Divisional Charts+Wendy

[Guest guest]

Namaste Ram.

The Rasi is but a division of the night sky.

Now i don't know how the vargas can take precendence over the Rasi, i never said

they did. But they are much more detailed than the Rasi.

 

Rasi is just too general.

But I also have a comment on Wendy's statement;

 

<<I just can't help but wonder why the Rashi is continually ignored in favour of

divisional charts?>>

 

It isn't ignored, but honestly, noone will let you get away with the fact that,

the Rasi Lagna only changes every 2 hrs. Thats why we first take Rasi, and then

if we feel we can see something, we go in deeper and determine the exact

indications, to be completely sure.

 

Precission is the word.

 

All of these Rasi explanations fail when we deal with twin births, with the same

Rasi and Navamsa.

 

Best wishes, Visti,.

 

-

Ram Kumar-Jaswal <ram.kumar.jaswal

<gjlist>

Monday, April 30, 2001 12:20 PM

RE: Sv: [gjlist] Re: Divisional Charts

 

 

> Namaste Visti

>

> I hope you don't mind my comments below .......

>

> since the Varga's are derived directly from the Rasi chart HOW can they

> (varga charts) take precedence over the Original Rasi chart? Please reflect

> on this and I am sure you can see from this as to "who has the overriding

> factor". In agreement with you that varga's can only support what is noted

> in the 'original' Rasi chart though they (varga's) can have 'mitigating'

> effects if Varga chart is well formed - obviously Not completely.

>

> I guess it is similar to interpreting a 'weak' Rasi chart and a 'strong'

> Navamsha chart - which conflict with one another - where Rasi effects still

> pre-dominate.

>

> Trusting you are not offended by my above comments (?) ......

>

> Jai Sita Ram

>

> Ram

>

> >

> > Visti Larsen [sMTP:vlarsen]

> > Monday, April 30, 2001 9:47 AM

> > gjlist

> > Sv: Sv: [gjlist] Re: Divisional Charts

> >

> > Namaste.

> > Like you said yourself, the Vargas should confirm this. They all support

> > the same thing, i've never said otherwise. But taking Rasi as an

> > overriding factor, is a wrong statement.

> > Best wishes, Visti.

> >

> > -

> > Manoj Pathak <manojpathak

> > <gjlist>

> > Monday, April 30, 2001 7:32 AM

> > Re: Sv: [gjlist] Re: Divisional Charts

> >

> >

> > > Hello Visti,

> > >

> > > >Heres my unwavoring oppinion;

> > > >Lets say someone is learning something. Then their activities are

> > activated

> > > >in D-24. But when is the person not learning something? Actually the

> > mind

> > > >is learning all the time, and gaining knowledge! So when will this Rasi

> > > >chart override this higher division?

> > > >

> > >

> > > What happens Visti, when the 5th house of the person does not even

> > sponsor

> > > education of any sort for the person. Even then, do you mean to say that

> > > D/24 would get him education. Fifth house, apart from education has many

> > > other aspects of life contained therein. It is for confirmation of these

> > > events in life, that the relevant divisional charts are used. Education,

> > > D/24, Child (D/7), Gyan (Knowledge) D/20 and so on and on. But if a

> > person's

> > > fifth house has no promise for education the same would only get

> > reflected

> > > in D/24. Thats my view.

> > >

> > > Manoj

> >

>

>

> This e-mail, and any attachment, is confidential. If you have received

> it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use or disclose

> the information in any way, and notify me immediately. The contents of

> this message may contain personal views which are not the views of the

> BBC, unless specifically stated.

>

>

> gjlist-

>

>

>

> Your use of is subject to

>

>

>