Guest guest Posted April 25, 2001 Report Share Posted April 25, 2001 Dear Manoj, Namaste. I actually didn't request any charts from anybody, other than those who started this discussion, but i'll take a look nevertheless. - Deha - 7th house is stronger than lagna, and Sun is stronger than the 7th from him. Hence Arudha Padas of 9th house and 3rd from Sun should be considered. A9 is in Pisces and the Sun is in 6th therefrom, hence problems in progeny are there. AS3 is in Gemini and the Sun is in the 3rd house therefrom, so rememdial messures can be performed, and surely there will be a delay. - Rasi - 5th house has Sun and Venus. Sun isn't a good planet for fertility, ruling the Agni Tattwa, however Venus adds some strength being the ruler of the Jala Tattwa(Moon and Venus in 5th is very good for kids). Putra Karaka Mercury is in 6th house, aspected by a Gaja Kesari Yoga, but also the exalted nodes. However Retro-Saturn and Mars aspect the 5th house, indicating the curse of the Father(Sun) which can deny childbirth. The lordship of Saturn in D-60 shows the reason. - Saptamsa - Now, the indications of the Rasi should be confirmed, hence a denial of children, due to curse(saturn). Paka Laga(lagna lord), is Venus and is in 3rd(dusthana) joined with retro-Saturn(curse), and sun(father). Moon would normally be good in this regard, but it must be kept in mind that she's 10th lord which is the maraka for children in female charts. Hence its clear that she denies children due to a curse from the past. 9th lord mercury is joined with debilitated Ketu little hope for children, Mars also aspects this combination, giving abortians. Rahu in 2nd shows that the reason is due to threat to life. Keep in mind that Putrakaraka is mercury hence not helping her. Can you please confirm that shes had two abortians? Best wishes, Visti. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 25, 2001 Report Share Posted April 25, 2001 Dear Visti, >I actually didn't request any charts from anybody, other than those who >started this discussion, but i'll take a look nevertheless.> I am sorry but I thought you were asking for charts when you had said in one of your mails, give it to me and I will try to find out the sex of children by your theory. Coming back to the instant chart. Your analysis suggests that there would be a delay and perhaps even a denial in this case, if I understood you correctly. Delay is what you see as perfect in the instant case. You were asking for confirmation of two abortions. My dear friend, the lady in question got married in 1986, has two children, one in 1987 and the other in 1991. Now this cannot be called a delay from any standards and no abortions. Look at the chart from Vimshottri angle and try to find the answers. with best regards, Manoj _______________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.