Guest guest Posted May 18, 2001 Report Share Posted May 18, 2001 Two posts from Mani have made me write this.... I am the father of Monoamniotic Twins. Let me explain the term "Monoamniotic", for the benefit of those who may not be familiar..... Fraternal, or dizygotic (Dz) twins arise from two different eggs being fertilised by two different sperm, and, like any siblings, have about 25% of their genes in common. Half of all fraternal twins are boy-girl twin pairs, a quarter are boy-boy, and the remaining 25% are girl-girl. Identical, or monozygotic (Mz) twins arise from a single egg being fertilised by a single sperm. The twins' genes are identical, and are always the same sex (boy-boy or girl-girl pairs). Some of these set of twins share the same amniotic sac and the same placenta (monochorionic and monoamniotic -- 1 in 25,000 to 1 in 60,000 pregnancies) -- and because of this, cord entanglement and compression become a very high risk. This can lead to an interruption in the blood flow to one or both babies where they may not receive enough nutrients or oxygen. When there is no membrane between the babies -- a monoamniotic twin pregnancy -- there is a very high risk of cord entanglement and also twin to twin transfusion syndrome. This represents a very high risk pregnancy and intensive monitoring and testing of the babies is required. At times, it is safer to deliver such babies early, some as early as they are viable (24 to 28 weeks). A good NICU is essential when considering the birth. 34 weeks is often considered "full term" for monoamniotic twins because of the cord risks outweigh the prematurity risks. By God's Grace both my sons were delivered prematurely at 32 weeks, but are healthy in general. For those interested in research, here are the details of their birth...: DOB: 29 August 1997 POB: Toronto, Canada Time Zone 5.00, Lat. 43 N 39, Long. 79 W 23, Nakulan - TOB 17:38 Sahadaevan - TOB 17:39 Let me come back to the real reason for writing the note.... In the case of my sons the time of conception is common, but still there are some differences in their constitution. Even if we take the time when the single embryo split into two (can't ever be determined), the point in time when they became separate physical beings, we would be at loss to explain their unique patterns of growth as embryos. Any comments from anyone.....? Love, Arun Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 18, 2001 Report Share Posted May 18, 2001 Dear Arun,Members, I am forwarding this mail to Vedic Astrology Group also so as to get a larger feedback for this chart.I hope you don't mind. If the Time given for these charts are accurate. With a bit of corrections It's seen that both the charts are identical except for the following divisional charts. Rudramsa (D11). Their Weakness and death could be different. Chaturvimsamsa(D24). Their Education could be differerent. Akshavedamsa(D45).Relations with Father and Paternal Grandparents could differ. Especially of the younger one. Shashtiamsa(D60). Sahadeva has 2& 5th lord debilitated in 11th his karma with children could be different that Nakula. I request the more learned members to give their opinions. Regards. S.Prabhakaran gjlist, "Uthayan, Arun" <arun.uthayan@c...> wrote: Two posts from Mani have made me write this.... I am the father of Monoamniotic Twins. Let me explain the term "Monoamniotic", for the benefit of those who may not be familiar..... Fraternal, or dizygotic (Dz) twins arise from two different eggs being fertilised by two different sperm, and, like any siblings, have about 25% of their genes in common. Half of all fraternal twins are boy-girl twin pairs, a quarter are boy-boy, and the remaining 25% are girl-girl. Identical, or monozygotic (Mz) twins arise from a single egg being fertilised by a single sperm. The twins' genes are identical, and are always the same sex (boy-boy or girl-girl pairs). Some of these set of twins share the same amniotic sac and the same placenta (monochorionic and monoamniotic -- 1 in 25,000 to 1 in 60,000 pregnancies) -- and because of this, cord entanglement and compression become a very high risk. This can lead to an interruption in the blood flow to one or both babies where they may not receive enough nutrients or oxygen. When there is no membrane between the babies -- a monoamniotic twin pregnancy -- there is a very high risk of cord entanglement and also twin to twin transfusion syndrome. This represents a very high risk pregnancy and intensive monitoring and testing of the babies is required. At times, it is safer to deliver such babies early, some as early as they are viable (24 to 28 weeks). A good NICU is essential when considering the birth. 34 weeks is often considered "full term" for monoamniotic twins because of the cord risks outweigh the prematurity risks. By God's Grace both my sons were delivered prematurely at 32 weeks, but are healthy in general. For those interested in research, here are the details of their birth...: DOB: 29 August 1997 POB: Toronto, Canada Time Zone 5.00, Lat. 43 N 39, Long. 79 W 23, Nakulan - TOB 17:38 Sahadaevan - TOB 17:39 Let me come back to the real reason for writing the note.... In the case of my sons the time of conception is common, but still there are some differences in their constitution. Even if we take the time when the single embryo split into two (can't ever be determined), the point in time when they became separate physical beings, we would be at loss to explain their unique patterns of growth as embryos. Any comments from anyone.....? Love, Arun --- End forwarded message --- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 20, 2001 Report Share Posted May 20, 2001 DEAR ARUN, Both of your Son's have lot of difference in appearance and behaviors, 1st is represented by Rahu, who is in the star of Venus and joins Sun and Mercury. This boy should have square face, may have defect in teeth, is sober but full of ego and self respect. He is prone to disease, needs more care.Rahu type persons mix in all the atmospheres , though they may not leave there basic nature. Your 2nd son is represented by Jupiter, it is in the star of Moon, boy should have round face, very simple and very emotional, suffer from cold and cough easily.Jupiter has exchange with Saturn , hence sound health from 3rd year to this boy in particular and avg. for 1st. Regards, Inder Jit Sahni - Uthayan, Arun 'gjlist' Friday, May 18, 2001 8:05 PM [gjlist] Puzzle!