Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Puzzle!-Twins-Conception and Health

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Two posts from Mani have made me write this....

 

I am the father of Monoamniotic Twins. Let me explain the term

"Monoamniotic", for the benefit of those who may not be familiar.....

 

Fraternal, or dizygotic (Dz) twins arise from two different eggs being

fertilised by two different sperm, and, like any siblings, have about 25% of

their genes in common. Half of all fraternal twins are boy-girl twin pairs,

a quarter are boy-boy, and the remaining 25% are girl-girl. Identical, or

monozygotic (Mz) twins arise from a single egg being fertilised by a single

sperm. The twins' genes are identical, and are always the same sex (boy-boy

or girl-girl pairs). Some of these set of twins share the same amniotic sac

and the same placenta (monochorionic and monoamniotic -- 1 in 25,000 to 1 in

60,000 pregnancies) -- and because of this, cord entanglement and

compression become a very high risk. This can lead to an interruption in the

blood flow to one or both babies where they may not receive enough nutrients

or oxygen. When there is no membrane between the babies -- a monoamniotic

twin pregnancy -- there is a very high risk of cord entanglement and also

twin to twin transfusion syndrome. This represents a very high risk

pregnancy and intensive monitoring and testing of the babies is required. At

times, it is safer to deliver such babies early, some as early as they are

viable (24 to 28 weeks). A good NICU is essential when considering the

birth. 34 weeks is often considered "full term" for monoamniotic twins

because of the cord risks outweigh the prematurity risks.

 

By God's Grace both my sons were delivered prematurely at 32 weeks, but are

healthy in general. For those interested in research, here are the details

of their birth...:

 

DOB: 29 August 1997

POB: Toronto, Canada

Time Zone 5.00, Lat. 43 N 39, Long. 79 W 23,

Nakulan - TOB 17:38

Sahadaevan - TOB 17:39

 

Let me come back to the real reason for writing the note....

 

In the case of my sons the time of conception is common, but still there are

some differences in their constitution. Even if we take the time when the

single embryo split into two (can't ever be determined), the point in time

when they became separate physical beings, we would be at loss to explain

their unique patterns of growth as embryos. Any comments from anyone.....?

 

Love,

Arun

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear Arun,Members,

I am forwarding this mail to Vedic Astrology Group also so as to

get a larger feedback for this chart.I hope you don't mind.

 

If the Time given for these charts are accurate. With a bit of

corrections It's seen that both the charts are identical except for

the following divisional charts.

Rudramsa (D11). Their Weakness and death could be different.

Chaturvimsamsa(D24). Their Education could be differerent.

Akshavedamsa(D45).Relations with Father and Paternal Grandparents

could differ. Especially of the younger one.

Shashtiamsa(D60). Sahadeva has 2& 5th lord debilitated in 11th

his karma with children could be different that

Nakula.

 

I request the more learned members to give their opinions.

 

Regards.

S.Prabhakaran

 

gjlist, "Uthayan, Arun" <arun.uthayan@c...> wrote:

Two posts from Mani have made me write this....

 

I am the father of Monoamniotic Twins. Let me explain the term

"Monoamniotic", for the benefit of those who may not be familiar.....

 

Fraternal, or dizygotic (Dz) twins arise from two different eggs being

fertilised by two different sperm, and, like any siblings, have about

25% of

their genes in common. Half of all fraternal twins are boy-girl twin

pairs,

a quarter are boy-boy, and the remaining 25% are girl-girl.

Identical, or

monozygotic (Mz) twins arise from a single egg being fertilised by a

single

sperm. The twins' genes are identical, and are always the same sex

(boy-boy

or girl-girl pairs). Some of these set of twins share the same

amniotic sac

and the same placenta (monochorionic and monoamniotic -- 1 in 25,000

to 1 in

60,000 pregnancies) -- and because of this, cord entanglement and

compression become a very high risk. This can lead to an interruption

in the

blood flow to one or both babies where they may not receive enough

nutrients

or oxygen. When there is no membrane between the babies -- a

monoamniotic

twin pregnancy -- there is a very high risk of cord entanglement and

also

twin to twin transfusion syndrome. This represents a very high risk

pregnancy and intensive monitoring and testing of the babies is

required. At

times, it is safer to deliver such babies early, some as early as

they are

viable (24 to 28 weeks). A good NICU is essential when considering the

birth. 34 weeks is often considered "full term" for monoamniotic twins

because of the cord risks outweigh the prematurity risks.

