Guest guest Posted April 9, 2001 Report Share Posted April 9, 2001 As astrologers we are suppose to gather info on many subject matters in order to advise as many people on as many departments of life. Here we have some interesting political ideas. More on China Vs US natabara ****************** Friends, I don't know about you, but I love a good conspiracy theory. I thought this might amuse youse. -- Jack ============================================= Fw: GW Wags the Dog The White House Line a.. A super-secret spy plane was sent into disputed airspace. a.. The plane was detected by those cagey, vigilant Chinese. a.. The plane accidentally collided with the tailing fighter planes. a.. The plane and crew are being held hostage. Anomalies (Or, What the Rat Smells Like) a.. The plane was not a stealth craft. Instead, it was a giant thing the size of a commercial airliner -- old technology -- that was sent out under conditions of a full moon and perfect visibility. a.. The crew was too big. It was 24 guys - not the six guys that were needed (infrared specialist, electronic surveillance specialist, MasCon specialist, pilot, copilot, and maybe a gunner) that were required. a.. Nobody ditched or self-destructed the plane. Instead, it landed in China under its own power. a.. Nobody took their cyanide pills. a.. The crew is not under interrogation at a military base. Instead, they are under house arrest at a hotel. a.. According to news reports up to 4/3/2001, the U.S. administration is most preoccupied with the health and whereabouts of the pilot only -- not the crew or the aircraft. Conclusions a.. The mission is a decoy. That is not a spy plane, it is an old, lame piece of retro garbage. a.. The intent of the mission was to do precisely what occurred: to attract attention, provoke engagement, be tailed, and then engage the Chinese planes by colliding with or, if necessary, firing on them. a.. The crew size is intended to make it impossible for the American public to "write off" the men as a loss. This news item is designed to become important. a.. The pilot is of interest to the U.S. administration because he is the only crew member who knows what the actual mission was. (Only the person in control of the aircraft had a need to know.) The crew is not being interrogated by the Chinese, for the same reason that they did not have orders take poison: they don't know anything. Purpose of This Incident The GW Bush administration needs to turn the economy around. They need to get billions of dollars into the coffers of their friends and families. That means funneling a great deal of tax money to military contractors and energy companies. In other words, they need a cold war. To have a cold war, the Bush administration must accomplish two things: a.. Furnish an enemy. a.. Lower the standard of living of the American public. Americans will not tolerate war if they feel prosperous. Because cheap manufactured goods consumed in America come overwhelmingly from China, the fastest way to lower our standard of living is to terminate China's "most-favored nation" trade status. GW has attempted to get clever, and accomplish both of these things in one process. He hopes to start a cold war with China, and use his own actions as an excuse for terminating "most-favored nation" trade status. The Chinese Reaction Because the Chinese leaders are older and smarter than ours are, they have sussed what this incident is supposed to accomplish. They realize that, if GW is determined to end "most-favored nation" status, he eventually will. However, they can limit the damage to their own economy -- and avoid an expensive cold war -- by accomplishing these objectives: a.. Prevent other countries from joining the U.S. in an interruption of trade. (Except Great Britain, which always goes along with the U.S.) a.. Undermine GW's ability to sell the new cold war at home Chinese public declarations and actions are aimed at these objectives. They are allowing an unusual amount of world press access, to allow reporters to draw the obvious conclusion: that the U.S. routinely violates their airspace. Their treatment of the "prisoners" indicates a low estimation of their value as spies. They're taking the entire episode in a very laid-back manner (for them). And whenever GW or Colin Powell say something stupid (e.g. that the American airplane in Chinese airspace is sovereign U.S., territory), the Chinese point out why the statement is stupid. The Outcome . . . ? a.. The Chinese will return the plane and 23 crew members within a few days. a.. The Chinese will return the pilot too -- but possibly a few days later, after they've had time to try and get some evidence. a.. The U.S. will continue similar provocations by land, sea, and air, and through proxies. a.. The administration will float a proposal in congress, to revoke China's "most-favored nation" trade status, in May or June of 2001. It will pass along partisan lines. a.. The U.S. and China will recall their diplomats by year's end. ===== end ===== Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 10, 2001 Report Share Posted April 10, 2001 Dear List Members, This will be my last e-mail for a while. I just have to much going on and reading 20 to 30 e-mails a day is presently a distraction from what I really need to be doing. A few last comments on the USA/China debate. I can level a ton of criticisms against the USA, but I need to make the contrast between these two countries clear. We still have religious freedom in this country. In China any unofficial house Church or real traditional Church, Roman Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, etc. are harassed and imprisoned on a regular basis. The situation in Tibet is still deplorable and China shows no remorse for destroying this religious culture. And as bad as the USA may be they do not go out and shoot Prisoner # 41 when they need a liver or a kidney. Once again I do not totally exonerate the USA because we have a lot of blood on our hands as well. But I'm glad to live where I do and I am thankful for the freedom that I have. In China I could not say the same. Wishing You All Well, Jeff Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.