our

conscience is

> Krishna. We need Arjunas who listen to their conscience!

>

 

> >

> > time to empower, if you can't, at least do not disempower

 

Om Amrtesvaryai Namah!!

 

Namaste dear ones!!

 

thank you Mani for your exposition on the British...you are perhaps

one of the most pro-British folks from Bharat that i have ever read!!

 

but on the other hand, my experience of the British..thru their

colonies and my study of history...it seems that you do have a

point...in that perhaps they were one of the least horrible in their

colonial policies...still there was very strong "casteism" in Britain,

and even out here in the colonies...in "British Columbia" if you were

anything but British not too long ago...even as recent as the last

world war...you were a 2nd class citizen...how do i know this? my

family is Norwegian...both sides...my mother's folks came to BC in

1918...and my dad emigrated with his family in 1927 at the age of

14...what they discovered was that they were nobody....as all

immigrants discovered, including Scots and Irish...only in this

country, the Scots and Irish were just below the English...and the

rest of us below that...and of course the First Peoples and the

Chinese and other Oriental races, as well as folks from India and

Pakistan were even farther down on the list...they couldn't even vote

or be real citizens until after the last world war...massive

discrimination...

 

Perhaps you have a good relationship with the English because you are

one of the "upper" classes...Brahmin i seem to remember....and

Educated, as well as majorly Westernized!! Perhaps you don't even have

much of an Indian accent!...Not that i'm trying to put you down for it

my brother...it's just that you may not represent the average Indian

when it comes to relating to the British...as well you worked in a

British shipping firm if i remember rightly...so you got to know them

well...in a working situation...

 

i actually think the truth lies somewhere between what you say and

what Dasji says...the Irish have felt exploited by England since AD

1200 or so, when they were invaded and conquered...and were treated

like creatures of the Gutter, unless they converted to protestantism

and became English Irish types...Dasji's Irish pain is REAL...why do

you think so many Irish came to America?????it wasn't because it was

wonderful in the home country as ruled by Britain...

 

i have also read in Hinduism today, that those same British that you

admire, spent a lot of their time trying to stamp out and assimilate

the Indians into the British mould of "culture"....thus the British

style schools and universities, and the governmental structure...the

same happened here with the attempted "genocide" of the native

peoples...unlike the Americans, the British in Canada had a more

"civilised" method...they put all the children in residential schools

run by the various churches, and beat the children for talking in

their own language...forced a new language, clothes, food, and culture

upon them along with the most horrendous physical and sexual

abuse...this tragedy is still affecting many of the adult Natives in

our country...they were scarred for life by this assimilation

culture...even they had to study in those prison schools, at least in

BC, a book called "The Vanishing Race" and guess who it was about?

Now there are so many lawsuits against the various churches in Canada

that most of them are faced with literal bankruptcy for their terrible

treatments of the children in the past...right up until the 50's and

60's...the Canadian Govt has apologised to the First Peoples, but

understandably the people want a little more than a piece of paper and

an eagle feather...they want compensation for their ruined lives!!!!

 

As well, Hinduism today blames the British for the destruction of the

major irrigation projects that ran thru South India...and turned the

place from an agricultural paradise into a desert in many places by

just building their roads and train tracks thru and filling up the

irrigation canals...Vast waterworks were rendered useless by this

simple tactic....as well, as far as i understand the British bled

India DRY of all its wealth, and only when India became more of a

liability than an asset were they willing to let Her go....

 

the main reason the British commonwealth came into being instead of

the British Empire...was that the British couldn't afford to pay for

the Second World War unless they mortgaged off their colonies to the

hilt....it was simply TOO expensive to replace all those sunken ships

and blown up factories at the current running American prices....

the Americans in this case were playing both ends against the

middle...they supplied both the British AND the Germans with war

materiel...and the British went so far into debt to pay that they had

to let their colonies go...they couldn't AFFORD them any more...they

had already extracted everything easily extractable...and it was too

tough to make a living off these colonies any more...so freedom.

 

still i see what you are saying re the child labourers....if they

don't get our work even though cheap, they'll starve...same arguments

are used to support the slave labour camps in China!!!this doesn't

excuse the capitalists from their greed, or their responsibilities to

their brothers and sisters.

 

As Amma has said many times...the rich people are to blame for the

misery of the poor folks...they have STOLEN all the money!!!so if they

don't help the poorer folks, they are GUILTY of abusing them!! this is

what Dasji is getting at...that when the capitalists are running the

world, and bottom line economics is the underpinning for everything,

then the weaker folks only get weaker and poorer...

 

Thus Dasji is advocating rule by the WORTHY ...that doesn't give a

blanket permission to all the hired thugs and assassins to take

charge!!!! would you call Arjuna a hired thug or assassin? or how

about Yudhisthira??? Dharma Raja he was called...the King of

Dharma...he was known NEVER to lie!! NEVER!!!