 

By God's Grace both my sons were delivered prematurely at 32 weeks,

but are

healthy in general. For those interested in research, here are the

details

of their birth...:

 

DOB: 29 August 1997

POB: Toronto, Canada

Time Zone 5.00, Lat. 43 N 39, Long. 79 W 23,

Nakulan - TOB 17:38

Sahadaevan - TOB 17:39

 

Let me come back to the real reason for writing the note....

 

In the case of my sons the time of conception is common, but still

there are

some differences in their constitution. Even if we take the time when

the

single embryo split into two (can't ever be determined), the point in

time

when they became separate physical beings, we would be at loss to

explain

their unique patterns of growth as embryos. Any comments from

anyone.....?

 

Love,

Arun

--- End forwarded message ---

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

DEAR ARUN,

Both of your Son's have lot of difference in appearance and behaviors,

1st is represented by Rahu, who is in the star of Venus and joins Sun and

Mercury. This boy should have square face, may have defect in teeth, is sober

but full of ego and self respect. He is prone to disease, needs more care.Rahu

type persons mix in all the atmospheres , though they may not leave there basic

nature.

Your 2nd son is represented by Jupiter, it is in the star of Moon, boy should

have round face, very simple and very emotional, suffer from cold and cough

easily.Jupiter has exchange with Saturn , hence sound health from 3rd year to

this boy in particular and avg. for 1st.

Regards,

Inder Jit Sahni

-

Uthayan, Arun

'gjlist'

Friday, May 18, 2001 8:05 PM

[gjlist] Puzzle!-Twins-Conception and Health

 

 

 

 

Two posts from Mani have made me write this....

 

I am the father of Monoamniotic Twins. Let me explain the term

"Monoamniotic", for the benefit of those who may not be familiar.....

 

Fraternal, or dizygotic (Dz) twins arise from two different eggs being

fertilised by two different sperm, and, like any siblings, have about 25% of

their genes in common. Half of all fraternal twins are boy-girl twin pairs,

a quarter are boy-boy, and the remaining 25% are girl-girl. Identical, or

monozygotic (Mz) twins arise from a single egg being fertilised by a single

sperm. The twins' genes are identical, and are always the same sex (boy-boy

or girl-girl pairs). Some of these set of twins share the same amniotic sac

and the same placenta (monochorionic and monoamniotic -- 1 in 25,000 to 1 in

60,000 pregnancies) -- and because of this, cord entanglement and

compression become a very high risk. This can lead to an interruption in the

blood flow to one or both babies where they may not receive enough nutrients

or oxygen. When there is no membrane between the babies -- a monoamniotic

twin pregnancy -- there is a very high risk of cord entanglement and also

twin to twin transfusion syndrome. This represents a very high risk

pregnancy and intensive monitoring and testing of the babies is required. At

times, it is safer to deliver such babies early, some as early as they are

viable (24 to 28 weeks). A good NICU is essential when considering the

birth. 34 weeks is often considered "full term" for monoamniotic twins

because of the cord risks outweigh the prematurity risks.

 

By God's Grace both my sons were delivered prematurely at 32 weeks, but are

healthy in general. For those interested in research, here are the details

of their birth...:

 

DOB: 29 August 1997

POB: Toronto, Canada

Time Zone 5.00, Lat. 43 N 39, Long. 79 W 23,

Nakulan - TOB 17:38

Sahadaevan - TOB 17:39

 

Let me come back to the real reason for writing the note....

 

In the case of my sons the time of conception is common, but still there are

some differences in their constitution. Even if we take the time when the

single embryo split into two (can't ever be determined), the point in time

when they became separate physical beings, we would be at loss to explain

their unique patterns of growth as embryos. Any comments from anyone.....?