-Twins-Conception and Health Two posts from Mani have made me write this.... I am the father of Monoamniotic Twins. Let me explain the term "Monoamniotic", for the benefit of those who may not be familiar..... Fraternal, or dizygotic (Dz) twins arise from two different eggs being fertilised by two different sperm, and, like any siblings, have about 25% of their genes in common. Half of all fraternal twins are boy-girl twin pairs, a quarter are boy-boy, and the remaining 25% are girl-girl. Identical, or monozygotic (Mz) twins arise from a single egg being fertilised by a single sperm. The twins' genes are identical, and are always the same sex (boy-boy or girl-girl pairs). Some of these set of twins share the same amniotic sac and the same placenta (monochorionic and monoamniotic -- 1 in 25,000 to 1 in 60,000 pregnancies) -- and because of this, cord entanglement and compression become a very high risk. This can lead to an interruption in the blood flow to one or both babies where they may not receive enough nutrients or oxygen. When there is no membrane between the babies -- a monoamniotic twin pregnancy -- there is a very high risk of cord entanglement and also twin to twin transfusion syndrome. This represents a very high risk pregnancy and intensive monitoring and testing of the babies is required. At times, it is safer to deliver such babies early, some as early as they are viable (24 to 28 weeks). A good NICU is essential when considering the birth. 34 weeks is often considered "full term" for monoamniotic twins because of the cord risks outweigh the prematurity risks. By God's Grace both my sons were delivered prematurely at 32 weeks, but are healthy in general. For those interested in research, here are the details of their birth...: DOB: 29 August 1997 POB: Toronto, Canada Time Zone 5.00, Lat. 43 N 39, Long. 79 W 23, Nakulan - TOB 17:38 Sahadaevan - TOB 17:39 Let me come back to the real reason for writing the note.... In the case of my sons the time of conception is common, but still there are some differences in their constitution. Even if we take the time when the single embryo split into two (can't ever be determined), the point in time when they became separate physical beings, we would be at loss to explain their unique patterns of growth as embryos. Any comments from anyone.....? Love, Arun gjlist- Your use of is subject to Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 22, 2001 Report Share Posted May 22, 2001 Dear Inder Jit, Thank you for your comments..... While reading your note I realized that I had given the wrong timings for my sons. Instead of 7:38PM and 7:39PM, I had erroneously types 17:38 and 17:39. Here is the correct data.... DOB: 29 August 1997 POB: Toronto, Canada Time Zone 5.00, Lat. 43 N 39, Long. 79 W 23, Nakulan - TOB 19:38 (7:38PM) Sahadaevan - TOB 19:39 (7:39PM) Sorry for the inconvenience... Love, Arun gjlist, "Inder Jit Sahni" <isawhney_21> wrote: > DEAR ARUN, > Both of your Son's have lot of difference in appearance and behaviors, > 1st is represented by Rahu, who is in the star of Venus and joins Sun and Mercury. This boy should have square face, may have defect in teeth, is sober but full of ego and self respect. He is prone to disease, needs more care.Rahu type persons mix in all the atmospheres , though they may not leave there basic nature. > Your 2nd son is represented by Jupiter, it is in the star of Moon, boy should have round face, very simple and very emotional, suffer from cold and cough easily.Jupiter has exchange with Saturn , hence sound health from 3rd year to this boy in particular and avg. for 1st. > Regards, > Inder Jit Sahni > - > Uthayan, Arun > 'gjlist' > Friday, May 18, 2001 8:05 PM > [gjlist] Puzzle!-Twins-Conception and Health > > > > > Two posts from Mani have made me write this.... > > I am the father of Monoamniotic Twins. Let me explain the term > "Monoamniotic", for the benefit of those who may not be familiar..... > > Fraternal, or dizygotic (Dz) twins arise from two different eggs being > fertilised by two different sperm, and, like any siblings, have about 25% of > their genes in common. Half of all fraternal twins are boy-girl twin pairs, > a quarter are boy-boy, and the remaining 25% are girl-girl. Identical, or > monozygotic (Mz) twins arise from a single egg being fertilised by a single > sperm. The twins' genes are identical, and are always the same sex (boy-boy > or girl-girl pairs). Some of these set of twins share the same amniotic sac > and the same placenta (monochorionic and monoamniotic -- 1 in 25,000 to 1 in > 60,000 pregnancies) -- and because of this, cord entanglement and > compression become a very high risk. This can lead to an interruption in the > blood flow to one or both babies where they may not receive enough nutrients > or oxygen. When there is no membrane between the babies -- a monoamniotic > twin pregnancy -- there is a very high risk of cord entanglement and also > twin to twin transfusion syndrome. This represents a very high risk > pregnancy and intensive monitoring and testing of the babies is required. At > times, it is safer to deliver such babies early, some as early as they are > viable (24 to 28 weeks). A good NICU is essential when considering the > birth. 34 weeks is often considered "full term" for monoamniotic twins > because of the cord risks outweigh the prematurity risks. > > By God's Grace both my sons were delivered prematurely at 32 weeks, but are > healthy in general. For those interested in research, here are the details > of their birth...: > > DOB: 29 August 1997 > POB: Toronto, Canada > Time Zone 5.00, Lat. 43 N 39, Long. 79 W 23, > Nakulan - TOB 17:38 > Sahadaevan - TOB 17:39 > > Let me come back to the real reason for writing the note.... > > In the case of my sons the time of conception is common, but still there are > some differences in their constitution. Even if we take the time when the > single embryo split into two (can't ever be determined), the point in time > when they became separate physical beings, we would be at loss to explain > their unique patterns of growth as embryos. Any comments from anyone.....? > > Love, > Arun > > > gjlist- > > > > Your use of is subject to > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.