Test Case/birth times

[Guest guest]

Mani:

 

First, please accept my sympathy and condolences for the loss of your

beloved sister-in-law. Truly beloved relatives, either by blood or by

marriage, are rare, so it must be a difficult time for you. With the

passing of years and the growth of experience, does death get any easier to

bear?

 

I've been out of the loop on this one, although I think I have your son's

data somewhere in my computer. It's interesting that the midwife had a

different time. I have heard this many times. A modern western hospital

nurse is no more reliable than an old Indian auntie -- or from any other

country for that matter. Indeed, since the auntie may care a good deal

more about the actual TOB, her observations and recollections will likely

be more reliable. So I would favour the midwife's time since she was

likely closer emotionally to your wife than the nurse was. A friend

recently had a son delivered at a hospital in a big city in Canada found

that the birth time recorded by the nurse was eight minutes late. I think

this is typical. That's why I would encourage everyone to not place too

much trust in the apparent accuracy of birth certificate times (1.34 or

whatever). The people who are doing the recording of information really

don't care that much about accuracy.

 

Chris

 

PS Could you refresh my memory? What is your son's data?

 

 

 

At 11:44 PM 4/3/01 +0200, you wrote:

>Dear Patrice and others who tried my test case,

>

>As I said, I gave the TOB as in the birth certificate, but the midwife

>definitely gave me a time - the same evening as my son was born - that was

15

>minutes earlier.

>

>What amazed me was that all had found great brains but its being of no

use. Also

>that the outers were taken into account! As a father and relative beginner

in

>astrology, using western sideral, was overjoyed at getting a genius - a

>"remarkable" thinker - as son. The first 8 months justified this, till the

>sudden change came.

>

>If I remember right, GJ1 found "mathibramayoga" but GJ 2.2 does not!

>

>regards

>Mani

>

>

>

>

>gjlist-

>

>

>

>Your use of is subject to

>

>

>

>