 

Love,

Arun

 

gjlist-

 

 

 

Your use of is subject to

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear Inder Jit,

 

Thank you for your comments.....

 

While reading your note I realized that I had given the wrong timings

for my sons. Instead of 7:38PM and 7:39PM, I had erroneously types

17:38 and 17:39. Here is the correct data....

 

DOB: 29 August 1997

POB: Toronto, Canada

Time Zone 5.00, Lat. 43 N 39, Long. 79 W 23,

Nakulan - TOB 19:38 (7:38PM)

Sahadaevan - TOB 19:39 (7:39PM)

 

Sorry for the inconvenience...

 

Love,

Arun

 

 

 

gjlist, "Inder Jit Sahni" <isawhney_21> wrote:

> DEAR ARUN,

> Both of your Son's have lot of difference in appearance and

behaviors,

> 1st is represented by Rahu, who is in the star of Venus and joins

Sun and Mercury. This boy should have square face, may have defect in

teeth, is sober but full of ego and self respect. He is prone to

disease, needs more care.Rahu type persons mix in all the

atmospheres , though they may not leave there basic nature.

> Your 2nd son is represented by Jupiter, it is in the star of Moon,

boy should have round face, very simple and very emotional, suffer

from cold and cough easily.Jupiter has exchange with Saturn , hence

sound health from 3rd year to this boy in particular and avg. for 1st.

> Regards,

> Inder Jit Sahni

> -

> Uthayan, Arun

> 'gjlist'

> Friday, May 18, 2001 8:05 PM

> [gjlist] Puzzle!-Twins-Conception and Health

>

>

>

>

> Two posts from Mani have made me write this....

>

> I am the father of Monoamniotic Twins. Let me explain the term

> "Monoamniotic", for the benefit of those who may not be

familiar.....

>

> Fraternal, or dizygotic (Dz) twins arise from two different eggs

being

> fertilised by two different sperm, and, like any siblings, have

about 25% of

> their genes in common. Half of all fraternal twins are boy-girl

twin pairs,

> a quarter are boy-boy, and the remaining 25% are girl-girl.

Identical, or

> monozygotic (Mz) twins arise from a single egg being fertilised

by a single

> sperm. The twins' genes are identical, and are always the same

sex (boy-boy

> or girl-girl pairs). Some of these set of twins share the same

amniotic sac

> and the same placenta (monochorionic and monoamniotic -- 1 in

25,000 to 1 in

> 60,000 pregnancies) -- and because of this, cord entanglement and

> compression become a very high risk. This can lead to an

interruption in the

> blood flow to one or both babies where they may not receive

enough nutrients

> or oxygen. When there is no membrane between the babies -- a

monoamniotic

> twin pregnancy -- there is a very high risk of cord entanglement

and also

> twin to twin transfusion syndrome. This represents a very high

risk

> pregnancy and intensive monitoring and testing of the babies is

required. At

> times, it is safer to deliver such babies early, some as early as

they are

> viable (24 to 28 weeks). A good NICU is essential when

considering the

> birth. 34 weeks is often considered "full term" for monoamniotic

twins

> because of the cord risks outweigh the prematurity risks.

>

> By God's Grace both my sons were delivered prematurely at 32

weeks, but are

> healthy in general. For those interested in research, here are

the details

> of their birth...:

>

> DOB: 29 August 1997

> POB: Toronto, Canada

> Time Zone 5.00, Lat. 43 N 39, Long. 79 W 23,

> Nakulan - TOB 17:38

> Sahadaevan - TOB 17:39

>

> Let me come back to the real reason for writing the note....

>

> In the case of my sons the time of conception is common, but

still there are

> some differences in their constitution. Even if we take the time

when the

> single embryo split into two (can't ever be determined), the

point in time

> when they became separate physical beings, we would be at loss to

explain

> their unique patterns of growth as embryos. Any comments from

anyone.....?

>

> Love,

> Arun

>

>

> gjlist-

>

>

>

> Your use of is subject to

 

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...