Rrrrr, sorry Wendy, pull over...

[Guest guest]

>One of the greatest tragedies

> (as I've said repeatedly) of looking to divisionals,

>is that we can miss the

> richness of Rashi. -w

 

>and may I add going to other dasha

>systems we can miss the richness of

>Vimshottari -n

 

 

These statements were unnecessary really, and they only bring up things in a

sort of provocative way I feel.

 

Please watch that aspect of how you write please if you agree.

 

Thanks,

 

das

[Guest guest]

Thank you Das,

 

I will be on guard regarding how to structure what I say in order not to

give the wrong impression. My intention was not to be provocative, but to

point out the importance of Rashi. All practising jyotishis consider major

divisionals, and it goes without saying that Navamsha is considered along

with Rashi in determining strength and nature of planets. However, if

divisionals are used as the primary method of prediction, then (as I said)

the all encompassing richness of Rashi can be overlooked.

 

There is also the issue of having absolutely correct birth times as the

divisionals depend on this. It's fair enough to say that the T.O.B. can be

rectified by adjusting D-60 (or whatever), but who's insightful enough to

clearly see the intricacies associated with another's destiny and to adjust

birth time accordingly. Jyotishi's (like anyone else) are subjected to their

own preconceived ideas, albeit on a subtle level, and their judgement can be

wrong...not intentionally so of course, but the chances of being wrong are

as great as the chances of being right.

 

Rashi is more inclined to be accurate and contains within it the hidden

detail of divisionals if it's studied deeply...let's not neglect Rashi in

favour of divisionals. This is all I'm trying to say, and it's not meant to

be a provocative statement.

 

Regards

Wendy

 

 

 

>One of the greatest tragedies

> (as I've said repeatedly) of looking to divisionals,

>is that we can miss the

> richness of Rashi. -w

 

>and may I add going to other dasha

>systems we can miss the richness of

>Vimshottari -n

 

 

These statements were unnecessary really, and they only bring up things in a

sort of provocative way I feel.

 

Please watch that aspect of how you write please if you agree.

 

Thanks,

 

das

[Guest guest]

PS: Further to this, of course, is the traditional method of

rectification...confirming major events (seen in Rashi) through Vimsottari

dasa system. This method has been used successfully by learned Pundit's from

the beginning till now...it's tried and tested...but (again) gets overlooked

by focusing on less traditional methods.

 

Regards

Wendy

 

 

PREVIOUS POST:

==============

Thank you Das,

 

I will be on guard regarding how to structure what I say in order not to

give the wrong impression. My intention was not to be provocative, but to

point out the importance of Rashi. All practising jyotishis consider major

divisionals, and it goes without saying that Navamsha is considered along

with Rashi in determining strength and nature of planets. However, if

divisionals are used as the primary method of prediction, then (as I said)

the all encompassing richness of Rashi can be overlooked.

 

There is also the issue of having absolutely correct birth times as the

divisionals depend on this. It's fair enough to say that the T.O.B. can be

rectified by adjusting D-60 (or whatever), but who's insightful enough to

clearly see the intricacies associated with another's destiny and to adjust

birth time accordingly. Jyotishi's (like anyone else) are subjected to their

own preconceived ideas, albeit on a subtle level, and their judgement can be

wrong...not intentionally so of course, but the chances of being wrong are

as great as the chances of being right.

 

Rashi is more inclined to be accurate and contains within it the hidden

detail of divisionals if it's studied deeply...let's not neglect Rashi in

favour of divisionals. This is all I'm trying to say, and it's not meant to

be a provocative statement.

 

Regards

Wendy