 

what politicians can today claim such?????????

 

Thus Dasji is not calling for the return of the Nazi Third Reich

worldwide, but rather enlightened rule by the REAL KSHATRIYAS...rather

than the VAISYAS who can ONLY think of their bellies!!!

 

i don't see that it is at all an issue of Dasji's sanity!! it is

merely a way of looking at the world....a way which many of the

baby-boomer types came to in the 60's and 70's, but which many later

"forgot" as it didn't work so well in the job marketplace....and it is

really a traditional Hindu view of the world...so to call his sanity

into question over this, my brother is just going a bit far!!!

 

i also do not agree that Dasji is throwing words and ideas out

indiscriminately....he does "rave" but in all that rave there is

usually a Thread of intent, of pointing to where he is intending to

take his readers...it's an irish colourful way of doing it, rather

like the beautiful carvings, and music...but under all that exquisite

floral decoration there is a thread (sutra!) of meaning, which can be

seen...so if you must call Dasji "mad" in this sense, i'm afraid you

may have to call many folks of his and my generation the same...myself

included...although i have NO trouble with that label, unless it means

i've got to go to some "hospital" to take forced medication

therapies...

 

Dasji does see things a little more "black and white" than you or i

might...it is possibly a little to do with that Vaishnava training in

dualism...but i can see where he's going...and in this case i'd have

to support his rave a little more than yours!!...although i did find

yours very interesting too...and loved the other side of the

picture...and will agree that you too have many good and powerful

points... i think you're BOTH right...there you are!!

 

but let's not publicly bandy words like "sanity" about in questioning

our friends' arguments...please?

 

in the Mother's Love,

and in Her Service,

 

as ever,

YOur own self,

 

visvanathan

 

Om Amrtesvaryai Namah!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear Kasi-V. and Das,

 

> i don't see that it is at all an issue of Dasji's sanity!!

 

 

I DID NOT MEAN THAT IN A SERIOUS SENSE AT ALL; WAS ONLY SAYING; "HEY, YOU MUST

BE CRAZY TO HOPE THAT THIS UTOPIAN RULE BY GOOD PEOPLE IS GONNA COME TRUE!"

 

Of course I agree with what Raghu says about exploitation etc. I only pointed

out to the stupid situation that is attached to hiring cheap labour. The real

blame goes to the tight-fisted Indian millionaires who refuse to help their own

people.

 

As to the Brits: I did not wash them white. I did not work for the Brits, but

had Brits as colleagues in the Indian company I worked for. My personal contact

in England was as a visitor, also passed my exams there. The examiners were very

nice, gave me top marks, one even recommended me to write textbooks. So I do

like the Brits..... But not everything they did in India. There were certainly

black chapters.

 

There is another angle to this. The British government ruled only about 50% of

India directly, and that for only about 70 years. The rest of the country was in

the hands of rajas. The major period of Brit rule was under the India Company.

THIS WAS VAYSYA RULE, as Das says, and based on exploitation. Their aim was to

get money, did not administer at all, did not interfere in the affairs of the

people at all! They usually wore Indian clothing, read Indian books, sat with

the Indian merchants, but never tried to govern. The British govt cannot be

really blamed for this neglect. At the time of independence the conditions in

the directly ruled parts was definitely better than in the raja ruled states.

 

We must see the world as it was at that time. If you read Dickens etc. the

conditions in Britain were not great either, the laws were oppressive, the poor

exploited, even voting in our sense did not exist. As to the destruction of

culture, it was happening anyhow. Some Moslem rulers were liberal, others

fanatically against Hindu culture. They forced people to learn urdu. The Brits

did not kill the local languages or customs, only did nothing to encourage them.

But these languages have still flourished, not practically died out like Gaelic.

The introduction of English was to make a uniform administration possible - and

is a great blessing for India, with its 14 odd languages.

 

Building of roads etc. which had negative effects was not a deliberate attempt

to ruin the country: meant actually to promote prosperity! The revenue was

mainly agricultural and to destroy agricultural land was not in the interest of

the Brits at all. That sort of well-meant but foolish destruction has taken

place all over the world - and since millennia. It was the canals that

Hammurabbi (or Sargon) built which turned Mesopotamia into a desert!

 

The CRIME of the Brits was in suppressing the development of industries in

India to protect their own.

 

Yes, there is a caste system in Britain: the English are very condescending when

it comes to Scots, Welsh or Irish and other Europeans too! But this is nowhere

near German arrogance!

 

So I definitely say AMEN to what Raghu said! The problem with all nations is

that the Vaysays dictate and no gevernment, even if it consisted of honest and

good people, can survive without vaisya support. I too am crazy and hope that

vaisyas will become honest, good prople!!!

 

regards

Mani

 

PS: Attached file is the speech of a Brit.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...